Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Raleigh 3 Speed Sizing?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Raleigh 3 Speed Sizing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-10, 07:29 AM
  #1  
CharmCityCycle
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Raleigh 3 Speed Sizing?

Well I was going to be a one bike kinda guy (nice thought right), but my wife thinks that given the amount I will have into my Trek 620 by the time I'm finished with it, that I would be foolish to leave it locked up here in the city. She's probably right. So I need to find something cheap that I can ride downtown to the library, or the movie theatre, or wherever, that I won't have to fret about. I'm thinking an old Raleigh 3 speed would make a good beater/grocery getter. Heck, that's pretty much what they were designed for, and it seems like they can be had for a hundred bucks or less, depending on condition. The problem is, I don't know what to look for in terms of sizing. I haven't seen a single one that has the 23.5-24 inch seat tube that I would look for in a road bike. Did they make them that big? Being that this won't be a remotely performance oriented bike, would it make sense to buy one in whatever remotely close size I can find, and then just crank the seat and bars up? Thoughts? Anyone using one of these for puttering around?
CharmCityCycle is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 10:20 AM
  #2  
wahoonc
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by CharmCityCycle
Well I was going to be a one bike kinda guy (nice thought right), but my wife thinks that given the amount I will have into my Trek 620 by the time I'm finished with it, that I would be foolish to leave it locked up here in the city. She's probably right. So I need to find something cheap that I can ride downtown to the library, or the movie theatre, or wherever, that I won't have to fret about. I'm thinking an old Raleigh 3 speed would make a good beater/grocery getter. Heck, that's pretty much what they were designed for, and it seems like they can be had for a hundred bucks or less, depending on condition. The problem is, I don't know what to look for in terms of sizing. I haven't seen a single one that has the 23.5-24 inch seat tube that I would look for in a road bike. Did they make them that big? Being that this won't be a remotely performance oriented bike, would it make sense to buy one in whatever remotely close size I can find, and then just crank the seat and bars up? Thoughts? Anyone using one of these for puttering around?
Biggest Raleigh Sports/Superbe they made is 23", the most common size is 21", they did make a 19" for a couple of years (these are the diamond frames). My "road" frame size is a 25.5" (65cm). I ride both a 21" and a 23". On the 21" Sports I have an extended length seat post and the bars as high as I can get them. I am 6'-2" with long arms and legs.

There are lots of choices out there for a ride to town and leave it bike.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 10:28 AM
  #3  
gna
Count Orlok Member
 
gna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,819

Bikes: Raleigh Sports, Raleigh Twenty, Raleigh Wyoming, Raleigh DL1, Schwinn Winter Bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Liked 177 Times in 97 Posts
The 23" frame is out there, but harder to find. This time of year, though, people are cleaning out garages and they can be found cheap at yard sales.

I'm about 5'11. I ride a 23" Raleigh Sports and a 23" Triumph Sports. I ride to work, which is 6 miles away, pick my daughter up at daycare in a trailer, go to the grocery store, Target, and Menards. I guess that qualifies as puttering around.

DSCN2223JPG.jpg
gna is offline  
Likes For gna:
Old 04-10-10, 11:04 AM
  #4  
Andrew F
Senior Member
 
Andrew F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 904
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm 6'2" and ride a 23" Raliegh Sport turned psuedo-Clubman, my road bike is a 62cm and both fit just fine. 23" 3 speeds are out there, just keep looking.
Andrew F is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 03:54 PM
  #5  
CharmCityCycle
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks everyone. I guess I will hold out until I can locate one of the 23" ones.
CharmCityCycle is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 06:09 PM
  #6  
Grand Bois
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew F
I'm 6'2" and ride a 23" Raliegh Sport turned psuedo-Clubman, my road bike is a 62cm and both fit just fine. 23" 3 speeds are out there, just keep looking.
That's one of the coolest looking bikes I've seen in a while.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 09:35 PM
  #7  
Andrew F
Senior Member
 
Andrew F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 904
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
That's one of the coolest looking bikes I've seen in a while.
Thanks, it was my 2009/10 winter project, lots of fun getting the parts together and it's proven to be an enjoyable ride.
Andrew F is offline  
Old 04-11-10, 08:22 AM
  #8  
gbalke
Senior Member
 
gbalke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West of St. Louis
Posts: 864

Bikes: (3) 1970's Raleigh Sports, (1) 1968 Robin Hood 3 speed, 1974 Raleigh Grand Prix, 1976 Raleigh Grand Prix, 1969 Peugeot UO-18, 1971 Peugeot UO-08, 1980 Giant road bike, 1954 Humber, 1940ish Hercules Popular, 1963 Dunelt, 2007 Trek 3700 mountain bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Like Wahoonc, I also ride two different size Sports. My 23" is a typical '74 Sports with Brooks saddle, rear carrier and a vinyl saddle bag. Pretty much stock with the exception of the grips, which are foam. Here's a pic showing mine and my wife's matching '73.



My 21" Sports is more radical; hand built from a bare frame using parts from a 23" Sports. It's powder coated in a semi-gloss black. It's built along the lines of a Clubman much like Andrew's except I retained the fenders and chain guard. I installed a Brook's B17 saddle in honey color with matching grips.

gbalke is offline  
Likes For gbalke:
Old 04-11-10, 10:13 AM
  #9  
wahoonc
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
These pictures will give you an idea of the set up on my two and sizing difference. The Sports has since had a new set of tires added, the chain cleaned and oiled and is getting a set of Wald baskets front and rear. It is going to live at my parents house in town, for pub and beer runs.

The seat post on the Sports sticks out about 1.5" more than on the Superbe.

Aaron



__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 04-25-10, 08:40 PM
  #10  
peterlat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have a 1972 Raleigh Sports with a 23" seat-tube measurement. (I bought it at an estate sale 15 years ago, hung it up in my basement and just took it out this weekend for the first time--can't believe the tires will hold air.) Oddly enough, here's the question I was going to ask: Did they make them in a shorter tube length? I guess so. The size I have works for me, but just barely--the standover height gives me only about a half-inch of clearance. I wish it was an inch or so shorter. It'd be nice to find some in in the Minneapolis area who'd want to trade their shorter Sports version. Here's a picture I snapped. By the way, I'm brand new to the forum, and I'm coming back to recreational riding after a long absence.
Originally Posted by CharmCityCycle
Well I was going to be a one bike kinda guy (nice thought right), but my wife thinks that given the amount I will have into my Trek 620 by the time I'm finished with it, that I would be foolish to leave it locked up here in the city. She's probably right. So I need to find something cheap that I can ride downtown to the library, or the movie theatre, or wherever, that I won't have to fret about. I'm thinking an old Raleigh 3 speed would make a good beater/grocery getter. Heck, that's pretty much what they were designed for, and it seems like they can be had for a hundred bucks or less, depending on condition. The problem is, I don't know what to look for in terms of sizing. I haven't seen a single one that has the 23.5-24 inch seat tube that I would look for in a road bike. Did they make them that big? Being that this won't be a remotely performance oriented bike, would it make sense to buy one in whatever remotely close size I can find, and then just crank the seat and bars up? Thoughts? Anyone using one of these for puttering around?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
raleigh..jpg (103.4 KB, 237 views)
peterlat is offline  
Likes For peterlat:
Old 04-25-10, 09:08 PM
  #11  
Chris_in_Miami
missing in action
 
Chris_in_Miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,483
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 29 Posts
There was a 21" version of the Sport, that sounds like what you need. That's a very clean example you've got, you just might find someone who wants to swap. Good luck!
Chris_in_Miami is offline  
Old 04-25-10, 09:27 PM
  #12  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
Isn't it true that a 21" works for you if you ride a 22" or bigger road frame? I don't even know why that is, but it seems to be.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 04-25-10, 09:47 PM
  #13  
mickey85
perpetually frazzled
 
mickey85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Linton, IN
Posts: 2,467

Bikes: 1977 Bridgestone Kabuki Super Speed; 1979 Raleigh Professional; 1983 Raleigh Rapide mixte; 1974 Peugeot UO-8; 1993 Univega Activa Trail; 1972 Raleigh Sports; 1967 Phillips; 1981 Schwinn World Tourist; 1976 Schwinn LeTour mixte; 1964 Western Flyer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
I usually ride about a 59cm road bike, but find I'm comfortable on a 21" English 3. Of course, that's with about 5" of seatpost sticking out...
mickey85 is offline  
Old 04-25-10, 10:12 PM
  #14  
peterlat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It's odd: My Raleigh has a 23" frame and a standover height that's taller than it should be for me; I'm only 5'7". Yet it doesn't feel that big or tall when I'm on it. And if you look at the picture I posted, the seat, which is pulled up a good 6 inches out of the tube, is the right height for me. On the other hand, I have a '78 Schwinn Suburban with a frame size and standover height that, according to all the rules, is the perfect size for me--yet it feels small and the riding position is less comfortable than the Raleigh. So why does the correct-size bike feel small, and the too-tall bike feel okay? Is there something about sizing yourself to a 70s bike that's different than today's models?
peterlat is offline  
Old 04-25-10, 10:35 PM
  #15  
NormanF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
I'm 5'7" and got a Raleigh Superbe 23" by mistake. I thought it was a 21" but the late Sheldon Brown informed me it was a size bigger and I've managed to get used to it even though meant the seatpost going almost all the way into the frame and raising the stem somewhat. I still like it despite going to a 700C wheelset which did raise the standover height. Should have kept it the traditional 700A wheelset but at the time they didn't have alloy rims in the size and a good selection of tires was scarce.
NormanF is offline  
Old 04-25-10, 10:47 PM
  #16  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
The Raleigh Sports isn't a 70's bike. It's more like a 40's or 50's bike.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Likes For noglider:
Old 04-26-10, 05:23 AM
  #17  
mickey85
perpetually frazzled
 
mickey85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Linton, IN
Posts: 2,467

Bikes: 1977 Bridgestone Kabuki Super Speed; 1979 Raleigh Professional; 1983 Raleigh Rapide mixte; 1974 Peugeot UO-8; 1993 Univega Activa Trail; 1972 Raleigh Sports; 1967 Phillips; 1981 Schwinn World Tourist; 1976 Schwinn LeTour mixte; 1964 Western Flyer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
The Raleigh Sports isn't a 70's bike. It's more like a 40's or 50's bike.

