11-34T vs 11-30T on long, steep climbs
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,889
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4788 Post(s)
Liked 3,914 Times
in
2,545 Posts
Somewhat random thoughts from a guy who loves to climb. More than one cassette is always good. Might even be worthwhile to have a second wheel to put it on. I am a huge fan of triples, variations of the old racing gearing and tiny inside chainrings. (Now, in my late sixties, I run a 50-38-24 on my 9-speed. I use any cassette between 12-23 and 14-28 (and they are for the most part loose cog so I can do quite a lot of customizing).
And, for any gear out there, there's a hill that will reduce you to pedaling way too slow. It is very possible to grunt up hills pedaling slow. It can even be fun. I make no claims to be anything like "normal" but I've forever used huge gears on hills. Rode many of the races in New England on a 42-19 which was also my training gear. I love riding fix gear and have a pretty good list of hills I've done in my regular flat ground gear. With my age, I've compromised and had a custom built that can handle every gear available using velodrome standard equipment. Rode today up a local hill, 1100' (340m) in a little under 3 miles (4.5k) on my fix gear in a 42-24. In mediocre condition. Just because I wanted to. I went slow. You would have gotten bored counting my RPM. Last two times up I used my 9-speed with first the 28, then the 25. 24-25 is very, very different from 42-24! Today I rode more than half the hill out of the saddle and sitting simply wasn't a choice.
Unless money is tight, get the 34 and try it. Might be a real blessing or it might tell you that the best bike for you has other features (like closer gears).
And, for any gear out there, there's a hill that will reduce you to pedaling way too slow. It is very possible to grunt up hills pedaling slow. It can even be fun. I make no claims to be anything like "normal" but I've forever used huge gears on hills. Rode many of the races in New England on a 42-19 which was also my training gear. I love riding fix gear and have a pretty good list of hills I've done in my regular flat ground gear. With my age, I've compromised and had a custom built that can handle every gear available using velodrome standard equipment. Rode today up a local hill, 1100' (340m) in a little under 3 miles (4.5k) on my fix gear in a 42-24. In mediocre condition. Just because I wanted to. I went slow. You would have gotten bored counting my RPM. Last two times up I used my 9-speed with first the 28, then the 25. 24-25 is very, very different from 42-24! Today I rode more than half the hill out of the saddle and sitting simply wasn't a choice.
Unless money is tight, get the 34 and try it. Might be a real blessing or it might tell you that the best bike for you has other features (like closer gears).
Likes For 79pmooney:
#27
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 88 Times
in
57 Posts
Have you considered a sub compact, 48/32 or 46/30, chain rings? Absolute black sells a set the will fit on ultegra 6800 and better that work great in the hills. The rings are ovals but work great.. PS, No I dont sell bike parts.
Likes For N2deep:
#28
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Japan
Posts: 106
Bikes: 2020 Trek Domane AL 3, 2019 Giant Escape RX Disc
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
Thanks for the helpful replies again, all. Sub compact chainrings and the SRAM 11-36 cassette are options I'll definitely look into.
Likewise, Kabuto, I find these hills are doable (and fun!) with a 30T in the back, with the exception of when I get two or more days in a row of tour bookings for long climbs. Without one to three days off between big climbs, it can be quite a grind for me, particularly when day two or three is a fit customer eager to smash the hills and not so interested in sightseeing stops. Once business returns, hopefully will find a backup tour guide round these parts so I can get days off when I need them. Or maybe the sub compact and SRAM 11-36 will do the trick.
Likewise, Kabuto, I find these hills are doable (and fun!) with a 30T in the back, with the exception of when I get two or more days in a row of tour bookings for long climbs. Without one to three days off between big climbs, it can be quite a grind for me, particularly when day two or three is a fit customer eager to smash the hills and not so interested in sightseeing stops. Once business returns, hopefully will find a backup tour guide round these parts so I can get days off when I need them. Or maybe the sub compact and SRAM 11-36 will do the trick.
#29
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
The 46/30T I am using now is Shimano's GRX, and here it costs US$150. The chainline is 3mm further out than my Ultegra 50/34, but the Ultegra front derailleur handles it fine. (The GRX mechanical one isn't prohibitively expensive, either).
