Camera for shooting and riding, and stopping and shooting
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,035
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,391 Times
in
709 Posts
Camera for shooting and riding, and stopping and shooting
I'm pretty new to cycling, but been a mostly amateur photographer / enthusiast for decades.
I have my iPhone on a quad lock, and pull it off the bars and take pictures occasionally when riding (when it's safe to one hand, obviously), and stop from time to time to do the same. But years of photography have made me a total camera snob, and whenever I have one of those epic amazing light / scenery rides, I wish I had a camera with me. I searched threads here and there's a lot of good action cam and strap recommendations. I'll probably wear the camera on a blackrapid sling.
Possibilities -
Nikon Z7, which happens to be a camera I already have, plus about 50 nikon Z and F mount lenses. But this is a 1.5lb camera with no good pancake lenses. The smallest lens I might use, which isn't that exciting (24-50 f/4-6.3) is another 7 oz, so almost 2lb (850g) of fairly awkwardly shaped camera hanging on my shoulder all ride. full frame, 46 megapixels.
Sony A7C. a third lighter, more pancake-y lens choices, including a nice 24 f/2.8 that's less than 2" deep and only 6 oz, for a total of 1.5lb. (671g) full frame, 24 megapixels.
Sony RX1R II. Smallest and lightest, but not interchangeable, 35mm f/2 only. 507g total, barely over a pound, full frame, 42 megapixels.
Nikon Z50. A compromise, allowing me to use existing lenses, with a smaller sensor and less resolution. Only 395g for the camera, and there's a very small and light 16-50 f/3.5-6.3 lens for a total weight of only 530g, essentially the same as the RX1R II, but with a smaller sensor, slower lens, but zoom!
I'd like fairly high resolution to allow aggressive cropping and recomposing in post, given the very quick nature of photos taken while riding, and the limited focal lengths available. That argues against the A7C, and for the Z7 or RX1R II. The former is free, the latter 3 grand...
Any suggestions from those who carry a decent quality camera on their body while riding? I'm not a huge fan of M4/3 from past experience, and had a mixed relationship with a couple Fuji X cameras. Most of my rides are 20-75 miles, typically early morning or late afternoon, average speed around 14mph with 1500-4000 feet of climbing. I ride a turbo creo, with the motor off 95% of the time, so the weight might not be that big of a deal other than the comfort factor.
I have my iPhone on a quad lock, and pull it off the bars and take pictures occasionally when riding (when it's safe to one hand, obviously), and stop from time to time to do the same. But years of photography have made me a total camera snob, and whenever I have one of those epic amazing light / scenery rides, I wish I had a camera with me. I searched threads here and there's a lot of good action cam and strap recommendations. I'll probably wear the camera on a blackrapid sling.
Possibilities -
Nikon Z7, which happens to be a camera I already have, plus about 50 nikon Z and F mount lenses. But this is a 1.5lb camera with no good pancake lenses. The smallest lens I might use, which isn't that exciting (24-50 f/4-6.3) is another 7 oz, so almost 2lb (850g) of fairly awkwardly shaped camera hanging on my shoulder all ride. full frame, 46 megapixels.
Sony A7C. a third lighter, more pancake-y lens choices, including a nice 24 f/2.8 that's less than 2" deep and only 6 oz, for a total of 1.5lb. (671g) full frame, 24 megapixels.
Sony RX1R II. Smallest and lightest, but not interchangeable, 35mm f/2 only. 507g total, barely over a pound, full frame, 42 megapixels.
Nikon Z50. A compromise, allowing me to use existing lenses, with a smaller sensor and less resolution. Only 395g for the camera, and there's a very small and light 16-50 f/3.5-6.3 lens for a total weight of only 530g, essentially the same as the RX1R II, but with a smaller sensor, slower lens, but zoom!
I'd like fairly high resolution to allow aggressive cropping and recomposing in post, given the very quick nature of photos taken while riding, and the limited focal lengths available. That argues against the A7C, and for the Z7 or RX1R II. The former is free, the latter 3 grand...
Any suggestions from those who carry a decent quality camera on their body while riding? I'm not a huge fan of M4/3 from past experience, and had a mixed relationship with a couple Fuji X cameras. Most of my rides are 20-75 miles, typically early morning or late afternoon, average speed around 14mph with 1500-4000 feet of climbing. I ride a turbo creo, with the motor off 95% of the time, so the weight might not be that big of a deal other than the comfort factor.
#2
Senior Member
I'm an amateur photog too. Own a bevvy of pristine vintage Nikons (Nikon F2AS, Nikkormat EL, Nikkormat FTN, etc) and new DSLRs plus my trusty Mamiya RB-67. I don't generally carry a camera with me while riding.
But, if I did, I'd take something small that can do it all like my Olympus Stylus Tough which is waterproof, or my Ricoh GR digital if I want to shoot some cool B&W's ala Daido Moriyama-esque.
I might consider taking my Fujifilm X100 but it's a fixed lens and not a do-it-all but the image quality is nothing short of phenomenal. The little Olympus takes great photos as well as video and it's my trusty companion when I backpack for days in the wild country.
I don't think I'd take any of my larger cameras because if I fall, Murphy's Law will take over. If I did, it would probably be the FTN. It's the only one that can hit concrete and still crank away.
BTW, which Fuji X cameras were you not impressed with? Just curious....
--
But, if I did, I'd take something small that can do it all like my Olympus Stylus Tough which is waterproof, or my Ricoh GR digital if I want to shoot some cool B&W's ala Daido Moriyama-esque.
I might consider taking my Fujifilm X100 but it's a fixed lens and not a do-it-all but the image quality is nothing short of phenomenal. The little Olympus takes great photos as well as video and it's my trusty companion when I backpack for days in the wild country.
I don't think I'd take any of my larger cameras because if I fall, Murphy's Law will take over. If I did, it would probably be the FTN. It's the only one that can hit concrete and still crank away.
BTW, which Fuji X cameras were you not impressed with? Just curious....
--
Last edited by drlogik; 06-14-21 at 07:51 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,035
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,391 Times
in
709 Posts
I'm an amateur photog too. Own a bevvy of pristine vintage Nikons (Nikon F2AS, Nikkormat EL, Nikkormat FTN, etc) and new DSLRs plus my trusty Mamiya RB-67. I don't generally carry a camera with me while riding.
But, if I did, I'd take something small that can do it all like my Olympus Stylus Tough which is waterproof, or my Ricoh GR digital if I want to shoot some cool B&W's ala Daido Moriyama-esque.
I might consider taking my Fujifilm X100 but it's a fixed lens and not a do-it-all but the image quality is nothing short of phenomenal. The little Olympus takes great photos as well as video and it's my trusty companion when I backpack for days in the wild country.
I don't think I'd take any of my larger cameras because if I fall, Murphy's Law will take over. If I did, it would probably be the FTN. It's the only one that can hit concrete and still crank away.
BTW, which Fuji X cameras were you not impressed with? Just curious....
--
But, if I did, I'd take something small that can do it all like my Olympus Stylus Tough which is waterproof, or my Ricoh GR digital if I want to shoot some cool B&W's ala Daido Moriyama-esque.
I might consider taking my Fujifilm X100 but it's a fixed lens and not a do-it-all but the image quality is nothing short of phenomenal. The little Olympus takes great photos as well as video and it's my trusty companion when I backpack for days in the wild country.
I don't think I'd take any of my larger cameras because if I fall, Murphy's Law will take over. If I did, it would probably be the FTN. It's the only one that can hit concrete and still crank away.
BTW, which Fuji X cameras were you not impressed with? Just curious....
