Brainstorm: Help me save 1000g!
#51
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For aliasfox:
#52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
If I were a true weight weenie looking to sacrifice performance and comfort for weight, I probably wouldn't be starting with a tank (pig?) of a titanium frame... which is part of the reason I don't particularly want to go too exotic/$$$ with this exercise - just looking to optimize beyond wheels (which I knew were heavy and slow going in).
#53
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1526 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Dunno about whether there was a 7 in the name, but the 110 stem I had was pretty damn flexy, and I'm certainly not making with monster torque. Replaced it with a Zipp Service Course SL, night and day.
__________________
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
My Litespeed Ti gravel bike is 20 lb ready to ride with computer, lights, bottle cages etc.
42mm gravel tyres and Sram Force 1x set up. No weight weenie stuff on the bike, so I can't see why you shouldn't be able to get yours at least that light.
Just a reasonable whee/tyre setup and light saddle would do it.
42mm gravel tyres and Sram Force 1x set up. No weight weenie stuff on the bike, so I can't see why you shouldn't be able to get yours at least that light.
Just a reasonable whee/tyre setup and light saddle would do it.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,022 Times
in
722 Posts
My preferred bike is 22.3lbs out the door and ready to ride. Have a 16lb road bike but multiple rides have shown me that its barely faster so I'll stick with it but will lighten it some.
Carbon bars are a good savings over the gossamer and really good if you have the omega bars. Check out Merlin Cycles for 3t bars. Picked up 3 sets over the last 6 months for 150.00 each. One for mine and the wife's gravel bikes and one for the cross bike. She loves the ergonova and I find the ergoterra to be stiff enough. The third is waiting for the cross bike handlebar tape to wear out but it'll get me to 22lb once I install it, too cheap to just toss good lizardskin tape till I have to.
Cassette can make a big difference especially with an 11-34 cassette, for a nice bike I'd go XTR/Dura Ace depending on desired gear range. I've also got a real nice cassette waiting to replace my chorus (when it wears out) that will take another 150ish grams off, which I will match with a much nicer/lighter chain though I doubt that'll be more then a 20g difference and probably closer to 10g.
Wheels you don't have to go too exotic. I built my bike with White Industry hubs, butted spokes, alloy nipples and velocity aileron rims which came to just over 1600g, wife's was just under 1600 using lighter spokes to match her weight, and in both cases 32 spoke wheels. Switching to 28 spoke would help a touch more. Cost was under 1k for the set. Not as light as going carbon but sweet hubs, and a strong build. For extra weight savings, ditch the tubes all together if its a gravel bike, I still don't like tubeless on road tires.
So wheels, handlebar, and cassette should get you to 500g or a bit more. Saddle is something to look at as they can have a wide weight range. After that you might have to spend big for small gains. For me, after handlebars and cassette, a lighter set of pedals should get me to your weight range which will be fine, the ride I've learned, matters more. If its a real concern leave the saddlebag, computer and ancillaries at home but I like them.
Carbon bars are a good savings over the gossamer and really good if you have the omega bars. Check out Merlin Cycles for 3t bars. Picked up 3 sets over the last 6 months for 150.00 each. One for mine and the wife's gravel bikes and one for the cross bike. She loves the ergonova and I find the ergoterra to be stiff enough. The third is waiting for the cross bike handlebar tape to wear out but it'll get me to 22lb once I install it, too cheap to just toss good lizardskin tape till I have to.
Cassette can make a big difference especially with an 11-34 cassette, for a nice bike I'd go XTR/Dura Ace depending on desired gear range. I've also got a real nice cassette waiting to replace my chorus (when it wears out) that will take another 150ish grams off, which I will match with a much nicer/lighter chain though I doubt that'll be more then a 20g difference and probably closer to 10g.
Wheels you don't have to go too exotic. I built my bike with White Industry hubs, butted spokes, alloy nipples and velocity aileron rims which came to just over 1600g, wife's was just under 1600 using lighter spokes to match her weight, and in both cases 32 spoke wheels. Switching to 28 spoke would help a touch more. Cost was under 1k for the set. Not as light as going carbon but sweet hubs, and a strong build. For extra weight savings, ditch the tubes all together if its a gravel bike, I still don't like tubeless on road tires.
