Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Too Afraid to Ride My Carbon Road Bike

Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Too Afraid to Ride My Carbon Road Bike

Old 12-06-21, 11:04 AM
  #1  
Grudey1
Suburban Dad
Thread Starter
 
Grudey1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Kingwood, TX
Posts: 38

Bikes: 2019 Trek Domane SL5 Disc, 2021 Giant Talon 2, 2012 Trek 7.1 FX, 2005 Trek Fuel 70, 2003 Trek 4500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 18 Posts
Too Afraid to Ride My Carbon Road Bike

I have a 2019 Trek Domane SL5 carbon road bike that, after significant weight gain during a riding hiatus, am now too afraid to ride in fear that I will damage the frame.

I am currently 305 lbs. and working hard to get some weight back off. In July I put smooth tires on my mountain bike and have been averaging 60 miles per week since. I, so badly, want to get back on the Domane but don’t want to over-stress it and, potentially ruin it, for when I get back down under 275 lbs. (Trek’s weight limit). When I originally purchased the Domane, I also invested an additional $1000 on heavy duty custom-built wheels (DT Swiss, RR 521’s with 32 heave-gauge spokes and hubs meant for bike touring). I am confident in the wheels but, even being a very conscientious rider, I just fear for the frame.

I have registered for a two-day, 150-mile ride in May which I intend to do on the road bike (Texas MS 150). This being said, I feel I should be training on the road bike (at least for my long rides on the weekends).

I am reaching out to the group to gather feedback on whether my concerns are warranted and if my decision to wait is wise, or if I am over-thinking it.
Grudey1 is offline  
Old 12-06-21, 11:30 AM
  #2  
blacknbluebikes 
Senior Member
 
blacknbluebikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,278

Bikes: two blacks, a blue and a white.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 444 Post(s)
Liked 844 Times in 408 Posts
I think you're being smart. Trek says 275, ah, for a reason. Might not know the reason, but you gotta respect it. Meantime, focus simply on getting more and more time in the saddle of the MB.
blacknbluebikes is offline  
Likes For blacknbluebikes:
Old 12-06-21, 11:44 AM
  #3  
ahultin
Senior Member
 
ahultin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bonsall, Ca
Posts: 679

Bikes: 2003 Cannondale Jekyll 1000, 2014 Fuji Finest 1.5 (wife), 2008 Fuji Finest 1.0 (Daughter), 2012 Fuji Cross 2.0 (son), 2011 Cannondale Road Tandem 2

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Ride it, The weight limit is to protect trek but they are tested to a much higher weight. I rode my carbon road bike as high as 364 with no negative implications. Any frame issues i have had have surprisingly been on the aluminum parts.
ahultin is offline  
Old 12-06-21, 01:04 PM
  #4  
shelbyfv
Expired Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,491
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3646 Post(s)
Liked 5,377 Times in 2,729 Posts
You shouldn't second guess Trek unless you have some actual knowledge to the contrary. Use the bike as an incentive. It's going to be hard to lose weight this time of year. Having the bike to look forward to may help galvanize your self control. Good luck!
shelbyfv is offline  
Likes For shelbyfv:
Old 12-06-21, 05:36 PM
  #5  
RVRBTR
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 16

Bikes: 1985 Trek 670, 1990 Trek 930, 1992 Trek 790, 1996 Trek 930, 1997 Bianchi Campione De Italia, 2000 Burley Samba

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Personally, I would set the carbon bike aside for now. How many pinch flats do you really want to repair? Pick up a nice steel MTB or hybrid from the 90's for $100-200 and go at it. I just converted a lugged steel trek 930 MTB to drop bar, and am getting ready to do the same to a lugged steel Trek 790, which has the same frame as the 520 touring bike. No reason you couldn't do a two day,150 miler on either one.
RVRBTR is offline  
Likes For RVRBTR:
Old 12-07-21, 01:40 PM
  #6  
brawlo
Senior Member
 
brawlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,210
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 57 Posts
Get on it and ride! The frame will be fine, and it sounds like the traditional weak points in the wheels won’t be an issue either. Go for it! This is coming from someone in exactly the same situation as you and damn near bang on the same weight with a carbon Canyon road bike
brawlo is offline  
Likes For brawlo:
Old 12-07-21, 02:30 PM
  #7  
Calsun
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,280
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 608 Post(s)
Liked 382 Times in 288 Posts
Bike frames are very strong being composed of a triangular structure. The wheels and in particular the spokes are the weakest link. When a spoke breaks it can result in a damaged rim. On the other hand spending thousands of dollars more to have a bike that is 2 lbs lighter than an aluminum alloy one makes little sense in your situation.

