suspension
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
suspension
looking to upgrade the old steel rigid HT gary fisher with suspension fork.
as it is a 90's bike should i be mindful of the amount of suspension. 80mm was norm then or there abouts.
looking into Suntour as seem like good price to quality given bike is old 7speed.
have been enjoying the beast ...currently set up as Single speed.
as it is a 90's bike should i be mindful of the amount of suspension. 80mm was norm then or there abouts.
looking into Suntour as seem like good price to quality given bike is old 7speed.
have been enjoying the beast ...currently set up as Single speed.
#2
Senior Member
You’ve got a very nice, classic rigid bike there. Honestly, it should be kept original. If you enjoy the old-school feel of 26ers, you’ll be better off getting a proper hardtail in the second-hand market that came with the right geometry for front suspension, disc brakes, etc. If you start messing around with upgrades the bike was not designed for, you’ll quickly realize that it won’t handle as well and it’ll lose its mojo. You may regret the wasted cash. Keep in mind that 26er hardtails or even full-suspension bikes from 12-20 years ago can be found at bargain prices on Craigslist or Pinkbike. Highly recommend going that route.
Last edited by Chris Pringle; 02-04-21 at 01:05 AM.
Likes For Chris Pringle:
#3
n00b
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,397
Bikes: Surly Karate Monkey, Twin Six Standard Rando
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 428 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
273 Posts
what specific fork did you have in mind? there are very few options out there for a fork designed for:
- 26" wheels
- rim brakes
- straight steerer tube
- 80mm or less travel
Likes For mack_turtle:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 478
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times
in
147 Posts
what specific fork did you have in mind? there are very few options out there for a fork designed for:
- 26" wheels
- rim brakes
- straight steerer tube
- 80mm or less travel
#5
n00b
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,397
Bikes: Surly Karate Monkey, Twin Six Standard Rando
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 428 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
273 Posts
shoot, yeah. that makes it nearly impossible if that's the case. however, if the fork is 1-1/8" threaded, which was common around that era, you could convert to the modern 1-1/8" threadless. that would mean a new fork, headset, and stem though.
Likes For mack_turtle:
#6
Full Member
You’ve got a very nice, classic rigid bike there. Honestly, it should be kept original. If you enjoy the old-school feel of 26ers, you’ll be better off getting a proper hardtail in the second-hand market that came with the right geometry for front suspension, disc brakes, etc. If you start messing around with upgrades the bike was not designed for, you’ll quickly realize that it won’t handle as well and it’ll lose its mojo. You may regret the wasted cash. Keep in mind that 26er hardtails or even full-suspension bikes from 12-20 years ago can be found at bargain prices on Craigslist or Pinkbike. Highly recommend going that route.
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/talon-4-2021
And after all that, the added stress you put on the head tube could result in stress cracking at the joints.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,085 Times
in
1,181 Posts
Adding a suspension fork also slows the steering. I did this on a ‘90 steel Fuji, the front geometry was not designed for the fork, which raises the fork crown as part of the suspension. The bike got slower thru turns. Then the fork I added started to leak fluids and there were no seals around to get this fixed.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
I have done this to my 92 Marin (1 1/8th HT) with mixed results.
First I added a cheap old Suntour (SX I believe) fork from a 26" Trek Hybrid someone gave me for parts. Not the best, clunky, low travel, but it did smooth off the impacts a bit. It actually rode pretty good but the geometry was thrown off for steep access climbing (it wanted to lift the front tire too easily).
Then I got a 26" Rocky Mountain parts bike with a Marzocchi Bomber fork and added that to the Marin. Better travel, less clunky, but even more hard to ride up steep access hills (front end gets very twitchy at slow speeds). The fork is a little longer. One project this winter is to SS the bike and work on reducing this issue. What's nice is it has disc mounts and my rims are disc ready so I can throw the V's on the back and 180 disc up front.
First I added a cheap old Suntour (SX I believe) fork from a 26" Trek Hybrid someone gave me for parts. Not the best, clunky, low travel, but it did smooth off the impacts a bit. It actually rode pretty good but the geometry was thrown off for steep access climbing (it wanted to lift the front tire too easily).
Then I got a 26" Rocky Mountain parts bike with a Marzocchi Bomber fork and added that to the Marin. Better travel, less clunky, but even more hard to ride up steep access hills (front end gets very twitchy at slow speeds). The fork is a little longer. One project this winter is to SS the bike and work on reducing this issue. What's nice is it has disc mounts and my rims are disc ready so I can throw the V's on the back and 180 disc up front.
Last edited by Happy Feet; 02-04-21 at 09:51 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
If you want to try a cheap suspension fork, try one. I've never bought into matching a rigid atc with a suspension. It should be within a reasonable difference, but there was a time when a lot of people were pushing the travel on old bikes. Rule of thumb used to be 1/2* change in HA for every 10mm.
My Serotta was originally a rigid with a suspension fork option of 46mm travel I'm running 70mm. Of course the HA was 72* so a little slack is not a problem. Likewise my Trek is spec'd for a 63mm, I'm running 80mm. But I'm a Bomber fan, so I can't vouch for Suntour.
As for Suntour, there are some on eBay that are probably closer to your rigid with a threaded steerer. Here is one that might tick enough boxes...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Suntour-1-1-8-Threaded-26-QR-MTB-Bike-63mm-204mm-Suspension-Fork-V-Brake-NEW/133596887790?epid=17041841983&hash=item1f1afebaee:gKAAAOSw7ixf80el
I'm far from a fork specialist, but with only 63mm of travel, how much pogo stick can you get, of course there could be a bottoming issue, but hopefully you can take out a lot of sag and that might help.
John
My Serotta was originally a rigid with a suspension fork option of 46mm travel I'm running 70mm. Of course the HA was 72* so a little slack is not a problem. Likewise my Trek is spec'd for a 63mm, I'm running 80mm. But I'm a Bomber fan, so I can't vouch for Suntour.
As for Suntour, there are some on eBay that are probably closer to your rigid with a threaded steerer. Here is one that might tick enough boxes...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Suntour-1-1-8-Threaded-26-QR-MTB-Bike-63mm-204mm-Suspension-Fork-V-Brake-NEW/133596887790?epid=17041841983&hash=item1f1afebaee:gKAAAOSw7ixf80el
I'm far from a fork specialist, but with only 63mm of travel, how much pogo stick can you get, of course there could be a bottoming issue, but hopefully you can take out a lot of sag and that might help.
John
Last edited by 70sSanO; 02-04-21 at 01:34 PM.
Likes For 70sSanO:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,599
Bikes: 06 Lemond Reno, 98 GT Timberline mtn.bike
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 699 Times
in
436 Posts
I wouldn't alter your GF. I won't list the link to a bike for sale(against BF rules), but a new fork isn't cheap, at least compared to a listing (Louisville, KY) on Craigslist for a Spec.Stumpjumper hardtail--in case you'd want to look just to compare a complete used bike price to a new fork. And no, it isn't my bike-haven't even seen it in person.
PS-my mtn bike started life as a '96 GT hardtail, frame was replaced under warranty in '98, at which time I began upgrades--finished around '05 or so). Nothing left of the orig bike. If I had an older mtn bike now (make that another old mtn bike!), would I upgrade-no, I'd buy a later, used model with more updated parts already on it. And I really like that GF-wouldn't change a thing!
PS-my mtn bike started life as a '96 GT hardtail, frame was replaced under warranty in '98, at which time I began upgrades--finished around '05 or so). Nothing left of the orig bike. If I had an older mtn bike now (make that another old mtn bike!), would I upgrade-no, I'd buy a later, used model with more updated parts already on it. And I really like that GF-wouldn't change a thing!
Last edited by freeranger; 02-04-21 at 03:59 PM.
Likes For freeranger:
#11
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
The C&V side of this website is going to have to come to terms with 1990's suspension forks pretty soon
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Likes For Darth Lefty:
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
truly like riding it but buddies sport FS 29ers....so wanna pretend i fit in .
front end handling is so much better tha with suspension.
but not easy to pound down trails all rigid.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
If you want to try a cheap suspension fork, try one. I've never bought into matching a rigid atc with a suspension. It should be within a reasonable difference, but there was a time when a lot of people were pushing the travel on old bikes. Rule of thumb used to be 1/2* change in HA for every 10mm.
My Serotta was originally a rigid with a suspension fork option of 46mm travel I'm running 70mm. Of course the HA was 72* so a little slack is not a problem. Likewise my Trek is spec'd for a 63mm, I'm running 80mm. But I'm a Bomber fan, so I can't vouch for Suntour.
As for Suntour, there are some on eBay that are probably closer to your rigid with a threaded steerer. Here is one that might tick enough boxes...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Suntour-1-1-8-Threaded-26-QR-MTB-Bike-63mm-204mm-Suspension-Fork-V-Brake-NEW/133596887790?epid=17041841983&hash=item1f1afebaee:gKAAAOSw7ixf80el
I'm far from a fork specialist, but with only 63mm of travel, how much pogo stick can you get, of course there could be a bottoming issue, but hopefully you can take out a lot of sag and that might help.
John
My Serotta was originally a rigid with a suspension fork option of 46mm travel I'm running 70mm. Of course the HA was 72* so a little slack is not a problem. Likewise my Trek is spec'd for a 63mm, I'm running 80mm. But I'm a Bomber fan, so I can't vouch for Suntour.
As for Suntour, there are some on eBay that are probably closer to your rigid with a threaded steerer. Here is one that might tick enough boxes...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Suntour-1-1-8-Threaded-26-QR-MTB-Bike-63mm-204mm-Suspension-Fork-V-Brake-NEW/133596887790?epid=17041841983&hash=item1f1afebaee:gKAAAOSw7ixf80el
I'm far from a fork specialist, but with only 63mm of travel, how much pogo stick can you get, of course there could be a bottoming issue, but hopefully you can take out a lot of sag and that might help.
John
thanks.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I would guess your steel fork weighs around 1000 grams. The 63mm Suntour is 2200 grans. Not a light fork and probably not a great fork. But I’m guessing finding that super light V-brake SID in new condition is both a needle in a haystack and a king’s ransom.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
Yes, there is a chance it will. But you really can’t run much over 80mm and no one makes a quality V-brake fork these days.
I would guess your steel fork weighs around 1000 grams. The 63mm Suntour is 2200 grans. Not a light fork and probably not a great fork. But I’m guessing finding that super light V-brake SID in new condition is both a needle in a haystack and a king’s ransom.
John
I would guess your steel fork weighs around 1000 grams. The 63mm Suntour is 2200 grans. Not a light fork and probably not a great fork. But I’m guessing finding that super light V-brake SID in new condition is both a needle in a haystack and a king’s ransom.
John
Likes For thehammerdog:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
If you want to try a cheap suspension fork, try one. I've never bought into matching a rigid atc with a suspension. It should be within a reasonable difference, but there was a time when a lot of people were pushing the travel on old bikes. Rule of thumb used to be 1/2* change in HA for every 10mm.
My Serotta was originally a rigid with a suspension fork option of 46mm travel I'm running 70mm. Of course the HA was 72* so a little slack is not a problem. Likewise my Trek is spec'd for a 63mm, I'm running 80mm. But I'm a Bomber fan, so I can't vouch for Suntour.
As for Suntour, there are some on eBay that are probably closer to your rigid with a threaded steerer. Here is one that might tick enough boxes...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Suntour-1-1-8-Threaded-26-QR-MTB-Bike-63mm-204mm-Suspension-Fork-V-Brake-NEW/133596887790?epid=17041841983&hash=item1f1afebaee:gKAAAOSw7ixf80el
I'm far from a fork specialist, but with only 63mm of travel, how much pogo stick can you get, of course there could be a bottoming issue, but hopefully you can take out a lot of sag and that might help.
John
My Serotta was originally a rigid with a suspension fork option of 46mm travel I'm running 70mm. Of course the HA was 72* so a little slack is not a problem. Likewise my Trek is spec'd for a 63mm, I'm running 80mm. But I'm a Bomber fan, so I can't vouch for Suntour.
As for Suntour, there are some on eBay that are probably closer to your rigid with a threaded steerer. Here is one that might tick enough boxes...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Suntour-1-1-8-Threaded-26-QR-MTB-Bike-63mm-204mm-Suspension-Fork-V-Brake-NEW/133596887790?epid=17041841983&hash=item1f1afebaee:gKAAAOSw7ixf80el
I'm far from a fork specialist, but with only 63mm of travel, how much pogo stick can you get, of course there could be a bottoming issue, but hopefully you can take out a lot of sag and that might help.
John
#17
n00b
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,397
Bikes: Surly Karate Monkey, Twin Six Standard Rando
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 428 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
273 Posts
This bike was not designed with a suspension fork in mind, and the suspension forks available are not much of an improvement. A nicer rigid fork might be an improvement, as would a larger tire. (BikeMan.com is a good source for those forks.) A larger tire will fit better on a wider rim. Tubeless tires will roll better with lower pressure. A carbon handlebar can take up some of the chatter.
But if you start down that road, the purchases add up quickly. No matter how supple you make a rigid bike, it's still a rigid bike.
But if you start down that road, the purchases add up quickly. No matter how supple you make a rigid bike, it's still a rigid bike.
Likes For mack_turtle:
#18
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
80mm was not the norm for an XC bike until the late 90s, and even then it was at the upper range.
That is a cool vintage bike. If you do go with a fork, see if you can find and refurbish a late 90's or early 2000's Z2 Bomber. That would be hot.
That is a cool vintage bike. If you do go with a fork, see if you can find and refurbish a late 90's or early 2000's Z2 Bomber. That would be hot.
#19
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Since it has a 1-1/8 steerer, there are thankfully options.
First, any decent used fork from about Y2k-2015 will fit. Most of them can have their travel adjusted down very easily with spacers under the air piston. You need to find one with canti studs.
For what's on sale now, I'm seeing Rockshox 30 Silver forks that still have 26" canti studs, for sale, if not on RS's website any more. These are not light or fancy. They have steel springs and fixed compression damping, but they are functional, and <$200. You'd need headset and stem to go with. A nicer fork is a Judy Gold RL, air spring, low speed compression adjustment, all alloy... but it starts at $350 and does not have canti studs. I looked at the Suntour catalog, there are a few 26" v-brake options but nothing with damping or air spring.
If you do not find one with canti studs you would be looking for a disc wheel and front brake to go with it, likely more of a project than you wanted
First, any decent used fork from about Y2k-2015 will fit. Most of them can have their travel adjusted down very easily with spacers under the air piston. You need to find one with canti studs.
For what's on sale now, I'm seeing Rockshox 30 Silver forks that still have 26" canti studs, for sale, if not on RS's website any more. These are not light or fancy. They have steel springs and fixed compression damping, but they are functional, and <$200. You'd need headset and stem to go with. A nicer fork is a Judy Gold RL, air spring, low speed compression adjustment, all alloy... but it starts at $350 and does not have canti studs. I looked at the Suntour catalog, there are a few 26" v-brake options but nothing with damping or air spring.
If you do not find one with canti studs you would be looking for a disc wheel and front brake to go with it, likely more of a project than you wanted
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 02-07-21 at 01:48 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
Im also in the camp that wouldnt touch this bike other than maintenance needed just to keep it rolling
i outlined my experience riding a 15 year old Santa Cruz in Bentonville just now on prj71’s post about “budget mountain bikes” - i wont re-write it, but id think for $500 + or - you could find something like that to keep up with your buddies.
After all, we all know that aluminum frames and 26” wheels are worthless for real trails (wink - nudge - im kidding , but they dont hold much resale value so you can find them periodically for attractive prices- ).
but thinking about a fork upgrade for you — lets see, $250 fork, $30 headset, $80 for new stem and bars, - thats $360 in parts by itself conservatively.
andis the bike labelled a “Fisher” or a “Gary Fisher” ? Thats an important distinction because Fisher was bought out by Trek at some point and started calling allhis bikes Gary Fisher . (I could have the name thing backwards) but the older pre Trek buyout Fisher’s are classics, along the lines of a real Ritchey, Bontrager, Yeti etc. and if yours is one of those, i wouldnt touch it with a 10 foot pole(except for replacing consumables , tires, cables, etc )
but as always, just giving my thoughts based on my experiences , andd with your bike and experiences - its your rules
have fun
i outlined my experience riding a 15 year old Santa Cruz in Bentonville just now on prj71’s post about “budget mountain bikes” - i wont re-write it, but id think for $500 + or - you could find something like that to keep up with your buddies.
After all, we all know that aluminum frames and 26” wheels are worthless for real trails (wink - nudge - im kidding , but they dont hold much resale value so you can find them periodically for attractive prices- ).
but thinking about a fork upgrade for you — lets see, $250 fork, $30 headset, $80 for new stem and bars, - thats $360 in parts by itself conservatively.
andis the bike labelled a “Fisher” or a “Gary Fisher” ? Thats an important distinction because Fisher was bought out by Trek at some point and started calling allhis bikes Gary Fisher . (I could have the name thing backwards) but the older pre Trek buyout Fisher’s are classics, along the lines of a real Ritchey, Bontrager, Yeti etc. and if yours is one of those, i wouldnt touch it with a 10 foot pole(except for replacing consumables , tires, cables, etc )
but as always, just giving my thoughts based on my experiences , andd with your bike and experiences - its your rules
have fun
#21
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Gary Fisher sold to Trek in 1996 but I think most of his unique stuff was either in the 80's, or early full suspension in the 90's. I wouldn't put any shade on this bike if it's a Trek. Fisher himself certainly wouldn't, he's been a Trek employee ever since and they still use his model names
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
no - no he certainly wouldnt. The man dresses like a cartoon character and has an ego the size of Texas, - and we as mountain bikers are all better for it with his killer designs he has pushed to market over the years 😀😀
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
Since posting in this thread earlier I pulled out the Marin and tried reworking the front end to eliminate some of the lifting going uphill. After a test ride today with a longer stem and moving the new seat forward a bit (after the photo was taken) it does better. Had a lot of fun riding and even managed a full somersault endo trying to stop on a steep downhill section (rookie move). The bomber fork takes the jolt out of rocks and roots enough to not try to avoid them.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
Im also in the camp that wouldnt touch this bike other than maintenance needed just to keep it rolling
i outlined my experience riding a 15 year old Santa Cruz in Bentonville just now on prj71’s post about “budget mountain bikes” - i wont re-write it, but id think for $500 + or - you could find something like that to keep up with your buddies.
After all, we all know that aluminum frames and 26” wheels are worthless for real trails (wink - nudge - im kidding , but they dont hold much resale value so you can find them periodically for attractive prices- ).
but thinking about a fork upgrade for you — lets see, $250 fork, $30 headset, $80 for new stem and bars, - thats $360 in parts by itself conservatively.
andis the bike labelled a “Fisher” or a “Gary Fisher” ? Thats an important distinction because Fisher was bought out by Trek at some point and started calling allhis bikes Gary Fisher . (I could have the name thing backwards) but the older pre Trek buyout Fisher’s are classics, along the lines of a real Ritchey, Bontrager, Yeti etc. and if yours is one of those, i wouldnt touch it with a 10 foot pole(except for replacing consumables , tires, cables, etc )
but as always, just giving my thoughts based on my experiences , andd with your bike and experiences - its your rules
have fun
i outlined my experience riding a 15 year old Santa Cruz in Bentonville just now on prj71’s post about “budget mountain bikes” - i wont re-write it, but id think for $500 + or - you could find something like that to keep up with your buddies.
After all, we all know that aluminum frames and 26” wheels are worthless for real trails (wink - nudge - im kidding , but they dont hold much resale value so you can find them periodically for attractive prices- ).
but thinking about a fork upgrade for you — lets see, $250 fork, $30 headset, $80 for new stem and bars, - thats $360 in parts by itself conservatively.
andis the bike labelled a “Fisher” or a “Gary Fisher” ? Thats an important distinction because Fisher was bought out by Trek at some point and started calling allhis bikes Gary Fisher . (I could have the name thing backwards) but the older pre Trek buyout Fisher’s are classics, along the lines of a real Ritchey, Bontrager, Yeti etc. and if yours is one of those, i wouldnt touch it with a 10 foot pole(except for replacing consumables , tires, cables, etc )
but as always, just giving my thoughts based on my experiences , andd with your bike and experiences - its your rules
have fun
#25
Senior Member
My understanding is that production was swiftly shifted to Waterloo, WI when Trek acquired the brand in April 1994. So if yours is still one of those frames made in California, you already own a true classic. Put your upgrade itching aside and enjoy this bike in its original form. Please keep it as beautiful as it looks now.
From the moment I saw it, I said to myself “this is a helluva bike as is!”
From the moment I saw it, I said to myself “this is a helluva bike as is!”