So wheels, handlebar, and cassette should get you to 500g or a bit more. Saddle is something to look at as they can have a wide weight range. After that you might have to spend big for small gains. For me, after handlebars and cassette, a lighter set of pedals should get me to your weight range which will be fine, the ride I've learned, matters more. If its a real concern leave the saddlebag, computer and ancillaries at home but I like them.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,902
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4802 Post(s)
Liked 3,922 Times
in
2,551 Posts
I do find it a bit odd that most Titanium manufactures have chosen to completely forego butting.
It would seem like some forming of the tubes beyond basic shapes would be possible, although perhaps straight tubes have to do with titanium flexibility and stresses.
Anyway, even without drilling out the frame, one may be able to post-manufacture thin the walls or add some type of fullers.
It would seem like some forming of the tubes beyond basic shapes would be possible, although perhaps straight tubes have to do with titanium flexibility and stresses.
Anyway, even without drilling out the frame, one may be able to post-manufacture thin the walls or add some type of fullers.
I could have paid more for butted tubes of a higher alloy, saved some grams and probably ended up with less stiff bikes that feel a little spiffier. Instead, I got two rock solid frames. After 36,000 miles, no regrets.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18371 Post(s)
Liked 4,507 Times
in
3,350 Posts
Clifford, I suspect this is about stiffness. Butting is to make a thin tube thick enough to be strong at the lugs or welds. Ti is a lot more elastic so making the middle thicker for stiffness makes sense. If that is now thick enough for a good, strong weld at the end, why go to the (expensive) trouble of butting?
I could have paid more for butted tubes of a higher alloy, saved some grams and probably ended up with less stiff bikes that feel a little spiffier. Instead, I got two rock solid frames. After 36,000 miles, no regrets.
I could have paid more for butted tubes of a higher alloy, saved some grams and probably ended up with less stiff bikes that feel a little spiffier. Instead, I got two rock solid frames. After 36,000 miles, no regrets.
I have troubles envisioning how all the forces would impact the tubes, from the fork interacting with the head tube which has the downtube/top tube. And similar at the rear triangle. Then we have a vertical force with weight on either the saddle or pedals. Bars that can have weight down or could be pulled up. And a side-to-side motion of pedaling, with support at various components of the bike. Torsion?
I'm trying to imagine levers and fulcrums. Mid-tube stresses should generally be less than at the ends, with the exception of certain torsional stresses which may be uniform along a tube.
My guess is that titanium tubes could be formed somewhat like Aluminum, if a company wanted, but so far most companies have chosen to build in pretty basic shapes (not all round, but with the exception of chain stays, generally uniform end to end.
#58
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,633
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4731 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Likes For Sy Reene:
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18371 Post(s)
Liked 4,507 Times
in
3,350 Posts
Have you seen some of the T-Lab bikes?
https://t-lab-bikes.com/ti-morph-technology
https://t-lab-bikes.com/ti-morph-technology
#60
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,101
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3425 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times
in
1,790 Posts
320 grams, for the crankset with the power meter. A savings of 448 grams over the Dura-Ace SRM crankset.
1975 euros.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,873
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times
in
867 Posts
Maybe I missed it, but you can probably shave some grams on rotors if you're willing to run something like this:
https://www.amazon.com/Ashima-140MM-.../dp/B07WZPMFDC
65g/ea which is likely a lot less than whatever is on your bike now. They chew through pads but otherwise seem to work based on reviews I've read.
https://www.amazon.com/Ashima-140MM-.../dp/B07WZPMFDC
65g/ea which is likely a lot less than whatever is on your bike now. They chew through pads but otherwise seem to work based on reviews I've read.
#62
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1526 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Clifford, I suspect this is about stiffness. Butting is to make a thin tube thick enough to be strong at the lugs or welds. Ti is a lot more elastic so making the middle thicker for stiffness makes sense. If that is now thick enough for a good, strong weld at the end, why go to the (expensive) trouble of butting?
__________________
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
The weight loss is a secondary (though fairly insignificant) benefit.
#65
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My preferred bike is 22.3lbs out the door and ready to ride. Have a 16lb road bike but multiple rides have shown me that its barely faster so I'll stick with it but will lighten it some.
Carbon bars are a good savings over the gossamer and really good if you have the omega bars. Check out Merlin Cycles for 3t bars. Picked up 3 sets over the last 6 months for 150.00 each. One for mine and the wife's gravel bikes and one for the cross bike. She loves the ergonova and I find the ergoterra to be stiff enough. The third is waiting for the cross bike handlebar tape to wear out but it'll get me to 22lb once I install it, too cheap to just toss good lizardskin tape till I have to.