The SRAM 11-36T cassette is SRAM PG-1170 , and I think it was about US$100. I'm using an XTR chain, fwiw. I don't think it matters, and it might make slightly more sense to use a SRAM chain.
The SRAM 11-36T cassette is SRAM PG-1170 , and I think it was about US$100. I'm using an XTR chain, fwiw. I don't think it matters, and it might make slightly more sense to use a SRAM chain.
Likes For Cyclist0108:
#30
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
Oh heck, if doing that for work every day, get an ebike. There's no shame.
Likes For znomit:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,839
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6934 Post(s)
Liked 10,938 Times
in
4,673 Posts
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirt...e_competition)
Likes For Koyote:
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,100
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 1,955 Times
in
941 Posts
From a business sense, it makes perfect sense to preserve your legs and be proactive in preventing overuse injuries.
It is worth investing in a GRX 46-30 crankset and even an 11-34 cassette to prevent tendonitis injuries.
It is worth investing in a GRX 46-30 crankset and even an 11-34 cassette to prevent tendonitis injuries.
Likes For CAT7RDR:
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2332 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Come to Pittsburgh. The steepest paved road maxes out at 37% grade.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirt...e_competition)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirt...e_competition)
Extended climbs of that duration over 15% are exceedingly rare.
Likes For GhostRider62:
#34
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,641
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1939 Post(s)
Liked 1,461 Times
in
1,012 Posts
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,802
Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times
in
118 Posts
10%-20% grades for two hours. Damn...you guys are gluttons for serious pain. That is, like a poster said, why they invented e-bikes. I'll be faster walking my bike up that. But yes...34, if not an e-bike.
Likes For Chandne:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 702
Bikes: '23 Poseidon Redwood, '07 Specialized Roubaix Comp Triple, '12 Gravity Fixie, '21 Liv Rove 4, '06? Giant EB Spirit
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
151 Posts
Granted I ride 11-28 with a triple…
So I actually have 50/34/30 up front
what I have found going from a cassette with lowest gears of 23,25 and 28 is that I always find a use for the easier gear. It could be I’m getting back in shape or I challenge myself to steeper climbs.
I say go for the 34. If you don’t need it change it back and sell it used
what I have found going from a cassette with lowest gears of 23,25 and 28 is that I always find a use for the easier gear. It could be I’m getting back in shape or I challenge myself to steeper climbs.
I say go for the 34. If you don’t need it change it back and sell it used
Likes For Symox:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2693 Post(s)
Liked 485 Times
in
350 Posts
Somewhat random thoughts from a guy who loves to climb. More than one cassette is always good. Might even be worthwhile to have a second wheel to put it on. I am a huge fan of triples, variations of the old racing gearing and tiny inside chainrings. (Now, in my late sixties, I run a 50-38-24 on my 9-speed. I use any cassette between 12-23 and 14-28 (and they are for the most part loose cog so I can do quite a lot of customizing).
And, for any gear out there, there's a hill that will reduce you to pedaling way too slow. It is very possible to grunt up hills pedaling slow. It can even be fun. I make no claims to be anything like "normal" but I've forever used huge gears on hills. Rode many of the races in New England on a 42-19 which was also my training gear. I love riding fix gear and have a pretty good list of hills I've done in my regular flat ground gear. With my age, I've compromised and had a custom built that can handle every gear available using velodrome standard equipment. Rode today up a local hill, 1100' (340m) in a little under 3 miles (4.5k) on my fix gear in a 42-24. In mediocre condition. Just because I wanted to. I went slow. You would have gotten bored counting my RPM. Last two times up I used my 9-speed with first the 28, then the 25. 24-25 is very, very different from 42-24! Today I rode more than half the hill out of the saddle and sitting simply wasn't a choice.
Unless money is tight, get the 34 and try it. Might be a real blessing or it might tell you that the best bike for you has other features (like closer gears).
