Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Best MTB geometry for heavy rider (hardtail)

Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Best MTB geometry for heavy rider (hardtail)

Old 07-30-21, 06:51 AM
  #1  
retrobolted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Best MTB geometry for heavy rider (hardtail)

I'm looking to buy a new hardtail MTB, and am attracted to the Cromag bikes. But I'm not sure their aggressive geometry will work for me (250lbs). I will be mostly riding trails with a little bit of uphill and downhill and roots/rocks, not mainly downhill stuff like the bikes seem designed for. Does anyone have views on whether different geometries matter for large vs small riders? Any tips or info or even speculation very welcome. Thanks!
retrobolted is offline  
Old 08-03-21, 02:27 AM
  #2  
FractalSquirrel
Clydesquirrel
 
FractalSquirrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
If it's the saddle pain that's the issue with an aggressive geometry, and as a heavy rider, I know that saddle and wrist pain only too well, Rans makes the most relaxed geometry mountain bike around, the Alterra.
You can still stand up and ride, unlike on my Rans Cruz, which is strictly a pavement cruiser. It is hard-tail but also hard everything, as there is no suspension whatsoever, but for trail riding, and slower rocks and roots stuff it should be fine.
FractalSquirrel is offline  
Old 08-05-21, 02:37 AM
  #3  
brawlo
Senior Member
 
brawlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,210
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 57 Posts
There’s many aspects to this, but the TLDR is geometry relates to riding style and terrain rather than being a clyde.......unless you’re a tall clyde.

How tall are you? For tall riders, the steep seat tubes and long reach associated with the aggressive geo frames is a godsend. If you’re not that tall then it’s much of a muchness. For the record, I’m a 6’5” clyde and ride a Pole Taival and ride mostly XC style trails. It’s a fantastic bike for anything but tight and flat turns. Everywhere else it is light years ahead of the XC HT I had before. Another bonus of the modern aggressive geo is the ability to run wider tyres on most of them, giving you some nice cushioning assistance.
brawlo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.