Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Closely-spaced ratios = quicker shift?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Closely-spaced ratios = quicker shift?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-21, 05:36 PM
  #101  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
If there's one thing that really ruins a good ride, it's having your heart explode.
Tell me about it - happens to me all the time.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 03-13-21, 05:47 PM
  #102  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times in 2,946 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
Tell me about it - happens to me all the time.
I hate it when that happens.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 03-15-21, 01:15 AM
  #103  
Ataylor
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
​​​​​​It's definitely noticeable. I guess it's like a really red jersey, some people will think it's tacky, some will notice and not care, some even prefer it. You notice if you don't have a high or low enough gear too, so the question is which one is going to bother you more? 🙂
Gotcha! Thanks. 🙂
Originally Posted by WhyFi
This may help or it may muddy the waters, but...

To go a given speed, you need to output a specific amount of power. To put out that specific amount of power is a balancing act between torque and cadence - you can go with low cadence and high torque or high cadence and low torque or mix of the two anywhere in between. More or less, high torque taxes the legs more whereas high cadence taxes the cardiovascular more.

Gaps in gearing are problematic when you're at high power output and you can't quite find the ideal balance - legs can't sustain on one cog and heart will explode on the other. In that type of situation, you just can't quite maintain that specific power, which means that you can't quite maintain that given speed, which is when you drop off your desired pace and you watch your PR or your group ride slip off beyond your reach.
It does help. More so on an intellectual level than experiential, since I neither race nor do I go on group rides. I mean I think I always knew deep down that this sport was complex and didn't simply involve sitting on a bike and pedaling fast, but it's still somewhat surprising to me that such a small gap between cogs can affect someone significantly enough to leave them trailing behind their group. I might just have to join a group one day - at least until I hit the 17th cog on my 11/28 - just to see (from behind, of course) what all the fuss is really about.
Ataylor is offline  
Likes For Ataylor:
Old 03-15-21, 09:57 AM
  #104  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by Ataylor
Gotcha! Thanks. 🙂
It does help. More so on an intellectual level than experiential, since I neither race nor do I go on group rides. I mean I think I always knew deep down that this sport was complex and didn't simply involve sitting on a bike and pedaling fast, but it's still somewhat surprising to me that such a small gap between riders can affect someone significantly enough to leave them trailing behind their group. I might just have to join a group one day - at least until I hit the 17th cog on my 11/28 - just to see (from behind, of course) what all the fuss is really about.

FIFY
woodcraft is offline  
Old 03-15-21, 11:08 AM
  #105  
Ataylor
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by woodcraft
FIFY
If I understand you correctly, SoSmellyAir mentioned that above, about how some have a more broad power band that can handle wider cadences without worry. For the rest of us, however? A bike bar in one hand and binoculars in the other comes to mind. Or at least that seems to be the conventional wisdom around here.
Ataylor is offline  
Old 03-15-21, 11:26 AM
  #106  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by Ataylor
...but it's still somewhat surprising to me that such a small gap between cogs can affect someone significantly enough to leave them trailing behind their group. I might just have to join a group one day - at least until I hit the 17th cog on my 11/28 - just to see (from behind, of course) what all the fuss is really about.
To be clear, it's a small difference, but it's a small difference that can make a big difference in the right situation. Think about being 2 seconds slower over a quarter of a mile - that's not much at all, right? But at the same time, it's enough that you could lose the wheel of the person in front of you, which means that you lose a good chunk of the benefit of their draft, which means that you're going to slow down even more because you're going to see increased wind resistance, which is going to open the gap between you and them even more, which means even more resistance, etc, etc.

If you don't ride in situations like that or if you're stronger than the people that you ride with, or if you're not looking to squeak out long-standing PRs, etc, then all of this means pretty much squat.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 03-15-21, 12:27 PM
  #107  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by Ataylor
If I understand you correctly, SoSmellyAir mentioned that above, about how some have a more broad power band that can handle wider cadences without worry. For the rest of us, however? A bike bar in one hand and binoculars in the other comes to mind. Or at least that seems to be the conventional wisdom around here.
Riding closely behind others can reduce the effort needed by up to 1/3 because of less wind resistance & the faster the speed, the more it matters. In groups, riders commonly take turns at the front and then rest at the back of the group, so the group as a whole can go faster than the individuals can.

Falling behind the group by just a few bike lengths at >20mph can lead to losing the group and it's advantage entirely. This is where having just the right gear ratio matters, being able to keep up at crucial moments.

For the bar & binoculars scenario, having a bike with nice slack geometry for no-hands riding is most important, IMO.
woodcraft is offline  
Likes For woodcraft:
Old 03-15-21, 02:55 PM
  #108  
Ataylor
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
If you don't ride in situations like that or if you're stronger than the people that you ride with, or if you're not looking to squeak out long-standing PRs, etc, then all of this means pretty much squat.
I mean I started this thread to see whether or not I would feel a tangible difference between cassettes, not for racing purposes, and was told that I would. In my mind, I felt like the overall ride would be more enjoyable (subjective, I know) if the shifting was actually smoother (or, less disruptive, as HTupolev put it). I'm looking at this whole thing through the lens of a very inexperienced worldview. I didn't know what cog meant two weeks ago. In all honesty, I'm still not sure if I'm using the right word. I also didn't know my cassette was an 11/32 until two weeks ago. I just ride my bike. That's it. So if any of this turns out to be true? Great. If not? So be it. I'll use the information I gathered from you guys for any group rides I may be a part of in the future. No biggie either way.
Originally Posted by woodcraft
Riding closely behind others can reduce the effort needed by up to 1/3 because of less wind resistance & the faster the speed, the more it matters. In groups, riders commonly take turns at the front and then rest at the back of the group, so the group as a whole can go faster than the individuals can.

