Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

New frame geometry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-15, 01:11 PM
  #1  
derek.fulmer
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
derek.fulmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 465
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New frame geometry

Hey all,

I am currently riding a 58cm All-City Mr. Pink. However, in hopes of doing a few cross races as well as exploring more terrain, I'm moving to a disc brake cross bike. Possibly a Van Dessel Aloominator. I was curious if anyone could lend some opinion on sizing based on geometry charts I've provided. I should be able to test ride one fairly soon, but I'm still doing all the research and comparing specs/numbers.

Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: png
IMG_2545.PNG (91.3 KB, 13 views)
derek.fulmer is offline  
Old 07-22-15, 08:15 AM
  #2  
IcySmooth52
Senior Member
 
IcySmooth52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 1,620
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Your Mr Pink is probably 'snappier' than the Aloominator. Same wheelbase & chainstays within mm, but different angles & rakes pointing the Pinky faster. Can't tell anything on positioning though with lack of info on the Aloominator specs. Don't consider headtube as any refrence to stack with these styles of bikes. (Forks come in MANY styles here)
IcySmooth52 is offline  
Old 07-22-15, 11:27 AM
  #3  
derekfulmer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks. I'm also comparing my old Allez geometry. I really think the 61 would be too large.
derekfulmer is offline  
Old 07-22-15, 11:40 AM
  #4  
IcySmooth52
Senior Member
 
IcySmooth52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 1,620
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by derekfulmer
Thanks. I'm also comparing my old Allez geometry. I really think the 61 would be too large.
I wouldn't put your Allez's geometry in the mix at all. Very different bike. Maybe if it were a Secteur (endurance), but the Allez is going to be too much of a jump in what kind of bike you're looking for. For sizing solely, only look at the stack, reach, and effective top tube. And consider the CX bike will probably have a slightly shorter reach + higher stack due to the rider position it's intended for.

Ideally, take it for a ride before buying. Sorry, online buying is a risk on fitting because there's no industry standard on measuring frames. Different brands have different tolerances and reference points on where they actually base their top tube length, or wheelbase, or reach, etc.
IcySmooth52 is offline  
Old 07-22-15, 11:44 AM
  #5  
derekfulmer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IcySmooth52
I wouldn't put your Allez's geometry in the mix at all. Very different bike. Maybe if it were a Secteur (endurance), but the Allez is going to be too much of a jump in what kind of bike you're looking for. For sizing solely, only look at the stack, reach, and effective top tube. And consider the CX bike will probably have a slightly shorter reach + higher stack due to the rider position it's intended for.

Ideally, take it for a ride before buying. Sorry, online buying is a risk on fitting because there's no industry standard on measuring frames. Different brands have different tolerances and reference points on where they actually base their top tube length, or wheelbase, or reach, etc.
gotcha. That makes sense.

I agree, test riding is the best option. But it may not be possible for me.
derekfulmer is offline  
Old 07-22-15, 02:20 PM
  #6  
NormanF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Grave/road adventure bikes - whether flat bar/drop bar - are built around endurance road bike geometry.

The difference from their road bike sibling is they can accept wider tires and they also have rack/fender mounts.
NormanF is offline  
Old 07-22-15, 06:40 PM
  #7  
derekfulmer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NormanF
Grave/road adventure bikes - whether flat bar/drop bar - are built around endurance road bike geometry.

The difference from their road bike sibling is they can accept wider tires and they also have rack/fender mounts.
That may be true, however this is a cyclocross bike which is all a "gravel bike" really is.
derekfulmer is offline  
Old 07-22-15, 06:47 PM
  #8  
NormanF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
A CX bike has a somewhat aggressive geometry. A gravel road/adventure bike is more relaxed.

CX for racing - gravel road/adventure for day-long riding.

Think of them as cousins fit for different aspects of exploring the off-road world.
NormanF is offline  
Old 07-23-15, 08:57 AM
  #9  
IcySmooth52
Senior Member
 
IcySmooth52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 1,620
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Even though the CX and gravel bikes are cousins designed for the same terrain, and the CX is to the gravel what a crit racer is to an endurance roadie, CX geometry is not based on crit racer road geometry unlike gravel taking many hints of enduro geometry.

Rider position is typically the only major difference between CX and gravel geometry (reach, stack, bb drop), but CX almost always has the same 'slack' on the front (angle & rake) (Mr. Pink doesn't to cater to the hipster street use riders usually use for it), the only common differences besides rider position are a slight difference in wheelbase and/or chainstay. This goes with the bb drop for taking sharp turns.

FYI: I studied bike fitting and frame geometry.

Last edited by IcySmooth52; 07-23-15 at 09:00 AM. Reason: Credentials
IcySmooth52 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
koolsilver
Road Cycling
11
04-13-18 01:24 PM
joejack951
Road Cycling
59
01-28-18 07:11 AM
sfh
Fitting Your Bike
18
08-23-17 01:16 PM
HiBoost
Touring
35
10-31-16 09:30 PM
Fastfwd01
Road Cycling
25
07-20-15 03:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.