Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Rolling Resistance: Hubs

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Rolling Resistance: Hubs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-21, 10:22 AM
  #1  
geezerwheels
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
geezerwheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland
Posts: 197

Bikes: +/-2000 Alp d'Huez (Dura Ace/Ultegra) Alloy Synapse disc (Ultegra), '84 de Rosa Eddie Merckx Super Prestige (Modified with 10sp Record mechs), Carbon Synapse disc (SRAM Red), '80-something Trek 540 (7sp AccuShift), Serotta Fierte (Ultegra)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rolling Resistance: Hubs

Much is made of the rolling resistance of tires. But what about hubs? My hunch is that there's significant difference in the rolling resistance of hub bearings. Also, in cassette bodies. Does anyone know of any data to compare various hubs, and how much resistance increases with wear? I think there is more to it than spinning your wheels when the bike is on the stand.
geezerwheels is offline  
Old 08-30-21, 01:18 PM
  #2  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,976

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6186 Post(s)
Liked 4,803 Times in 3,313 Posts
Bearings are pretty efficient even when poorly adjusted or worn. And most of us will know when they are too worn.

I don't think there is as much there as you believe.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 08-30-21, 01:49 PM
  #3  
cxwrench
Senior Member
 
cxwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767

Bikes: lots

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times in 1,489 Posts
Nope, very very very very little resistance for anything but the most worn, filled-with-sticky-dirty-old grease bearings. Very very very little difference between loose balls and good cartridge bearings. Same with ceramic bearings. Almost all are hybrid (ceramic balls, steel races). They are engineered for very high rpm (not a bicycle), clean/hot (not a bicycle) and a pure radial load (definitely not a bicycle). The reason you seem them spin like crazy in videos is because they have no-contact seals and no to maybe a little super thin grease.
cxwrench is offline  
Likes For cxwrench:
Old 08-30-21, 02:28 PM
  #4  
Crankycrank
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,666
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 836 Post(s)
Liked 1,060 Times in 744 Posts
As mentioned the seals are going to create the most drag which is barely measurable between just the different bearings themselves. New seals will also generally have more drag than used seals after they've been "broken in". Plenty of comparisons on the web between a hub that has quality, new seals and one that has expensive bearings of some sort but has crappy seals which result in less drag when new and claims that the bearings are better. Agreed that hybrid ceramic bearings even the full ceramic $$$$ types are a waste of money for cyclists.

Last edited by Crankycrank; 08-31-21 at 08:36 AM.
Crankycrank is offline  
Old 08-30-21, 02:33 PM
  #5  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,370
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,952 Times in 1,677 Posts
Story told by a Bicycling! magazine writer who had been sent to cover the 1977 Tour de France: he was strolling around the mechanics' area before one stage and picked up a front wheel from the bike of Bernard Thevenet, who went on to win that edition of the race. To the writer's surprise, the hub of the wheel felt crunchy, indicating that the cones were too tight. He told the mechanic, who glanced at the wheel and said (in French, it is to be presumed), "Doesn't slow him down."

I now realize that the mechanic was annoyed by the writer and probably adjusted the hub after he left. Still, it's likely that, given the effective lever length represented by the distance from the tire to the bearing surfaces, a hub could be very tight and still have almost no effect on speed.
Trakhak is offline  
Likes For Trakhak:
Old 08-30-21, 06:36 PM
  #6  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
The rolling resistance in even half-decently adjusted hub bearings is insignificant and the resistance of a freehub body is extremely low when coasting and zero when pedaling. My front wheels (and rear when the chain is off the cogs) will spin for a long time when given a push and will "pendulum" to a stop just because of the slight wheel imbalance. The makers and sellers of ceramic hub bearings have made a lot of money convincing riders that they can save 50% of the friction losses in hubs while not admitting they save 50% of an extremely small number.
HillRider is offline  
Old 08-30-21, 09:43 PM
  #7  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,063

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4197 Post(s)
Liked 3,849 Times in 2,300 Posts
I'll add to the pile-

For basic bicycle design, mechanical function and human interaction I suggest Bicycling Science (The MIT Press): Wilson, David Gordon, Schmidt, Theodor, Papadopoulos, Jeremy J M.: 9780262538404: Amazon.com: Books Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
Old 09-01-21, 07:38 AM
  #8  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,782

