True vintage routing for non-aero brake cables
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 10,303
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
33 Posts
True vintage routing for non-aero brake cables
What is the "proper" ( i.e., vintage) way of routing (non-aero) brake cables?
Should they route ahead of, or behind the handle bars?
I have seen them both ways in old catalogs - so I take it even the manufacturers were confused,
but there must be a right way and a wrong way (unless of course you are some sort of a bicycle nihilist).
Should they route ahead of, or behind the handle bars?
I have seen them both ways in old catalogs - so I take it even the manufacturers were confused,
but there must be a right way and a wrong way (unless of course you are some sort of a bicycle nihilist).
#3
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
Vintage Trek routed them both behind the bars as well. The first brochure on the vintage Trek site with pictures is the 1982 one. I have done it both ways (I need to be more consistent).
#4
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
I think it depends on the length of the stem. With a short stem, you often have to go under / in front of the bar for the rear brake, so you do the same for the front.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,146
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3804 Post(s)
Liked 6,643 Times
in
2,602 Posts
I think it also depends on whether you're running side-pull or center-pull brakes.
Neal
Neal
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Medford, OR
Posts: 308
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know for sure which way to do it. but I also find stem length to be the factor. If you have a long stem and you run the front brake in front of it, the cable has to bend more then it needs too. If you have a short stem it will be in the way of your center hand position.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,214 Times
in
1,103 Posts
The right way is with the minimum of resistance the internal cable will experience. I thought you were going to go to which side the front brake should be on! Oh, there is a thread on that already!
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 10,303
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
33 Posts
I don't know for sure which way to do it. but I also find stem length to be the factor. If you have a long stem and you run the front brake in front of it, the cable has to bend more then it needs too. If you have a short stem it will be in the way of your center hand position.
Good points - though it seems the vast majority of the bikes I acquire are routed ahead of the bars, regardless of the stem length, side pull, or center pull...
But I just as arbitrarily route them behind the bars every time, which also can be a little more unrestrained. (Maybe that's why some of the older bikes routed this way included a cable clip, to tie the two housings together above the stem.)
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,141
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Classic, 1984 Schwinn LeTour, 1998 Gary Fisher Marlin, 1969 Hercules, 1977 Sekai 5000 Superlite, 1993 Koga-Myata TerraLiner, 2013 Trek Farley.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mine go behind like Eddy's and that is how I see most pictures.
Aside from the quest for vintage truth, I like it that way for an unintended, purely practical reason:
When I put the bike in my car, I take off the front wheel and lie the bike on its left side, handlebars turned 90 degrees to the right so they are facing up.
The behind-the-bars front brake cable routing acts as a stop that prevents the bars from dinging the top tube.
Aside from the quest for vintage truth, I like it that way for an unintended, purely practical reason:
When I put the bike in my car, I take off the front wheel and lie the bike on its left side, handlebars turned 90 degrees to the right so they are facing up.
The behind-the-bars front brake cable routing acts as a stop that prevents the bars from dinging the top tube.
#13
Who cares, just ride it!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 989
Bikes: 1992ish Davidson Impulse, 1981 Apollo Gran Sport SS, 2006 Salsa Las Cruces, 2010 Soma Double Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Always behind the bar for me.
Also, not like in the Eddy picture. I route the rear cable (if it's on the right side lever) on the right side of the stem. By doing this, the two cables never touch each other and it avoids the little kink that can occur at the lever ferrule. Mind you, this is only practical if the frame has the cable guides on top.
Also, not like in the Eddy picture. I route the rear cable (if it's on the right side lever) on the right side of the stem. By doing this, the two cables never touch each other and it avoids the little kink that can occur at the lever ferrule. Mind you, this is only practical if the frame has the cable guides on top.
Last edited by Antipodes; 12-17-09 at 08:29 PM.
#15
Bottecchia fan
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
Always behind the bar for me.
Also, not like in the Eddy picture. I route the rear cable (if it's on the right side lever) on the right side of the stem. By doing this, the two cables never touch each other and it avoids the little kink that can occur at the lever ferrule. Mind you, this is only practical if the frame has the cable guides on top.
