Would you enjoy racing less...
#26
out walking the earth
when I'm in a race and whatever I'm using and whatever they're using I'm going to beat them.
Likes For gsteinb:
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For Phatman:
#28
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I like the complexity and never being able to figure out the secret sauce. Being able to get the good stuff is part of the competition. Same as a lot of auto racing - I prefer the complexity around the teams and car prep.
The more you standardize everything they more it comes down to just the athlete and removes variables. I find variables in sport more exciting. This has been well tested in soccer where the human refs who are pretty good, introduce human error and that just adds an aspect to the game. At one time I learned I could finish better getting a job so I could buy a decent bike and afford entry to a race vs training and having no money to enter. That was my early 80s. Then I found I was not good anyway, but at least I got to ride some really nice bikes to work.
The Keirin was mentioned. Is the excitement around the betting (in Japan) or the sport? I think the former. Pretty hard to see Keirin for the fans on TV. UCI Worlds are nice, but I don't find myself checking in on Keirin races very often.
The more you standardize everything they more it comes down to just the athlete and removes variables. I find variables in sport more exciting. This has been well tested in soccer where the human refs who are pretty good, introduce human error and that just adds an aspect to the game. At one time I learned I could finish better getting a job so I could buy a decent bike and afford entry to a race vs training and having no money to enter. That was my early 80s. Then I found I was not good anyway, but at least I got to ride some really nice bikes to work.
The Keirin was mentioned. Is the excitement around the betting (in Japan) or the sport? I think the former. Pretty hard to see Keirin for the fans on TV. UCI Worlds are nice, but I don't find myself checking in on Keirin races very often.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Relatively slower, like in comparison to the rest of the pack, because you would have the same gear as everyone else?
I've definitely flatted out of a break before, it was not a good feeling, after that I only used "normal" racing tires, not the superlight/fast rolling ones. Never run Gatorskins in a race, but I have used a Michelin Carbon on a back wheel. Then again, Michelin Carbons were unusually nice
handling training tars.
I've definitely flatted out of a break before, it was not a good feeling, after that I only used "normal" racing tires, not the superlight/fast rolling ones. Never run Gatorskins in a race, but I have used a Michelin Carbon on a back wheel. Then again, Michelin Carbons were unusually nice
handling training tars.
I think at this point there's a very solid mix of CRR and durability amongst the top couple of road tires. TT tires take it up another level, but those are for specific use.
#31
out walking the earth
I like the complexity and never being able to figure out the secret sauce. Being able to get the good stuff is part of the competition. Same as a lot of auto racing - I prefer the complexity around the teams and car prep.
The more you standardize everything they more it comes down to just the athlete and removes variables. I find variables in sport more exciting. This has been well tested in soccer where the human refs who are pretty good, introduce human error and that just adds an aspect to the game. At one time I learned I could finish better getting a job so I could buy a decent bike and afford entry to a race vs training and having no money to enter. That was my early 80s. Then I found I was not good anyway, but at least I got to ride some really nice bikes to work.
The Keirin was mentioned. Is the excitement around the betting (in Japan) or the sport? I think the former. Pretty hard to see Keirin for the fans on TV. UCI Worlds are nice, but I don't find myself checking in on Keirin races very often.
The more you standardize everything they more it comes down to just the athlete and removes variables. I find variables in sport more exciting. This has been well tested in soccer where the human refs who are pretty good, introduce human error and that just adds an aspect to the game. At one time I learned I could finish better getting a job so I could buy a decent bike and afford entry to a race vs training and having no money to enter. That was my early 80s. Then I found I was not good anyway, but at least I got to ride some really nice bikes to work.
The Keirin was mentioned. Is the excitement around the betting (in Japan) or the sport? I think the former. Pretty hard to see Keirin for the fans on TV. UCI Worlds are nice, but I don't find myself checking in on Keirin races very often.
The human body/mind is pretty complex. Have you figured out the secret sauce and all the variables? Do tell.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Certainly not a lot, but enough to give a kid an advantage over those that knew less. I've been posting about it sine 2009 (I think). You sound like you were far more dominant in your categories. My kid's racing was very close and lots of little things made a difference. It was always a combo of the rider and those supporting the rider - the training, logistics, equipment and balance against other important things. The developing adolescents / teens were certainly enough variables, but the non riding support teams around the riders made it even more interesting to me. Equipment selection was a large part of that.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
The larger difference is more likely teams/non-teams and the support behind them. I realize the recreational racer (the 95% of USAC racers) can do a lot just based on themselves. The top level of the sport, is a team sport. At the elite level there are likely as many staff supporting the racers as there are racers.
#35
out walking the earth
I was thinking more along the lines of "Enter a race running the same equipment as me? That's a paddlin"
https://youtu.be/sKiLfH3DVGc
https://youtu.be/sKiLfH3DVGc
I have a friend who was a pro mountain biker back in the day. He'd show up on the local group ride and win it on his mountain bike with knobbies. He'd show up for a NYC park and win that. He'd win whatever he could, whenever he could.