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,398 Times in 1,932 Posts
Originally Posted by geezerwheels
Does anyone know of any data to compare various hubs, and how much resistance increases with wear? I think there is more to it than spinning your wheels when the bike is on the stand.
Originally Posted by cxwrench
Nope, very very very very little resistance for anything but the most worn, filled-with-sticky-dirty-old grease bearings. Very very very little difference between loose balls and good cartridge bearings. Same with ceramic bearings. Almost all are hybrid (ceramic balls, steel races). They are engineered for very high rpm (not a bicycle), clean/hot (not a bicycle) and a pure radial load (definitely not a bicycle). The reason you seem them spin like crazy in videos is because they have no-contact seals and no to maybe a little super thin grease.
+1 this. Unloaded spinning in a stand tells you nothing about loaded rolling resistance on the road. The rolling resistance of any decently maintained and adjusted hub will vanish in the noise of tire rolling resistance, road conditions, etc.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 09-01-21, 07:53 AM
  #9  
geezerwheels
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
geezerwheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland
Posts: 197

Bikes: +/-2000 Alp d'Huez (Dura Ace/Ultegra) Alloy Synapse disc (Ultegra), '84 de Rosa Eddie Merckx Super Prestige (Modified with 10sp Record mechs), Carbon Synapse disc (SRAM Red), '80-something Trek 540 (7sp AccuShift), Serotta Fierte (Ultegra)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
rr-hubs

thanks all for your observations. Even so, it would still be interesting to see this tested out on a dyno, with a load on the saddle. FWIW, this notion arose after replacing some cheap wheels with a set of Pacentis with glassy smooth White Industry hubs. What an improvement! Not sure, however, how much was due to lighter, wider rims.
geezerwheels is offline  
Old 09-01-21, 07:55 AM
  #10  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times in 2,342 Posts
Originally Posted by geezerwheels
Much is made of the rolling resistance of tires. But what about hubs? My hunch is that there's significant difference in the rolling resistance of hub bearings. Also, in cassette bodies. Does anyone know of any data to compare various hubs, and how much resistance increases with wear? I think there is more to it than spinning your wheels when the bike is on the stand.
dunno but when a shop changed my rear wheel & hub of course, I picked up a solid 1mph to my avrg speed
rumrunn6 is offline  
Likes For rumrunn6:
Old 09-01-21, 07:59 AM
  #11  
geezerwheels
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
geezerwheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland
Posts: 197

Bikes: +/-2000 Alp d'Huez (Dura Ace/Ultegra) Alloy Synapse disc (Ultegra), '84 de Rosa Eddie Merckx Super Prestige (Modified with 10sp Record mechs), Carbon Synapse disc (SRAM Red), '80-something Trek 540 (7sp AccuShift), Serotta Fierte (Ultegra)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
To Andrew R.
just ordered Bicycle Science--thanks for the tip!
geezerwheels is offline  
Old 09-01-21, 09:04 AM
  #12  
cxwrench
Senior Member
 
cxwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767

Bikes: lots

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times in 1,489 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
dunno but when a shop changed my rear wheel & hub of course, I picked up a solid 1mph to my avrg speed
Ok, it was definitely the wheel.
cxwrench is offline  
Likes For cxwrench:
Old 09-01-21, 10:06 AM
  #13  
70sSanO
Senior Member
 
70sSanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times in 1,323 Posts
If it is one of your listed bikes, I’d guess the Trek 540 would be the “cheap” wheel bike. Even still 1mph gain is a lot to pick up with just a wheelset change. I’d still imagine weight is a bigger influence over hubs.

Another story if the wheels were truly cheap Wheel Master level quality vs White Ind wheels.

John
70sSanO is offline  
Old 09-01-21, 10:21 AM
  #14  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,370
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,952 Times in 1,677 Posts
With your bike up in a repair stand, try pressing your fingertip against the hub seal where it meets the axle while the wheel is spinning freely. You'd have to press very hard to make even the slightest perceptible difference in wheel speed. No hub without major damage is going to present more than a tiny fraction of that much resistance.
Trakhak is offline  
Old 09-01-21, 10:41 AM
  #15  
cheesesandwich
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
I would think the weight of the hub plays a part rather than bearing resistance. I had a pair of hed ardennes plus and also farsports 50mm rims on dt swiss 350. Both front wheels felt about the same (no scale just using my hand to hold). But the rear wheels had significant weight difference with the hed being a little heavier. Although the farsports are more aero I doubt the 10watts saving or so could give me a 1- 1.5km/h increase of average speed. Last I calculate 10watts gives less than a 1km/h advantage. I could be wrong

