Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Which started the whole chrome forks with bike builders?

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Which started the whole chrome forks with bike builders?

Old 09-04-22, 04:17 PM
  #1  
Robvolz 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 1,918

Bikes: several Eddy Merz (ride like Eddy, braze like Jim!)

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 1,780 Times in 650 Posts
Which started the whole chrome forks with bike builders?

It seems to have come about by the British, I’m not sure for the rationale. Chrome actually adds weight.
Robvolz is offline  
Old 09-04-22, 04:30 PM
  #2  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3463 Post(s)
Liked 2,826 Times in 1,994 Posts
Falcon and Holdsworth are two I recall but did not infect the industry.
Leave that to Ernesto
repechage is offline  
Old 09-04-22, 04:37 PM
  #3  
iab
Senior Member
 
iab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,045
Mentioned: 200 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3009 Post(s)
Liked 3,775 Times in 1,405 Posts
Chrome plating was commercially available in the early/mid 1930s. Most Italian bike manufacturers used the process for components and forks. While used on some frames then, it did not get popular until after WW2.
iab is offline  
Likes For iab:
Old 09-04-22, 05:22 PM
  #4  
clubman 
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,841

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2295 Post(s)
Liked 2,041 Times in 1,250 Posts
And previous to the 30's, builders were using nickel plating on their forks. Dressing up a bike frame with shiny bits is pretty much as old as bikes themselves. Have a look at the Pryor Dodge book, The Bicycle.

Here's a 1926 CCM Flyer


Last edited by clubman; 09-04-22 at 05:25 PM.
clubman is offline  
Likes For clubman:
Old 09-04-22, 06:54 PM
  #5  
machinist42
mycocyclist
 
machinist42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Monkey Junction, Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,230

Bikes: 1964 Schwinn Paramount P-13 DeLuxe, 1964 Schwinn Sport Super Sport, 1972 Falcon San Remo, 1974 Maserati MT-1, 1974 Raleigh International, 1984 Lotus Odyssey, 198? Rossin Ghibli, 1990 LeMond Le Vanquer (sic), 1991 Specialized Allez Transition Pro, +

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 908 Post(s)
Liked 811 Times in 448 Posts
Glossing Over The Obvious?

Originally Posted by Robvolz
...Chrome actually adds weight.
More then Paint?

For no particular reason I weighed my '73 "23"" Carabela Profesional (sic) before removing the non-original paint.
It weighed 2328g.
After removing all the coating, (and discovering it's almost entirely chromed),
It weighs 2294g.
So that paint weighed 34g?

How much does chrome weigh?
No way for me to say with any authority. I have and will have no data on that.
But Paint weighs something...

So, discounting "Chromovelato," does Paint weigh more than Chrome?

(Of more concern is "hydrogen embrittlement," though hopefully the original Chromer would have taken steps to mitigate that?)
machinist42 is offline  
Old 09-05-22, 06:09 AM
  #6  
oneclick 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,811
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,324 Times in 781 Posts
Originally Posted by machinist42
does Paint weigh more than Chrome?
A bicycle frame has a surface area somewhere around 400 square inches; perhaps more if big and/or lots of brazeons etcetera.

Typical decorative chromium plating has a thickness of about a millionth of an inch.

Chromium has a density of about four-and-a-quarter ounces per cubic inch.

In round figures, 0.02 of an ounce - half a gram.
oneclick is offline  
Old 09-05-22, 06:16 AM
  #7  
SJX426 
Senior Member
 
SJX426's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,578

Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8

Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1606 Post(s)
Liked 2,210 Times in 1,102 Posts
@oneclick - interesting info. What about the copper plating underneath, or what every might be plated prior to the chrome?
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
SJX426 is offline  
Old 09-05-22, 07:05 AM
  #8  
pastorbobnlnh 
Freewheel Medic
 
pastorbobnlnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: An Island on the Coast of GA!
Posts: 12,880

Bikes: Snazzy* Schwinns, Classy Cannondales & a Super Pro Aero Lotus (* Ed.)

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1451 Post(s)
Liked 2,183 Times in 960 Posts
Does an all-chrome fork match any frame color? Is it a practical matter for the builder? Whether on an expensive Lotus or a basic electro-forged Schwinn, chrome forks look brilliant.


__________________
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!

Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com





pastorbobnlnh is offline  
Likes For pastorbobnlnh:
Old 09-05-22, 07:23 AM
  #9  
jdawginsc 
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,748

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2427 Post(s)
Liked 3,082 Times in 1,942 Posts
And here I was thinking the chrome was because it was more durable than paint on high ding areas...fork blades, chain stays, seat stays...and when the entire frame was chromed and painted...durability?

Chromed lugs...that was pure design.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super












jdawginsc is online now  
Old 09-05-22, 07:33 AM
  #10  
oneclick 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,811
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,324 Times in 781 Posts
Originally Posted by SJX426
@oneclick - interesting info. What about the copper plating underneath, or what every might be plated prior to the chrome?
There are no hard values for plating thicknesses; the above value for decorative chrome is what is a reasonable minimum to get a shiny surface that will last whatever the expected life of the product is. Nickle and nickle-copper may be much thicker, ten to perhaps a hundred times (think Harley level show chrome).
oneclick is offline  
Likes For oneclick:
Old 09-05-22, 12:05 PM
  #11  
Chombi1 
Senior Member
 
Chombi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,470
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1635 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 823 Times in 532 Posts
Everyone loved the look of chrome forks on their bikes in the 80's. That is why many bikes had it. Even the mid to lower model levels had chromed forks on the 80's. It was a great selling point for bike manufacturers. Chrome on bikes started to suddenly dissappear after the mid 80's because of ever stricter environmental anti-pollution laws that made the chroming process too expensive to maintain, so, by 3/4ths into the 80's most new bike had no chrome on their frames.
__________________
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
Chombi1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.