Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Are some FD super sensitive to chainlink?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Are some FD super sensitive to chainlink?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-22, 12:47 PM
  #1  
Classtime 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,697

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1946 Post(s)
Liked 2,004 Times in 1,105 Posts
Are some FD super sensitive to chain drop?

I asked in Mechanics sub forum and haven't solved the problem yet. I really want to mod my 77 Grand Record with a compact ten speed. I had the 6700 derailleurs, shifters, chain, and modern Sugino Mighty Tour on a modern bike that worked flawlessly. I moved everything over to the Motobecane and no matter how I adjusted the front derailleur and no matter where the chain was on the cassette, it would randomly drop over the big ring. I got a new chain and the results were the same. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE is the bottom bracket--the crank wants a 110 and that is what I used on the other bike but I don't have Swiss rings for my 110mm Phil Wood so I used a Shimano 113. I've never ever had such difficulty adjusting a FD. I'm too cheap right now to replace the chainring(s) to see if that helps and it worked so well on the other bike, it is hard to believe that is the problem.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.

Last edited by Classtime; 11-11-22 at 08:02 PM.
Classtime is offline  
Old 11-11-22, 08:55 PM
  #2  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,995 Posts
Review the chain line.
repechage is offline  
Old 11-11-22, 09:02 PM
  #3  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,108

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1784 Post(s)
Liked 1,622 Times in 928 Posts
When you moved the chainrings over, did you get the clocking of the inner ring correct? If not, the chain rollers won't mesh with the teeth in the big ring properly. It'll be hard to shift, then when it does, the chain will be inclined to skip over the big ring in a big "s" path on top of the teeth & drop off the other side on account of the effort to get there.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.

Car dependency is a tax.
base2 is offline  
Likes For base2:
Old 11-15-22, 12:24 PM
  #4  
Classtime 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,697

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1946 Post(s)
Liked 2,004 Times in 1,105 Posts
They seem to be clocked properly.

__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is offline  
Old 11-15-22, 01:10 PM
  #5  
Bianchi84
Senior Member
 
Bianchi84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 699

Bikes: 1984 Bianchi Tipo Corsa, 1985 Cannondale SM600 (24/26)

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 235 Post(s)
Liked 349 Times in 190 Posts
Do you mean that the chain "over-shifts" off of the big ring? Do you have pictures of front derailleur set up from side and from above, to see clearance and angle?
Bianchi84 is offline  
Old 11-15-22, 06:30 PM
  #6  
scarlson 
Senior Member
 
scarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089

Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem

Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times in 723 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
When you moved the chainrings over, did you get the clocking of the inner ring correct? If not, the chain rollers won't mesh with the teeth in the big ring properly. It'll be hard to shift, then when it does, the chain will be inclined to skip over the big ring in a big "s" path on top of the teeth & drop off the other side on account of the effort to get there.
Do you think clocking matters on a non-ramped/pinned set of chainrings? And if so, how do you determine clocking for these? I suppose it depends on a number of factors and there are only so many ways to try and see if they work worse or better. Asking because I have a front derailleur that always does this. Seems to be chainline dependent also (or maybe chain tension), as it mostly does it in the smaller cogs. But I would love to make it stop!
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
scarlson is offline  
Old 11-15-22, 06:47 PM
  #7  
P!N20
Senior Member
 
P!N20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,468
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1078 Post(s)
Liked 1,896 Times in 930 Posts
What's the FD limit screw doing while all this is happening?
P!N20 is offline  
Likes For P!N20:
Old 11-16-22, 09:17 AM
  #8  
L134 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 702

Bikes: 1978 Bruce Gordon, 1977 Lippy, 199? Lippy tandem, Bike Friday NWT, 1982 Trek 720, 2012 Rivendell Atlantis, 1983 Bianchi Specialissima?

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times in 106 Posts
I had a similar problem which I solved. Unfortunately, I made two changes at once so can't be sure which change was the fix if not both. I changed out a 110 BB for a 107 BB (and I can't remember why I decided to do that - maybe I didn't like the chainline; maybe because I had the 107, it fit and I was desperate, or ?) and installed a new outer chainring (replacing an old 42t middle chainring I was using as an outer chainring with a new, modern TA 42t outer chainring). I went from very difficult shifts to outer ring with frequent drops to beautifully smooth shifts with zero drops. You went from perfect shifts with a 110 BB to imperfect shifts using a 113 BB (if I'm reading the situation correctly). If possible, I'd install a 110 BB, or shorter, on the new bike.
L134 is offline  
Likes For L134:
Old 11-16-22, 09:22 AM
  #9  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,108

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1784 Post(s)
Liked 1,622 Times in 928 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
They seem to be clocked properly.

I agree. I don't see where the problem would be then.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.

Car dependency is a tax.
base2 is offline  
Old 11-16-22, 10:21 AM
  #10  
Classtime 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,697

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1946 Post(s)
Liked 2,004 Times in 1,105 Posts
Some pics

Never had trouble like this.


One way and then the other.

Random overshift

Another one

Random perfect shift

Too close? Already tried higher.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is offline  
Old 11-16-22, 10:37 AM
  #11  
fender1
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
Shimano FD's like a small space between themselves and the chainring, a couple of millimeters, so I think you are good there.

I am going to say a shorter bottom bracket would likely solve the issue. I run a Sugino Compact double, 46/34 on a bike with 130 rear spacing, 10 speed 11-32 cassette and am using a 110mm BB. I am using a Shimano CX70 FD and bfirters. It all works well. Very easy to set up and very crisp shifting.

Last edited by fender1; 11-16-22 at 10:44 AM.
fender1 is offline  
Likes For fender1:
Old 11-16-22, 10:39 AM
  #12  
scarlson 
Senior Member
 
scarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089

Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem

Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times in 723 Posts
Wait, I am confused. Why would a shorter BB make it better? I would think that putting the rings closer inboard would make the chain more likely to go off the outside, no? Educate me, please!
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
scarlson is offline  
Old 11-16-22, 10:49 AM
  #13  
fender1
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
Originally Posted by scarlson
Wait, I am confused. Why would a shorter BB make it better? I would think that putting the rings closer inboard would make the chain more likely to go off the outside, no? Educate me, please!
I can't! Just a guess on my end. Its the wrong bottom bracket for the crank. That is the is a place to start. I would also check the frame alignment since friction shifting, which the Moto was built for, has a lot more wiggle room when it come to adequate shifting performance vs. modern indexed stuff.
fender1 is offline  
Likes For fender1:
Old 11-16-22, 03:08 PM
  #14  
scarlson 
Senior Member
 
scarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089

Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem

Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times in 723 Posts
I mean, isn't a double a double, indexed or friction? You're sorta banging it up and down against the upper and lower limits which I assume should be well adjusted in either case.

I've had tandems where this is essential. You gotta hit the small ring right as you start climbing that roller or else in a second you and your stoker are gonna be walking and that's not a good time. But seems like some setups just ain't got it, for whatever reason

Sure, I know someone is going to say you could shift with more finesse and probably keep the worst of it from happening by jockeying the derailleur carefully, but in the heat of the moment, in the dark, in the rain, accidentally on singletrack with a road bike, riding with someone you want to impress - it's not gonna happen. And that's precisely when you would not like your chain to fall off!
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.

Last edited by scarlson; 11-16-22 at 03:27 PM.
scarlson is offline  
Old 11-16-22, 05:08 PM
  #15  
Rooney 
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 383

Bikes: '72 Raleigh Super Course; '90 Cannondale ST1000; '98/99 Cannondale T700; 2002 Cannondale CAAD5 R700; 2022 Cannondale Topstone 2L

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked 348 Times in 156 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
I'd screw in the high limit based on this photo. I'll also echo the call to try a 110mm axle since that seems to be the only significant component change.
Rooney is offline  
Old 11-16-22, 05:28 PM
  #16  
Classtime 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,697

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1946 Post(s)
Liked 2,004 Times in 1,105 Posts
Originally Posted by Rooney
I'd screw in the high limit based on this photo. I'll also echo the call to try a 110mm axle since that seems to be the only significant component change.
Chain is on the small ring. Photo shows alignment of cage with rings. It would be nice if I could find a JIS spindle of 110mm so I could se my current Swiss cups.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is offline  
Old 11-16-22, 05:32 PM
  #17  
Rooney 
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 383

Bikes: '72 Raleigh Super Course; '90 Cannondale ST1000; '98/99 Cannondale T700; 2002 Cannondale CAAD5 R700; 2022 Cannondale Topstone 2L

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked 348 Times in 156 Posts
Hah, so it is. Nevermind me.
Rooney is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.