Lightweight vintage mtb?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
Lightweight vintage mtb?
So I built up this winter commuter with a generic steel 90s (I assume) mtb frame. It replaced a Jamis Exile, which was pretty nice but a bit too small. The current steed is one heavy-a$$ ride. While my commute is short, and it’s unclear how much commuting I’ll actually be doing in the new year, I’d still like to build up something that uses these parts, but is lighter and has a lower BB. Does such a beast exist? Should I be looking at old Cannondales or other alu frames? A larger Jamis? Should I ditch the 559 wheels and find a Trek hybrid or some such?
Likes For nlerner:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Does weight matter that much? I don't worry much about the weight. This bike has a quality frame and parts which means that the weight can't be too bad.
That said, there is a fair amount of variation in terms of weight on production vintage MTBS. I like vintage MTBs and I have four that I ride on a regular basis. My lightest ones have prestige tubing. My 1993 Bridgestone MB 1 weighs in at 26 lbs; my 1992 Specialized Stumpjumper weighs 27 lbs. Neither bike is kitted out as a commuter though.
My commuter is a late 80s Specialized Stumpjumper Comp and it must weigh a bit north of 30 lbs.
That said, there is a fair amount of variation in terms of weight on production vintage MTBS. I like vintage MTBs and I have four that I ride on a regular basis. My lightest ones have prestige tubing. My 1993 Bridgestone MB 1 weighs in at 26 lbs; my 1992 Specialized Stumpjumper weighs 27 lbs. Neither bike is kitted out as a commuter though.
My commuter is a late 80s Specialized Stumpjumper Comp and it must weigh a bit north of 30 lbs.
Last edited by bikemig; 12-25-20 at 06:41 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Alabama
Posts: 519
Bikes: Konas: Jake the Snake-Fire Mountain-Zing Supreme, Dew Deluxe,Zone Ltd. (frame, needs parts), Surly Long Haul Trucker, Santana Arriva tandem, Montagues: Paratrooper-Fit, Trek 1200, Bianchi Ocelot, Fantom Cross Uno, Bridgestone 200
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
122 Posts
I think my old Cannondale M500 would be a pretty light utility bike, though I built it a little heavy.
Frame is just a little small for me, though, and I've got the components in mind for another project.
Frame is just a little small for me, though, and I've got the components in mind for another project.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,024 Times
in
723 Posts
The frame isn't going to be a big part of the weight, even a lighter older frame will only drop a couple lbs off at best, my old 90s c-dale came with a steel fork and wasn't all that light. But looking at your build there's nothing light about it. Nice looking and well equipped as far as being a commuter, doesn't look like there'd be anything on there that would fail or not serve its purpose well, but nothing that looks all that light to really build a lighter bike. From the amount of stem showing another size larger frame might not be a bad idea though that won't help in the weight department but it would get the stem a little further in the headtube and the seatpost still has plenty of length showing so you'd still have plenty of adjustability if you needed.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: se MIch.
Posts: 2,309
Bikes: 1938 claud butler,1983 Basso,teledyne titan,teocali super,nrs,1993 stumpjumper fsr,Paramountain,Paramount Buell(sold),4 banger,Zaskar LE,Colnago Master Ibex MTB,1987ish,.etc....
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 802 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times
in
1,497 Posts
light weight.
maxxis 2.35 tires? they appear north of 600g's. each? if seeking lighter try 1.95's & still have enough sidewall to absorb potholes.cro-mo steel or mild steel?
Likes For '02 nrs:
#6
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
The 1990s Kona Lava Dome Race Light weighed around 25 lbs, not bad for a steel frame mountain bike. A change from knobbies to street-friendly tires would save a little weight.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,109
Bikes: Trek 800 x 2, Schwinn Heavy Duti, Schwinn Traveler, Schwinn Le Tour Luxe, Schwinn Continental, Cannondale M400 and Lambert, Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 809 Post(s)
Liked 1,022 Times
in
665 Posts
That looks like a great commuter set up. When I started commuting again on Long Island I used my bike with 700c wheels. The potholes, irregularities and garbage in the road caused me to rethink and use my 90's Trek 800 mountain bike. The mountain bike was heavier, but took everything in stride. I put smooth tires on it but kept the flat bars.
One of the big advantages of 559 wheels is that they are strong. Really strong. The only thing stronger is BMX wheels.
