Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

Comparing Stack/Reach - Existing Bike to New Bike

Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Comparing Stack/Reach - Existing Bike to New Bike

Old 12-05-21, 12:23 PM
  #1  
Noonievut
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 944
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Liked 254 Times in 127 Posts
Comparing Stack/Reach - Existing Bike to New Bike

I’ve read that these numbers are pretty important when checking specs on potential new bikes. I know the stack and reach on my existing bike, and on three bikes I’m looking at. This new bike will be ridden like my existing bike though with wider tires. I can’t easily try these bikes at the moment (one is a buildup of a frame).

The numbers are below, existing bike bold font.

When I compare these, what are the things I should be paying attention to? Thanks 😊

Reach 383 / 392 / 394 / 378
Stack 575 / 566 / 557 / 565
Noonievut is offline  
Old 12-05-21, 12:33 PM
  #2  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,810

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
Well if you want your fit to be just like your previous bike, then those as well as the rest of the geometry numbers should be about the same.

However if you want different fits on the different bike then you need to decide if you want a lower stack for a lower more aero position or do you want more stack for a more upright position. Reach can do somewhat the same for you with regard to making you more or less aero in position, but the two numbers really need to work together to match your particular desires, wants and needs. Since your body measurements and perceptions about your fit aren't mine, you really need to go see what they feel like.

I use the reach and stack to give me clues to what bikes I want, but not to just blindly pick a bike or size of bike.
Iride01 is offline  
Likes For Iride01:
Old 12-05-21, 12:41 PM
  #3  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,890

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 751 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 799 Times in 467 Posts
If your bold numbers were my numbers, then I'd find all of the other number-combos comfortable. I have a number of bikes and have measured the stack/reach on all of them. For me at least, the S-R numbers of a comfortable bike is a general target as anywhere reasonably close (as your numbers are) would work for me. As Iride01 said..depends on what your goals are for n+1.
fishboat is offline  
Likes For fishboat:
Old 12-06-21, 06:54 AM
  #4  
AnthonyG
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by Noonievut
I’ve read that these numbers are pretty important when checking specs on potential new bikes. I know the stack and reach on my existing bike, and on three bikes I’m looking at. This new bike will be ridden like my existing bike though with wider tires. I can’t easily try these bikes at the moment (one is a buildup of a frame).

The numbers are below, existing bike bold font.

When I compare these, what are the things I should be paying attention to? Thanks 😊

Reach 383 / 392 / 394 / 378
Stack 575 / 566 / 557 / 565
Based on these numbers, frames 2 and 3 both will have your handlebars being lower and further away than your current frame. Frame 4 will have a slightly shorter reach but lower handlebars. This is all assuming the same stem and steerer tube length. You can play around with different stems and possibly with different steer tube lengths (If your using a new fork) to get the bars into the same position as your current bike.
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 12-06-21, 12:52 PM
  #5  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,269 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by Noonievut
I’ve read that these numbers are pretty important when checking specs on potential new bikes. This new bike will be ridden like my existing bike though with wider tires.
It would help to know whether you're looking for a fit that feels similar your current bike, or something different. As has been pointed out, your four choices are all lower than your current bike, and three of them are longer.

A low stack height can be adjusted with spacers under the stem, and a different stem length and/or angle can accommodate for reach differences, but only to a degree. Don't be this guy:

Rolla is offline  
Likes For Rolla:
Old 12-06-21, 05:03 PM
  #6  
Noonievut
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 944
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Liked 254 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by Rolla
It would help to know whether you're looking for a fit that feels similar your current bike, or something different. As has been pointed out, your four choices are all lower than your current bike, and three of them are longer.

