Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Garmin Pulse Ox

Old 11-06-21, 12:22 PM
  #1  
NoWhammies
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
NoWhammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993

Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 306 Posts
Garmin Pulse Ox

Are any of you using the Pulse Ox functionality on your Garmin wearable device? Are you gaining any insight or is just another feature to quickly drain the battery?
NoWhammies is offline  
Old 11-08-21, 12:42 PM
  #2  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Garmin originally put a pulse oxygen sensor in their watches for mountain climbers. A Fenix was the first to get this feature, it's marketed as the hiker's watch. Peak bagging is basically a continuum of hiking. People can be affected negatively even at low altitude.

There was a lot of interest in whether blood oxygen saturation could provide early warning for covid infections. The data says not really, it turns out that if your watch does respiration rate that gets you closer to a covid pre "diagnosis."

I'm not sure what other value the data might have?
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-08-21, 02:30 PM
  #3  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
Might be interesting to see if O2 levels are different just before you cramp up from exertion. But so far it's just another number to argue about and possibly keep us from focusing on the correct thing... can you climb that hill quicker or cross the finish line sooner than you did before.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 11-08-21, 05:31 PM
  #4  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
Might be interesting to see if O2 levels are different just before you cramp up from exertion. But so far it's just another number to argue about and possibly keep us from focusing on the correct thing... can you climb that hill quicker or cross the finish line sooner than you did before.
It can't measure when you're on the bike.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-09-21, 09:41 AM
  #5  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
Well there goes any interest for me.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 11-09-21, 11:41 AM
  #6  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
Well there goes any interest for me.
Don't worry, I read it's just another number to argue about. I favor 7.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
Old 11-09-21, 11:46 AM
  #7  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
Don't worry, I read it's just another number to argue about. I favor 7.
Interesting. Why not 42?
Iride01 is offline  
Likes For Iride01:
Old 11-09-21, 12:19 PM
  #8  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Can't tell if serious. 7 is obviously better. Anybody who doesn't prefer 7 eats babies!
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-09-21, 08:49 PM
  #9  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
It can't measure when you're on the bike.
Originally Posted by Iride01
Well there goes any interest for me.
​​​​​​For the record, and getting back to NoWhammies ' question. People who love cycling probably spend 22+ hours in an average day off their bikes. Whether this specific feature (PulseOx) is valuable is the question of this thread. But there's definitely value to cycling in things that happen off the bike, that's the idea behind a lot of the features in these watches.

To answer the question, I have this turned on even though I'm not convinced there's a lot of value in it. I'm a data guy and think that if there's any utility, having a good background measurement will enhance that. And the battery life is pretty incredible these days (F6x) so it's no biggie. 🙂 It agrees within 1% at the doctor's office for what it's worth.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-10-21, 10:08 AM
  #10  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
This is measuring SpO2 or serum O2 isn't it? I've not looked to see what Garmin or any other is actually saying about for any devices they sell that have that feature. This thread was the first I'd heard of what I thought was a wrist worn sporting device.

I'm not sure that it'll show anything useful on a bike either. But who knows, it's something that does slightly peak my interest. But with only a SpO2 range of 95 to 100% saturation being generally considered healthy and anything 93% or less time for thinking about going on O2 or even a respirator I'm skeptical.

Even in my comment about muscle cramps and muscle fatigue I'm doubtful that it'll show anything. I think that is more how fast the muscles can rid themselves of CO2 localized around those specific muscle and not so much a function of the overall saturation levels of all the blood in our system.

I do think it's good for SpO2 to be monitored for overall health if it can be done reasonably. It might alert someone that the nagging cough and congestion in their lungs is a little more serious than just a common cold. I've got one of those pulse oxymeters that clip on a finger tip and it amuses me sometimes to see when it shows low SpO2 as opposed to when I think it should be low. Though that's rare. Usually I'm 98% or better.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 11-10-21, 12:27 PM
  #11  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
The thing in @NoWhammies watch is exactly like the thing you put on your finger, except it's already on, and can take readings throughout the day and night as a result.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-11-21, 03:45 PM
  #12  
NoWhammies
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
NoWhammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993

Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 306 Posts
Thanks for the feedback @Seattle Forrest. According to DC Rainmaker having the PulseOx with the 745 really drains the battery. So for that reason I have it turned off. There is a setting on the watch to have PulseOx come during sleep, which I am thinking of doing. LIke you I am a numbers guy so I think I might find it interesting. At least for a couple of days anyway.
NoWhammies is offline  
Old 11-11-21, 09:09 PM
  #13  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Sleep is probably when that data is most likely to be of use, and when it's best able to measure it. I have an unusual doctor arrangement, I showed her my data and she found it very interesting.

With my watch (so probably yours too) you can go into watch mode while an activity is recording, and you can take a manual Pulse Ox reading any time you like to in the widget. So if you're hiking in the Bugaboos, you can take a data point when you stop for pictures and lunch, still have data when it's relevant (because you're at altitude) without paying too much battery for it.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-12-21, 09:40 AM
  #14  
NoWhammies
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
NoWhammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993

Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 306 Posts
I did some Google searching about the whole Garmin PulseOx thing. Consensus seemed to be that if you are changing altitudes, then the PulseOx feature is of use. But if you're sticking to the same altitude a lot of the time, then the feature might not yield as much useful information. I am still thinking of turning it on for sleeping. If only because it is more information to play with.
NoWhammies is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.