V-brakes: Are Ball Bearings Worth It?
#1
BF's Resident Dumbass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,566
Bikes: 1990 Raleigh Flyer (size 21"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 15"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 17.5"); 2019 Dahon Mu D9; 2020 Dahon Hemingway D9
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,493 Times
in
496 Posts
V-brakes: Are Ball Bearings Worth It?
So, I've been running these V-brakes with ball bearings (allegedly) for a few weeks now and they work great - definitely nicer and stiffer than the bendy factory V-brake arms. So now I'm curious as to how the brand-name stuff would feel and perform. I've been looking at LDC, Bullseye, Bombshell, Speedline and the like. But when the ones with ball bearings are twice price of the ones with brass pivots or more, it makes me wonder if having ball bearings for V-brake pivots is really worth it? Keep in mind that this is a folding bike that I ride for fun, exercise and commuting, and not a competition/show BMX. What do you think?
#2
Really Old Senior Member
Ball bearing V brakes?
Sounds like a solution looking for a problem.
Sounds like a solution looking for a problem.
#3
BF's Resident Dumbass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,566
Bikes: 1990 Raleigh Flyer (size 21"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 15"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 17.5"); 2019 Dahon Mu D9; 2020 Dahon Hemingway D9
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,493 Times
in
496 Posts
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,694
Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 834 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times
in
247 Posts
These brakes have longer arms. The performance difference that you experience may be more due to that length than bearings. There is a down side to the length in that your levers need to work with the longer cable pull required. You end up with less space for accommodating imperfections, such as slightly uneven rim or wheel sitting.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SFBay
Posts: 2,334
Bikes: n, I would like n+1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 133 Times
in
108 Posts
My general rule for advising others on upgrades is as follows:
1. If it’s a toy, in budget, and you want it to try out, go buy it without regret. Just don’t complain if that money does nothing other than let you try out something that may or may not have made a difference.
2. If it’s not a toy, or is not clearly in budget, do not buy it unless there is clearly something wrong or unsatisfactory about what you have now which cannot be remedied in a more financially prudent manner.
3. If you have neither now, see if you can try out both. If you can’t tell the difference or don’t care about the difference, get the cheaper one.
All of this assumes we aren’t talking about some junky thing that’s going to fall apart in short order.
Are properly maintained bearing systems smoother in a properly cabled system on a long term basis than an equivalent bushing assembly? Yes. Does that little bit of smoothness bring you enough satisfaction to justify more $ over the safe and functional system you have already implemented? See questions 1 and 2 above.
1. If it’s a toy, in budget, and you want it to try out, go buy it without regret. Just don’t complain if that money does nothing other than let you try out something that may or may not have made a difference.
2. If it’s not a toy, or is not clearly in budget, do not buy it unless there is clearly something wrong or unsatisfactory about what you have now which cannot be remedied in a more financially prudent manner.
3. If you have neither now, see if you can try out both. If you can’t tell the difference or don’t care about the difference, get the cheaper one.
All of this assumes we aren’t talking about some junky thing that’s going to fall apart in short order.
Are properly maintained bearing systems smoother in a properly cabled system on a long term basis than an equivalent bushing assembly? Yes. Does that little bit of smoothness bring you enough satisfaction to justify more $ over the safe and functional system you have already implemented? See questions 1 and 2 above.
#6
BF's Resident Dumbass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,566
Bikes: 1990 Raleigh Flyer (size 21"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 15"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 17.5"); 2019 Dahon Mu D9; 2020 Dahon Hemingway D9
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,493 Times
in
496 Posts
These brakes have longer arms. The performance difference that you experience may be more due to that length than bearings. There is a down side to the length in that your levers need to work with the longer cable pull required. You end up with less space for accommodating imperfections, such as slightly uneven rim or wheel sitting.
#7
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,269 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I've been running these V-brakes with ball bearings (allegedly) for a few weeks now and they work great
it makes me wonder if having ball bearings for V-brake pivots is really worth it?
it makes me wonder if having ball bearings for V-brake pivots is really worth it?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,694
Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 834 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times
in
247 Posts
As we know from practice, brakes get serious sprays from tires in rough weather. I once had a chain tensioner positioned close to the ground, running on ball bearings. After about a year after putting on sealed bearings, they would seize due to rust. After several iterations of the experience, I solved the problem by putting there bearing cartridges with ceramic balls and stainless races. I since went to completely different solution on the particular bike, but my experience may be relevant in the context of those bearing-equipped brake arms.
