Cantilever brake reach problem
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 10
Bikes: 2011 Long Haul Trucker, 2015 Seven Evergreen, 2000 KHS Tandemania Sport, early 90s Trek Antelope, 2013 Surly Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cantilever brake reach problem
I've recently been building a touring bike for a cross country trip this summer, I just finished building the wheels, and when I went to install the cantilever brakes, I found that the pads did not reach far enough down to the rim, they hit the tire.
When I looked further in this problem, I found out it may be an issue of wheel size. the frame I'm using is a 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus which comes with boss fittings for the brakes. After reviewing vintage-trek.com I realized I misidentified the frame as a 1985 before I built the wheels. The 85 came standard 700c wheels, while the 87 had 27". So the wheels I built are 700c, a bit shorter than the 27" the frame came standard with.
The funny thing is though, when I took a 27" wheel off of my commuter bike and put it on the frame, the new cantilever brakes I bought (Tektro Oryx) still did not reach down to the rim and hit the tire.
Do new cantilever brakes extend longer from the boss than the older ones? I would really like to use cantilever brakes on this bike. Is there any canti's out there that have a shorter boss - brake pad length? Is there any modifications I can do to make this work?
Thanks for your help!
Zach
When I looked further in this problem, I found out it may be an issue of wheel size. the frame I'm using is a 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus which comes with boss fittings for the brakes. After reviewing vintage-trek.com I realized I misidentified the frame as a 1985 before I built the wheels. The 85 came standard 700c wheels, while the 87 had 27". So the wheels I built are 700c, a bit shorter than the 27" the frame came standard with.
The funny thing is though, when I took a 27" wheel off of my commuter bike and put it on the frame, the new cantilever brakes I bought (Tektro Oryx) still did not reach down to the rim and hit the tire.
Do new cantilever brakes extend longer from the boss than the older ones? I would really like to use cantilever brakes on this bike. Is there any canti's out there that have a shorter boss - brake pad length? Is there any modifications I can do to make this work?
Thanks for your help!
Zach
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,696
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5774 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times
in
1,423 Posts
The difference between 27" and 700c shouldn't be enough to be a problem, so something else is wrong. I don't know anything about changes in brake design but it's possible.
Put the wheel back in and measure the vertical and horizontal distance from the center of rim to the boss. It should be in the 30mm range, but let's check. I have a bunch of NOS brakes from that era and if I know the measurement, I'll check if any will help.
Put the wheel back in and measure the vertical and horizontal distance from the center of rim to the boss. It should be in the 30mm range, but let's check. I have a bunch of NOS brakes from that era and if I know the measurement, I'll check if any will help.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#3
Senior Member
Can you post a picture of the brakes? Most cantilevers allow rotation of the arm that holds the brake-posts. This lets you vertically adjust the spot where the pads touch. The minor 4mm difference between 700c vs. 27" rims can easily be accomomdated by a brake-adjustment.
btw - the straddle cable on this picture is way too tall, you want it just barely skimming the tyre for maximum braking-force.
Here's how you adjust the rotation of the holder of the brake-posts:
From Park Tool - Cantilever Brake Service, near the bottom of the page.
btw - the straddle cable on this picture is way too tall, you want it just barely skimming the tyre for maximum braking-force.
Here's how you adjust the rotation of the holder of the brake-posts:
From Park Tool - Cantilever Brake Service, near the bottom of the page.
Last edited by DannoXYZ; 04-19-10 at 03:17 PM.
#4
Peace and bicycle grease!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Island, CA
Posts: 285
Bikes: '85 Schwinn Voyageur, Ross Mt Hood, Rossin, the Nugget
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i'm wondering if the bosses are set too close to each other for the oryx's.
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Tektro Oryx brakes and many modern cantilever brake pads sit higher above the canti pivot studs than older cantis. Trek prolly speced Dia Compe cantis on that bike, which require the canti studs to sit slightly higher with a smaller tolerance range. Oryx won't work, neither will most modern low profile cantis (Shimano, Paul) and 'high profile' cantis (spooky, VO, Paul, and others).
You never mentioned why you are using the Tektro brakes in the first place. Your options may be limited to using the original canti brakes speced on the bike and upgrade the pads to something with a better compound. Koolstop salmon is a favorite around here. We (VO) have pads with adjustable toe in and are more forgiving to canti studs that sit higher on older frames too.
You never mentioned why you are using the Tektro brakes in the first place. Your options may be limited to using the original canti brakes speced on the bike and upgrade the pads to something with a better compound. Koolstop salmon is a favorite around here. We (VO) have pads with adjustable toe in and are more forgiving to canti studs that sit higher on older frames too.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 10
Bikes: 2011 Long Haul Trucker, 2015 Seven Evergreen, 2000 KHS Tandemania Sport, early 90s Trek Antelope, 2013 Surly Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for all the responses.
I measured the distance from the center of the rim to the center of the boss and got a vertical measurement of about 20mm, and a horizontal of 30mm.
Here is a picture of the brake on the front wheel.
The shoes on this brake are adjusted via sliding up and down. The shoe is in the farthest down position in the photo.
velo-orange - I've never used canti's before and was not aware that there was this much variation in the length between the shoes and bosses.
What is my best bet in terms of brakes that will fit the 20mm vertical masurement?
I measured the distance from the center of the rim to the center of the boss and got a vertical measurement of about 20mm, and a horizontal of 30mm.
Here is a picture of the brake on the front wheel.
The shoes on this brake are adjusted via sliding up and down. The shoe is in the farthest down position in the photo.
velo-orange - I've never used canti's before and was not aware that there was this much variation in the length between the shoes and bosses.
What is my best bet in terms of brakes that will fit the 20mm vertical masurement?
#7
Real Men Ride Ordinaries
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Thanks for all the responses.
I measured the distance from the center of the rim to the center of the boss and got a vertical measurement of about 20mm, and a horizontal of 30mm.
Here is a picture of the brake on the front wheel.
The shoes on this brake are adjusted via sliding up and down. The shoe is in the farthest down position in the photo.
velo-orange - I've never used canti's before and was not aware that there was this much variation in the length between the shoes and bosses.
What is my best bet in terms of brakes that will fit the 20mm vertical masurement?
I measured the distance from the center of the rim to the center of the boss and got a vertical measurement of about 20mm, and a horizontal of 30mm.
Here is a picture of the brake on the front wheel.
The shoes on this brake are adjusted via sliding up and down. The shoe is in the farthest down position in the photo.
velo-orange - I've never used canti's before and was not aware that there was this much variation in the length between the shoes and bosses.
What is my best bet in terms of brakes that will fit the 20mm vertical masurement?
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
The distance between studs may not matter in this case. 20mm from brake track to canti stud center sounds about right. I've measured 15mm for certain dia compe brakes. newer canti and V brakes like the oryx, shimano, paul, etc. are all going to need 25mm from brake track to canti stud center.
These measurements are going from memory though. so I may be off.
shimano really made an impact with standardization of frame spec to work with their components. They may catch hell for re-inventing stuff that doesn't need re-inventing, but in this case, the adjustment and compatibility range really opened up options for everyone.
These measurements are going from memory though. so I may be off.
shimano really made an impact with standardization of frame spec to work with their components. They may catch hell for re-inventing stuff that doesn't need re-inventing, but in this case, the adjustment and compatibility range really opened up options for everyone.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 10
Bikes: 2011 Long Haul Trucker, 2015 Seven Evergreen, 2000 KHS Tandemania Sport, early 90s Trek Antelope, 2013 Surly Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
About 62mm between the studs.
Any ideas which dia compe (or other) brakes I could look at with the 15mm reach, and where I might find them?
Thanks!
Any ideas which dia compe (or other) brakes I could look at with the 15mm reach, and where I might find them?
Thanks!
Last edited by Rudomanski; 04-20-10 at 08:51 AM.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 10
Bikes: 2011 Long Haul Trucker, 2015 Seven Evergreen, 2000 KHS Tandemania Sport, early 90s Trek Antelope, 2013 Surly Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I spoke with someone from harris cyclery via email and he said an old pair of ritchey logics should work with the measurements I listed. I'm going to try and see how those work. Thanks for everyone's help on this, I'm looking forward to getting out on the road.
-Zach
-Zach
#12
nice idea, poor execution
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West Newton, MA
Posts: 395
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just for posterity:
The more recent cantilever brakes I found that have the shortest pivot to braking surface distance are old Ritchey Logics, made by Dia Compe. I'm not sure what the Dia Compe equivalent is, the forging and pad hardware looks similar to the 986, but it uses normal springs instead of the "U brake" style that the 986 used.
The minimum pivot to rim vertical distance on these is 19mm with pads horizontal, you could angle them down just a bit to get a little lower. The maximum distance is about 30mm. The box specifically says "Longer slot allows for greater vertical pad adjustment" and they mean it.
I sold the last set of these to Rudomanski. We don't have any more, but they're out there.
The more recent cantilever brakes I found that have the shortest pivot to braking surface distance are old Ritchey Logics, made by Dia Compe. I'm not sure what the Dia Compe equivalent is, the forging and pad hardware looks similar to the 986, but it uses normal springs instead of the "U brake" style that the 986 used.
The minimum pivot to rim vertical distance on these is 19mm with pads horizontal, you could angle them down just a bit to get a little lower. The maximum distance is about 30mm. The box specifically says "Longer slot allows for greater vertical pad adjustment" and they mean it.
I sold the last set of these to Rudomanski. We don't have any more, but they're out there.
#13
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for all the responses.
I measured the distance from the center of the rim to the center of the boss and got a vertical measurement of about 20mm, and a horizontal of 30mm.
Here is a picture of the brake on the front wheel.
The shoes on this brake are adjusted via sliding up and down. The shoe is in the farthest down position in the photo.
velo-orange - I've never used canti's before and was not aware that there was this much variation in the length between the shoes and bosses.
What is my best bet in terms of brakes that will fit the 20mm vertical masurement?
I measured the distance from the center of the rim to the center of the boss and got a vertical measurement of about 20mm, and a horizontal of 30mm.
Here is a picture of the brake on the front wheel.
The shoes on this brake are adjusted via sliding up and down. The shoe is in the farthest down position in the photo.
velo-orange - I've never used canti's before and was not aware that there was this much variation in the length between the shoes and bosses.
What is my best bet in terms of brakes that will fit the 20mm vertical masurement?
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 10
Bikes: 2011 Long Haul Trucker, 2015 Seven Evergreen, 2000 KHS Tandemania Sport, early 90s Trek Antelope, 2013 Surly Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the logics I put on there just barely cleared at 20mm. I'm afraid these probably wouldn't work at 15. If you're not set on cantis, you may be able to go with a set of long reach calipers.
#15
Senior Member
There are two fancy variants of the Dia-Compe cantis I know of which feature an eccentric bushing. One is a variant of the 983 model, and the other is model (or variant?) NGC982.
These bushings have an off-center hole, this is the hole that the stud slides into. By varying the orientation of the bushing, one can change the vertical position of the entire brake by about 4mm. (Actually one can vary several parameters relevant to brake set-up simultaneously by simply rotating the bushing).
These fancy variants tend to come on a rare few vintage higher-end 1980s mtn bikes that typically have U-brakes on the rear and said variant cantis on the front. They are very hard to find. In five years of full-time bike salvage I have only come across a total of 3 individual brakes.
These models do not allow any vertical adjustment at the pad post, only at the bushing.
These bushings have an off-center hole, this is the hole that the stud slides into. By varying the orientation of the bushing, one can change the vertical position of the entire brake by about 4mm. (Actually one can vary several parameters relevant to brake set-up simultaneously by simply rotating the bushing).
These fancy variants tend to come on a rare few vintage higher-end 1980s mtn bikes that typically have U-brakes on the rear and said variant cantis on the front. They are very hard to find. In five years of full-time bike salvage I have only come across a total of 3 individual brakes.
These models do not allow any vertical adjustment at the pad post, only at the bushing.
Last edited by Drakonchik; 05-31-10 at 01:28 PM.
#16
Senior Member
I have a Dia-Compe NGC982 canti brake on my desk right now. With the eccentric bushing set so that the pad can sit as low as possible, there is a vertical distance of about 23mm from the center of the stud to the center of the bolt which fastens the pad post.
#17
Senior Member
Got a set of Dia-Compe 986 ("Coda" Cannondale branded) on my desk. Vertical reach on these is also 23mm at lowest setting.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
I just ran into this problem. I was installing tektro 720s on a 1992 bridgestone XO-2 and they're not going to work on the front wheel. I set the cantis as low as they can go and they are still a bit high. Plus the movement on the cantilever isn't quite right; I think the spacing between the canti posts is a bit close by modern standards. Sigh, lol. I could go with 650b wheels I guess (the bike was originally spec'd with 26inch wheels but I don't want to build/buy new wheels. It looks like I'll be scrounging around for old cantis to try to find a pair that works.
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
Been researching this topic and wanted to raise it again to see if anyone else has solved this in recent years.
I have a mid-80s touring bike running on 27" wheels. The canti brakes i have are dia compe 980s from 1986. They don't work great, are impossible to toe-in and in general would love a vintage upgrade.
If i were to updgrade to a later version of the 980, would the sizing remain the same in terms of working with my 27" wheels? Thank you everyone.
I have a mid-80s touring bike running on 27" wheels. The canti brakes i have are dia compe 980s from 1986. They don't work great, are impossible to toe-in and in general would love a vintage upgrade.
If i were to updgrade to a later version of the 980, would the sizing remain the same in terms of working with my 27" wheels? Thank you everyone.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I'm running XTR M900 cantilevers. They have the same toe-in setup as other cantis, but with Koolstop pads there is no braking issues.
These Dia Compe cantilevers look to use a linear style brake pad and are probably easier to setup, and still vintage looking. Have no idea how well they stop but I'd use Koolstops.
DC980 | Diacompe
John
These Dia Compe cantilevers look to use a linear style brake pad and are probably easier to setup, and still vintage looking. Have no idea how well they stop but I'd use Koolstops.
DC980 | Diacompe
John
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
Paul makes V brakes that will solve the reach problem. They are pricy though.
Also trying to keep the look of the canti brakes for this one. Thx.
#23
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
I'm running XTR M900 cantilevers. They have the same toe-in setup as other cantis, but with Koolstop pads there is no braking issues.
These Dia Compe cantilevers look to use a linear style brake pad and are probably easier to setup, and still vintage looking. Have no idea how well they stop but I'd use Koolstops.
DC980 | Diacompe
John
These Dia Compe cantilevers look to use a linear style brake pad and are probably easier to setup, and still vintage looking. Have no idea how well they stop but I'd use Koolstops.
DC980 | Diacompe
John
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dinobyte
Bicycle Mechanics
28
07-17-16 07:11 PM
southpawboston
Classic & Vintage
19
05-27-13 03:03 PM
atombianchi
Bicycle Mechanics
9
06-16-10 07:41 PM