Last edited by cheesesandwich; 09-01-21 at 10:45 AM.
cheesesandwich is offline  
Old 09-01-21, 11:30 AM
  #16  
davidad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,660
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 171 Times in 138 Posts
For our use sintered bronze bushings would work. At 30mph bike wheels turn at about 350 rpm.
davidad is offline  
Likes For davidad:
Old 08-20-23, 07:00 AM
  #17  
f15h
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 3

Bikes: Trek 470(modified 1(50)x 7(12-32) solid axles solid tyres, giant bowery(modiied 1(40)x1(12) solid axles), Merida Speedster(modified 1(52)x 8(11-32)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by geezerwheels
Much is made of the rolling resistance of tires. But what about hubs? My hunch is that there's significant difference in the rolling resistance of hub bearings. Also, in cassette bodies. Does anyone know of any data to compare various hubs, and how much resistance increases with wear? I think there is more to it than spinning your wheels when the bike is on the stand.
In my experience; old school serviceable bearings on solid axles perform better than any of the reasonably priced quick release axles. You can test this by cleaning and lubricating your front wheel bearings in a quick release wheel, reassembling and spinning whilst off the bike. Use approximately the same force when you lock it into the fork and see how long it takes to get to a halt. I switched two of my rosd bikes to solid axle solid tyres because of this. It's obviously not practical for off road cycling.
f15h is offline  
Old 08-20-23, 08:55 AM
  #18  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,007
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4369 Post(s)
Liked 1,546 Times in 1,012 Posts
Originally Posted by f15h
In my experience; old school serviceable bearings on solid axles perform better than any of the reasonably priced quick release axles. You can test this by cleaning and lubricating your front wheel bearings in a quick release wheel, reassembling and spinning whilst off the bike. Use approximately the same force when you lock it into the fork and see how long it takes to get to a halt. I switched two of my rosd bikes to solid axle solid tyres because of this. It's obviously not practical for off road cycling.
Sounds like you did all that instead of setting the QR hub slightly loose so it achieves proper bearing preload when the QR is closed.

That isn't some theory - every bicycle service manual will tell you to do this.
Kontact is offline  
Old 08-20-23, 09:09 AM
  #19  
f15h
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 3

Bikes: Trek 470(modified 1(50)x 7(12-32) solid axles solid tyres, giant bowery(modiied 1(40)x1(12) solid axles), Merida Speedster(modified 1(52)x 8(11-32)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
Sounds like you did all that instead of setting the QR hub slightly loose so it achieves proper bearing preload when the QR is closed. It's not my preferred axle frame interface

That isn't some theory - every bicycle service manual will tell you to do this.
True. I'm just suggesting that the variability in proper preloading presents a problem for QR systems.
f15h is offline  
Old 08-20-23, 09:10 AM
  #20  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,007
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4369 Post(s)
Liked 1,546 Times in 1,012 Posts
Originally Posted by f15h
True. I'm just suggesting that the variability in proper preloading presents a problem for QR systems.
You can screw up the preload on any bearing. But it is not hard to get the preload on QR hubs right by setting them so play just disappears when the QR is tight. The axles can only compress so much, so the system is not that sensitive to variations in QR tension.

Did you really replace your QR axles with nutted just because of this?
Kontact is offline  
Likes For Kontact:
Old 08-20-23, 09:14 AM
  #21  
f15h
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 3

Bikes: Trek 470(modified 1(50)x 7(12-32) solid axles solid tyres, giant bowery(modiied 1(40)x1(12) solid axles), Merida Speedster(modified 1(52)x 8(11-32)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
You can screw up the preload on any bearing. But it is not hard to get the preload on QR hubs right by setting them so play just disappears when the QR is tight.