Tom, are you referring to the style, or to production dates? As far as style, I'd agree. The really generous setback would allow for a larger frame than usual.

Peter - have you seen Electra's bikes? Think about that kind of technology, but not as extreme. That's why you can ride a bigger frame than you typically could on a standard bike.
mickey85 is offline  
Old 04-26-10, 07:34 AM
  #18  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
Mickey, yes, the style, or really, the design. The bike changed very little over all the time it was produced, and Norman was comparing sizing it with sizing a modern bike.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Likes For noglider:
Old 05-17-21, 07:01 AM
  #19  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Isn't it true that a 21" works for you if you ride a 22" or bigger road frame? I don't even know why that is, but it seems to be.
Old thread but it has useful information on sizing for English 3 speeds. I ride a 57 or a 22.5 road frame but I'm thinking of picking up a 21 inch English 3 speed. After reading this thread, I'm comfortable that I can make the sizing work.
bikemig is offline  
Old 05-17-21, 08:03 AM
  #20  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
Also, keep in mind that the fairly uncommon - but out there - 3-speed, 27"-wheeled version of the Sprite offered after '77 was available in both 23.5 and 25" as well. Hard to find, but one of the best options for a tall rider looking for a traditional Sports without having to build one out of a completely unrelated bike.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Likes For cudak888:
Old 05-17-21, 08:24 AM
  #21  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
@bikemig, it will be fine for you.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Likes For noglider:
Old 05-17-21, 10:14 AM
  #22  
IsleRide
Full Member
 
IsleRide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Western MA
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 80 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
Also, keep in mind that the fairly uncommon - but out there - 3-speed, 27"-wheeled version of the Sprite offered after '77 was available in both 23.5 and 25" as well. Hard to find, but one of the best options for a tall rider looking for a traditional Sports without having to build one out of a completely unrelated bike.

-Kurt

IsleRide is offline  
Likes For IsleRide:
Old 05-17-21, 05:18 PM
  #23  
thumpism 
Bikes are okay, I guess.
 
thumpism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 6,938

Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT

Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,446 Times in 1,557 Posts
I ride 25" road bikes and have a 23" men's Sports and also a 23" ladies' Sports that is boxed up for future use when I can no longer swing a leg over the diamond frames. I grabbed my men's when I found it because they seemed so rare but lately I've been finding loads of them on FB Marketplace. Seriously worth a look if you're in the market. The ladies' bike I found at the curb on trash day in Wake Forest NC. What timing!

I geared mine down with a 24T rear cog from a Shimano Nexus 3 hub.

thumpism is offline  
Likes For thumpism:
Old 05-20-21, 11:02 AM
  #24  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by IsleRide
You just brought back memories for me. In 1980 and 1981, I was head mechanic at a shop in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on MIT campus. A frequent customer rode this bike. He was very tall and rather large framed. He had frequent breakdowns and was frustrated. He destroyed cotter pins, spokes, and I think rims. His was the first 3-speed hub I overhauled, as he ruined his pawls. He asked why he had so many problems with his bike. I was only 20 years old, so I didn't know about tact, so I told him it was because of his weight. Now I know to use the word "size." I also rebuilt his rear wheel with a Weinmann concave rim, and I think that worked out well.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Likes For noglider:
Old 05-20-21, 11:54 AM
  #25  
IsleRide
Full Member
 
IsleRide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Western MA
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 80 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
You just brought back memories for me. In 1980 and 1981, I was head mechanic at a shop in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on MIT campus. A frequent customer rode this bike. He was very tall and rather large framed. He had frequent breakdowns and was frustrated. He destroyed cotter pins, spokes, and I think rims. His was the first 3-speed hub I overhauled, as he ruined his pawls. He asked why he had so many problems with his bike. I was only 20 years old, so I didn't know about tact, so I told him it was because of his weight. Now I know to use the word "size." I also rebuilt his rear wheel with a Weinmann concave rim, and I think that worked out well.
Good story. Based on the condition of this one it wasn't his bike!
IsleRide is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kpp80202
Classic & Vintage
9
05-16-13 09:27 PM
_dylan
Classic & Vintage
10
04-30-13 11:25 AM
mello velo
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
2
04-12-13 10:33 PM
Maxturbo
Classic & Vintage
3
11-14-11 08:50 PM
markk900
Classic & Vintage
2
07-28-10 06:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.