I wouldn't change a thing. Ok, maybe skinner tires, but I believe you got those for the ride and I would be inclined to think that that may be a good way to go especially if you are seeking more comfort.
In fact, one of my thoughts while I was commuting is that a suspension fork with only a little bit of travel would be a good way to take some of the jolts out of the ride. But fat tires might be a better way to go.
The fact that it is non-descript frame is a plus as far as I'm concerned.
One of the big advantages of 559 wheels is that they are strong. Really strong. The only thing stronger is BMX wheels.
I wouldn't change a thing. Ok, maybe skinner tires, but I believe you got those for the ride and I would be inclined to think that that may be a good way to go especially if you are seeking more comfort.
In fact, one of my thoughts while I was commuting is that a suspension fork with only a little bit of travel would be a good way to take some of the jolts out of the ride. But fat tires might be a better way to go.
The fact that it is non-descript frame is a plus as far as I'm concerned.
#8
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southeastern,VA
Posts: 310
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times
in
22 Posts
I think much will boil down to the frame and/or tires. I’ve not fully delved in to the supple tire business, but I do recall going from schwalbe marathons to pastela tour guard (both 1.5”) and noticing a good difference. Switching to the non-belted 1.75 pastela yielded even better results.
along the same lines, I had a 26” surly long haul trucker built with heavy duty tires and found the ride completely dead and uninspiring.
Flopping parts to an 80s Schwinn high Sierra seemed a bit better. The jump to an even higher quality frame from there (and where I’ve landed) have an even more inspiring ride.
along the same lines, I had a 26” surly long haul trucker built with heavy duty tires and found the ride completely dead and uninspiring.
Flopping parts to an 80s Schwinn high Sierra seemed a bit better. The jump to an even higher quality frame from there (and where I’ve landed) have an even more inspiring ride.
#9
Not lost wanderer.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,328
Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 990 Times
in
522 Posts
While not a MTB, it was a hybrid from Japan. I had a local welder reposition the cable stops and came up with this.
It is running 1x9 Shimano and could benefit from a clutch derailleur.
3x7 hybrid with Canti brakes
Setup as a SS
3x9 MTB that developed rust issues under the paint.
Stripped and rebuilt to 1x9
It is running 1x9 Shimano and could benefit from a clutch derailleur.
3x7 hybrid with Canti brakes
Setup as a SS
3x9 MTB that developed rust issues under the paint.
Stripped and rebuilt to 1x9
Last edited by bwilli88; 12-25-20 at 10:30 PM.
#10
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times
in
176 Posts
After looking at the photo of your bike, the frame is probably the lightest part. You have every heavy bolt-on I can think of aside from a rack? Is that front hub a generator?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Ritchey P-23
you will need to Pay though
you will need to Pay though
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
Clearly, we have a difference of opinion as to what's best for urban winter commuting.
I think one problem is that my longest trip so far with this bike was 20 miles to Costco and back, hauling my two-wheel Burley trailer. For my very short commute, I probably won't even notice the weight, right? Even though I did commute on it once last week, and, well, that's what prompted me to start this thread.
Thanks for the suggestions, all.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,704
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 2,010 Times
in
1,109 Posts
Keep your eyes open for a Prestige tubing bike. My Alpina Team was lighter than my Stumpjumper.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
nlerner , I just weighed my MTBs. My late 80s Stumpjumper Comp commuter with fenders, rack, and pump weighs a bit under 33 lbs. It has double butted chrome moly tubing. My 1992 Stumpjumper with Prestige tubing weighs 27.75 lbs but it doesn't have a rack and fenders. That's 5 lbs weight difference.
The commuter has heavier tires, so the additional weight of the tires, rack, and fenders is right around 3.5 lbs. So call the weight difference between the 2 stumpjumpers at right around 1.5 lbs (5 minus 3.5). Honestly that seems like a lot just based on frame tubing but I always thought the late 80s Stumpjumper Comp was a bit heavy and overbuilt.
1992 Stumpjumper
Late 80s Stumpjumper Comp Commuter
The commuter has heavier tires, so the additional weight of the tires, rack, and fenders is right around 3.5 lbs. So call the weight difference between the 2 stumpjumpers at right around 1.5 lbs (5 minus 3.5). Honestly that seems like a lot just based on frame tubing but I always thought the late 80s Stumpjumper Comp was a bit heavy and overbuilt.
1992 Stumpjumper
Late 80s Stumpjumper Comp Commuter
Last edited by bikemig; 12-26-20 at 12:32 PM.
Likes For bikemig:
#15
RUSA #3100
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon City
Posts: 836
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 505 Times
in
181 Posts
I was just thinking that "light weight" and "commuter" are rarely used in the same sentence.
__________________
https://utahrandonneur.wordpress.com
https://utahrandonneur.wordpress.com
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times
in
422 Posts
Finding a low bottom bracket on a Mountain Frame is kind of a trick. I have a Bridgestone CB-1 "City Bike" that has a lower bottom bracket height, and combined with 175mm cranks feels pretty low. I've got he 2.10 Maxis tire under fenders and could tell I was higher when I sized up from 1.9 slicks. I have a nicer 170mm triple that is going on at some point. I hope they don't make the bike feel any higher.
Now, me being me, the bike has another 25 ponds of stuff tacked on so not a light weight. I don't know any specifics, but I would suggest checking out some of the frames that where marketed as city bikes, like the Specialized City Stomper or the Trek 890.
Now, me being me, the bike has another 25 ponds of stuff tacked on so not a light weight. I don't know any specifics, but I would suggest checking out some of the frames that where marketed as city bikes, like the Specialized City Stomper or the Trek 890.
Last edited by bark_eater; 12-27-20 at 07:58 AM.
Likes For bark_eater:
#17
PM me your cotters
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,241
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1137 Post(s)
Liked 590 Times
in
422 Posts
I'd been wanting to build up a lightweight gravel bike with similar frame. For many years I've kept eyes out for a larger 60cm Cannondale ST framesets, maybe one of their ATBs? Cannondale, Klein, GT, Giant and others were making alloy framesets in the 90s but I've had a tough tie finding anything worthwhile all these years. I'm sure there were probably others out there I'm missing.
Will be interested in following this thread, see where it lands.
Will be interested in following this thread, see where it lands.
__________________
███████████████
███████████████
Last edited by francophile; 01-20-21 at 01:18 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
I took the winter commuter out for some errand running this afternoon and pondered some possibilities while not particularly enjoying the ride. Perhaps one problem is that my current road bike of choice is a sub-20lb titanium rig with 38mm tires. Perhaps I just don't like the geometry/ride qualities of MTBs refashioned as upright (or flat) bar commuters. I've tried several over the years, some reasonably decent ones, including a Ritchey Ascent that I even put some high-zoot Compass tires on, but it didn't really do it for me. I have road bikes in various configurations I could repurpose. I have a couple of sets of Schwalbe Marathon Winter tires in 700 x 35mm that do reasonably well in ice/snow. I also have my gugicafizioned '71 Raleigh Int'l, currently with 650B x 42 Soma Cazadera tires, which work quite well in snow--though winter commuting in the Boston area is really hard on a bike, particularly given the constant brine of road salt and slush, and I don't want to abuse that bike more than I already do. I have a fairly rusty Lemond Tourmalet on the indoor trainer that could likely take 650b x 38mm wheels, maybe even 42mm. Hmm.
#20
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
That’s a nice winter commuter bike, so nice that I think I might like to imitate it.
But you’re saying you just don’t like it. Is it possible that the position doesn’t suit you? Or could it be that the cranks are too long? I never got comfortable with 175mm cranks.
I just picked up an old Trek 800 that’s probably too big for me. Let me know if this sounds interesting.
But you’re saying you just don’t like it. Is it possible that the position doesn’t suit you? Or could it be that the cranks are too long? I never got comfortable with 175mm cranks.
I just picked up an old Trek 800 that’s probably too big for me. Let me know if this sounds interesting.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Likes For noglider:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
My 18" 92 Stumpjumper Comp comes in at 23.33 lbs with pedals, which I think is a decent weight for a MTB not trying to be light. An 18" 94 Prestige S-Works came in at 22.6lbs w/o pedals so its not terrible.
Weight is relative though, I am skinny and weak, and live in a 6Fl walkup , so its about 3 lbs over what I would like. I have some lighter MTBs, old Cannondales are cheap and light right off the bat (stock M500 = 23lbs)
Lower BB was a west coast thing (fire roads), east coast bikes had higher BBs (woods). Specialized is known for a lower BB, Cannondale for tall BBs - Beast of the East being an extreme example.
