If you change all the parts . . . is it still the same bike?
#51
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,072
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1764 Post(s)
Liked 1,577 Times
in
910 Posts
Well that's a bit of an exception. What happens if you bought a Varsity and then changed over all the components to replicate a Continental? Would it then become a Continental even though it still said Varsity on the frame? Also what happens if you change just a few of the components over? Does it then become a Varsinental?
I have 2 Varsinentals that were reborn in 2016-2017-ish. When they came to me they were in such poor shape as they could not be identified. It could be accurately said that they had existed with out form. Now that they are reborn, I think of them as my 50 year-old-5 year old bikes. That's practically brand new!
One is simply "Vernon" & the other is "Pink Sparkle Bike" even though it is target red.
I think the point of the Theseus philosophy paradox is to establish that identity is a construct. That things often exist in a duality of forms. The name I tell people a thing is, & the name I think of a thing as...Then, there is the true name which will never be known.
It is the true name that this thread is dancing around.
Who's bike is Cats?
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#52
Super-duper Genius
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 983 Times
in
508 Posts
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 580 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
I have a Bike of Theseus, actually maybe a little beyond that as it actually has the identical replacement frame as the SECOND frame the bike had. First was a steel road racing frame w/matching fork, fork replaced with carbon, then frame replaced with aluminum & aluminum fork, then aluminum frame cracked and replaced with identical one. Moving parts replaced over the years as required, sometimes to upgrade. Literally every part has been replaced as of 2019 when I replaced the original (1991!) F wheel because the axle broke.
I think it's questionable to say it's the same bike as the one that was built in 1991 with a steel road racing frame, but replacing the aluminum frame (c. 2008) with an identical one did not change the nature or character of the bike.
I think it's questionable to say it's the same bike as the one that was built in 1991 with a steel road racing frame, but replacing the aluminum frame (c. 2008) with an identical one did not change the nature or character of the bike.
#54
Must be symmetrical
Thread Starter
The bike you buy is still defined/identified by its frame though. Nobody says their bike is a Zipp just because it has Zipp wheels. Or a Shimano Ultegra or whatever. They name it by what frame it has, custom or off-shelf spec. Doesn't really matter. The spec itself obviously matters, but the bike is still named by its frame.
My local UK bike shop used to have "House" branded frames, both custom build and off-the-peg. They had an in-house frame builder for a while, but I believe they used several reputable frame builders. This was in the mid-80s when everything was steel.
My local UK bike shop used to have "House" branded frames, both custom build and off-the-peg. They had an in-house frame builder for a while, but I believe they used several reputable frame builders. This was in the mid-80s when everything was steel.
But everyone felt the same commodity frames were totally different. So they created an identity that was the bike with what? i don't know, the decal, or the after the fact head badge, or the painted on stripes, or, most likely, the store, its owner, and their relationship.
#55
Must be symmetrical
Thread Starter
I think also that components could play a more important role in the identity of a bike than people so far have said. I mean, if I took a bike that came originally with Sun Tour components from the 80s and put on a Shimano Di2 system, I think I would have to parse the situation again.
Or, I can recall a TdF picture of Lemond with a TT bike, Mavic derailleur, and Simplex Retrofriction downtubers. Or Armstrong with a rear brifter and a front downtuber. Change those things and the iconic set up is no more.
Or, the XO-1 was defined 1) as a Grant Petersen bike but 2) that bike with mustache handlebars. A lot changed between year 1 and year last on the XO-1 but the bars defined the bike. If I had the chance to get my hands on an XO-1 today, the last thing I would change would be the bars.
Or, I can recall a TdF picture of Lemond with a TT bike, Mavic derailleur, and Simplex Retrofriction downtubers. Or Armstrong with a rear brifter and a front downtuber. Change those things and the iconic set up is no more.
Or, the XO-1 was defined 1) as a Grant Petersen bike but 2) that bike with mustache handlebars. A lot changed between year 1 and year last on the XO-1 but the bars defined the bike. If I had the chance to get my hands on an XO-1 today, the last thing I would change would be the bars.
#56
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,925
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2184 Post(s)
Liked 3,336 Times
in
1,741 Posts
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4273 Post(s)
Liked 4,709 Times
in
2,909 Posts
I think also that components could play a more important role in the identity of a bike than people so far have said. I mean, if I took a bike that came originally with Sun Tour components from the 80s and put on a Shimano Di2 system, I think I would have to parse the situation again.