Cassette can make a big difference especially with an 11-34 cassette, for a nice bike I'd go XTR/Dura Ace depending on desired gear range. I've also got a real nice cassette waiting to replace my chorus (when it wears out) that will take another 150ish grams off, which I will match with a much nicer/lighter chain though I doubt that'll be more then a 20g difference and probably closer to 10g.
Wheels you don't have to go too exotic. I built my bike with White Industry hubs, butted spokes, alloy nipples and velocity aileron rims which came to just over 1600g, wife's was just under 1600 using lighter spokes to match her weight, and in both cases 32 spoke wheels. Switching to 28 spoke would help a touch more. Cost was under 1k for the set. Not as light as going carbon but sweet hubs, and a strong build. For extra weight savings, ditch the tubes all together if its a gravel bike, I still don't like tubeless on road tires.
So wheels, handlebar, and cassette should get you to 500g or a bit more. Saddle is something to look at as they can have a wide weight range. After that you might have to spend big for small gains. For me, after handlebars and cassette, a lighter set of pedals should get me to your weight range which will be fine, the ride I've learned, matters more. If its a real concern leave the saddlebag, computer and ancillaries at home but I like them.
Carbon bars are a good savings over the gossamer and really good if you have the omega bars. Check out Merlin Cycles for 3t bars. Picked up 3 sets over the last 6 months for 150.00 each. One for mine and the wife's gravel bikes and one for the cross bike. She loves the ergonova and I find the ergoterra to be stiff enough. The third is waiting for the cross bike handlebar tape to wear out but it'll get me to 22lb once I install it, too cheap to just toss good lizardskin tape till I have to.
Cassette can make a big difference especially with an 11-34 cassette, for a nice bike I'd go XTR/Dura Ace depending on desired gear range. I've also got a real nice cassette waiting to replace my chorus (when it wears out) that will take another 150ish grams off, which I will match with a much nicer/lighter chain though I doubt that'll be more then a 20g difference and probably closer to 10g.
Wheels you don't have to go too exotic. I built my bike with White Industry hubs, butted spokes, alloy nipples and velocity aileron rims which came to just over 1600g, wife's was just under 1600 using lighter spokes to match her weight, and in both cases 32 spoke wheels. Switching to 28 spoke would help a touch more. Cost was under 1k for the set. Not as light as going carbon but sweet hubs, and a strong build. For extra weight savings, ditch the tubes all together if its a gravel bike, I still don't like tubeless on road tires.
So wheels, handlebar, and cassette should get you to 500g or a bit more. Saddle is something to look at as they can have a wide weight range. After that you might have to spend big for small gains. For me, after handlebars and cassette, a lighter set of pedals should get me to your weight range which will be fine, the ride I've learned, matters more. If its a real concern leave the saddlebag, computer and ancillaries at home but I like them.
Carbon bars scare me, to be honest - I know they shouldn't, but the thought of that much leverage on a relatively small clamping area just puts a question mark in my head. I can definitely look at a lighter alloy option when it comes time to re-tape my bars - though looking at new bar/stem combos is more about the fact that I'm not a huge fan of the FSA graphics (preferred the Deda graphics on the old bike, I guess).
Light Bicycle Wheel is definitely in the running when I do pull the trigger, and I expect about 500g from there. The Velocity Team 30 are pigs, and I can feel the extra ~200-250g from the Ksyrium Equipes that the Bianchi had - same total bicycle weight, the Bianchi feels livelier from a stop. The Lynskey pulls better once you're up to speed, which is likely due to aerodynamics and higher rotating weight. Of course, the Ksyrium Equipes aren't aero, and the Bianchi doesn't stop nearly as well.
Likes For aliasfox:
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,399
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 4,836 Times
in
2,990 Posts
Nothing to be scared of really. If you buy quality and install them properly they are probably less likely to fail than lightweight alloy bars. They will certainly have a higher strength/weight ratio.
#68
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Some of these things are fairly irrational fears, and I know that. But on balance, I'd personally rather go with a lightweight alloy bar than a carbon bar. It's reasons like this that I can never be a true weight weenie lol.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18371 Post(s)
Liked 4,507 Times
in
3,350 Posts
Dura Ace C40
Rim brake clincher: front 674g, rear 834g
Rim brake tubular: front 605g, rear 750g
So, the pair of tubular saves 69g front, 84g rear for a total of 153g.
Vittoria Corsa
Tubular 25-28: 290g
Tubeless 25mm: 290g
Foldable Clincher, 25mm: 255g
Latex Tubes are all over the place from about 22g to over 100g Just for fun, let's try 22g.
I believe the Dura Ace rim above is tapeless, but in many cases one would have to add in rim tape.
Glue? I saw one estimate of 10g (per wheel). If one goes with about 1g/cc, then that would be 10cc of glue which may be appropriate... but that is still a wet measurement, not a dry measurement which would be less. Gluing both tire & rim?
Ok, so above, we have:
Tubular: 605g + 750g (wheels) + 2x 290g tires + 2x10g glue = 1955g
Tubeless: 674g + 834g (wheels) + 2x 290g tires + 2x30g sealant = 2148g
Tubes (tubolito): 674g + 834g (wheels) +2x 255g tires + 2x22g tubes = 2062g
Overall, with this quick comparison, the tubular comes in slighly lighter.
The tubeless/tube config would be very close depending on the chosen tubes. Road vs Track? Probably 50g to 75g for tubes would have been more representative, quickly closing the gap.
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Well, if you really want to splurge on power cranks and save weight, there's the THM Clavicula SE Powermeter crankset.
320 grams, for the crankset with the power meter. A savings of 448 grams over the Dura-Ace SRM crankset.
1975 euros.
320 grams, for the crankset with the power meter. A savings of 448 grams over the Dura-Ace SRM crankset.
1975 euros.
Likes For rubiksoval:
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Ok, here are some numbers:
Overall, with this quick comparison, the tubular comes in slighly lighter.
The tubeless/tube config would be very close depending on the chosen tubes. Road vs Track? Probably 50g to 75g for tubes would have been more representative, quickly closing the gap.
Overall, with this quick comparison, the tubular comes in slighly lighter.
The tubeless/tube config would be very close depending on the chosen tubes. Road vs Track? Probably 50g to 75g for tubes would have been more representative, quickly closing the gap.
So again, the tubular tires are heavier, and then you add glue on top of that. If you're going with a whole system weight, you definitely don't want Shimano, as it's ridiculously easy to go sub 1000 grams for a tubular wheelset if that's the desired effect. In any case, almost definitely outside of the realm of the OPs expertise. I was just going with tires, only, but sure, can't have those without the appropriate wheels.
And yes, the tubeless setup can be heavier, and likely is when you include sealant.
Last edited by rubiksoval; 06-04-21 at 02:05 PM.
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18371 Post(s)
Liked 4,507 Times
in
3,350 Posts
Yep. I know the numbers.
So again, the tubular tires are heavier, and then you add glue on top of that. If you're going with a whole system weight, you definitely don't want Shimano, as it's ridiculously easy to go sub 1000 grams for a tubular wheelset if that's the desired effect. In any case, almost definitely outside of the realm of the OPs expertise. I was just going with tires, only, but sure, can't have those without the appropriate wheels.
And yes, the tubeless setup can be heavier, and likely is when you include sealant.
So again, the tubular tires are heavier, and then you add glue on top of that. If you're going with a whole system weight, you definitely don't want Shimano, as it's ridiculously easy to go sub 1000 grams for a tubular wheelset if that's the desired effect. In any case, almost definitely outside of the realm of the OPs expertise. I was just going with tires, only, but sure, can't have those without the appropriate wheels.
And yes, the tubeless setup can be heavier, and likely is when you include sealant.
Single walled rims may have some weight benefit, but have largely fallen out of favor.
Thus, across all manufacturers you'll see a greater weight savings for tubular over clinchers wheels. And, there used to be discussions about "rotating weight" amplifying the differences even more.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,022 Times
in
722 Posts
Yep. I know the numbers.
So again, the tubular tires are heavier, and then you add glue on top of that. If you're going with a whole system weight, you definitely don't want Shimano, as it's ridiculously easy to go sub 1000 grams for a tubular wheelset if that's the desired effect. In any case, almost definitely outside of the realm of the OPs expertise. I was just going with tires, only, but sure, can't have those without the appropriate wheels.
And yes, the tubeless setup can be heavier, and likely is when you include sealant.
So again, the tubular tires are heavier, and then you add glue on top of that. If you're going with a whole system weight, you definitely don't want Shimano, as it's ridiculously easy to go sub 1000 grams for a tubular wheelset if that's the desired effect. In any case, almost definitely outside of the realm of the OPs expertise. I was just going with tires, only, but sure, can't have those without the appropriate wheels.
And yes, the tubeless setup can be heavier, and likely is when you include sealant.