Carbon Fiber vs Aluminum and Designated Use riders
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Carbon Fiber vs Aluminum and Designated Use riders
I'm sure Carbon vs Aluminum has come up on this forum, but being new here, I can't find the thread. I'm 64 and have crashed a few times in the last 10 or so years. The last time was this week, and I still don't know how I lost control. But, I bounced back up, checked the bike, carried on. I've always had aluminum bikes and never had a problem. I've been wondering lately if a carbon fiber bike is worth my investment and at the same time, wondering if a clunker like happened 2 days ago would crack a carbon frame? I live in the San Fernando Valley. My usual route is the bike path that stretches from Sherman Oaks west to Canoga Park and north to Granada Hills. Round trip is 30 miles. I was reading the warranty on Piranello's website and it specifically states, "The Products have been designed for specific uses consistent with their characteristics. For example, the racing models will be intended solely to be used on a track or a smooth road, while MTB are intended for outdoor usage on unpaved and/or downhill roads. Therefore, each Product should be used in accordance with its characteristics and structure (“Designated Use”)."
The bike path is part poured and rolled asphalt and part concrete slabs with the inevitable uneven seams. You can't help but hit a bump. There's cracked and uneven spots along the way. Do all manufacturers of carbon fiber bikes have this type of "Designated Use" rider in their warranties? If so, I guess I'll stick to aluminum.
The bike path is part poured and rolled asphalt and part concrete slabs with the inevitable uneven seams. You can't help but hit a bump. There's cracked and uneven spots along the way. Do all manufacturers of carbon fiber bikes have this type of "Designated Use" rider in their warranties? If so, I guess I'll stick to aluminum.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,381
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4387 Post(s)
Liked 4,828 Times
in
2,984 Posts
Watch this video. Spoiler alert: carbon frames are much stronger.
As for disclaimers about intended use, all bike manufacturers state them regardless of frame material. So if you go gap jumping on a road bike and the frame breaks you can’t claim on the warranty.
As for disclaimers about intended use, all bike manufacturers state them regardless of frame material. So if you go gap jumping on a road bike and the frame breaks you can’t claim on the warranty.
Likes For PeteHski:
#3
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
The aluminum frame bend and deformed, while carbon frame shattered and failed catastrophically...I'll stick with aluminum and steel.
#4
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,507
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3657 Post(s)
Liked 5,393 Times
in
2,738 Posts
Welcome to BF! I don't know if carbon fiber frame durability has been discussed here but I expect folks may have opinions. I'd probably prefer steel if I planned to wreck frequently.
Likes For shelbyfv:
#5
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
I was reading the warranty on Piranello's website and it specifically states, "The Products have been designed for specific uses consistent with their characteristics. For example, the racing models will be intended solely to be used on a track or a smooth road, while MTB are intended for outdoor usage on unpaved and/or downhill roads. Therefore, each Product should be used in accordance with its characteristics and structure (“Designated Use”)."
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hollister, CA (not the surf town)
Posts: 1,734
Bikes: 2019 Specialized Roubaix Comp Di2, 2009 Roubaix, early 90's Giant Iguana
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 641 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
549 Posts
At 64 (same age as me) I'd worry more about breaking a hip than the bike. Not sure what kind of crashes you have experienced but if just falling over I would not really worry about either. As was mentioned above, steel is what I'd get if really concerned about it.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
Canyon calls it "Bike Classification" -
https://www.canyon.com/en-us/gravel-...sl-8/2850.html
I bet most bike manufacturers put out this kind of statement to help them battle overly aggressive warranty claims.
Bikes of this category are designed for riding on hard-surface roads where the wheels remain in permanent contact to the ground. These are in general road racing bicycles with racing handlebars or straight handlebars, triathlon or time trial bicycles. The permissible maximum overall weight comprising rider, luggage and bicycle should not exceed 120 kg. Under certain circumstances this permissible maximum weight can be further limited by the component manufacturers’ recommendations for use. Proven cyclocross and gravel bikes with racing handlebars and cantilever or disc brakes are a special case in this category. In addition, these bikes are also suitable for gravel paths and off-road trails where a short loss of tyre contact with the ground due to small stairs or steps at a height of 15 to 20 cm can occur.
I bet most bike manufacturers put out this kind of statement to help them battle overly aggressive warranty claims.
Likes For tyrion:
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Dislocated my shoulder about 8 years ago when I fell. The blood pressure medication I was on lowered it too low, and I blacked out on the bike path. The crash I had this week was minor. Over corrected leaning away from the fence long the bike path while laid out on my aerobars. If I weighed 230 (my weight pre lockdown) rather than 195 (my weight now), I might have broken something.
Likes For mwrider:
#11
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
I have a "pro" lever carbon bike and have put 26,000 miles on it. I ride some MUPs but mostly road. The roads on Long Island are far from pristine with plenty of potholes, patched section and uneven pavement.
I'm 200#, the bike is 14# and i'm 65.
Life is short, buy the bike of your dreams and ride the crap out of it.
BTW... i've you've never watched any of the "cobble" classics such as Paris-Roubaix, take a look at the surfaces they ride.
I'm 200#, the bike is 14# and i'm 65.
Life is short, buy the bike of your dreams and ride the crap out of it.
BTW... i've you've never watched any of the "cobble" classics such as Paris-Roubaix, take a look at the surfaces they ride.
Likes For GlennR:
#12
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
If the weight and ride quality of CF is worth it to you, get it.
I would not worry about crashing it.
I would not worry about crashing it.
Likes For Kapusta:
#13
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,090
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3414 Post(s)
Liked 3,543 Times
in
1,783 Posts
If strength and longevity are the important features, there's no contest.
Carbon fiber beats aluminum every time.
The one weakness of carbon fiber is it doesn't like to be crushed or dented. If you expect to be smashing your frame against rocks, then pick aluminum.
Carbon fiber beats aluminum every time.
The one weakness of carbon fiber is it doesn't like to be crushed or dented. If you expect to be smashing your frame against rocks, then pick aluminum.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Likes For terrymorse:
#15
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Unless there’s some crucial performance advantage that only carbon will give you, I’d stick with metal. It's pretty durable stuff.
Last edited by Rolla; 06-05-21 at 10:53 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,801
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I don’t own carbon, but know enough people with carbon bikes, especially mountain bikes, to not see an issue with the material.
I would be a bit more concerned with the crashes and what geometry would work best for your riding. If the bike doesn’t fit well or isn’t as stable as you want, you need to get a bike that fits your riding now and in the coming years. You don’t need to get a real dog when it comes to performance, but maybe something that won’t be an issue negotiating certain situations.
My Cannondale Criterium has steep angles and it is a blast to ride, but as I’ve gotten older I feel I need to be aware that it is less forgiving and over-correcting can have consequences. I’m not ready to give it up, but the day I do, I’ll be looking for a bike that is more stable.
John
I would be a bit more concerned with the crashes and what geometry would work best for your riding. If the bike doesn’t fit well or isn’t as stable as you want, you need to get a bike that fits your riding now and in the coming years. You don’t need to get a real dog when it comes to performance, but maybe something that won’t be an issue negotiating certain situations.
My Cannondale Criterium has steep angles and it is a blast to ride, but as I’ve gotten older I feel I need to be aware that it is less forgiving and over-correcting can have consequences. I’m not ready to give it up, but the day I do, I’ll be looking for a bike that is more stable.
John
Last edited by 70sSanO; 06-05-21 at 10:32 PM.
#17
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
If CF isn't any more fragile or likely to fail than metal, why all the "Is this scratch/nick/scrape/whatever on my CF bike safe to ride?" threads on BF?
Likes For AlmostTrick:
#18
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Likes For Kapusta:
#19
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,090
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3414 Post(s)
Liked 3,543 Times
in
1,783 Posts
#20
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Likes For Rolla:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,481
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,465 Times
in
1,831 Posts
This is one of those topics where science makes no difference.
Buy whatever you like.
At our age, if you crash hard enough to damage the frame, the real problem is paying for the ambulance and emergency room treatment .... and the cast, the cane, the PT .......
Funny part to me is that we all know a lot of cyclists, and we all know a lot of cyclists who ride CF. Somehow that Actual data pool is ignored so that folks can debate stuff they searched for online to support their prejudices. And then they claim "Science."
Just for kicks watch the F1 race from Baku from 6-6-21. A couple 200-mph crashes .... sadly both drivers walked away uninjured because they foolishly put their faith in carbon fiber.
I weigh about an eighth of a ton---and most of my bikes have 20/24 or 24/28 spoke counts. Everyone says I weigh 70 pounds too much for such low spoke counts. In my ignorance .... I don't have wheel issues nor do I break spokes. if only I understood science better .......
Buy whatever you like.
At our age, if you crash hard enough to damage the frame, the real problem is paying for the ambulance and emergency room treatment .... and the cast, the cane, the PT .......
Funny part to me is that we all know a lot of cyclists, and we all know a lot of cyclists who ride CF. Somehow that Actual data pool is ignored so that folks can debate stuff they searched for online to support their prejudices. And then they claim "Science."
Just for kicks watch the F1 race from Baku from 6-6-21. A couple 200-mph crashes .... sadly both drivers walked away uninjured because they foolishly put their faith in carbon fiber.
I weigh about an eighth of a ton---and most of my bikes have 20/24 or 24/28 spoke counts. Everyone says I weigh 70 pounds too much for such low spoke counts. In my ignorance .... I don't have wheel issues nor do I break spokes. if only I understood science better .......
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,381
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4387 Post(s)
Liked 4,828 Times
in
2,984 Posts
That is simply not true. Regardless of frame material you cannot ride any bike anywhere. In the modern world of litigation all modern bikes come with "designated use" statements. They are usually over-stated, but you can't go riding bikes on terrain way beyond what they were designed for and expect them not to break. This has nothing to do with carbon vs metal frames.
#23
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
806 Posts
Quoting:
"My usual route is the bike path..."
and
"...while laid out on my aerobars."
What the heck? Why in the world would you be riding aero bars on a multi use path? Are you time trialing?
"My usual route is the bike path..."
and
"...while laid out on my aerobars."
What the heck? Why in the world would you be riding aero bars on a multi use path? Are you time trialing?
Likes For Phil_gretz: