GP5000 clincher width sizing
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
6 Posts
GP5000 clincher width sizing
I'm running older carbon Renolds 46/66 clincher wheels with 14mm internal width. With the older GP4000 25C tires, the actual measured tire width was 26mm. With the new GP5000 28c tires, the measured width is 25mm which is disappointing.
Is it worth trying to go with the 30C GP5000 hoping for a tire where the width will be more than the current measured 25mm?
Is it worth trying to go with the 30C GP5000 hoping for a tire where the width will be more than the current measured 25mm?
Likes For Bald Paul:
#5
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 41,713
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 556 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21239 Post(s)
Liked 7,729 Times
in
3,630 Posts
Likes For datlas:
Likes For Dictatorsaurus:
#7
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 13,848
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5657 Post(s)
Liked 4,329 Times
in
2,980 Posts
Won't be a mystery if you try them out. Will it be a disaster if they are off by a few millimeters? Personally I doubt it. If it is, then it's just that tires ride quality or whatever compared to another model of tire. Or just your own high expectation.
Pressure too might also affect the width you measure. So if you are running significantly lower tire pressure than the manufacturer might recommend if you find their chart tables or calculator tool for recommended tire pressure at your ride weight, then I can see where it might measure narrower.
Pressure too might also affect the width you measure. So if you are running significantly lower tire pressure than the manufacturer might recommend if you find their chart tables or calculator tool for recommended tire pressure at your ride weight, then I can see where it might measure narrower.
#8
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 15,899
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10307 Post(s)
Liked 6,743 Times
in
3,818 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2329 Post(s)
Liked 2,082 Times
in
1,304 Posts
GP4000 25 mm were big (27-29mm depending on which rims I used)
GP5000 25 mm run nominal on "normal rims", skinny on your rims as can be seen with your 28mm running 26mm.
I have all those sizes and from memory I would guess 30 mm GP5000 tubes on narrow internal rims are going to be 27.5-28.5 mm. Depends on tire pressure and age, too.
30mm tubeless on wide internal hookless run 31-32 and 32mm run 34.5mm after breaking in
GP5000 25 mm run nominal on "normal rims", skinny on your rims as can be seen with your 28mm running 26mm.
I have all those sizes and from memory I would guess 30 mm GP5000 tubes on narrow internal rims are going to be 27.5-28.5 mm. Depends on tire pressure and age, too.
30mm tubeless on wide internal hookless run 31-32 and 32mm run 34.5mm after breaking in
Likes For GhostRider62:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,551
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 382 Times
in
269 Posts
No experience with the exact configuration but I would guess that a 30mm will measure out to ~28mm ish on an old school narrow rim.
I went through a similar situation as I have newer wider rims on some bikes and older narrow rims on other bikes. I've found the old 25mm Conti GP4k tires on 23mm external rims to be 26-27mm, which just fits my older frames. The new GP5ks I've read run narrower due to compensating for modern wider rims.
I found that I can maybe run 28mm tires on narrow rims, or I can run 25mm tires on wider rims. But 28mm tires on wider rims for sure won't clear any of my road frames.
So I basically stick to 23-25mm tires on modern rims and 25 tires on older rims.
I went through a similar situation as I have newer wider rims on some bikes and older narrow rims on other bikes. I've found the old 25mm Conti GP4k tires on 23mm external rims to be 26-27mm, which just fits my older frames. The new GP5ks I've read run narrower due to compensating for modern wider rims.
I found that I can maybe run 28mm tires on narrow rims, or I can run 25mm tires on wider rims. But 28mm tires on wider rims for sure won't clear any of my road frames.
So I basically stick to 23-25mm tires on modern rims and 25 tires on older rims.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 1,611
Bikes: 2021 Domane SL6, Black Beta (Nashbar frame), 2004 Trek 1000C being made an all arounder.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 378 Times
in
234 Posts
I’d buy one tire and try. I have some data of a 25mm GP5000 on a 14 mm rim at it measured 25.6mm at 115 psi after stretching. This was a tire when o bought when they first came out. Not tubeless.
I have a newer about a year old non tubeless 28mm. On a 19mm rim at 90psi it measured 29mm. I did not try it on the old 14mm front wheel I don’t use anymore. Wanted to but did not take the time.
My guess is get a 30mm. It would end up 27 to 28 is my vote.
I have a newer about a year old non tubeless 28mm. On a 19mm rim at 90psi it measured 29mm. I did not try it on the old 14mm front wheel I don’t use anymore. Wanted to but did not take the time.
My guess is get a 30mm. It would end up 27 to 28 is my vote.
#13
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
6 Posts
I just ordered a 30C GP5000. I would be happy if it measures 27mm-28mm on my 14mm internal width rims.
I'll report back once I get it and install it with the actual measurements.
I'll report back once I get it and install it with the actual measurements.
Likes For Dictatorsaurus:
#15
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
6 Posts
As promised. Here are the measurements:
14mm inner width rim:
- GP5000 clincher 28 - Measures 26mm
- GP5000 clincher 30 - Measures 28mm
Basically, the tire measures 2mm less than the advertised width on narrow 14mm rims.
I installed the 30 up front and the 28 on the rear since the rear would not allow for a wider tire.
14mm inner width rim:
- GP5000 clincher 28 - Measures 26mm
- GP5000 clincher 30 - Measures 28mm
Basically, the tire measures 2mm less than the advertised width on narrow 14mm rims.
I installed the 30 up front and the 28 on the rear since the rear would not allow for a wider tire.
Likes For Dictatorsaurus:
#16
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 13,848
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5657 Post(s)
Liked 4,329 Times
in
2,980 Posts
GP 5000's come in quite a few slightly different versions of clincher. Which did you get?
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,458
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 975 Post(s)
Liked 984 Times
in
635 Posts
I read somewhere, or maybe dreamt, that some tire companies are now assuming a wider rim when they label the tire widths on their tires.
For example, if previously a typical road rim internal width was 14mm, they'd label a 700cX25 tire that way expecting it to be about 25mm when inflated on a typical rim. It might have plumped up a couple mm on a wider rim back then. Isn't that why we all started thinking about getting wider rims back then before they were common? To get a little more volume from the tires we were using? (23 or 25 typically)
If nowadays they're assuming that a typical rim is now wider, maybe 18 or even 20 internal width, they might label a tire as 28 even though it might be essentially the same tire as that previous 25, because they assume it's how it will measure on that new typical rim. If it's mounted on what they now assume is an atypical narrower rim, for example, a 14mm rim, it might end up being just like the "old 25" on that rim, still measuring 25mm give or take instead of the label size of 28mm.
I don't know if this is a fact or just a dream I had. But it kind of makes sense.
For example, if previously a typical road rim internal width was 14mm, they'd label a 700cX25 tire that way expecting it to be about 25mm when inflated on a typical rim. It might have plumped up a couple mm on a wider rim back then. Isn't that why we all started thinking about getting wider rims back then before they were common? To get a little more volume from the tires we were using? (23 or 25 typically)
If nowadays they're assuming that a typical rim is now wider, maybe 18 or even 20 internal width, they might label a tire as 28 even though it might be essentially the same tire as that previous 25, because they assume it's how it will measure on that new typical rim. If it's mounted on what they now assume is an atypical narrower rim, for example, a 14mm rim, it might end up being just like the "old 25" on that rim, still measuring 25mm give or take instead of the label size of 28mm.
I don't know if this is a fact or just a dream I had. But it kind of makes sense.
Last edited by Camilo; 03-28-23 at 10:47 PM.
Likes For Camilo:
#18
Newbie
I read somewhere, or maybe dreamt, that some tire companies are now assuming a wider rim when they label the tire widths on their tires.
For example, if previously a typical road rim internal width was 14mm, they'd label a 700cX25 tire that way expecting it to be about 25mm when inflated on a typical rim. It might have plumped up a couple mm on a wider rim back then. Isn't that why we all started thinking about getting wider rims back then before they were common? To get a little more volume from the tires we were using? (23 or 25 typically)
If nowadays they're assuming that a typical rim is now wider, maybe 18 or even 20 internal width, they might label a tire as 28 even though it might be essentially the same tire as that previous 25, because they assume it's how it will measure on that new typical rim. If it's mounted on what they now assume is an atypical narrower rim, for example, a 14mm rim, it might end up being just like the "old 25" on that rim, still measuring 25mm give or take instead of the label size of 28mm.
I don't know if this is a fact or just a dream I had. But it kind of makes sense.
For example, if previously a typical road rim internal width was 14mm, they'd label a 700cX25 tire that way expecting it to be about 25mm when inflated on a typical rim. It might have plumped up a couple mm on a wider rim back then. Isn't that why we all started thinking about getting wider rims back then before they were common? To get a little more volume from the tires we were using? (23 or 25 typically)
If nowadays they're assuming that a typical rim is now wider, maybe 18 or even 20 internal width, they might label a tire as 28 even though it might be essentially the same tire as that previous 25, because they assume it's how it will measure on that new typical rim. If it's mounted on what they now assume is an atypical narrower rim, for example, a 14mm rim, it might end up being just like the "old 25" on that rim, still measuring 25mm give or take instead of the label size of 28mm.
I don't know if this is a fact or just a dream I had. But it kind of makes sense.
Likes For RJC1811:
#21
Full Member
I'm running older carbon Renolds 46/66 clincher wheels with 14mm internal width. With the older GP4000 25C tires, the actual measured tire width was 26mm. With the new GP5000 28c tires, the measured width is 25mm which is disappointing.
Is it worth trying to go with the 30C GP5000 hoping for a tire where the width will be more than the current measured 25mm?
Is it worth trying to go with the 30C GP5000 hoping for a tire where the width will be more than the current measured 25mm?
All of my tires, from 23mm to 32mm, always look just a little... shy... when first mounted.
#22
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
6 Posts
One additional thought - how fresh was the GP5k when you measured it? If it's freshly mounted, I'd give it a day or two at-pressure to settle in before measuring. Maybe even leave the bike outside in the sun to allow the tire to 'relax' a bit.
All of my tires, from 23mm to 32mm, always look just a little... shy... when first mounted.
All of my tires, from 23mm to 32mm, always look just a little... shy... when first mounted.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,746
Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 444 Post(s)
Liked 161 Times
in
101 Posts
They definitely resized the 5000s. I stocked up on some 4000s while I could. One set of 25s on 19.5mm internal-width rims measure 28.38 and 28.42 today. On my older 18mm rims, they still measure 28.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,231
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4355 Post(s)
Liked 3,423 Times
in
2,219 Posts
Do you have a bike shop that carries Continental? I'd go in and tell them you want an actual 28c for your rim; that you would like to try a 30c but wold like to be able to bring it back if it doesn't measure out. Good shop, this shouldn't be an issue.