Or, I can recall a TdF picture of Lemond with a TT bike, Mavic derailleur, and Simplex Retrofriction downtubers. Or Armstrong with a rear brifter and a front downtuber. Change those things and the iconic set up is no more.
Or, the XO-1 was defined 1) as a Grant Petersen bike but 2) that bike with mustache handlebars. A lot changed between year 1 and year last on the XO-1 but the bars defined the bike. If I had the chance to get my hands on an XO-1 today, the last thing I would change would be the bars.
Or, I can recall a TdF picture of Lemond with a TT bike, Mavic derailleur, and Simplex Retrofriction downtubers. Or Armstrong with a rear brifter and a front downtuber. Change those things and the iconic set up is no more.
Or, the XO-1 was defined 1) as a Grant Petersen bike but 2) that bike with mustache handlebars. A lot changed between year 1 and year last on the XO-1 but the bars defined the bike. If I had the chance to get my hands on an XO-1 today, the last thing I would change would be the bars.
#58
Must be symmetrical
Thread Starter
#59
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,072
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1764 Post(s)
Liked 1,577 Times
in
910 Posts
This is for Frkl
I've posted these before. If not Vernon & Pink Sparkle, then what? I fail to see how the identity "Schwinn" even still applies even if the biggest component still bears the name plate.
Make your case.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l-project.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/framebuil...ification.html
I've posted these before. If not Vernon & Pink Sparkle, then what? I fail to see how the identity "Schwinn" even still applies even if the biggest component still bears the name plate.
Make your case.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l-project.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/framebuil...ification.html
Likes For burnthesheep:
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Up
Posts: 4,695
Bikes: Masi, Giant TCR, Eisentraut (retired), Jamis Aurora Elite, Zullo, Cannondale, 84 & 93 Stumpjumpers, Waterford, Tern D8, Bianchi, Gunner Roadie, Serotta, Serotta Duette, was gifted a Diamond Back
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Liked 2,038 Times
in
604 Posts
I had a bike frame that cracked, I bought a similar frame and moved all of the gear to that frame. Everything is essentially the same but a different frame, so it is a different bike.
Likes For cyclist2000:
#62
Must be symmetrical
Thread Starter
This is for Frkl
I've posted these before. If not Vernon & Pink Sparkle, then what? I fail to see how the identity "Schwinn" even still applies even if the biggest component still bears the name plate.
Make your case.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l-project.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/framebuil...ification.html
I've posted these before. If not Vernon & Pink Sparkle, then what? I fail to see how the identity "Schwinn" even still applies even if the biggest component still bears the name plate.
Make your case.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l-project.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/framebuil...ification.html
I don't know the answer to the question, I posed it as a sincere question for discussion. I am fine with everyone thinking different things, actually I would expect that everyone feels different things. I would be somewhat uncomfortable if there was actually no disagreement on this topic.
I think the very fact that the identity of a bike is so multifaceted is a case, if one must be made, in itself.
Who or what our bikes are? Why try to make a case to convince others that they are right/wrong?
Likes For Frkl:
#63
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,072
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1764 Post(s)
Liked 1,577 Times
in
910 Posts
Sorry, I am not sure what case I should make?
I don't know the answer to the question, I posed it as a sincere question for discussion. I am fine with everyone thinking different things, actually I would expect that everyone feels different things. I would be somewhat uncomfortable if there was actually no disagreement on this topic.
I think the very fact that the identity of a bike is so multifaceted is a case, if one must be made, in itself.
Who or what our bikes are? Why try to make a case to convince others that they are right/wrong?
I don't know the answer to the question, I posed it as a sincere question for discussion. I am fine with everyone thinking different things, actually I would expect that everyone feels different things. I would be somewhat uncomfortable if there was actually no disagreement on this topic.
I think the very fact that the identity of a bike is so multifaceted is a case, if one must be made, in itself.
Who or what our bikes are? Why try to make a case to convince others that they are right/wrong?
I appreciate the humility.
Good thread.
base2
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4273 Post(s)
Liked 4,709 Times
in
2,909 Posts
Likes For PeteHski:
#65
Newbie
Would definitely say that the frame is the main part of the bike and most other parts are consumables or will need replaced after enough use or misuse.
Foe example, lets say you had two bikes bought new and with all original parts still intact... a Trek and a Bianchi. You moved all the components from one, onto the other and vice versa. You would surely still identify each bike by the frame... the Trek is still the Trek even with all but 1 part from the other bike.