Did you really replace your QR axles with nutted just because of this?
​​​​​​

Not just because of this. On two road bikes that I also run solid tyres on I have though. There's an added assurance of not having to remove the wheels to repair flats
f15h is offline  
Old 08-20-23, 10:17 AM
  #22  
mpetry912 
aged to perfection
 
mpetry912's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,810

Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked 1,252 Times in 661 Posts
have not tested this but I think the hub's friction is a small contribution to the overall drag and resistance encountered by a bike. Speculatioin is that radius of the wheel (hub to ground) moots all but the most extreme cases of high rolling resistance. I could imagine a test that measures the temperature of the bearing - comparing the best possible hub in perfect adjustment with the best grease - to a worst case bearing. See if there are any friction losses that can be discerned with temperature. Portlandjim might have done an experiment like this in the Specialized lab, they had a rolling road test rig I believe.

In order I think the sources of drag and resistance on a bike are

Aerodynamic drag
Tire rolling resistance
and driveline losses

also note that aerodynamic losses become a bigger part of the overall drag budget as the speed increases. Draq increases as the square of speed, and the power required to overcome it rises as the cube.

/markp
mpetry912 is offline  
Old 08-20-23, 02:30 PM
  #23  
sweeks
Senior Member
 
sweeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,551

Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times in 399 Posts
Originally Posted by f15h
In my experience; old school serviceable bearings on solid axles perform better than any of the reasonably priced quick release axles. You can test this by cleaning and lubricating your front wheel bearings in a quick release wheel, reassembling and spinning whilst off the bike. Use approximately the same force when you lock it into the fork and see how long it takes to get to a halt. I switched two of my rosd bikes to solid axle solid tyres because of this. It's obviously not practical for off road cycling.
This may be because of axle compression (slight decrease in length between the locknuts) by the quick-release when it is closed; this can put more than optimal pre-load on the bearings, if they're not properly adjusted in the first place.
Axle compression between the locknuts does not occur in solid-axle hubs as a result of tightening the mounting nuts.
The axle type should make no difference if the bearings are properly adjusted (not an insignificant "if").
sweeks is offline  
Old 08-20-23, 03:23 PM
  #24  
mpetry912 
aged to perfection
 
mpetry912's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,810

Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked 1,252 Times in 661 Posts
Originally Posted by sweeks
axle compression (slight decrease in length between the locknuts) by the quick-release when it is closed;.
would be worth an experiment to detemine if the axle "compresses" or does it bow ? I think the latter.

I'm in agreement with the rest of your posting however. The old school mechanics that I learned from would adjust the hub with just the slightest play, so that the play was taken up as the quick release was tightened. I agree that's not a factor with a solid axle with lock nuts.

/markp
mpetry912 is offline  
Old 08-20-23, 04:24 PM
  #25  
sweeks
Senior Member
 
sweeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,551

Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times in 399 Posts
Originally Posted by mpetry912
would be worth an experiment to detemine if the axle "compresses" or does it bow ? I think the latter.
Hi, Mark,
This has been discussed a lot, but the material science is clear: actually the axle compresses, while the skewer stretches. Steel is an elastic material, and like all such materials responds to stress (within limits) by expanding or contracting.

Bicycling Science, Fourth Edition, by Wilson and Schmidt (The MIT Press, 2020) has this to say, and describes the experiment you suggest:
"A bicycle wheel's quick-release skewer (the through-axle tension rod used to secure most modern wheels) applies considerable compressive force to the wheel's axle, shortening it by 0.02-0.04 mm and thereby "tightening" the bearing adjustment. The effect of this shortening and the resultant tightening can be felt by placing some washers on the axle to take the place of the bicycle frame and squeezing them with the skewer as if the wheel were installed. (This experiment will not simulate any bearing load that might arise from axle bending due to operating loads or preexisting frame misalignment, however.)" Pages 272-273

Jobst Brandt (quoted on Sheldon Brown's web site HERE ) had this to say in 2003:
"Wheels with quick release (QR) axles present an additional problem in that closing the QR alters bearing clearance. Closing the lever requires increasing manual force with a slight over-center feel near the end of the stroke. This lever force arises from compressing the hollow axle and stretching the skewer. The ratio of elastic length change between axle and skewer is that of their cross sectional area and active lengths."Although small, axle compression on QR hubs is large enough to alter bearing clearance and should be considered when adjusting bearings."

FBinNY has mentioned the bending effect of misaligned dropouts and operational loads as well. As to bending, a cylindrical piece of an elastic material (such as a bicycle axle) experiencing bending will elongate on the outside of the curve, and shorten on the inside of the curve.
These changes are very small and hard to measure... but they can be measured.
I hope this helps settle the matter.
sweeks is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.