Zwift virtual racing
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
Zwift virtual racing
I watched virtual race on Virtual Joe Martin Stage Race on https://www.cyclingnews.com/ and I have few questions which the race moderators assume 'everybody knows'...
What do racers see on their TV or laptop or phone, is that what is shown for us on the webpage video of the race, or maybe it is the same except for a given racer, it keeps view on his own group that he currently rides in? That is not switching among various split groups?
Does everybody in the race know where everybody else is positioned, maybe including time loss or gain if somebody escaped the pack or fell behind it?
I take it, all of them have at least some streaming view device, that you couldn't ride blind with only something like cyclocomputer display to feed you numerical race data, right? Maybe you could race with just the rank chart displayed like you see in the video stream on the right side of the view?
When it is not time trial (with drafting 'switched off', does everybody in the pack get the same drafting easement, except for the one whose front wheel is deemed to be the first in the pack? I take it, there is no simulated side wind or any such finesses, because the Zwift is not that sophisticated (and likely no program could)? Probably not even the head wind is simulated? But if it was simulated, it would make you think twice to try to escape from the pack...
If your dog trips on the power cable and you get disconnected, you qualify as 'not finished the race'? Or you could correct the situation and it would put you in the race at the place where you lost contact and you could chase the field? Like if a rider crashes in real race?
What do racers see on their TV or laptop or phone, is that what is shown for us on the webpage video of the race, or maybe it is the same except for a given racer, it keeps view on his own group that he currently rides in? That is not switching among various split groups?
Does everybody in the race know where everybody else is positioned, maybe including time loss or gain if somebody escaped the pack or fell behind it?
I take it, all of them have at least some streaming view device, that you couldn't ride blind with only something like cyclocomputer display to feed you numerical race data, right? Maybe you could race with just the rank chart displayed like you see in the video stream on the right side of the view?
When it is not time trial (with drafting 'switched off', does everybody in the pack get the same drafting easement, except for the one whose front wheel is deemed to be the first in the pack? I take it, there is no simulated side wind or any such finesses, because the Zwift is not that sophisticated (and likely no program could)? Probably not even the head wind is simulated? But if it was simulated, it would make you think twice to try to escape from the pack...
If your dog trips on the power cable and you get disconnected, you qualify as 'not finished the race'? Or you could correct the situation and it would put you in the race at the place where you lost contact and you could chase the field? Like if a rider crashes in real race?
Last edited by vane171; 07-11-20 at 12:02 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
Already while watching some more, I came across the this view into the 'pain cave' where you see what the rider sees on his TV. Most of them probably don't have TV, just laptop I suppose. This is gonna cost many folks a bundle if this should catch on and Zwift stock should rise sky high. Wonder if this virtual racing mode will die off with the virus or will continue to live on. Probably it doesn't have many viewing fans since nobody is replying here?
If it should take off, we could have a new racer breed who would race only in virtual world. Go out for training rides but race only in virtual races. One big advantage over real outdoor racing is the assured absence of 'road rash', total safety and not just from virus.
Another question, how is it with coasting downhill? I've seen in the video occasional rider avatar stopping spinning pedals and wonder if that means the real rider did freewheel at that moment? But most kept pedaling all during downhill ride, unlike in real outdoor race.
If it should take off, we could have a new racer breed who would race only in virtual world. Go out for training rides but race only in virtual races. One big advantage over real outdoor racing is the assured absence of 'road rash', total safety and not just from virus.
Another question, how is it with coasting downhill? I've seen in the video occasional rider avatar stopping spinning pedals and wonder if that means the real rider did freewheel at that moment? But most kept pedaling all during downhill ride, unlike in real outdoor race.
Last edited by vane171; 07-11-20 at 12:01 PM.
#3
Member
Cadence sensors will have the avatar in-game emulate the speed of the actual rider's legs - if they coast then the avatar stops spinning. Zwift tends to "brake" a little when no power is applied - this helps people who want to stop riding slow down (since there's no actual braking in-game). In early days there was no braking so you would just coast forever downhill for a bit, especially as road resistance was pretty minimal. Now, not so much, hence the pedaling.
Zwift racing is quite a bit different from outdoor racing so it's fun to see the pros adjust (who haven't been on the platform).
Full disclosure: I work at Zwift.
Zwift racing is quite a bit different from outdoor racing so it's fun to see the pros adjust (who haven't been on the platform).
Full disclosure: I work at Zwift.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
This heyday of not just virtual training but even races on such a level as to make them interesting enough (read worthwhile) to stream to general public, could lead to some development, like in graphics and fluidity or motion and showing actual likeness on rider faces (cartoonized remake of actual submited photo) and who knows what else. Like with everything, it would take off if there is public interest in watching it. Hope Zwift will take the bull by the horns and invest to catch this surf wave of covid opportunity.
Great, I actually watched the cadence numerical readout and it did look like it agreed with the particular racer.
Also would like to see some beefing up of streaming servers, else why not allow us to watch in full screen, on that particular website anyway? Maybe graphics are not up to full screen size and higher quality stream is more expensive or maybe graphics are simply not there for that bigger size? Probably the quality that is OK for those taking part in a race is not quite good enough for viewers? Maybe Zwift should sponsor such efforts for that to take off.
Also would like to see some beefing up of streaming servers, else why not allow us to watch in full screen, on that particular website anyway? Maybe graphics are not up to full screen size and higher quality stream is more expensive or maybe graphics are simply not there for that bigger size? Probably the quality that is OK for those taking part in a race is not quite good enough for viewers? Maybe Zwift should sponsor such efforts for that to take off.