--
i try REALLY hard to avoid falling on the bike, but does that argue against my using my primary camera with an expensive, beloved lens….
i mostly shoot architecture, landscapes, and cityscapes, so i’m typically lugging tilt-shift lenses, fast ultrawides, etc.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,667
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,981 Times
in
1,775 Posts
Ok. I'm a photographer too. I settled on carrying a Canon Powershot G9x since it's small, durable, fits in a jersey pocket, also does video and is better quality than any camera phone. Plus I found a mint used one locally for $200. It's not competing with any of my DSLRs but it does a pretty good job. I gave up trying to combine my real photography with biking years ago as I didn't want to risk damaging my gear.
That said.... I do have a stout dutch bike on order with a full complement of racks and huge weight carrying capacity. With it I may go back to riding the bike more to get to shooting locations.
That said.... I do have a stout dutch bike on order with a full complement of racks and huge weight carrying capacity. With it I may go back to riding the bike more to get to shooting locations.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#5
Kamen Rider
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: KL, MY
Posts: 1,071
Bikes: Fuji Transonic Elite, Marechal Soul Ultimate, Dahon Dash Altena
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
164 Posts
Before going out and spending plenty of cash on a new camera (or entirely new system), try what you have first. There are people who vlog with a full frame mirrorless camera and ultra wide 16-35 lens, so it's not as unwieldly as you think. But I'd be wary of any strap that is designed to attach to the camera solely by the tripod mount. Two points of attachment is much safer, and ideally you'd want one with a cross-body stabilizer and/or a pull tab for quickly adjusting the length of the strap.
#6
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 29
Bikes: '21 Trek Domane AL3, '18 Trek FX2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times
in
5 Posts
I've moved away from DSLRs in favor or P&Ss with superzooms (which have more reach than any of the telephotos I've owned). I've been bringing my Nikon Coolpix A900 on rides with me lately. It's small and light enough for it to not be annoying to carry on a ride. I really love not having to mess around with multiple lenses too.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 520
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 327 Times
in
179 Posts
I'm currently in vacation and am using a Panasonic GM5 with 12-35mm lens and a 20mm pancake lens.
It easily fits in a jersey pocket. It's M4/3, which you said you didn't like. But it's what I use. I also have a tiny camera bag (because the GM5 is tiny) that I can sling across my shoulder and it doesn't distract from my riding.
It easily fits in a jersey pocket. It's M4/3, which you said you didn't like. But it's what I use. I also have a tiny camera bag (because the GM5 is tiny) that I can sling across my shoulder and it doesn't distract from my riding.
#8
Senior Member
Ditto on the Canon G9X Mk II
Super compact and great image quality. Manual controls, RAW, etc. Fits in a really small case hung on my belt.
I also have a Dslr, but for the weight, bulk and fear of theft or damage, I prefer to leave it at home.
I suppose if I wanted a larger sensor, I would go with the Sony A6000
Super compact and great image quality. Manual controls, RAW, etc. Fits in a really small case hung on my belt.
I also have a Dslr, but for the weight, bulk and fear of theft or damage, I prefer to leave it at home.
I suppose if I wanted a larger sensor, I would go with the Sony A6000
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,035
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,391 Times
in
709 Posts
lots of interesting options! thanks to all for the input.
i hadn’t really considered a 1” zoom compact, like the g9x or rx100. a big zoom range would certainly be useful, and they’re small and light. is the image quality far enough about the latest iPhone to make it worth it?
trying my Z7 with a kit lens has some appeal too, low investment, as long as i don’t bail and kill it 😂
i hadn’t really considered a 1” zoom compact, like the g9x or rx100. a big zoom range would certainly be useful, and they’re small and light. is the image quality far enough about the latest iPhone to make it worth it?
trying my Z7 with a kit lens has some appeal too, low investment, as long as i don’t bail and kill it 😂
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,035
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,391 Times
in
709 Posts
I'm currently in vacation and am using a Panasonic GM5 with 12-35mm lens and a 20mm pancake lens.
