$1,000 derailleur system with 1930's technology
#76
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Seattle
Posts: 387
Bikes: Davidson ’81
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 229 Times
in
121 Posts
I think there’s a good-sized subset of cyclists who have heard of the Original Nivex precisely because of Jan’s writings, myself included.
#77
elcraft
See:
https://www.disraeligears.co.uk/site...leur_s100.html
Likes For elcraft:
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,704
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 2,010 Times
in
1,109 Posts
I want one. I also want one of those crank sets. And a pair of those brakes. And a stem with Maes bend bars. And 700c RH tires. And …
HEY! I just clicked and that RD is only 729 bucks 😉
HEY! I just clicked and that RD is only 729 bucks 😉
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Last edited by Classtime; 12-12-22 at 11:41 PM.
Likes For Classtime:
#79
Senior Member
You mean where he says "What happens if we start from scratch to make the best mechanical derailleur possible? " Wait, that's not it. How about " (The 1930s Nivex provided a wonderful inspiration, but it was never intended for modern drivetrains.)". One sentence, in parentheses, is his attribution. More or less.
#80
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1174 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times
in
1,073 Posts
#81
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,422
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times
in
647 Posts
Honestly if I had a bike that this would look right on I'd get one
#82
Tinker-er
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 450
Bikes: 1956 Rudge Sports; 1983 Univega Alpina Uno; 1981 Miyata 610; 1973 Raleigh Twenty; 1994 Breezer Lightning XTR; V4 Yuba Mundo aka "The Schlepper"; 1987 Raleigh "The Edge" Mountain Trials; 1952 R.O. Harrison "Madison"
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 267 Times
in
183 Posts
I'm still stuck on the intro stating that modern derailleurs are precise, then stating that the new Nivex shifter index notches "serve as a guide." So, is it not precise? Just get the PR wording correct in the whole post; if you want precise, say your new derailleur and shifter are precise, if you want something to "serve as a guide", then state it as such. This is just like a 4-way stop in Philly, it's advertised with big, red, octagonal signs as one thing, but in real life those signs are merely suggestions.
Likes For PhilFo:
#83
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Upper third of the central USA
Posts: 492
Bikes: N+1
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 651 Times
in
319 Posts
You mean where he says "What happens if we start from scratch to make the best mechanical derailleur possible? " Wait, that's not it. How about " (The 1930s Nivex provided a wonderful inspiration, but it was never intended for modern drivetrains.)". One sentence, in parentheses, is his attribution. More or less.
Likes For JulesCW:
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,093
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times
in
760 Posts
I think one of the great unreported stories of 2022 is all the hate that's been heaped on Jan Heine. He runs a niche bicycle components business and publishing company. Isn't he allowed to do stuff outside the mainstream?
Likes For fender1:
#86
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Posts: 461
Bikes: '72 Peugeot PX-10, '09 A. Homer Hilsen, '78 Masi Gran Crit, '79 Echelon Spectra
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
100 Posts
RH’s new derailleur isn’t for me but I wish it luck!
Last edited by BertoBerg; 12-13-22 at 08:48 AM.
Likes For BertoBerg:
#87
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,393 Times
in
2,092 Posts
-Kurt
Likes For cudak888:
#88
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 243
Bikes: 1985 Roberts SLX, Mercian 531, 1984 Torpado SLX,1981/82 Peugeot PSV-10, 1978 Charlie Roberts full touring, 1970 Charlie Roberts 531 road.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked 164 Times
in
61 Posts
From Disraeligears, advertising picture of the Nivex, showing the clamp on version, I.e. no welding of mounting, and the chain holder, allowing easy removal of rear wheel for flat repair. Collier ou constructeur. Schwinn or Gugie!
Likes For santa fe 2926:
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,093
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times
in
760 Posts
Lots of whining about the price over on The Paceline as well, and that's a crowd that's not shy about spending for expensive componentry.
#90
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,393 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Likes For cudak888:
#91
Full Member
I don't think Jan is going to revolutionize much of anything in the cycling world with his new Nivex RD, but I think it's probably going to make a few people (himself included) very happy to own one at any price.
Likes For bear_a_bug:
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
I will attempt to provide my perspective, at the risk of sounding silly, since it hasn't been said by anyone else. I'm honestly kind of surprised I have a novel perspective on this dogpile? Whatever, here goes.
I CNC machine stuff sometimes. It is hard, and takes a long time, mostly to make the first one. Subsequent ones will be easier/faster and that's where the profits could come in. That said, I don't understand how he will make much money at all doing this. How many will he realistically sell? I would bet it's not worth the costs to sell it, all things considered. If it were, I'd probably be CNC machining more stuff for money. God knows people ask me to.
And it is very cool, and will be cherished like the CNC'd Paul and White Industries derailleurs of old. But it's not for money. He makes his money on tires and we all know that. I think he's doing it because he wants to make a statement. The funny thing is, I don't know if it's the right statement to make. He's got kind of an ego, and I think that's the elephant in the room here. It's not price. It's not fidelity to the original design. it's more subtle than that, and that's why people aren't putting a finger on it.