Last edited by vane171; 07-11-20 at 10:03 PM.
#5
Member
This heyday of not just virtual training but even races on such a level as to make them interesting enough (read worthwhile) to stream to general public, could lead to some development, like in graphics and fluidity or motion and showing actual likeness on rider faces (cartoonized remake of actual submited photo) and who knows what else. Like with everything, it would take off if there is public interest in watching it. Hope Zwift will take the bull by the horns and invest to catch this surf wave of covid opportunity.
Great, I actually watched the cadence numerical readout and it did look like it agreed with the particular racer.
Also would like to see some beefing up of streaming servers, else why not allow us to watch in full screen, on that particular website anyway? Maybe graphics are not up to full screen size and higher quality stream is more expensive or maybe graphics are simply not there for that bigger size? Probably the quality that is OK for those taking part in a race is not quite good enough for viewers? Maybe Zwift should sponsor such efforts for that to take off.
Great, I actually watched the cadence numerical readout and it did look like it agreed with the particular racer.
Also would like to see some beefing up of streaming servers, else why not allow us to watch in full screen, on that particular website anyway? Maybe graphics are not up to full screen size and higher quality stream is more expensive or maybe graphics are simply not there for that bigger size? Probably the quality that is OK for those taking part in a race is not quite good enough for viewers? Maybe Zwift should sponsor such efforts for that to take off.
Likes For evchon:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
Thanks for the youtube tip, I started watching virtual TDF.
There is lots for improvement though. It seems that staying in the bunch or basically keeping your position relative to other riders is quite critical, unlike in the real life. Here things change way too fast, escapes out front as well as dropping through the peloton to be left behind. Those power ups (besides being poor graphics) make it into an un-serious game like pursuit, it devalues the effort that goes into it, bringing into it element of luck or how it is determined?
And the algorithm could use tuning up too, too much of side-wise hyper jumping or riders when they pass each other. Things like these wouldn't exactly make me eager to get onto it (the Zwift platform I mean). It all reminds me of early gaming days.
BTW, can people cheat? Like somebody else riding the bike in a particular race? When you register account, how do they know what sex I am? More to the point, can men pose as women and take part in their race? Is it compulsory that you should have active your monitor camera, so that they can check it is not you but your husband who rode the race? I read that HRMonitor is compulsory to be counted in the race, yet one woman in the virtual TDF didn't show her heart beat, it was at zero bpm, maybe collapsed rider.
There is lots for improvement though. It seems that staying in the bunch or basically keeping your position relative to other riders is quite critical, unlike in the real life. Here things change way too fast, escapes out front as well as dropping through the peloton to be left behind. Those power ups (besides being poor graphics) make it into an un-serious game like pursuit, it devalues the effort that goes into it, bringing into it element of luck or how it is determined?
And the algorithm could use tuning up too, too much of side-wise hyper jumping or riders when they pass each other. Things like these wouldn't exactly make me eager to get onto it (the Zwift platform I mean). It all reminds me of early gaming days.
BTW, can people cheat? Like somebody else riding the bike in a particular race? When you register account, how do they know what sex I am? More to the point, can men pose as women and take part in their race? Is it compulsory that you should have active your monitor camera, so that they can check it is not you but your husband who rode the race? I read that HRMonitor is compulsory to be counted in the race, yet one woman in the virtual TDF didn't show her heart beat, it was at zero bpm, maybe collapsed rider.
Last edited by vane171; 07-17-20 at 12:58 AM.
#7
Señor Member
BTW, can people cheat? Like somebody else riding the bike in a particular race? When you register account, how do they know what sex I am? More to the point, can men pose as women and take part in their race? Is it compulsory that you should have active your monitor camera, so that they can check it is not you but your husband who rode the race? I read that HRMonitor is compulsory to be counted in the race, yet one woman in the virtual TDF didn't show her heart beat, it was at zero bpm, maybe collapsed rider.
There are other ways to cheat as well. Another obvious possibility is just attaching an e-bike to the trainer. The Zwift game monitors the number of Watts/Kg that you put out, and if it is outside of some boundaries, it can throw you out of a race. Now professional racers can put out a lot more than an average rider, so they probably have that stuff turned off for these events. During the stage this morning, I was stunned to see some of the numbers that both the men and women were putting out - 7-8 W/Kg, in some cases, but they usually couldn't hold that for all that long.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
Thanks for comment on that. Not that I am really suspicious, in fact I tend to believe most (if not maybe all) play fair.
This W/Kg info I don't quite get, even if I understand the idea behind it, it makes it possible to compare power output among various riders.
I always thought individual riders in real races or training rides watch their total Watts output on their cyclocomputers (I guess they need to enter their weight in the computer when setting it up), which is typically in hundreds of Watts. Or maybe they have both values on their computer display? It would seem, one should only be interested in those W/Kg either way, on Zwift or real road racing.
I should really look it up on net, probably there is a whole science around it.
I recall article where a pro racer complained he was disconnected (or not counted in a race) when Zwift deemed his power output over their set limit.
This W/Kg info I don't quite get, even if I understand the idea behind it, it makes it possible to compare power output among various riders.
I always thought individual riders in real races or training rides watch their total Watts output on their cyclocomputers (I guess they need to enter their weight in the computer when setting it up), which is typically in hundreds of Watts. Or maybe they have both values on their computer display? It would seem, one should only be interested in those W/Kg either way, on Zwift or real road racing.
I should really look it up on net, probably there is a whole science around it.
I recall article where a pro racer complained he was disconnected (or not counted in a race) when Zwift deemed his power output over their set limit.