A gravel bike should be able to better support your weight or a bike designed for rough roads like the Specialized Roubaix. Even with a downhill speed of 30 mph I would not want to have the catastrophic failure of the bike. There might be no damage to your body or you might end up with a broken shoulder or collar bone or damaged knee cap and these injuries taken months to heal. I evaluate risks based on the worst case and the impact it will have on me and if that is a concern then I don't proceeed.
Calsun is offline  
Likes For Calsun:
Old 12-12-21, 05:37 PM
  #8  
justcynn
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 276

Bikes: Lots of Schwinns

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 250 Times in 114 Posts
have been riding a 2010 Roubaix for a couple year from 255-265 lbs with out issue. I am extra careful over bumps, but that is any bike, especially the skinny tire bikes I ride. I am also very cautious on down hills, but I would be whether was 165 or 265.... I don't want to fall LOL

You could also convert a 90's MTB inexpensively. I am riding this Singletrack with winter. $100 Bike, $50 for the new Brake Levers, recycled bars, new bar tape. Good luck!


justcynn is offline  
Likes For justcynn:
Old 12-13-21, 08:26 AM
  #9  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,197
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18391 Post(s)
Liked 15,465 Times in 7,306 Posts
Originally Posted by justcynn
You could also convert a 90's MTB inexpensively. I am riding this Singletrack with winter. $100 Bike, $50 for the new Brake Levers, recycled bars, new bar tape. Good luck!


I bought a new 930 back in 1992 for city and unpaved rail-trail riding. Even took it on one real MTB ride. I abused the hell out of that thing for more than a dozen years. It rarely complained. Finally put it out with the trash, dented frame, twisted rear rim and all, when i was cleaning out my mom's house. Someone took it in less than two hours. I hope they got more years out of it.
indyfabz is offline  
Likes For indyfabz:
Old 12-18-21, 08:31 AM
  #10  
jaxgtr
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,862

Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Liked 1,713 Times in 1,002 Posts
Carbon frames are very strong and you should be fine. I rode a carbon frame when I was around 280, no issues and you have a very strong set of wheels. You will be fine.

This guy on a carbon bike and carbon wheels....again, you will be fine.

__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Originally Posted by AEO
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.




Last edited by jaxgtr; 12-18-21 at 08:35 AM.
jaxgtr is offline  
Likes For jaxgtr:
Old 12-20-21, 12:11 PM
  #11  
Grudey1
Suburban Dad
Thread Starter
 
Grudey1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Kingwood, TX
Posts: 38

Bikes: 2019 Trek Domane SL5 Disc, 2021 Giant Talon 2, 2012 Trek 7.1 FX, 2005 Trek Fuel 70, 2003 Trek 4500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 18 Posts
I found this exact same bike for sale near me. The seller says it is a 26." I'm 5'10" tall. I think this may be too small. Judging from the head tube, yours looks like a bigger frame.



Last edited by Grudey1; 12-20-21 at 12:16 PM.
Grudey1 is offline  
Old 12-23-21, 05:44 PM
  #12  
Leisesturm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,984
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 735 Times in 520 Posts
26" refers to the wheel size in that illustration. With that kind of seat and stem extension it may well fit someone 5'10".
Leisesturm is offline  
Likes For Leisesturm:
Old 12-27-21, 06:53 PM
  #13  
DMC707
Senior Member
 
DMC707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,393

Bikes: Too many to list

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,123 Times in 746 Posts
the bike will be fine. just ride it
DMC707 is offline  
Likes For DMC707:
Old 12-27-21, 08:43 PM
  #14  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,104

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1782 Post(s)
Liked 1,620 Times in 926 Posts
Though the advice to "just ride it" isn't misplaced, it should be taken with the caveat that you should "ride nice." That means no bunny hops, no standing sprints, "float" over the bumps, etc...IOW: Don't ride it like a gorilla.

Taking care of the wheels situation was a smart move. Ride 'em. That's what you bought ''em for.

Unfortunately, You can't ride your way out of weight gain. For that, it is 100 percent calories in versus calorie out. Though riding can be an important part of that equation. It is only part of the equation.

You know what to do here. It's a matter of execution. That's the hard part. I recently lost 20 pounds in 16 weeks for the purpose of respecting weight limits on some premium ($$$) bike parts. It was not easy. Even harder was admitting I needed to.

You can do this. You'll be there soon if you follow through on executing a/the plan.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.

Car dependency is a tax.
base2 is offline  
Old 12-29-21, 11:24 AM
  #15  
Grudey1
Suburban Dad
Thread Starter
 
Grudey1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Kingwood, TX
Posts: 38

Bikes: 2019 Trek Domane SL5 Disc, 2021 Giant Talon 2, 2012 Trek 7.1 FX, 2005 Trek Fuel 70, 2003 Trek 4500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 18 Posts
@base2, thank you for the words of encouragement. As info I started using the LoseIt app to track calories and have lost 7 lbs since Dec 1st.
Grudey1 is offline  
Likes For Grudey1:
Old 12-30-21, 01:43 AM
  #16  
softreset
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 849
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 54 Times in 25 Posts
I put 2100 miles on a BMC Gran Fondo GF01 and another 1800 miles on a Domane 5.9 back in 2017-2018 when I was over 275 (max was 319).

Had zero issues on either bike, the wheels got a once over on the truing stand every 500 miles.
softreset is offline  
Old 12-30-21, 03:06 PM
  #17  
Leisesturm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,984
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 735 Times in 520 Posts
Originally Posted by Grudey1
@base2, thank you for the words of encouragement. As info I started using the LoseIt app to track calories and have lost 7 lbs since Dec 1st.
You don't need no steenkin' app. You will tire of using it after a month anyway. What are you tracking anyway? You cut out ALL granulated sugar. ALL crap junk. You know what junk is. Cut it out. No cookies, sweets, etc. They are dead to you. No more! You probably ate plenty of junk over the Holidays I know I did. Well, you are done for a long, long time. I'm not even going to mention cheat days. No such thing. Zero tolerance. Cheating is cheating. You will do it, of course, you're human. But 'cheat day' means it's allowed. It isn't. You can use Stevia or maybe Xylitol in coffee or tea but avoid the cheap artificial sweetners they are a poison in their own right. Which means NONE of the 'Zero' soft drinks. No carbs at night. You have breakfast and lunch to carb out. Simple, no? No calorie counting, no apps, not tracking. Just sensible eating. Then give it time. You didn't get here overnight, it will take time to get down to fighting weight. Happy New You!
Leisesturm is offline  
Likes For Leisesturm:
Old 03-18-22, 09:01 PM
  #18  
Dangelo Deckow
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I wish I could buy this topic.
Dangelo Deckow is offline  
Old 03-18-22, 09:21 PM
  #19  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,991
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2220 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,774 Posts
The only bike frame I ever broke was steel. I weighed 170 lbs at the time.

Ride it. The wheels are much more likely to be the weak point than the frame. Don't huck it or try to get airborne and you will be fine.

The weight limit is there for the warranty/liability. If you do break the frame when you are over the limit, it probably would void the warranty. So if you can live with that, ride the hell out of it and soon enough you'll be under the limit. (Actually, watch your diet too. Riding makes me eat like a pig.)
Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 03-26-22, 02:48 PM
  #20  
deaninkl
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and Linkou, Taiwan
Posts: 187

Bikes: 2009 Giant TCR Aluxx SL, 2015 Bruno 700c Tour, Canyon Urban 8.0, Giant FCR 2018,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
I would lose a little more weight first, use the carbon bike as an incentive! I don't think you'll damage it, but why take the risk, if something did happen you'd kick yourself and now that you've put the question out there you'd be even more pissed!
deaninkl is offline  
Likes For deaninkl:
Old 03-26-22, 04:12 PM
  #21  
Calsun
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,280
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 608 Post(s)
Liked 382 Times in 288 Posts
For serious weight loss the answer is a zero carbs diet which means no processed foods whatsoever. There is a reason why there are no fat vegans running around. The real benefit is to the health of your liver which is what takes a beating with a high carb and fructose sugar diet. But you are effectively out of time for a May ride.

I would not want to bicycle with a 100 lb load on the bike and that is effectively what you are contemplating doing. A separate concern is the weather as the humidity can be very high and that results in even fit athletes overheating. When I was living in Dallas they held an Olympics marathon trial there and a local runner died during the race of heatstroke. I found it strange to have to slow my pace because I could tell my body was seriously overheating on rides in the Dallas area.

With a bike there are static and dynamic loads and the latter are what can damage a bike and its rider. The max weight rating takes into consideration dynamic or impact loads on the bike frame and forks.
Calsun is offline  
Likes For Calsun:
Old 03-27-22, 07:37 AM
  #22  
Toadmeister
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Iowa
Posts: 682

Bikes: 2021 Salsa Fargo 1x12, 2019 Jamis Renegade Exploit 1x11. Motobacne NX Fat Tire

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 198 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times in 170 Posts
Originally Posted by Calsun
For serious weight loss the answer is a zero carbs diet which means no processed foods whatsoever. There is a reason why there are no fat vegans running around. The real benefit is to the health of your liver which is what takes a beating with a high carb and fructose sugar diet. But you are effectively out of time for a May ride.