Also, not like in the Eddy picture. I route the rear cable (if it's on the right side lever) on the right side of the stem. By doing this, the two cables never touch each other and it avoids the little kink that can occur at the lever ferrule. Mind you, this is only practical if the frame has the cable guides on top.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
#16
sultan of schwinn
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
9 Posts
Not a right or a wrong way, just what works. Ergo:
one over, one under
both under
I think that it is more of a personal preference (and pretty much every bike repair manual I read, states it as this). Mine is over the bars but with as short loops as I can get away with (because there is an aerobar there usually and having my nose rubbing on cables, would bug me ).
one over, one under
both under
I think that it is more of a personal preference (and pretty much every bike repair manual I read, states it as this). Mine is over the bars but with as short loops as I can get away with (because there is an aerobar there usually and having my nose rubbing on cables, would bug me ).
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Lay them out. Play with them a bit. You'll see which is the best way. It depends upon a few things like stem length and location of the cable clamps, etc.
I will admit, that on all of my bikes with side pull brakes, they both went behind the bars,... just like Eddie's. Hey, he copied me!
#18
Rustbelt Rider
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
177 Posts
That Bianchi just looks strange to me. Which ever way they go, at least do both the same!
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 744
Bikes: Too many to list, all titanium or steel.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
The original routing on this bike (with bar-end shifters and cantilever brakes) was one in front (the rear brake), and the other behind the bar (the most direct way for the cable to drop right down into the stem mounted cable stop above the front brake). I used the same routing when I redid the cables.
I originally thought it looked funny too, but is seems the least restrictive.
CMC
I originally thought it looked funny too, but is seems the least restrictive.
CMC
#21
Senior Member
The original routing on this bike (with bar-end shifters and cantilever brakes) was one in front (the rear brake), and the other behind the bar (the most direct way for the cable to drop right down into the stem mounted cable stop above the front brake). I used the same routing when I redid the cables.
I originally thought it looked funny too, but is seems the least restrictive.
CMC
I originally thought it looked funny too, but is seems the least restrictive.
CMC
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 744
Bikes: Too many to list, all titanium or steel.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Yes they are the Velo Orange Elkhide. I love them and now that I've learned how to install them (the first side took about an hour, the second half that) I'm seriously considering putting them on my next keeper. I'll probably go for black just to see how that looks.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,749 Times
in
937 Posts
The where do the brake cable go has been a dilemma for me for a long time. I ensure that I do what I can to reduce friction between the cable and casing by making the casing as short as possible and with a few bends as possible. And any bends must be as gradual as possible. However...
Aesthetics are also important to me. I want to see some symmetry in cable appearance, not like the picture of the Bianchi. That is about the worst looking cable location I can recall, but that is just me expressing an opinion. Anyway, I try to set the height and loop of my cables to look the same.
And, to this day, I do not understand why some people want the front brake lever on the right with the rear lever on the left**********??
Aesthetics are also important to me. I want to see some symmetry in cable appearance, not like the picture of the Bianchi. That is about the worst looking cable location I can recall, but that is just me expressing an opinion. Anyway, I try to set the height and loop of my cables to look the same.
And, to this day, I do not understand why some people want the front brake lever on the right with the rear lever on the left**********??
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The where do the brake cable go has been a dilemma for me for a long time. I ensure that I do what I can to reduce friction between the cable and casing by making the casing as short as possible and with a few bends as possible. And any bends must be as gradual as possible. However...
Aesthetics are also important to me. I want to see some symmetry in cable appearance, not like the picture of the Bianchi. That is about the worst looking cable location I can recall, but that is just me expressing an opinion. Anyway, I try to set the height and loop of my cables to look the same.
And, to this day, I do not understand why some people want the front brake lever on the right with the rear lever on the left**********??
Aesthetics are also important to me. I want to see some symmetry in cable appearance, not like the picture of the Bianchi. That is about the worst looking cable location I can recall, but that is just me expressing an opinion. Anyway, I try to set the height and loop of my cables to look the same.
And, to this day, I do not understand why some people want the front brake lever on the right with the rear lever on the left**********??
It's quite unusual to see the front brake connected to the left lever here.