It easily fits in a jersey pocket. It's M4/3, which you said you didn't like. But it's what I use. I also have a tiny camera bag (because the GM5 is tiny) that I can sling across my shoulder and it doesn't distract from my riding.
It easily fits in a jersey pocket. It's M4/3, which you said you didn't like. But it's what I use. I also have a tiny camera bag (because the GM5 is tiny) that I can sling across my shoulder and it doesn't distract from my riding.
#11
Full Member
i mostly shoot architecture, landscapes, and cityscapes, so i’m typically lugging tilt-shift lenses, fast ultrawides, etc.
#12
Senior Member
I carry a Fuji X-Pro2 with the 27mm pancake in my bike bag. Love this combo.
My second option would be the X100.
Have just returned from a safari in Kenya where I used my Fuji X-T2 with 14/2.8, 35/1.4 and a 55-200 zoom for both stills and video. This was the only time in the past decade that I used a zoom. It all depends on your way of seeing and preferred angle but I am most comfortable with primes. Plus I love the higher end Fuji bodies as all their controls are on the top deck and I almost never need to dive into menus.
sorry to hear you did not like the Fuji X series; their colors are spectacular, as is the Fujinon glass. I used to be a Nikon guy until I tried the original Fuji X100 a decade ago and never looked back. Have 4 Fuji bodies now.
My second option would be the X100.
Have just returned from a safari in Kenya where I used my Fuji X-T2 with 14/2.8, 35/1.4 and a 55-200 zoom for both stills and video. This was the only time in the past decade that I used a zoom. It all depends on your way of seeing and preferred angle but I am most comfortable with primes. Plus I love the higher end Fuji bodies as all their controls are on the top deck and I almost never need to dive into menus.
sorry to hear you did not like the Fuji X series; their colors are spectacular, as is the Fujinon glass. I used to be a Nikon guy until I tried the original Fuji X100 a decade ago and never looked back. Have 4 Fuji bodies now.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,394
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4391 Post(s)
Liked 4,833 Times
in
2,988 Posts
Ditto on the Canon G9X Mk II
Super compact and great image quality. Manual controls, RAW, etc. Fits in a really small case hung on my belt.
I also have a Dslr, but for the weight, bulk and fear of theft or damage, I prefer to leave it at home.
I suppose if I wanted a larger sensor, I would go with the Sony A6000
Super compact and great image quality. Manual controls, RAW, etc. Fits in a really small case hung on my belt.
I also have a Dslr, but for the weight, bulk and fear of theft or damage, I prefer to leave it at home.
I suppose if I wanted a larger sensor, I would go with the Sony A6000
#14
Senior Member
I'm a lifelong Nikon guy, but don't have any experience with the new FF Z series.... I've brought along DSLRs (in backpacks) a few times on the bike, but more frequently I have used my little Nikon "1" mirrorless camera.... It fits just right in my little underseat bag. Sure, it's an orphaned system, and big fast ultrawides and tilt-shift lenses don't exist for it (but you could use them, I suppose, with an adapter, which would take up more space in your bag).but the resulting pictures from it are amazingly good. I wouldn't pixel-peek them side-by-side with a good FF or even a DX format DSLR, but considering the tiny size of the camera, they're more than good enough for my needs.
I also have a Sony A6000 mirrorless, but don't use it often because its battery life isn't very good. My Nikons can sit in the bag all week and only lose a percent or two of charge, but the Sony will lose 60-80 percent in a week whether I use it or not. If I shoot with it on a Saturday, I MUST charge the battery again if I want to shoot with it again on Sunday.
I also have a Sony A6000 mirrorless, but don't use it often because its battery life isn't very good. My Nikons can sit in the bag all week and only lose a percent or two of charge, but the Sony will lose 60-80 percent in a week whether I use it or not. If I shoot with it on a Saturday, I MUST charge the battery again if I want to shoot with it again on Sunday.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,698
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 817 Post(s)
Liked 1,651 Times
in
778 Posts
Here's a suggestion: if you are riding along, and see a scene you'd really like to photograph, make a note of where you are and come back the next day in your vehicle with the camera, lens, and accessories you'd want, and get the shot.
If it's something that is happening quickly and not likely to be repeated (say, a baby deer at the side of the road) chances are you won't get the shot anyway by the time you stop the bike, get your camera off the strap, and get set up properly.
A friend of mine took his Canon on a cross country motorcycle trip to get some shots along the way. On the second day, he accidently dropped it and damaged the lens and lens mount on the camera so badly it was unusable. He boxed it up at the next UPS store he saw and shipped it to me to hold for him. Unfortunately, the damage was so bad it couldn't be fixed.
If it's something that is happening quickly and not likely to be repeated (say, a baby deer at the side of the road) chances are you won't get the shot anyway by the time you stop the bike, get your camera off the strap, and get set up properly.
A friend of mine took his Canon on a cross country motorcycle trip to get some shots along the way. On the second day, he accidently dropped it and damaged the lens and lens mount on the camera so badly it was unusable. He boxed it up at the next UPS store he saw and shipped it to me to hold for him. Unfortunately, the damage was so bad it couldn't be fixed.
#16
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
806 Posts
If the purpose of the ride is photography, then plan accordingly. Perhaps a bike with panniers, that way you can carry the equipment that you'll need. A monopod or tri pod, a few lenses and a camera body that can be packed in foam when not in use. Maybe a flash and spare batteries as well. You could have a handlebar bag with your digital point and shoot camera for the general photos, and then the better camera for the shots for which you want to take your time.
Use the right tools for the job.
For me, riding and photographs don't go together. I ride to ride, so I'd almost never stop for the purposes of a photo. My wife enjoys taking photos when she sees something that she'd like to capture. So, riding with her (especially off road or scenic rides), I have to be ready to stop and wait. But, it's what she enjoys. To each, his or her own.
Use the right tools for the job.
For me, riding and photographs don't go together. I ride to ride, so I'd almost never stop for the purposes of a photo. My wife enjoys taking photos when she sees something that she'd like to capture. So, riding with her (especially off road or scenic rides), I have to be ready to stop and wait. But, it's what she enjoys. To each, his or her own.
#17
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,098
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3422 Post(s)
Liked 3,559 Times
in
1,789 Posts
I still have a Canon Powershot S90 for point-and-shoot photos.
Small but full-featured.
It's really easy to take shots while riding, and the 28-105 mm lens range is ideal. I also like how quickly it focuses, handy for action photos.
Canon PowerShot S90, f/4.5, 6.0mm, ISO 160, 1/500s
Small but full-featured.
It's really easy to take shots while riding, and the 28-105 mm lens range is ideal. I also like how quickly it focuses, handy for action photos.
Canon PowerShot S90, f/4.5, 6.0mm, ISO 160, 1/500s
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Last edited by terrymorse; 06-15-21 at 08:09 AM.
#18
Senior Member
I used to be a Nikon guy until I tried the original Fuji X100 a decade ago and never looked back.
Likes For drlogik:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,895
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2601 Post(s)
Liked 1,925 Times
in
1,208 Posts
Sounds like the OP rides to shoot. If that's the case, either load up tripods, lenses, and the whole nine yards in a pannier or two, and go for it. (You might want to make sure you've got a kick stand on the bike to hold it up while you're setting up, photographing, and taking the photo equipment down and re-packing.) A little bit shy of that would be a Ortlieb bar bag with the camera equipment padding add-on, if they still make that.
As for me, I take pretty good snapshots, so a point and shoot is good enough for me. If it looks like it might be wet (either from rain or sweat), I'll take an Olympus Tough. After borrowing my brother's DSLR for a trip to Yellowstone 10 years ago, I bought a Canon SX50 so I could put a polarizing filter on it, but I rarely carry that on the bike.
As for me, I take pretty good snapshots, so a point and shoot is good enough for me. If it looks like it might be wet (either from rain or sweat), I'll take an Olympus Tough. After borrowing my brother's DSLR for a trip to Yellowstone 10 years ago, I bought a Canon SX50 so I could put a polarizing filter on it, but I rarely carry that on the bike.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,518 Times
in
7,324 Posts
I take a good number of photos during my tours. I will definitely consider that Cannon. I got my first digital camera as a present in 2009. It was some sort of Cannon P&S model. Beautiful images for such a compact camera. Unfortunately, I accidentally dropped it off a bridge into a river during a long weekend tour thanks to sweaty hands and not using a wrist strap.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,518 Times
in
7,324 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,035
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,391 Times
in
709 Posts
...For me, riding and photographs don't go together. I ride to ride, so I'd almost never stop for the purposes of a photo. My wife enjoys taking photos when she sees something that she'd like to capture. So, riding with her (especially off road or scenic rides), I have to be ready to stop and wait. But, it's what she enjoys. To each, his or her own.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,035
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,391 Times
in
709 Posts
Sounds like the OP rides to shoot. If that's the case, either load up tripods, lenses, and the whole nine yards in a pannier or two, and go for it. (You might want to make sure you've got a kick stand on the bike to hold it up while you're setting up, photographing, and taking the photo equipment down and re-packing.) A little bit shy of that would be a Ortlieb bar bag with the camera equipment padding add-on, if they still make that....
Likes For mschwett:
#24
Senior Member
! Warning ! Unpopular Opinion Ahead
If you gonna do it, go mirrorless. But, I would strongly argue to not do it. At all. It tends to take from the riding. The camera needs constant safety procedures and becomes the focal point (pun intended) of the enterprise.
There is such a glut of cliche bike photography bombarding us on every social media site it has become a mundane and banal pursuit to which even Andy Warhol has grown fatigued.
If you gonna do it, go mirrorless. But, I would strongly argue to not do it. At all. It tends to take from the riding. The camera needs constant safety procedures and becomes the focal point (pun intended) of the enterprise.
There is such a glut of cliche bike photography bombarding us on every social media site it has become a mundane and banal pursuit to which even Andy Warhol has grown fatigued.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
fwiw
when I carry a full size slr, film or digital, w/ a mirror or w/o, skiiing, snowshoeing, hiking or biking I use a traditional slr holster type bag with a single strap slung over a shoulder. while riding a bike it easily swings around to my back & sits there just above my hips. while riding I can swing it around & if it's not fully zipped grab the camera 1-handed & take a snap. obviously stopping is easier & safer
I don't use such a camera while biking anymore cuz I have small sportcams. I've tried small flat digital cameras but they are usually disappointing due to having to wait while they turn on & their shutter lag. modern digital cameras, w/ manual controls, buried in menus, are frustrating. I still love physical exterior controls for aperture, shutter speed & manual/auto focus
if one has a camera & a bag, use what you have. but I fully support camera addiction & spending to excess, if you have the discretionary cash ;-)
when I carry a full size slr, film or digital, w/ a mirror or w/o, skiiing, snowshoeing, hiking or biking I use a traditional slr holster type bag with a single strap slung over a shoulder. while riding a bike it easily swings around to my back & sits there just above my hips. while riding I can swing it around & if it's not fully zipped grab the camera 1-handed & take a snap. obviously stopping is easier & safer
I don't use such a camera while biking anymore cuz I have small sportcams. I've tried small flat digital cameras but they are usually disappointing due to having to wait while they turn on & their shutter lag. modern digital cameras, w/ manual controls, buried in menus, are frustrating. I still love physical exterior controls for aperture, shutter speed & manual/auto focus
if one has a camera & a bag, use what you have. but I fully support camera addiction & spending to excess, if you have the discretionary cash ;-)
Last edited by rumrunn6; 06-15-21 at 09:09 AM.