I would not want to bicycle with a 100 lb load on the bike and that is effectively what you are contemplating doing. A separate concern is the weather as the humidity can be very high and that results in even fit athletes overheating. When I was living in Dallas they held an Olympics marathon trial there and a local runner died during the race of heatstroke. I found it strange to have to slow my pace because I could tell my body was seriously overheating on rides in the Dallas area.

With a bike there are static and dynamic loads and the latter are what can damage a bike and its rider. The max weight rating takes into consideration dynamic or impact loads on the bike frame and forks.
I like the rest of your response except the bold line above made me laugh! LOL. I know plenty of overweight vegans! I’m not criticizing them however, there’s many reasons one can be overweight.
Toadmeister is offline  
Likes For Toadmeister:
Old 03-27-22, 07:44 AM
  #23  
Toadmeister
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Iowa
Posts: 682

Bikes: 2021 Salsa Fargo 1x12, 2019 Jamis Renegade Exploit 1x11. Motobacne NX Fat Tire

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 198 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times in 170 Posts
Originally Posted by blacknbluebikes
I think you're being smart. Trek says 275, ah, for a reason. Might not know the reason, but you gotta respect it. Meantime, focus simply on getting more and more time in the saddle of the MB.
Originally Posted by ahultin
Ride it, The weight limit is to protect trek but they are tested to a much higher weight. I rode my carbon road bike as high as 364 with no negative implications. Any frame issues i have had have surprisingly been on the aluminum parts.
You both make valid points on both ends of the spectrum.

I’ll take a middle ground: If your carbon frame is in top condition (no cracks, chips, dents, damage) it is going to support your weight under normal roading conditions. Trek engineering and lawyers put a significant safety factor on the recommended weight limit on their marketing literature.

Your Achilles heel is in your wheels, tires, and maybe seat post. Wear components like brake pads and crank bearings will have lower life.

Get out and ride!
Toadmeister is offline  
Likes For Toadmeister:
Old 03-27-22, 07:48 AM
  #24  
joesch
Senior Member
 
joesch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hotel CA / DFW
Posts: 1,729

Bikes: 83 Colnago Super, 87 50th Daccordi, 79 & 87 Guerciotti's, 90s DB/GT Mtn Bikes, 90s Colnago Master and Titanio, 96 Serotta Colorado TG, 95/05 Colnago C40/C50, 06 DbyLS TI, 08 Lemond Filmore FG SS, 12 Cervelo R3, 20/15 Surly Stragler & Steamroller

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 600 Post(s)
Liked 777 Times in 495 Posts
Originally Posted by RVRBTR
Personally, I would set the carbon bike aside for now. How many pinch flats do you really want to repair? Pick up a nice steel MTB or hybrid from the 90's for $100-200 and go at it. I just converted a lugged steel trek 930 MTB to drop bar, and am getting ready to do the same to a lugged steel Trek 790, which has the same frame as the 520 touring bike. No reason you couldn't do a two day,150 miler on either one.
+1 and you may just decide to sell the carbon. Get a steel road and mtb so your covered for both and have strong and sturdy backups.
joesch is offline  
Likes For joesch:
Old 03-27-22, 09:23 AM
  #25  
kstephens
Full Member
 
kstephens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Western Ky
Posts: 379

Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by joesch
+1 and you may just decide to sell the carbon. Get a steel road and mtb so your covered for both and have strong and sturdy backups.
I used to see this on here a ton, and would roll my eyes until I actually did it. I had a trek 1.5, and I was planning on upgrading to carbon. I also wanted to get in to touring a litle, so I put the carbon bike on hold and bought a surly LHT, but still planning on keeping the Trek for group rides, and upgrading to carbon down the road. I loved the steel so much, I sold my trek. Still love the surly, look at carbon bikes often, but also now love looking at custom steel too. (all of that is personal preference -but I never would have discovered that had I not tried).

But aside from that, I think the weight limits on bike are on the light side. I would think that is where the manufacturer would indicated that failure COULD occur, but not a given. But there is a reason why they stuck with 275 - so it is probably best to respect that. But if keeping the carbon not only motivates you be healthier and ride more - by all means hold on to it and best of luck in your journey.
kstephens is offline  
Likes For kstephens:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.