Foe example, lets say you had two bikes bought new and with all original parts still intact... a Trek and a Bianchi. You moved all the components from one, onto the other and vice versa. You would surely still identify each bike by the frame... the Trek is still the Trek even with all but 1 part from the other bike.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,529
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2111 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Got a deal on a Cannondale frameset, moved everything over except the headset, seatpost, and the destroyed rear derailleur.
I call my bike Frankndale.
-mr. bill
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,404
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 2,225 Times
in
1,248 Posts
I ride vintage steel road bikes and a few of my bikes have been modified or upgraded. The latest build is maybe my most modified build yet, is it the same bike? I have no idea because when I got it , the wheels were missing, the cranks were not matching, the derailleurs were not original, and the brake levers were not correct. I took it to the next level only in a good way. The paint was starting to bubble around the top tube cable guides so I had the frame media blasted and powder painted to close to original color but put seventies style graphics from the same manufacturer (Motobecane) . I then built it up with seventies Campy NR components and a nice Brooks saddle. I never rode the bike before I got it but I would venture to say it ain’t nothing like it was.
#68
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,188
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
For me, the frame (and sometimes fork) define what makes "a bike". Sure, changing the wheels, cockpit and drivetrain can make it feel different from the way it was previously configured, but the geometry and character of the frame is what forms the basis of "the ride"
Maybe it's because I tend to gravitate to bikes that are a little outside the normal.
My Cannondale and Softride bikes, I chose because they don't ride or handle like more common bikes. They've both been updated over the years (especially the Softride) but that just enhances what makes them stand out in the first place
Maybe it's because I tend to gravitate to bikes that are a little outside the normal.
My Cannondale and Softride bikes, I chose because they don't ride or handle like more common bikes. They've both been updated over the years (especially the Softride) but that just enhances what makes them stand out in the first place
#69
Senior Member
I'm also tempted to say that the frame is the crucial part. But then I thought about full suspension mountain bikes where the frame consists of several individual parts... is the front triangle or the rear one more important?
Likes For subgrade:
#70
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,427
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 698 Post(s)
Liked 1,292 Times
in
646 Posts
I ride a lot of boring black bikes, if I were to put different components on my boring black bikes they're still boring black bikes
#71
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,188
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
You can change the shock, but that would be like putting upgraded shocks on your VW and calling it an Audi.
#72
Senior Member
Mine's pretty much a bike of Theseus at this stage, as only the frame, fork, headset, and seat tube are original. And I will be changing the fork as well in the spring, as I want to convert to disc brakes (frame has a disc brake mount, but fork does not). I'll also be changing to my fourth set of wheels so I can mount the discs.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18319 Post(s)
Liked 4,487 Times
in
3,337 Posts
I'm not sure it really matters. My old Colnago has had a lot of parts wear out and get replaced over the years. Generally one or two parts at a time.
It still has the original seatpost, but the seatpost binder bolt broke a while ago. The headset and bottom bracket are both worn, and will be eventually replaced.
Oh, I think it still has the original Universal brake calipers. But, I might eventually get tired of those.
The "New" Colnago, on the other hand, was bought as a bare frame, and assembled as I saw fit. I won't call it the same bike as it was before the previous owner parted it out.
It still has the original seatpost, but the seatpost binder bolt broke a while ago. The headset and bottom bracket are both worn, and will be eventually replaced.
Oh, I think it still has the original Universal brake calipers. But, I might eventually get tired of those.
The "New" Colnago, on the other hand, was bought as a bare frame, and assembled as I saw fit. I won't call it the same bike as it was before the previous owner parted it out.
#74
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,054 Times
in
634 Posts
I have the axe that George Washington use to chop down the cherry tree when he was a young kid. It has had 5 handles and 3 heads.
Likes For rydabent:
#75
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,187
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2749 Post(s)
Liked 2,516 Times
in
1,422 Posts
I think also that components could play a more important role in the identity of a bike than people so far have said. I mean, if I took a bike that came originally with Sun Tour components from the 80s and put on a Shimano Di2 system, I think I would have to parse the situation again.
The question was not “what parts of the bike make the most difference in ride characteristics?”
The question was “when is it a new bike”.
And my answer to that (entirely subjective question) is “when you change the frame.
In your example above, in my book I would say that I changed the components, but it is still the same bike. The fact that it rides differently is beside the point IMO.