Park Tool BBT-69.2 or BBT-9 for external lockrings?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,955
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 873 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
Park Tool BBT-69.2 or BBT-9 for external lockrings?
One of my bikes came with a DT Swiss wheelset that uses external lockrings for the disc rotors. I was thinking of getting the Park Tool BBT-69.2, but I'd need to buy a ratchet or breaker bar since I have neither. Would the BBT-9 be fine instead?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
92 Posts
You might want to send your query to Park Tool. I've asked them technical questions such as yours and they've responded pretty quickly. Best to hear the answer directly from them.
Likes For MudPie:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,955
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 873 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
I know the BBT-9 can be used on the same 16t external lockrings, it's more that I don't know whether buying it will make me regret not going with the more expensive version that allows for the use of ratchet and torque wrenches. Do people tend to precisely torque their lockrings or just go on feel?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SFBay
Posts: 2,334
Bikes: n, I would like n+1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 133 Times
in
108 Posts
I can’t say that I’ve ever torqued a lock ring, but that has more to do with not owning any torque tools for long enough that I got a decent feel for it.
Looking online those two are the same price, and I consider a breaker bar to be a standard tool worth owning. While not needed a long lever, used responsibly, is really nice sometimes. It looks like to socket version takes up less space too. Having your load application offset from the handle has pluses and minuses depending on the circumstances.
Looking online those two are the same price, and I consider a breaker bar to be a standard tool worth owning. While not needed a long lever, used responsibly, is really nice sometimes. It looks like to socket version takes up less space too. Having your load application offset from the handle has pluses and minuses depending on the circumstances.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I use a torque wrench to tighten both disc rotor and cassette lockrings since the specified 40 -50 N-m is more torque than most people think and I already have suitable torque wrenches. That said, as long as you get them "very tight" it's probably adequate to go by feel. 3/8"-sq drive and 1/2"-sq drive breaker bars don't have to be expensive and I found mine used at local flea markets for less than $10/each for good brand names. Even Harbour Freight tools are adequate quality for this use.
#6
Senior Member
Might as well get the newly released Park BBT-69.3. It allows you to use it with the (also) new Park BBT-RS Bottom Bracket Tool Retaining System.
BBT-69.3
Pros:
- all aluminum, so it doesn't mar the BB's external surfaces (more relevant if BB is colour anodized).
- 3/8" square drive for rachets, torque wrenches, and breaker bars
Cons:
- if you use a breaker bar, the stress will make the square 3/8" aluminum hole into a non-square hole
BBT-9
Pros:
- steel, so wears well
Cons:
- since it doesn't cup over the entire BB, easier to slip and mar the bike frame
- relatively short lever handle
- can't use a breaker bar or torque wrench
I had both; sold both and now use the Cyclus Snap.in system. But then I run a shop; for most people the BBT-69.3 is fine (or get a BBT-69.2 cheap from someone upgrading to a BBT-69.3)
BBT-69.3
Pros:
- all aluminum, so it doesn't mar the BB's external surfaces (more relevant if BB is colour anodized).
- 3/8" square drive for rachets, torque wrenches, and breaker bars
Cons:
- if you use a breaker bar, the stress will make the square 3/8" aluminum hole into a non-square hole
BBT-9
Pros:
- steel, so wears well
Cons:
- since it doesn't cup over the entire BB, easier to slip and mar the bike frame
- relatively short lever handle
- can't use a breaker bar or torque wrench
I had both; sold both and now use the Cyclus Snap.in system. But then I run a shop; for most people the BBT-69.3 is fine (or get a BBT-69.2 cheap from someone upgrading to a BBT-69.3)
#7
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,516
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4352 Post(s)
Liked 3,989 Times
in
2,663 Posts
Might as well get the newly released Park BBT-69.3. It allows you to use it with the (also) new Park BBT-RS Bottom Bracket Tool Retaining System.
BBT-69.3
Pros:
- all aluminum, so it doesn't mar the BB's external surfaces (more relevant if BB is colour anodized).
- 3/8" square drive for rachets, torque wrenches, and breaker bars
Cons:
- if you use a breaker bar, the stress will make the square 3/8" aluminum hole into a non-square hole
BBT-9
Pros:
- steel, so wears well
Cons:
- since it doesn't cup over the entire BB, easier to slip and mar the bike frame
- relatively short lever handle
- can't use a breaker bar or torque wrench
I had both; sold both and now use the Cyclus Snap.in system. But then I run a shop; for most people the BBT-69.3 is fine (or get a BBT-69.2 cheap from someone upgrading to a BBT-69.3)
BBT-69.3
Pros:
- all aluminum, so it doesn't mar the BB's external surfaces (more relevant if BB is colour anodized).
- 3/8" square drive for rachets, torque wrenches, and breaker bars
Cons:
- if you use a breaker bar, the stress will make the square 3/8" aluminum hole into a non-square hole
BBT-9
Pros:
- steel, so wears well
Cons:
- since it doesn't cup over the entire BB, easier to slip and mar the bike frame
- relatively short lever handle
- can't use a breaker bar or torque wrench
I had both; sold both and now use the Cyclus Snap.in system. But then I run a shop; for most people the BBT-69.3 is fine (or get a BBT-69.2 cheap from someone upgrading to a BBT-69.3)
BBRT is actually pretty neat, I am surprised I missed that one it actually looks to be quite handy. Didn't need more tools but I will put that on the list.
For the OP BBT-69.3 or a similar Abbey or other quality tool certainly would be the way to go.