Chain Not Seating on Chainring Properly, Wrong Pitch?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Chain Not Seating on Chainring Properly, Wrong Pitch?
Hello folks, I've recently encountered an interesting problem. In trying to replace the chain on my neighbor's singlespeed, I've found that the chain I put on will not properly mesh with the teeth of the chainring. The chain is a standard singlespeed chain with internal width of 1/8". Rather than an issue of being the wrong width however, I think this is an issue with the pitch of the chain. It's as if the chain has too short a distance between rollers for this chainring. I thought all bicycle chains were always 1/2" between rollers, but with this one, it seems as if they need to be further apart to allow it to actually seat on the chainring correctly. What are people's thoughts on this? Any ideas what the problem may be? From what I've read online, people seem to diagnose this as a worn chainring, but I'm not entirely sure that makes sense to me. Wouldn't a worn chainring have wear on the teeth such that there is excess space both in front of and behind each tooth and still be able to let the chain on, just loosely? I've attached a picture, sorry for the low quality. Thanks for any help you can offer.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 529 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 255 Times
in
185 Posts
Measure across as many links as you can, and divide it by the number of links. See if it is a standard sized chain.
Another option would be to hold another chain against it, and see if the links are the same length.
Another option would be to hold another chain against it, and see if the links are the same length.
Likes For alo:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,892
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4792 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times
in
2,548 Posts
I'm betting worn chainring. Look to see if the teeth in line with the cranks are the same shape and width as the teeth at right angles. If they are not identical, the difference is wear. A chain fitting loosely is a worn out ("stretched" chain on a newer chainring.)
Do you still have the old chain? Pull it tight (nothing radical needed; just need to pull out all the play) and measure the distance between pins 12 pairs of links apart with a steel tape measure or ruler. If the length is 12 3/32" or more, there's your answer. A new chain won't run on a cog/chainring that's worn to match a chain that stretched. (Well it might but it will be a poor experience.)
Do you still have the old chain? Pull it tight (nothing radical needed; just need to pull out all the play) and measure the distance between pins 12 pairs of links apart with a steel tape measure or ruler. If the length is 12 3/32" or more, there's your answer. A new chain won't run on a cog/chainring that's worn to match a chain that stretched. (Well it might but it will be a poor experience.)
Likes For 79pmooney:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
3/32" (geared, but most singlespeed MTBs use it) chain on 1/8" (bmx) chainring would be my 1st guess. Just asking for a singlespeed chain can be a crapshoot, and if you get the wrong one, it no workee. Getting it wrong in the opposite direction also doesn't work, but if memory serves, fails the other way... the chain won't stay on the ring, whereas yours won't go on in the first place.
As already suggested, it could be a worn chainring, but it doesn't look bad enough to do that. It looks like a steel ring?
--Shannon
As already suggested, it could be a worn chainring, but it doesn't look bad enough to do that. It looks like a steel ring?
--Shannon
Likes For ShannonM:
Likes For Lazyass:
#7
Droid on a mission
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 1,005
Bikes: Diamondback Wildwood Classic
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 317 Post(s)
Liked 280 Times
in
195 Posts
Agreed, worn chainring, the slots that the chain links would fit into have elongated (larger) so pitch is effectively > 1". If you have another chainring around, try it or compare the two. I would also check the gear on the rear wheel, it most likely is also very worn.
__________________
JoeTBM (The Bike Man) - I'm a black & white type of guy, the only gray in my life is the hair on my head
www.TheBikeMenOfFlaglerCounty.com
JoeTBM (The Bike Man) - I'm a black & white type of guy, the only gray in my life is the hair on my head
www.TheBikeMenOfFlaglerCounty.com
Last edited by JoeTBM; 07-11-21 at 02:13 AM.
Likes For JoeTBM:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,835
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Tread, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 674 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
430 Posts
That's not a new chain, is it? It looks like the chain has elongated at least a half link (1/2") in the 32-tooth (16") circumference of the ring, or about 3%. Acceptable wear is about 0.5%.
#9
Newbie
Thread Starter
Likes For Rainbow83:
#10
Newbie
Thread Starter
I'm betting worn chainring. Look to see if the teeth in line with the cranks are the same shape and width as the teeth at right angles. If they are not identical, the difference is wear. A chain fitting loosely is a worn out ("stretched" chain on a newer chainring.)
Do you still have the old chain? Pull it tight (nothing radical needed; just need to pull out all the play) and measure the distance between pins 12 pairs of links apart with a steel tape measure or ruler. If the length is 12 3/32" or more, there's your answer. A new chain won't run on a cog/chainring that's worn to match a chain that stretched. (Well it might but it will be a poor experience.)
Do you still have the old chain? Pull it tight (nothing radical needed; just need to pull out all the play) and measure the distance between pins 12 pairs of links apart with a steel tape measure or ruler. If the length is 12 3/32" or more, there's your answer. A new chain won't run on a cog/chainring that's worn to match a chain that stretched. (Well it might but it will be a poor experience.)
Last edited by Rainbow83; 07-10-21 at 07:34 AM.
#11
Newbie
Thread Starter
Thanks for all the suggestions. I'll have a look at it again tonight after work. Hopefully it won't be too hard to get ahold of a new crank if it needs it.
#12
Senior Member
Weird. Looks like the pitch is too short for the chain wheel and it also doesnt look like a SRAM chain. Get a better picture for identification.
#13
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,953
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6178 Post(s)
Liked 4,796 Times
in
3,308 Posts
All bicycles for a very long time have been made with the exact same pitch. 1/2 inch.
So the issue is not pitch. In fact chain comes in pitches that are exactly 1/8" apart from each other. That chain doesn't have a 25% difference in pitch.
So you issue is likely a worn chain ring. Unless a roller for some reason is not in the right position or some of the side plates are tight not letting the link swing fully into position. Which on chains from days long gone has been an issue. But they fix themselves after the chain is used a little.
So the issue is not pitch. In fact chain comes in pitches that are exactly 1/8" apart from each other. That chain doesn't have a 25% difference in pitch.
So you issue is likely a worn chain ring. Unless a roller for some reason is not in the right position or some of the side plates are tight not letting the link swing fully into position. Which on chains from days long gone has been an issue. But they fix themselves after the chain is used a little.
Last edited by Iride01; 07-10-21 at 08:04 AM.
Likes For Crankycrank:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,801
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
The thing with single speeds, especially less expensive ones, is the chain tension is not consistent throughout the entire revolution of the crank.
If it was originally setup with the chain too tight at one point, I’m guessing it will not only stretch the chain, it will probably wear (bend?) the teeth more at that point. And Lord knows, the rider will make that crank turn.
John
If it was originally setup with the chain too tight at one point, I’m guessing it will not only stretch the chain, it will probably wear (bend?) the teeth more at that point. And Lord knows, the rider will make that crank turn.
John
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,835
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Tread, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 674 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
430 Posts
On a freewheel bike, a worn chainring usually has a "shark fin" pattern, or teeth are ground down to points. Look online for examples. If this is a fixed gear bike, with no brakes, and a very tight chain, perhaps that could explain the worn chainring without the usual wear.
Last edited by andrewclaus; 07-10-21 at 11:44 AM.
#17
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,108
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1784 Post(s)
Liked 1,622 Times
in
928 Posts
You need an "Exotic" 5/32 bike chain.
Perhaps "BMX" & not "single speed" would get you the results you want? Maybe call it a "415" chain...
Perhaps "BMX" & not "single speed" would get you the results you want? Maybe call it a "415" chain...
Last edited by base2; 07-10-21 at 10:55 AM.
#18
Newbie
Thread Starter
The thing with single speeds, especially less expensive ones, is the chain tension is not consistent throughout the entire revolution of the crank.
If it was originally setup with the chain too tight at one point, I’m guessing it will not only stretch the chain, it will probably wear (bend?) the teeth more at that point. And Lord knows, the rider will make that crank turn.
John
If it was originally setup with the chain too tight at one point, I’m guessing it will not only stretch the chain, it will probably wear (bend?) the teeth more at that point. And Lord knows, the rider will make that crank turn.