Likes For 2_i:
#9
BF's Resident Dumbass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,566
Bikes: 1990 Raleigh Flyer (size 21"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 15"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 17.5"); 2019 Dahon Mu D9; 2020 Dahon Hemingway D9
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,493 Times
in
496 Posts
As for the fact that they have sealed bearings for pivots and whether that made a difference, i can tell you they do pivot a little more smoothly than the ones they replaced which had brass bushings - if you push them by hand. Whether or not that makes any difference at the lever, I can't really tell. That's why I asked the question - a set of perfectly good, American-made LDCs - with brass pivots - is less than 80 bucks; a set of Bullseyes is well over $200.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,649
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3437 Post(s)
Liked 2,830 Times
in
1,726 Posts
Ball "thrust" bearings started to appear in center-pivot side-pull brakes in the 1980s, as I recall. The idea was that as the brake applied pressure to the rim, if thrust bearings weren't there, the friction between the brake's two moving calipers would increase. The thrust bearings were said to alleviate this friction. I imagine the same is true for V brakes.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,541
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 978 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
395 Posts
Ball "thrust" bearings started to appear in center-pivot side-pull brakes in the 1980s, as I recall. The idea was that as the brake applied pressure to the rim, if thrust bearings weren't there, the friction between the brake's two moving calipers would increase. The thrust bearings were said to alleviate this friction. I imagine the same is true for V brakes.
Likes For sweeks:
#12
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,298
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4262 Post(s)
Liked 3,874 Times
in
2,585 Posts
Just FYI they are linear pull brakes, V-brakes are wholly owned Shimano trademark.
I will say my Paul brakes are quite nice and I couldn't really ask for much better but I have heard the XTR brakes are some of the absolute best out there but I don't want to spend that kind of money for vintage.
Personally a good cable set and stiff shoes and good pads are the best upgrade to make.
I will say my Paul brakes are quite nice and I couldn't really ask for much better but I have heard the XTR brakes are some of the absolute best out there but I don't want to spend that kind of money for vintage.
Personally a good cable set and stiff shoes and good pads are the best upgrade to make.
Likes For veganbikes:
#13
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,277
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6148 Post(s)
Liked 4,096 Times
in
2,326 Posts
Just FYI they are linear pull brakes, V-brakes are wholly owned Shimano trademark.
I will say my Paul brakes are quite nice and I couldn't really ask for much better but I have heard the XTR brakes are some of the absolute best out there but I don't want to spend that kind of money for vintage.
Personally a good cable set and stiff shoes and good pads are the best upgrade to make.
I will say my Paul brakes are quite nice and I couldn't really ask for much better but I have heard the XTR brakes are some of the absolute best out there but I don't want to spend that kind of money for vintage.
Personally a good cable set and stiff shoes and good pads are the best upgrade to make.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,971
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2475 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
515 Posts
It may be obvious, but maybe not: "stiffness" of the brake arms and "smoothness" of the caliper arm rotation around its pivot point are unrelated functions. In any case, the degree of rotation needed in a caliper arm is minuscule, not even a 5 degree rotation. Rotation in fact is a generous description of caliper arm motion. Ball bearings excel at providing a smooth rotation for wheels, cranks and motors of all kinds where the rpms vary from dozens to thousands of (full 360 degree) rotations per minute. They are simply gross overkill in any kind of brake pivot application. A sales gimmick.
I DOUBT there are actual (typical) ball bearings anywhere in the brakes in question. Actually, I just followed the link and now I KNOW that there are no actual ball bearings in those calipers. Just marketing hyperbole. Of course I could be wrong, there could be some amazing nanotechnology being produced and given away at consumer level retail level but I DOUBT it. I've used all kinds of V brakes from unbranded OEM offerings on BSO tandems to Shimano LX-V level and beyond and I never really wished that any of them had 'stiffer' brake arms once the $50/pr. price point is reached. I see no real benefit to engineering V-brakes to the sophistication (and price) of hydraulic disc brakes! Sometimes a little knowledge really is a dangerous thing.
I DOUBT there are actual (typical) ball bearings anywhere in the brakes in question. Actually, I just followed the link and now I KNOW that there are no actual ball bearings in those calipers. Just marketing hyperbole. Of course I could be wrong, there could be some amazing nanotechnology being produced and given away at consumer level retail level but I DOUBT it. I've used all kinds of V brakes from unbranded OEM offerings on BSO tandems to Shimano LX-V level and beyond and I never really wished that any of them had 'stiffer' brake arms once the $50/pr. price point is reached. I see no real benefit to engineering V-brakes to the sophistication (and price) of hydraulic disc brakes! Sometimes a little knowledge really is a dangerous thing.
Last edited by Leisesturm; 07-01-22 at 12:08 AM.
#15
Senior Member
I just picked up a set of XTR 951 V-brakes. They were covered in goo and were sticky inside. So I took the hour per pair and disassembled and serviced these right down to the tiny ball bearings. Felt like watch repair. Now they are smooth as 'butta.
Rarely have I seen a bike part more over-engineered that these. But on a bike they work fantastically, better than any other V-brake or mechanical disc setup I've used.
I think what makes these special are the low-flex forged arms, plus the very low friction due to the ball thrust bearings. But one feature to these is unique: that the arms do not pivot on the frame brake bosses. On most cantis and V's, the arms pivot around the bosses, requiring that these be lubed. Eventually these interfaces wear and the whole system gets sloppy. But on the XTR's, the arms rotate around the thrust bearings. Very cool feature.