Falling behind the group by just a few bike lengths at >20mph can lead to losing the group and it's advantage entirely. This is where having just the right gear ratio matters, being able to keep up at crucial moments.
Oh, that's what's you meant. I always assumed it effected riders to some degree, but a 1/3 reduction in effort is pretty crazy.
Originally Posted by woodcraft
For the bar & binoculars scenario, having a bike with nice slack geometry for no-hands riding is most important, IMO.
Can't say I fully understand the no-hands/slack geometry thing, but I'm sure the advice is sound and practical for us drifters, so I'll look into it.
Ataylor is offline  
Old 03-15-21, 02:57 PM
  #109  
Ataylor
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Anyway, ya'll. Thanks again for your help. I'm all set on this end, so there won't be a need for me to check for updates to this thread as often anymore. So I bid you guys a safe and happy riding season. Hope each of you enjoys it in good health. Take care.
Ataylor is offline  
Old 03-15-21, 04:52 PM
  #110  
SoSmellyAir
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,657

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 1,467 Times in 1,016 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
If there's one thing that really ruins a good ride, it's having your heart explode.
That's why it's good to have a glass of red wine -- assuming that the wine is good -- the night after you ride. I hear it is good for the heart.
SoSmellyAir is offline  
Old 03-15-21, 04:54 PM
  #111  
SoSmellyAir
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,657

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 1,467 Times in 1,016 Posts
Originally Posted by Ataylor
Anyway, ya'll. Thanks again for your help. I'm all set on this end, so there won't be a need for me to check for updates to this thread as often anymore. So I bid you guys a safe and happy riding season. Hope each of you enjoys it in good health. Take care.
Let us know how it goes with the 11-28 cassette. I hope it is as life changing for you as the 12-25 was for me.
SoSmellyAir is offline  
Old 03-15-21, 06:40 PM
  #112  
rm -rf
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,939
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 973 Post(s)
Liked 511 Times in 351 Posts
Di2
You are getting Di2? It's a very fast, very reliable shift on any rear cassette. And the front is quite fast and drama free. I shift all the time, often for just a few pedal strokes, then shift again. A few years ago on a group ride, we went around a bend in the road and right there was an unexpected short steep climb. The three Di2 riders shifted way down, and were climbing the 30 foot hill in the small chainring and low gear, sitting down. The mechanical shift riders were still in their big ring, mashing up the hill. They didn't even attempt to shift the front.

28 vs 32 as a low gear
The 32 is 14% easier. The ratio, 32/28 = 1.14 That's a little more than "one more gear", since gear shifts can range from around 5% to maybe 15% or so. 10% is a reasonable rule of thumb for typical shifts.
My 32 is the difference between sitting or having to stand up on a 10-12% grade. And it's extremely helpful on really steep grades, like 15-18%

Close ratio cassettes
Some riders don't seem to notice if they have big jumps between gears, so that their cadence changes quite a bit. Others want a cadence all the time that's "just right". It's way less critical at easier paced riding, where cadence is often a bit lower anyway.

A few years ago, I liked a local cycle club ride that was fairly flat and a bit too fast for me. It would hit 20-23 mph at times, and I was going all-out to keep that pace. So I'd shift to the next larger cog, but then I'd be spinning too fast. Shifting back to the harder gear, I'd be pushing too hard on the pedal. It was back-and-forth, trying to find that good cadence.

From a BF post, I ended up making a Shimano 14-32. Perfect for that ride!

14-32 cassette
This is the largest 5 cogs from an 11-32 (on two cog carriers), and the other 6 from the 14-28 "junior racing cassette"
The 50-34 front and 14-32 at typical flat road cadences:
This has very close shifts from 18-25 mph, just where I needed it. And the low gears to get up the occasional steep hills.
The downside is that it spins out at 28-29 mph. That's okay, I'll just coast on steeper downhills.
And the 34 chainring tops out around 17 mph, instead of 21 mph with an 11-32.
The other problem with this gearing: shifting the front chainring needs 4-5 shifts in the back, instead of about 3 shifts. But the Di2 can do that quickly and easily.



11-32
During Covid, I only rode with 3-5 riders, and no drafting. We would push hard on climbs, but cruise on the flats. So close gearing isn't necessary.
Here's the standard 11-32. Big jumps between shifts in the 20-25 mph range.
Good spacing in the 15-20 mph range, for either the 50 or 34 chainring. That's good for many riders.
(note that this chart goes to 35 mph, not 30.)


Last edited by rm -rf; 03-15-21 at 06:48 PM.
rm -rf is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.