John
On a freewheel bike, a worn chainring usually has a "shark fin" pattern, or teeth are ground down to points. Look online for examples. If this is a fixed gear bike, with no brakes, and a very tight chain, perhaps that could explain the worn chainring without the usual wear.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,139
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 759 Times
in
568 Posts
The ring just doesn't look that worn to me. It appears to be a very heavy steel ring and it doesn't show the typical wean patterns associated with a ring that's severely worn. A worn ring should still have a 1/2" pitch between the tops of the teeth, right? Sure, they'll be ramped and it'll be easier to skip a chain, but I think the pitch would be maintained. The pitch of the ring and pitch of the chain appear to be unsynchronized by about half of a link around half the circumference. That seems awfully strange.
I'm looking forwarding to hearing back on the identity of this chain and if it appears like it really does have a true 1/2" pitch.
Likes For hokiefyd:
#20
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
The ring just doesn't look that worn to me. It appears to be a very heavy steel ring and it doesn't show the typical wean patterns associated with a ring that's severely worn. A worn ring should still have a 1/2" pitch between the tops of the teeth, right? Sure, they'll be ramped and it'll be easier to skip a chain, but I think the pitch would be maintained. The pitch of the ring and pitch of the chain appear to be unsynchronized by about half of a link around half the circumference. That seems awfully strange.
I say correct chain because a 3/32 chain on a 1/8 inch ring will look like what you got going on here because it will not fully seat on the teeth.
Likes For AlmostTrick:
#21
Newbie
Thread Starter
Wow, I'm shocked. I got a pair of calipers to measure the chain. As expected, the pitch is 1/2". The width however, was not 1/8". It was in fact 3/32". And further, having looked at the markings on the chain, it is very much not a SRAM chain, which is really odd, because I bought it new from my bike shop and it was in a SRAM box and everything. I'll put pics of the box, a section of excess chain, and the caliper measurement below. Sorry to have troubled you all with this. I really thought I had a 1/8" chain, after all, that is what the box said. I guess the lesson here is to always double check and make sure you're actually dealing with what you think you are.
The box it came in, labelled SRAM PC-1, what I thought I had.
An excess piece of chain, the markings say TAYA, not SRAM.
The measurement of the internal width of the chain, it's definitely 3/32", not 1/8"
The box it came in, labelled SRAM PC-1, what I thought I had.
An excess piece of chain, the markings say TAYA, not SRAM.
The measurement of the internal width of the chain, it's definitely 3/32", not 1/8"
#22
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
Mystery solved! I wonder if the bike shop got out two chains at once to install, and accidentally put this one back in the wrong box.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,153
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2362 Post(s)
Liked 1,748 Times
in
1,191 Posts
^^^^^^ Back in 2015, quite possibly.....
Likes For madpogue:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18354 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times
in
3,346 Posts
I think you found the problem a few days ago with the 3/32 chain causing the chain to right slightly high. Hopefully it is now fixed.
I thought I'd post this Wippermann chart from a couple of years ago. Ignoring the wear (they have done quite a few more tests since this time).
What I found unique was that the initial length of all the chains were slightly different. And, the Campagnolo Record chain measured slightly short.
I thought I'd post this Wippermann chart from a couple of years ago. Ignoring the wear (they have done quite a few more tests since this time).
What I found unique was that the initial length of all the chains were slightly different. And, the Campagnolo Record chain measured slightly short.
#25
Newbie
Thread Starter
I think you found the problem a few days ago with the 3/32 chain causing the chain to right slightly high. Hopefully it is now fixed.
I thought I'd post this Wippermann chart from a couple of years ago. Ignoring the wear (they have done quite a few more tests since this time).
What I found unique was that the initial length of all the chains were slightly different. And, the Campagnolo Record chain measured slightly short.
I thought I'd post this Wippermann chart from a couple of years ago. Ignoring the wear (they have done quite a few more tests since this time).
What I found unique was that the initial length of all the chains were slightly different. And, the Campagnolo Record chain measured slightly short.