A low stack height can be adjusted with spacers under the stem, and a different stem length and/or angle can accommodate for reach differences, but only to a degree. Don't be this guy:

yeah that’s what I’m dealing with, as my existing bike is custom geometry and was based on a tall, short reach profile. I won’t replicate with off the shelf, but I’ve owned other bikes over the years and made them work.
Noonievut is offline  
Old 12-06-21, 05:12 PM
  #7  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,810

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
Well consider the pic an example of a bike that has too little frame stack height for the position the owner wants to be in.

Please don't make a bike look like in the pic and ride them in public places!
Iride01 is offline  
Old 12-06-21, 05:29 PM
  #8  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,269 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by Noonievut
my existing bike is custom geometry and was based on a tall, short reach profile.
The numbers you posted earlier are kind of moving in the opposite direction. Not sure what kind of a bike you're looking for (or your budget), but maybe folks here can point you towards a taller stack/shorter reach frame, if that's what works best for you. They're out there!


Rolla is offline  
Old 12-08-21, 11:02 AM
  #9  
Moisture
Drip, Drip.
 
Moisture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575

Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times in 163 Posts
You obviously need to know stem length. Top tube length will also play a factor. Also important to consider saddle setback, hence which is why it is important to be able to try the bikes in person and make adjustments to saddle height, tilt, angle, setback, handlebar angle/position etc. as needed before comparing.

generally speaking, you can compensate for less or more frame reach by changing stem length accordingly, that is assuming that frame stack is roughly the same.

You can always manipulate the "effective" frame stack/reach with different stem lengths.

Don't forgot handlebar rise , reach, drop degrees whatever depending on flat/drop bar.
Moisture is offline  
Old 12-08-21, 11:05 AM
  #10  
Moisture
Drip, Drip.
 
Moisture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575

Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times in 163 Posts
once frame stack starts to change dramatically, this is when comparos become slightly more difficult. some bikes have a long headset cup which changes the lower stack you can use. Others have cut steerer tubes. others dont. this is why stem length/degree combos are useful to achieve the effective handlebar stack/reach position you want.

Your stack/reach comparo is a good start. but dont be too critical, because like i mentioned there are other factors which may change your preferred fit. different frame geometries can work similarly well for you when comparing from bike to bike.
Moisture is offline  
Old 12-09-21, 03:19 PM
  #11  
Badger6
Obsessed with Eddington
 
Badger6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330

Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times in 368 Posts
Originally Posted by Moisture
You obviously need to know stem length. Top tube length will also play a factor. Also important to consider saddle setback, hence which is why it is important to be able to try the bikes in person and make adjustments to saddle height, tilt, angle, setback, handlebar angle/position etc. as needed before comparing.

generally speaking, you can compensate for less or more frame reach by changing stem length accordingly, that is assuming that frame stack is roughly the same.

You can always manipulate the "effective" frame stack/reach with different stem lengths.

Don't forgot handlebar rise , reach, drop degrees whatever depending on flat/drop bar.
Originally Posted by Moisture
once frame stack starts to change dramatically, this is when comparos become slightly more difficult. some bikes have a long headset cup which changes the lower stack you can use. Others have cut steerer tubes. others dont. this is why stem length/degree combos are useful to achieve the effective handlebar stack/reach position you want.

Your stack/reach comparo is a good start. but dont be too critical, because like i mentioned there are other factors which may change your preferred fit. different frame geometries can work similarly well for you when comparing from bike to bike.
I'll say it like this, most of the statements you've made are correct. But, the presentation is haphazard and incoherent. You are clearly gaining lots of info, but info is not knowledge. This is not really helpful to the OP.
Badger6 is offline  
Old 12-09-21, 06:33 PM
  #12  
Noonievut
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 944
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Liked 254 Times in 127 Posts
I ended up getting the bike that was the smaller frame, but exact same gravel bike frame as I had a few years ago and it fit well (Bombtrack Hook by the way). Spent a couple hours at the bike shop dialing in saddle height, fore/aft, and stem length and stack. Felt pretty good so we’ll see how she goes! Thanks for responses.
Noonievut is offline  
Likes For Noonievut:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.