My other favorite road compatible V-brakes: TRP 8.4 and 9.0s. Great stoppers.
Rarely have I seen a bike part more over-engineered that these. But on a bike they work fantastically, better than any other V-brake or mechanical disc setup I've used.
I think what makes these special are the low-flex forged arms, plus the very low friction due to the ball thrust bearings. But one feature to these is unique: that the arms do not pivot on the frame brake bosses. On most cantis and V's, the arms pivot around the bosses, requiring that these be lubed. Eventually these interfaces wear and the whole system gets sloppy. But on the XTR's, the arms rotate around the thrust bearings. Very cool feature.
My other favorite road compatible V-brakes: TRP 8.4 and 9.0s. Great stoppers.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,649
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3437 Post(s)
Liked 2,830 Times
in
1,726 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,971
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2475 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
515 Posts
And these as well. The pivot point is around the frame boss. There is an additional pivot point that keeps the brake pad perpendicular to the rim (eliminate? pad dive) otherwise the functioning is conventional. I cannot argue as to the bearings themselves, but even a brass bushing functions as a bearing and is called such. Honestly, cyclists are some of the most contrary individuals on planet earth. Hydraulic discs, four puck (piston) hydraulic discs are mature technology and plenty of you are unimpressed with them(!) and here we are waxing rhapsodic about v-brake technology that is what ... 20? 30? Years old? Maybe that is because many of you are still rocking steel frames with 126mm OLD rear dropout spacing and, of course, no disc caliper mounts of any kind.
#18
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,277
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6148 Post(s)
Liked 4,096 Times
in
2,326 Posts
As I said above, it’s cool design but not nearly stiff enough. The thin arms the pads are mounted on can flex and vibrate leading to brake chatter. The more conventional design where the pads travel in an arc are much more solid and less prone to chatter.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#19
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,277
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6148 Post(s)
Liked 4,096 Times
in
2,326 Posts
And these as well. The pivot point is around the frame boss. There is an additional pivot point that keeps the brake pad perpendicular to the rim (eliminate? pad dive) otherwise the functioning is conventional. I cannot argue as to the bearings themselves, but even a brass bushing functions as a bearing and is called such. Honestly, cyclists are some of the most contrary individuals on planet earth. Hydraulic discs, four puck (piston) hydraulic discs are mature technology and plenty of you are unimpressed with them(!) and here we are waxing rhapsodic about v-brake technology that is what ... 20? 30? Years old? Maybe that is because many of you are still rocking steel frames with 126mm OLD rear dropout spacing and, of course, no disc caliper mounts of any kind.
There’s nothing wrong with riding on old bikes with “no disc caliper mounts of any kind”. Some how those of us riding those kinds of bikes can still stop the bike when and where we want and even enjoy flying down hills at stupid speeds while riding our pre-hydraulic death traps.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,971
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2475 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
515 Posts
You forgot 26” wheel mountain bikes…the horror!!!
There’s nothing wrong with riding on old bikes with “no disc caliper mounts of any kind”. Some how those of us riding those kinds of bikes can still stop the bike when and where we want and even enjoy flying down hills at stupid speeds while riding our pre-hydraulic death traps.
There’s nothing wrong with riding on old bikes with “no disc caliper mounts of any kind”. Some how those of us riding those kinds of bikes can still stop the bike when and where we want and even enjoy flying down hills at stupid speeds while riding our pre-hydraulic death traps.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SFBay
Posts: 2,334
Bikes: n, I would like n+1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 133 Times
in
108 Posts
I also insist on keeping the rim brakes on the back of my tandem as changing to disc (frame and hub capable) would require giving up the oh so useful Arai drum.
#22
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,277
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6148 Post(s)
Liked 4,096 Times
in
2,326 Posts
Nobody is talking about bringing “something from 1984 into the 21st Century”. Linear brakes date to the mid90s and most everything you’ll find from that era is still used as standards today.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,541
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 978 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
395 Posts
I've had my XTR brakes for over 20 years, and they have never squeaked.
They worked well with the STI shifters I had the bike built with. There were "Travel Agents" in the brake lines to adapt the long-pull brakes to the short-pull levers.
When I recently changed the bike over to trekking bars, I was able to use long-pull levers (Paul "Love Levers"). When I took the bike out for a long shake-down ride, I found that the brakes worked markedly better than previously. They felt like disc brakes. Also they did not squeak!
#24
Senior Member
But the XTR brakes are different in that the arms rotate between two rows of thrust bearings. There is no movement or play between the boss and the caliper arms; a superior design.
Shimano's contemporaneous XT and LX para-pull caliper arms do not share this feature.
#25
Junior Member
I liked the parallel push idea (no need to adjust pads as they wear) but it does not have a particularly good reputation. Some of the best seem to be XT BR-M750s which have a different mechanism to most. These give great tyre/mudguard clearance and can be modified to greatly reduce squeal. So far these work great.