It's the expression of his ego in this thing, that people don't like. I've proposed to him that he ought to release the plans and allow us all to make our own Nivex. It's folded sheet metal, after all. We can order metal and get it cut. Maybe 3D print some parts, as he did in some iterations. He could crowdsource the development. Crowdsourcing the development of this thing could have been great publicity among the exact crowd who'd be interested in it. And it reduces exclusivity, which could be helpful within such an exclusive niche of an already exclusive hobby. AND I'd wager that he would not even lose sales. The type of person who's going to make one isn't the type who'd buy one. But he hasn't done that, and I can see no other reason than vanity. And we know what Vélocio said: Ne jamais pédaler par amour-propre. Never ride for vanity. Remember Lance? That's why some people dislike him too. It's the elephant in the room. That's why I'm calling my east-coast shadow-organization Cycles René Hubris. It's a grim reminder we all fall for it from time to time.
Now for some nuts and bolts. Because I read about the Nivex in the first edition of the Dancing Chain when it came out in 2000, and first saw one in Nijmegen in 2002, and I own an original Nivex and a frame for it, so I feel that I can comment about this:
What about the dropout? Where's the fancy dropout? Those dropouts he sells don't have a chainrest. Is that not the point of the whole thing? Yes, he said that it "doesn't work well with modern cassettes" but what does that mean? Did he even try? He used to sorta show his methods for developing new stuff, like supple tires and thin wall tubing. Not so anymore? Am I wrong? Is it in BQ someplace?
To my mind, the dropout is a necessary part of the system with a chainstay-mounted rear derailleur. As you can see, the chain wraps way around the cog. Anyone who's ever had to remove a wheel with this kind of system sans chainrest knows that it involves touching the chain - quite a bit, in fact. That's why Tullio's Gran Sport was a better system for racers than these chainstay-mounted cyclotouring derailleurs: you could easily and quickly remove a wheel by pivoting the derailleur back on its mounting bolt. Can't do that with a chainstay-mounted derailleur. Hence, the chainrest. Seems it would play well with thru-axles. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I wonder if he's missed an opportunity here. Or, if there will be an improved dropout, if not an improved derailleur, coming out someday. I can guess about why the chainrest didn't work for him. Maybe because small cogs are all different sizes? If that's the case, why not make them replaceable, like the Campy portacatena? Like I said, I've been curious about this since 2002. That's more than half my life. I was thinking about making a chainrest for my rinko Trek mongrel, but I don't have enough time to really sink my teeth into that project.
Finally, I wonder if he can even legally trademark the Nivex name, since it has already appeared on the same object. Is there no prior-art clause for trademarks? Maybe he can only trademark it in the USA, because it was probably only ever registered in France. I will ask my trademark attorney friend next time I see her.
I CNC machine stuff sometimes. It is hard, and takes a long time, mostly to make the first one. Subsequent ones will be easier/faster and that's where the profits could come in. That said, I don't understand how he will make much money at all doing this. How many will he realistically sell? I would bet it's not worth the costs to sell it, all things considered. If it were, I'd probably be CNC machining more stuff for money. God knows people ask me to.
And it is very cool, and will be cherished like the CNC'd Paul and White Industries derailleurs of old. But it's not for money. He makes his money on tires and we all know that. I think he's doing it because he wants to make a statement. The funny thing is, I don't know if it's the right statement to make. He's got kind of an ego, and I think that's the elephant in the room here. It's not price. It's not fidelity to the original design. it's more subtle than that, and that's why people aren't putting a finger on it.
It's the expression of his ego in this thing, that people don't like. I've proposed to him that he ought to release the plans and allow us all to make our own Nivex. It's folded sheet metal, after all. We can order metal and get it cut. Maybe 3D print some parts, as he did in some iterations. He could crowdsource the development. Crowdsourcing the development of this thing could have been great publicity among the exact crowd who'd be interested in it. And it reduces exclusivity, which could be helpful within such an exclusive niche of an already exclusive hobby. AND I'd wager that he would not even lose sales. The type of person who's going to make one isn't the type who'd buy one. But he hasn't done that, and I can see no other reason than vanity. And we know what Vélocio said: Ne jamais pédaler par amour-propre. Never ride for vanity. Remember Lance? That's why some people dislike him too. It's the elephant in the room. That's why I'm calling my east-coast shadow-organization Cycles René Hubris. It's a grim reminder we all fall for it from time to time.
Now for some nuts and bolts. Because I read about the Nivex in the first edition of the Dancing Chain when it came out in 2000, and first saw one in Nijmegen in 2002, and I own an original Nivex and a frame for it, so I feel that I can comment about this:
What about the dropout? Where's the fancy dropout? Those dropouts he sells don't have a chainrest. Is that not the point of the whole thing? Yes, he said that it "doesn't work well with modern cassettes" but what does that mean? Did he even try? He used to sorta show his methods for developing new stuff, like supple tires and thin wall tubing. Not so anymore? Am I wrong? Is it in BQ someplace?
To my mind, the dropout is a necessary part of the system with a chainstay-mounted rear derailleur. As you can see, the chain wraps way around the cog. Anyone who's ever had to remove a wheel with this kind of system sans chainrest knows that it involves touching the chain - quite a bit, in fact. That's why Tullio's Gran Sport was a better system for racers than these chainstay-mounted cyclotouring derailleurs: you could easily and quickly remove a wheel by pivoting the derailleur back on its mounting bolt. Can't do that with a chainstay-mounted derailleur. Hence, the chainrest. Seems it would play well with thru-axles. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I wonder if he's missed an opportunity here. Or, if there will be an improved dropout, if not an improved derailleur, coming out someday. I can guess about why the chainrest didn't work for him. Maybe because small cogs are all different sizes? If that's the case, why not make them replaceable, like the Campy portacatena? Like I said, I've been curious about this since 2002. That's more than half my life. I was thinking about making a chainrest for my rinko Trek mongrel, but I don't have enough time to really sink my teeth into that project.
Finally, I wonder if he can even legally trademark the Nivex name, since it has already appeared on the same object. Is there no prior-art clause for trademarks? Maybe he can only trademark it in the USA, because it was probably only ever registered in France. I will ask my trademark attorney friend next time I see her.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Likes For scarlson:
#93
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 703
Bikes: 1978 Bruce Gordon, 1977 Lippy, 199? Lippy tandem, Bike Friday NWT, 1982 Trek 720, 2012 Rivendell Atlantis, 1983 Bianchi Specialissima?
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
107 Posts
It's got me thinking about another bike I don't need. That's worth something? I can easily imagine that friction shifting without the springs could be a really nice improvement. I guess I'd like to be able to try it before buying it. Otherwise, the only thing about the announcement that annoys me is that everything one needs to make it functional is not available and there is no mention of when all the bits will be available (or did I miss that?).
#94
Senior Member
Clearly you have either not read nor are choosing to ignore the numerous other times over the past decade+ that Jan has written about the Nivex and how much he liked it, and how he was working on a new version. FWIW, the cheval you are beating is quite morte... it will never pull the cart of angry villagers with whom you're hoping to storm Jan's chateau.
Last edited by daka; 12-13-22 at 10:40 AM.
#95
Junior Member
There are two bikes I'd really like to have. One is a Tony Oliver 753 ATB tourer and the other is an Oregon Outback Rene Herse. If either are ever available I'll not be able to afford them, but, like the Nivex, I can appreciate them from afar and make do with what I have. I'm really glad there are folk out there doing different things.
Likes For esasjl:
#96
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,704
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 2,010 Times
in
1,109 Posts
I think he really likes riding bikes. And he gets to build really cool bikes to ride lots. And that is his job. I am jealous.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Likes For Classtime:
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,323 Times
in
674 Posts
You are correct, I've never subscribed to BQ and don't follow any blogging he posts. What I know of the Nivex is from Frank Berto's "The Dancing Chain". I find Jan Heine to be tiresome in a "Big Hat, No Cattle" kind of way. But the truth is that there is no victim here - the original Nivex is long dead, he isn't depriving some grieving widow of a royalty income. In fact the only person likely to be hurt financially by the new Nivex is Heine himself. I'm going to try and twist my attitude and dislike around to see this as a labor of love trying to honor the original idea rather than exploit it.
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
#98
This wrench fits...
I'm sure the Atelier will be completely booked with this new derailleur system. I'm disappointed that $1k doesn't get you a front derailleur and shifter, however.
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
....
Now for some nuts and bolts. Because I read about the Nivex in the first edition of the Dancing Chain when it came out in 2000, and first saw one in Nijmegen in 2002, and I own an original Nivex and a frame for it, so I feel that I can comment about this:
What about the dropout? Where's the fancy dropout? Those dropouts he sells don't have a chainrest. Is that not the point of the whole thing? Yes, he said that it "doesn't work well with modern cassettes" but what does that mean? Did he even try? He used to sorta show his methods for developing new stuff, like supple tires and thin wall tubing. Not so anymore? Am I wrong? Is it in BQ someplace?
......
Now for some nuts and bolts. Because I read about the Nivex in the first edition of the Dancing Chain when it came out in 2000, and first saw one in Nijmegen in 2002, and I own an original Nivex and a frame for it, so I feel that I can comment about this:
What about the dropout? Where's the fancy dropout? Those dropouts he sells don't have a chainrest. Is that not the point of the whole thing? Yes, he said that it "doesn't work well with modern cassettes" but what does that mean? Did he even try? He used to sorta show his methods for developing new stuff, like supple tires and thin wall tubing. Not so anymore? Am I wrong? Is it in BQ someplace?
......
you mention owning a Nivex equipped bike and show this photo.
Maybe it's just the angle, but it looks a lot like a Cyclo.
The only image that I could quickly find of a Cyclo is from the Dancing Chain...
plus this image of a Jo Routens displayed at a semi-recent Classic Rendezvous event by Mr. Della Rossa
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#100
*____*
It's an interesting example of how online reputation & marketing develops - I feel like (lately at least, I'm relatively new to all of this) Peterson/Riv evoke such a wildly different set of responses from people than Heine, despite there being so many similarities between the companies. People just seem to not like Heine (or at least, not like how he holds himself out publicly).