I used to be able to win those group rides on a fixed gear. 36 hole wheels with gatorskins. Whatever. You show up with what you got, however you are, and you game it.
Athletics are littered with stories of people over coming adversity to win any way. That's what it's all about.
Likes For gsteinb:
#36
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I already gave my opinion about enjoying variables. But to this OP...You mean actually allow all racers in the race to use the same equipment? Like juniors would be allowed to use the same gears as adults? I would vote for that. At this time there are a group of pretty fast racers being handicapped by the rules. Fix that first.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
The gear restriction isn't a lifetime thing, and I tend to think its a good thing. I'm not sure I can definitely say that the lower gears improve pedaling technique, but I think that its probably good thing for kids under 18 to be handicapped when compared to adult riders, it effectively prevents overeager parents from pushing their kids too hard and too early into world class competition. Other sports have age-grouping leagues to limit this, like little league baseball and the high-school-->college-->professional progression in football. In sports that don't have those systems like gymnastics or some extent, track and field, you get a decent amount of exploited kids that burn out before they reach adult competition.
Rules being about parenting? My parenting would say a rider forced to spin higher RPMs is subject to injuries that a rider that can shift [to a bigger gear] is not. World Class Completion happens years before they get the big gears. They can get WT contracts while still on restrictions, the parent pushing thing is not valid they must compete at the world class level as a kid to get the contract later (Primoz and a few others being an exception), not that that should be the point of a rule either.
Last edited by Doge; 03-24-21 at 10:32 PM.
#38
Senior Member
Thread Starter
You have examples of other sports where a kid is playing the adult pros and they are limited? If a little league player was good enough for the AAA they would have a bat restriction? The progressions you list are for all competing in a class having the same restrictions. The point of rules in the open classes is not to coach, not to teach. They are to provide a fair even competition so we can find who the best is. If the idea is to teach and coach, why not apply it to everyone in that class. Why does a Cat 5 30 old beginner not need to learn how to spin and Cat 1 and Pro kids do?
Rules being about parenting? My parenting would say a rider forced to spin higher RPMs is subject to injuries that a rider that can shift [to a bigger gear] is not. World Class Completion happens years before they get the big gears. They can get WT contracts while still on restrictions, the parent pushing thing is not valid they must compete at the world class level as a kid to get the contract later (Primoz and a few others being an exception), not that that should be the point of a rule either.
Rules being about parenting? My parenting would say a rider forced to spin higher RPMs is subject to injuries that a rider that can shift [to a bigger gear] is not. World Class Completion happens years before they get the big gears. They can get WT contracts while still on restrictions, the parent pushing thing is not valid they must compete at the world class level as a kid to get the contract later (Primoz and a few others being an exception), not that that should be the point of a rule either.
Anyways, I’ve dragged my own thread off topic, but it’s okay, it think this is an interesting subject too.
#39
Not actually Tmonk
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 13,948
Bikes: road, track, mtb
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2508 Post(s)
Liked 2,967 Times
in
1,577 Posts
I was thinking more along the lines of "Enter a race running the same equipment as me? That's a paddlin"
https://youtu.be/sKiLfH3DVGc
https://youtu.be/sKiLfH3DVGc
__________________
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
Likes For TMonk:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
This is both in rider level/ability and roads/events they select. At the entertainment level (real pros) there will always be something tossed in to make it interesting. Id be happy if they just kept Grand Tour stages to pavement.
For beginners it makes complete sense to have a standard bike. No carbon :-) The gear thing I would not limit as I believe there is room to allow people to pedal how they want and some do better differently than others. There are some fixie races too that get pretty popular. But back to the top level - there are generally more staff than riders on the road at any one time. That level - it is always going to remain complex.
#41
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
Anyway - Yeah I find spec racing boring no matter the sport or discipline.
To illustrate some of the points people made earlier I have a quick story. There was a banquet dinner for all the crews and teams after the Purdue Grand Prix one year. We had Dick Simon (of indy car fame but at the time was running Dick Simon Racing) speak. He relayed a story about how him and a couple of friends/mechanics, etc decided one year to race go-karts in a series. It was supposed to just be fun and like most kart racing it was a spec class. He had stories about how it only took a couple of weeks before he and the rest of them started "circumventing" the intent of the spec without directly violating it. He then went on to say that was the key to all racing success in any discipline: finding the rule that hasn't been written yet and exploiting it until the rule needs to be written.
In any discipline that requires any sort of gear of any type - this will always be the case. Spec or not. In which case I would prefer open classes. That way you know going in that everyone is "cheating".
To illustrate some of the points people made earlier I have a quick story. There was a banquet dinner for all the crews and teams after the Purdue Grand Prix one year. We had Dick Simon (of indy car fame but at the time was running Dick Simon Racing) speak. He relayed a story about how him and a couple of friends/mechanics, etc decided one year to race go-karts in a series. It was supposed to just be fun and like most kart racing it was a spec class. He had stories about how it only took a couple of weeks before he and the rest of them started "circumventing" the intent of the spec without directly violating it. He then went on to say that was the key to all racing success in any discipline: finding the rule that hasn't been written yet and exploiting it until the rule needs to be written.
In any discipline that requires any sort of gear of any type - this will always be the case. Spec or not. In which case I would prefer open classes. That way you know going in that everyone is "cheating".
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#42
Senior Member
#43
no cat contains
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edinburgh Scotland
Posts: 884
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 142 Times
in
75 Posts
On marginal gains, I heard the same old thing this weekend on a ride talking about how changing some part would “only” save 40 grams. The way you lose pounds from your kit is to keep adding those up.
I think it’s the same with aero. Folks focus on how silly it might be to wear an aero helmet, or longer socks, and any one of those in isolation might be negligible.
I think it’s the same with aero. Folks focus on how silly it might be to wear an aero helmet, or longer socks, and any one of those in isolation might be negligible.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
On marginal gains, I heard the same old thing this weekend on a ride talking about how changing some part would “only” save 40 grams. The way you lose pounds from your kit is to keep adding those up.
I think it’s the same with aero. Folks focus on how silly it might be to wear an aero helmet, or longer socks, and any one of those in isolation might be negligible.
I think it’s the same with aero. Folks focus on how silly it might be to wear an aero helmet, or longer socks, and any one of those in isolation might be negligible.
Former coach comes by today and shows me his new replacement S-Works Venge (prior matt finish frame cracked). This one has gloss paint and weighs 1oz more than the other. As he's at the UCI limit anyway it was a good aero investment with concluded. How much - well at least in his brain.
Likes For Doge:
#45
out walking the earth
That dude who set the everest record did it on a 12 1/2 pound bike. I think that includes the fairing he used. That's a bit beyond marginal gains. I'd have to replace everything.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
With steel pedals, and steel BB spindle, Di2 1X this tipped in just under 12# with out the bottle. Stuff gets squishy much under 12# so that seemed like a good place to stop.
12# without the water bottle.
12# without the water bottle.
Likes For Doge:
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,553
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4200 Post(s)
Liked 2,916 Times
in
1,784 Posts
Anyway - Yeah I find spec racing boring no matter the sport or discipline.
To illustrate some of the points people made earlier I have a quick story. There was a banquet dinner for all the crews and teams after the Purdue Grand Prix one year. We had Dick Simon (of indy car fame but at the time was running Dick Simon Racing) speak. He relayed a story about how him and a couple of friends/mechanics, etc decided one year to race go-karts in a series. It was supposed to just be fun and like most kart racing it was a spec class. He had stories about how it only took a couple of weeks before he and the rest of them started "circumventing" the intent of the spec without directly violating it. He then went on to say that was the key to all racing success in any discipline: finding the rule that hasn't been written yet and exploiting it until the rule needs to be written.
In any discipline that requires any sort of gear of any type - this will always be the case. Spec or not. In which case I would prefer open classes. That way you know going in that everyone is "cheating".
https://youtu.be/DJETB-MfpnQ
To illustrate some of the points people made earlier I have a quick story. There was a banquet dinner for all the crews and teams after the Purdue Grand Prix one year. We had Dick Simon (of indy car fame but at the time was running Dick Simon Racing) speak. He relayed a story about how him and a couple of friends/mechanics, etc decided one year to race go-karts in a series. It was supposed to just be fun and like most kart racing it was a spec class. He had stories about how it only took a couple of weeks before he and the rest of them started "circumventing" the intent of the spec without directly violating it. He then went on to say that was the key to all racing success in any discipline: finding the rule that hasn't been written yet and exploiting it until the rule needs to be written.
In any discipline that requires any sort of gear of any type - this will always be the case. Spec or not. In which case I would prefer open classes. That way you know going in that everyone is "cheating".
https://youtu.be/DJETB-MfpnQ
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 1,221
Bikes: '13 Diamondback Hybrid Commuter, '17 Spec Roubaix Di2, '17 Spec Camber 29'er, '19 CDale Topstone Gravel
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 590 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times
in
260 Posts
Would the NFL be MORE interesting if each team had their own specific pads, helmets, shoes, etc? No.
Would NASCAR be LESS interesting if every car were exactly the same? Yes.
Is golf MORE interesting because each golfer has different clubs, balls, and shoes. No.
Would bike racing be MORE interesting if all teams had the exact same kit and bikes? Maybe.
Would NASCAR be LESS interesting if every car were exactly the same? Yes.
Is golf MORE interesting because each golfer has different clubs, balls, and shoes. No.
Would bike racing be MORE interesting if all teams had the exact same kit and bikes? Maybe.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,689
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 413 Times
in
246 Posts
The bike is what makes bike racing different from running. Setting up and customizing the bike is part of the enjoyment and excitement, whether its using the latest greatest gear or simply figuring out the best way to make your body and your bike function together. Training and having great gear aren't mutually exclusive.
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton