Road Test/Bike Review (1986) KUWAHARA Adventurer tandem
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,991
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 436 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
999 Posts
Road Test/Bike Review (1986) KUWAHARA Adventurer tandem
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
Likes For SpeedofLite:
#2
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,653
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,525 Times
in
1,055 Posts
Thanks, SoL, for another fun blast from the past.
BYW, that is a dreadful way to set up the brakes (one lever controlling both rim brakes, one controlling the drum brake).One front tire blowout on a downhill will tell you all you ever want to know about why this is a bad idea. I survived exactly this scenario and never want to experience that pucker-factor adrenaline rush again.
BYW, that is a dreadful way to set up the brakes (one lever controlling both rim brakes, one controlling the drum brake).One front tire blowout on a downhill will tell you all you ever want to know about why this is a bad idea. I survived exactly this scenario and never want to experience that pucker-factor adrenaline rush again.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
Likes For bikingshearer:
#3
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times
in
1,073 Posts
Thanks SpeedofLite for sharing the scan.
I like John Derven, but he wrote some dumb things sometimes.
Being surprised that the cheaper, heavier frame is still "adequately stiff" ? Does he not know that the modulus of elasticity of steel is (nearly) a constant? If you keep the same diameter and add wall thickness (as they did on this bike), the stiffness can only go up, regardless of what alloy or heat-treatment you're using on the (2 pounds!) lighter frame. This is not controversial; it's been well-established for a couple hundred years. The frame of the circa 1990 steel Davidson tandem Laurie and I ride is less than half the weight of this Kuwahara, yet the stiffness is way better than "adequate". We've won sprints on it, including the crit at the Burley Duet Classic stage race, and we've toured with full panniers, never wished for any more stiffness. If I were to do it over, I might design it with a little more give. Stiff frames are for people who don't know how to pedal!
I also got a laugh at Ed Philipp saying he was plant manager at Santana. Maybe he was in charge of watering the plants? Dave Archambault (I might be butchering the name) was the boss the whole time Ed worked there, but Ed always acted like he thought he should be the boss. He was not a bad person, but was much less easy to like than Dave, who was a super cool boss. Ed was pushy and more than a bit off-putting. I wasn't the only one there who didn't get along with him smoothly. I was just an apprentice framebuilder when I started, and I'm grateful to Ed for all he taught me, but Dave taught me just as much if not more, without all the attitude. When Ed left (and took all Santana's designs with him) to go to Kuwahara, there were some who were, um, OK with him leaving, even if it was to go compete with us.
One more nit to pick (man I'm being grouchy today): they talk about building a triple, and they mean a three-seater. Those are called triplets. A triple is a crank with three chainrings. Cohen, Philipp and Derven all should have known better. Let's all remain vigilant on the proper use of jargon, lest civilization devolve into barbarity.
Mark B, the language Nazi.
I like John Derven, but he wrote some dumb things sometimes.
Being surprised that the cheaper, heavier frame is still "adequately stiff" ? Does he not know that the modulus of elasticity of steel is (nearly) a constant? If you keep the same diameter and add wall thickness (as they did on this bike), the stiffness can only go up, regardless of what alloy or heat-treatment you're using on the (2 pounds!) lighter frame. This is not controversial; it's been well-established for a couple hundred years. The frame of the circa 1990 steel Davidson tandem Laurie and I ride is less than half the weight of this Kuwahara, yet the stiffness is way better than "adequate". We've won sprints on it, including the crit at the Burley Duet Classic stage race, and we've toured with full panniers, never wished for any more stiffness. If I were to do it over, I might design it with a little more give. Stiff frames are for people who don't know how to pedal!
I also got a laugh at Ed Philipp saying he was plant manager at Santana. Maybe he was in charge of watering the plants? Dave Archambault (I might be butchering the name) was the boss the whole time Ed worked there, but Ed always acted like he thought he should be the boss. He was not a bad person, but was much less easy to like than Dave, who was a super cool boss. Ed was pushy and more than a bit off-putting. I wasn't the only one there who didn't get along with him smoothly. I was just an apprentice framebuilder when I started, and I'm grateful to Ed for all he taught me, but Dave taught me just as much if not more, without all the attitude. When Ed left (and took all Santana's designs with him) to go to Kuwahara, there were some who were, um, OK with him leaving, even if it was to go compete with us.
One more nit to pick (man I'm being grouchy today): they talk about building a triple, and they mean a three-seater. Those are called triplets. A triple is a crank with three chainrings. Cohen, Philipp and Derven all should have known better. Let's all remain vigilant on the proper use of jargon, lest civilization devolve into barbarity.
Mark B, the language Nazi.
Likes For bulgie:
#4
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times
in
1,073 Posts
I violently agree! Controlling the drum with a (friction) shift lever for a "set and forget" drag brake is sooo much better. What, were they thinking?