If you want racks and fenders, many race bikes like the P-23 will be more challenging to adapt those to as many lack eyelets.
92 Stumpjumper Comp
23lbs 5oz
Weight is relative though, I am skinny and weak, and live in a 6Fl walkup , so its about 3 lbs over what I would like. I have some lighter MTBs, old Cannondales are cheap and light right off the bat (stock M500 = 23lbs)
Lower BB was a west coast thing (fire roads), east coast bikes had higher BBs (woods). Specialized is known for a lower BB, Cannondale for tall BBs - Beast of the East being an extreme example.
If you want racks and fenders, many race bikes like the P-23 will be more challenging to adapt those to as many lack eyelets.
92 Stumpjumper Comp
23lbs 5oz
Likes For DorkDisk:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,780
Bikes: Numerous
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1677 Post(s)
Liked 3,097 Times
in
913 Posts
If you want to experiment some more, maybe you could look at a cyclocross frame. You probably wouldn’t be able to fit the balloon tires though. I’d lean toward an aluminum frame for regular commuting on salted roads, but you, fortunately, have more experience in that. Trek XO1 and Specialized TriCross were the common aluminum models and the Trek has dropout eyelets.
__________________
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
#23
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times
in
491 Posts
Perhaps I just don't like the geometry/ride qualities of MTBs refashioned as upright (or flat) bar commuters. I've tried several over the years, some reasonably decent ones, including a Ritchey Ascent that I even put some high-zoot Compass tires on, but it didn't really do it for me.
I have two (well technically three now that I built up a fat bike) commuters up here in the mountains of MT. My commute is just under 2 miles one way over mostly residential streets but with a 1/4 of it on various types of gravel. I see a lot of snow packed and icy conditions over the winter, so commuter #1 can’t get the job done.
1) ‘83 Stumpjumper Sport with fenders and a front rack w/basket. Pretty much stock and heavy. It fits me well (an ‘84 Ross Mt Hood does not - not all UJBs have the same geometry). I run Rene Herse Rat Trap Pass tires and they were a revelation for me in comfort on gravel roads, bike weight be damned. It literally feels like the bike is floating. I’ve commuted and explored over 1000 miles on that bike this year and loved every mile of it.
2) ‘05 Fiji Monterey 2.0. Aluminum, upright beast (almost like I’m standing up when I pedal) that weights more than the Stumpy. But I couldn’t give a rip about what the salt does to it. Set up 1x9, outfitted with a rear rack, fenders and some cheap studded tires. The word supple could only be used near these tires if I was fixing a flat after immediately after having a manicure. But those tires cut through light snow like a hot knife through... snow, handle glare ice confidently (nothing will ever make ice feel like pavement) and the geometry + upright position make recovery from little slips and slides fairly quick. (I’m also less likely to go down on a shoulder like when I’m riding a drop bar bike.) Most of my weight is over the rear tire so I get very good traction. I rode home through a snow storm the other night and for some reason couldn’t stop giggling all the way home (maybe life was getting a bit too stressful...).
That’s a long way of saying that everybody’s mileage will vary, but if you don’t feel comfortable on a bike, I don’t think it’s the bike’s weight that is causing the problem - it’s fit.
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
#24
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,858
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,923 Times
in
1,491 Posts
As others have noted you can certainly get a lighter better quality of frame, it is just a matter of how much you care to spend. But a lighter high end MTB frame is likely have just as high if not a slightly higher BB shell. Higher end bikes are all about performance and an extra 3-6mm of BB height can mean the difference between cleaning an obstacle or not/
How long is your commute? Unless you lie in downtown Hooterville or Kabul you can, as others again mentioned sae considerable weight with different tires. If your only going a few miles on relatively smooth road a Paselea 1.75 tire will be much lighter and likely give you just as smooth a ride.
Ditching the Dynamo hub in favor a rechargeable LED light will same a few grams too.
Do you really need that giant seat bag?
How long is your commute? Unless you lie in downtown Hooterville or Kabul you can, as others again mentioned sae considerable weight with different tires. If your only going a few miles on relatively smooth road a Paselea 1.75 tire will be much lighter and likely give you just as smooth a ride.
Ditching the Dynamo hub in favor a rechargeable LED light will same a few grams too.
Do you really need that giant seat bag?
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#25
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times
in
491 Posts
What a silly question! Actually, it should be ditched for a front rack and basket combo!
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
Likes For mountaindave: