Weight Threshold for Rolf Vector Comp?
03-03-08, 05:48 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Weight Threshold for Rolf Vector Comp?
I'm about 200lbs and thinking about running a Rolf Vector Comp for a front wheel. Does anyone know how much weight they can handle? I usually frequent the SS/Fixed forum but figured I'd get an easier answer around here. Thanks.
03-03-08, 06:13 PM
#2
Making a kilometer blurry
Those Vector Comps are heavy training wheels with no weight limit. They are durable.
03-03-08, 06:47 PM
#3
Ninja don't wear flipflop
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NE TN
Posts: 1,443
Bikes: Specialized S-Works Roubaix SL3, BMC TM01...if it every ships
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I had one for years when I was 240+. Mine was indestructable.
03-03-08, 11:18 PM
#6
Making a kilometer blurry
First off, aerodynamic properties matter a fair amount, so really deep rims are better (neither V. Comps or Ksyriums are aero). To get reasonable aero improvements, you're going to need a 40mm or greater rim depth. So, AC420s, Zipps, Reynolds, PlanetX, Lews, etc., etc. are all more aero).
Weight is highly overrated. Rotating mass barely matters at all. Raw weight uphill is well understood. If you and the bike weigh 175 lbs, how much difference do you think 200g makes? Yeah, it's that simple.
You want a stiff wheel so you don't get brake rub or goofy handling. Ksyriums are probably stiffer than the V Comps because of a smarter lacing strategy -- at least on the rear. They're possibly as durable.
06-13-22, 05:23 PM
#8
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Physics
I had to create an account, just to leave a response to the self assure "comprehensive response" that you left.
Pretend you don't know anything about physics...shouldn't be hard, because you don't.
Ask yourself: "Why do car manufacturers keep trying to make lighter and lighter wheels?!" Do you think that a pound in the car matters? Why do car makers use terms such as: unsprung weight?
Well, turns out that spinning up weight, and centrifugal force are heck of a lot different than just dead weight...yes, this requires some rudimentary understanding of physics.
Or just take my word for it: you are dead wrong! Now go out and research stuff before you post garbage online...please!
Also: Rolf Vector Comps are a heavy, but a very rugged wheel. I had mine for 18 years now, and I had to repack the bearings once.
Shhh. Don't tell anyone on BF, but there's not too much performance difference in wheels (by "better," I'm assuming you mean "faster". Correct me if I'm wrong.
First off, aerodynamic properties matter a fair amount, so really deep rims are better (neither V. Comps or Ksyriums are aero). To get reasonable aero improvements, you're going to need a 40mm or greater rim depth. So, AC420s, Zipps, Reynolds, PlanetX, Lews, etc., etc. are all more aero).
Weight is highly overrated. Rotating mass barely matters at all. Raw weight uphill is well understood. If you and the bike weigh 175 lbs, how much difference do you think 200g makes? Yeah, it's that simple.
You want a stiff wheel so you don't get brake rub or goofy handling. Ksyriums are probably stiffer than the V Comps because of a smarter lacing strategy -- at least on the rear. They're possibly as durable.[/QUOTE]
Pretend you don't know anything about physics...shouldn't be hard, because you don't.
Ask yourself: "Why do car manufacturers keep trying to make lighter and lighter wheels?!" Do you think that a pound in the car matters? Why do car makers use terms such as: unsprung weight?
Well, turns out that spinning up weight, and centrifugal force are heck of a lot different than just dead weight...yes, this requires some rudimentary understanding of physics.
Or just take my word for it: you are dead wrong! Now go out and research stuff before you post garbage online...please!
Also: Rolf Vector Comps are a heavy, but a very rugged wheel. I had mine for 18 years now, and I had to repack the bearings once.
Shhh. Don't tell anyone on BF, but there's not too much performance difference in wheels (by "better," I'm assuming you mean "faster". Correct me if I'm wrong.
First off, aerodynamic properties matter a fair amount, so really deep rims are better (neither V. Comps or Ksyriums are aero). To get reasonable aero improvements, you're going to need a 40mm or greater rim depth. So, AC420s, Zipps, Reynolds, PlanetX, Lews, etc., etc. are all more aero).
Weight is highly overrated. Rotating mass barely matters at all. Raw weight uphill is well understood. If you and the bike weigh 175 lbs, how much difference do you think 200g makes? Yeah, it's that simple.
You want a stiff wheel so you don't get brake rub or goofy handling. Ksyriums are probably stiffer than the V Comps because of a smarter lacing strategy -- at least on the rear. They're possibly as durable.[/QUOTE]
06-13-22, 05:45 PM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
I ran Vector Pros (same paired spoke design, fewer spokes (14F, 16R)) for ~16 years/~50,000 miles. I'm 185 lb. They were completely bulletproof. The only potential downside with this design is if you break a spoke, the wheel will go significantly - even possibly unrideably - out of true
06-13-22, 06:48 PM
#10
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,044
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22590 Post(s)
Liked 8,924 Times
in
4,157 Posts
I ran Vector Pros (same paired spoke design, fewer spokes (14F, 16R)) for ~16 years/~50,000 miles. I'm 185 lb. They were completely bulletproof. The only potential downside with this design is if you break a spoke, the wheel will go significantly - even possibly unrideably - out of true
Likes For datlas:
06-13-22, 08:00 PM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
I had to create an account, just to leave a response to the self assure "comprehensive response" that you left.
Pretend you don't know anything about physics...shouldn't be hard, because you don't.
Ask yourself: "Why do car manufacturers keep trying to make lighter and lighter wheels?!" Do you think that a pound in the car matters? Why do car makers use terms such as: unsprung weight?
Well, turns out that spinning up weight, and centrifugal force are heck of a lot different than just dead weight...yes, this requires some rudimentary understanding of physics.
Or just take my word for it: you are dead wrong! Now go out and research stuff before you post garbage online...please!
Also: Rolf Vector Comps are a heavy, but a very rugged wheel. I had mine for 18 years now, and I had to repack the bearings once.
Shhh. Don't tell anyone on BF, but there's not too much performance difference in wheels (by "better," I'm assuming you mean "faster". Correct me if I'm wrong.
First off, aerodynamic properties matter a fair amount, so really deep rims are better (neither V. Comps or Ksyriums are aero). To get reasonable aero improvements, you're going to need a 40mm or greater rim depth. So, AC420s, Zipps, Reynolds, PlanetX, Lews, etc., etc. are all more aero).
Weight is highly overrated. Rotating mass barely matters at all. Raw weight uphill is well understood. If you and the bike weigh 175 lbs, how much difference do you think 200g makes? Yeah, it's that simple.
You want a stiff wheel so you don't get brake rub or goofy handling. Ksyriums are probably stiffer than the V Comps because of a smarter lacing strategy -- at least on the rear. They're possibly as durable.
Pretend you don't know anything about physics...shouldn't be hard, because you don't.
Ask yourself: "Why do car manufacturers keep trying to make lighter and lighter wheels?!" Do you think that a pound in the car matters? Why do car makers use terms such as: unsprung weight?
Well, turns out that spinning up weight, and centrifugal force are heck of a lot different than just dead weight...yes, this requires some rudimentary understanding of physics.
Or just take my word for it: you are dead wrong! Now go out and research stuff before you post garbage online...please!
Also: Rolf Vector Comps are a heavy, but a very rugged wheel. I had mine for 18 years now, and I had to repack the bearings once.
Shhh. Don't tell anyone on BF, but there's not too much performance difference in wheels (by "better," I'm assuming you mean "faster". Correct me if I'm wrong.
First off, aerodynamic properties matter a fair amount, so really deep rims are better (neither V. Comps or Ksyriums are aero). To get reasonable aero improvements, you're going to need a 40mm or greater rim depth. So, AC420s, Zipps, Reynolds, PlanetX, Lews, etc., etc. are all more aero).
Weight is highly overrated. Rotating mass barely matters at all. Raw weight uphill is well understood. If you and the bike weigh 175 lbs, how much difference do you think 200g makes? Yeah, it's that simple.
You want a stiff wheel so you don't get brake rub or goofy handling. Ksyriums are probably stiffer than the V Comps because of a smarter lacing strategy -- at least on the rear. They're possibly as durable.
Damn, you really put a lot of thought into a post that's only a little over 14 years late.
Likes For cxwrench:
06-13-22, 08:13 PM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Was it a question on wait threshold? Maybe that explains it.
Last edited by seypat; 06-13-22 at 08:20 PM.
06-14-22, 07:12 AM
#14
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,044
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22590 Post(s)
Liked 8,924 Times
in
4,157 Posts
No prob dude. I have suggested many times to management that an old thread like this should not be able to be bumped except maybe by the OP or someone else who posted, but apparently that's not realistic.
06-14-22, 07:13 AM
#15
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,044
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22590 Post(s)
Liked 8,924 Times
in
4,157 Posts
Likes For datlas:
06-17-22, 11:39 AM
#16
Le Crocodile
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 369 Post(s)
Liked 787 Times
in
311 Posts
I had to create an account, just to leave a response to the self assure "comprehensive response" that you left.
Pretend you don't know anything about physics...shouldn't be hard, because you don't.
You got me there.................
Ask yourself: "Why do car manufacturers keep trying to make lighter and lighter wheels?!" Do you think that a pound in the car matters? Why do car makers use terms such as: unsprung weight?
I don't know...............
Well, turns out that spinning up weight, and centrifugal force are heck of a lot different than just dead weight...yes, this requires some rudimentary understanding of physics.
I'll be damned.
Or just take my word for it: you are dead wrong! Now go out and research stuff before you post garbage online...please!
Also: Rolf Vector Comps are a heavy, but a very rugged wheel. I had mine for 18 years now, and I had to repack the bearings once.
Pretend you don't know anything about physics...shouldn't be hard, because you don't.
You got me there.................
Ask yourself: "Why do car manufacturers keep trying to make lighter and lighter wheels?!" Do you think that a pound in the car matters? Why do car makers use terms such as: unsprung weight?
I don't know...............
Well, turns out that spinning up weight, and centrifugal force are heck of a lot different than just dead weight...yes, this requires some rudimentary understanding of physics.
I'll be damned.
Or just take my word for it: you are dead wrong! Now go out and research stuff before you post garbage online...please!
Also: Rolf Vector Comps are a heavy, but a very rugged wheel. I had mine for 18 years now, and I had to repack the bearings once.
