27in or 29in?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 685
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Liked 376 Times
in
210 Posts
For a MTB?
I have all wheel sizes, a 26" wheeled Turner 5-Spot, a 27.5 " wheeled Turner Burner, and a 29" IBIS Ripley.
The 26" 5-Spot is fun and feels fast but is slow and is not nearly as confident in the rough stuff as the 29er. The Burner feels like the spot but with heavier wheels. Nothing is different between that bike and the 26" bike. The times on my local trails are similar but I feel slower. The Ripley is another story. Fast, confidence inspiring in the rough and feels like I am barely working. And almost as fun as the 5-Spot. These new 29ers are just out of this world.
I have all wheel sizes, a 26" wheeled Turner 5-Spot, a 27.5 " wheeled Turner Burner, and a 29" IBIS Ripley.
The 26" 5-Spot is fun and feels fast but is slow and is not nearly as confident in the rough stuff as the 29er. The Burner feels like the spot but with heavier wheels. Nothing is different between that bike and the 26" bike. The times on my local trails are similar but I feel slower. The Ripley is another story. Fast, confidence inspiring in the rough and feels like I am barely working. And almost as fun as the 5-Spot. These new 29ers are just out of this world.
#3
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,535
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10901 Post(s)
Liked 7,390 Times
in
4,148 Posts
Boulevard or Lane. Which do you prefer?
Likes For mstateglfr:
Likes For phughes:
Likes For SpedFast:
Likes For DMC707:
#7
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
27.5 fad is on it's way out...29 is here to stay...26 is going to make a comeback.
Likes For wolfchild:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,527
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times
in
2,331 Posts
really enjoyed my 27s
Likes For rumrunn6:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 731
Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Liked 201 Times
in
127 Posts
Go big or go home!
For a MTB?
I have all wheel sizes, a 26" wheeled Turner 5-Spot, a 27.5 " wheeled Turner Burner, and a 29" IBIS Ripley.
The 26" 5-Spot is fun and feels fast but is slow and is not nearly as confident in the rough stuff as the 29er. The Burner feels like the spot but with heavier wheels. Nothing is different between that bike and the 26" bike. The times on my local trails are similar but I feel slower. The Ripley is another story. Fast, confidence inspiring in the rough and feels like I am barely working. And almost as fun as the 5-Spot. These new 29ers are just out of this world.
I have all wheel sizes, a 26" wheeled Turner 5-Spot, a 27.5 " wheeled Turner Burner, and a 29" IBIS Ripley.
The 26" 5-Spot is fun and feels fast but is slow and is not nearly as confident in the rough stuff as the 29er. The Burner feels like the spot but with heavier wheels. Nothing is different between that bike and the 26" bike. The times on my local trails are similar but I feel slower. The Ripley is another story. Fast, confidence inspiring in the rough and feels like I am barely working. And almost as fun as the 5-Spot. These new 29ers are just out of this world.
Went from a 26" hard tail to the Ripley last May and it's been pretty damn amazing. The larger wheels & tires make the "gnar" a lot easier to get through. Far fewer issues with that tire getting stuck on something and threatening going over the bars. That plus slacker head angle and almost zero reach stem mean OTB is FAR less of a risk than in the old days on the old stuff. Rode Hole in the Ground at Donner Pass last fall and assumed I'd walk some of the gnarlier stuff (nursing a sore and injured shoulder and being mid 50's means you adhere to the adage, "ride smart to ride the next day!"). Turns out I walked virtually NONE of it! There were a few tech sections I simply didn't clear due to bad timing or being at my limit (almost 8,000 feet, ouch!). But ended up surprised at how much I blew through. I'll admit that I did hop off for about 20 yards of the "rock fall" at the end, but rode the other 90% of it. Again, wasn't planning on riding virtually all of it, but did when it simply "felt right."
New geometry makes a lot more "feel right."
And to the OP's question: I'd go 29" all the way if it works. Smaller riders on XS or S bikes may find 27.5" a better option. My wife's 5' tall, so a 29" wheel was out of the question. She's been totally psyched on the bike, as she too was going from a '94 hard tail. Night and day difference, even with the smaller 27.5" option.
Likes For LV2TNDM:
#10
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,810
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
Get one of each.
Likes For Iride01:
#11
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,269 Times
in
1,439 Posts
27.5" for me, on both gravel and mountain bike. I get 90% of the rollover benefits of 29", with 90% of the acceleration and flickability benefits of 26". For pure road riding I still like 700c, but I never ride pure road anymore.
#12
Junior Member
a bit of apples to oranges isn't it?
27" on my vintage road bikes
29" on my modern mountain bikes
I like them both, but hard to compare
27" on my vintage road bikes
29" on my modern mountain bikes
I like them both, but hard to compare
Likes For tempocyclist:
#14
rebmeM roineS
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,216
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
225 Posts
27 does not equal 27.5
The three bikes that I ride (two singles and a tandem) all have 20”/406 front and 26”/559 rear wheels.
The three bikes that I ride (two singles and a tandem) all have 20”/406 front and 26”/559 rear wheels.
__________________
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
#16
Banned.
29'er for me because more comfortable and much better availability of tires. It will even fit 700c tires in there and have actually used 50mm wide 700c gravel tires in my MTB for less noise and faster rolling when riding on pavement.
#17
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,935
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,367 Times
in
1,916 Posts
27" (ETRTO 630) is a deprecated size with limited tire and rim selection. 29er (ETRTO 622) is still active and has far better tire and rim selection.