And, for any gear out there, there's a hill that will reduce you to pedaling way too slow. It is very possible to grunt up hills pedaling slow. It can even be fun. I make no claims to be anything like "normal" but I've forever used huge gears on hills. Rode many of the races in New England on a 42-19 which was also my training gear. I love riding fix gear and have a pretty good list of hills I've done in my regular flat ground gear. With my age, I've compromised and had a custom built that can handle every gear available using velodrome standard equipment. Rode today up a local hill, 1100' (340m) in a little under 3 miles (4.5k) on my fix gear in a 42-24. In mediocre condition. Just because I wanted to. I went slow. You would have gotten bored counting my RPM. Last two times up I used my 9-speed with first the 28, then the 25. 24-25 is very, very different from 42-24! Today I rode more than half the hill out of the saddle and sitting simply wasn't a choice.
Unless money is tight, get the 34 and try it. Might be a real blessing or it might tell you that the best bike for you has other features (like closer gears).
Likes For LarrySellerz:
#38
Senior Member
If you're geared appropriately, that's highly unlikely. People tend to visualize "walking speed" as whatever their brisk walk is in day-to-day life, but walking speeds that are trivial when unencumbered on flat ground can be very hard efforts when pushing a bicycle up a steep hill.
Steeper gradients do diminish the advantage of riding a bicycle versus walking it, but as long as things remain reasonably rideable (which on paved roads is nearly always only limited by appropriate choice of gearing), it's just about always faster to ride.
Having a lower gear is downright faster if it allows you to maintain good fluid pedaling form, or if it allows you to ride less conservatively on the shallow parts of a climb since you don't need to "save up" your matchbox for torquing through the steep spots.
Steeper gradients do diminish the advantage of riding a bicycle versus walking it, but as long as things remain reasonably rideable (which on paved roads is nearly always only limited by appropriate choice of gearing), it's just about always faster to ride.
Having a lower gear is downright faster if it allows you to maintain good fluid pedaling form, or if it allows you to ride less conservatively on the shallow parts of a climb since you don't need to "save up" your matchbox for torquing through the steep spots.
Likes For HTupolev:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,802
Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times
in
118 Posts
Well, I have mountain biked up some 20% grades and it is simply easier/faster for me to walk the darn slope. There is not enough weight over the front there though and the ground is pretty loose on those steep slopes due to water flow when it rains. Road- yeah, if geared low enough, I just hang over the front and grind it out. Sometimes, I'd rather walk.
Likes For Chandne:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,373
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4384 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
2,981 Posts
If you're geared appropriately, that's highly unlikely. People tend to visualize "walking speed" as whatever their brisk walk is in day-to-day life, but walking speeds that are trivial when unencumbered on flat ground can be very hard efforts when pushing a bicycle up a steep hill.
Steeper gradients do diminish the advantage of riding a bicycle versus walking it, but as long as things remain reasonably rideable (which on paved roads is nearly always only limited by appropriate choice of gearing), it's just about always faster to ride.
Having a lower gear is downright faster if it allows you to maintain good fluid pedaling form, or if it allows you to ride less conservatively on the shallow parts of a climb since you don't need to "save up" your matchbox for torquing through the steep spots.
Steeper gradients do diminish the advantage of riding a bicycle versus walking it, but as long as things remain reasonably rideable (which on paved roads is nearly always only limited by appropriate choice of gearing), it's just about always faster to ride.
Having a lower gear is downright faster if it allows you to maintain good fluid pedaling form, or if it allows you to ride less conservatively on the shallow parts of a climb since you don't need to "save up" your matchbox for torquing through the steep spots.
I can't say I've ever been passed by a cyclist walking their bike up a hill either on or off-road. I've had runners go by me on really steep hills, but they don't have a bike in tow and they are wearing running shoes. The biggest grindfest of a riding event I did this year saw plenty of guys walking up the 25%+ slopes. I was barely moving on the bike, but I was still passing anybody who was off and walking.
I also agree that you can't really have a low enough gear once you get over 20% slopes. Anything that increases your cadence once you are forced into grinding below 50 rpm is simply going to be better. For me a 50/34 front and 11-34 cassette is still pretty marginal if there is a lot of seriously steep climbing involved. On the ride I mentioned above it was right on the limit above 20%. I think that's why a lot of guys were forced to walk. Some of them were stronger than me, but just didn't have the gears to keep cranking over.
Likes For PeteHski: