Varia radar camera RCT715 leaked
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 22,955
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17642 Post(s)
Liked 9,550 Times
in
5,390 Posts
Varia radar camera RCT715 leaked
I'm using the RTL510 and happy with it. This doesn't interest me, but the appeal to some is obvious.
The camera can be off, on, or radar activated. It's 1080p but can be run in 720p for better battery life. Six (6) hours total with constant-on light and camera, according to a German language spec sheet.
Looks like it will cost $400.
The camera can be off, on, or radar activated. It's 1080p but can be run in 720p for better battery life. Six (6) hours total with constant-on light and camera, according to a German language spec sheet.
Looks like it will cost $400.


Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Australia
Posts: 445
Bikes: 2002 Trek 5200 (US POSTAL), 2020 Canyon Aeroad SL
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 324 Times
in
165 Posts
From what I've been told it's shaping up to be a great (if expensive) product.
I've been waiting for a rear camera-light-radar combo package to be released for a long time. If this reviews well by the usual guys I'll be straight onto it!
I've been waiting for a rear camera-light-radar combo package to be released for a long time. If this reviews well by the usual guys I'll be straight onto it!
Likes For tempocyclist:
Likes For Polaris OBark:
#4
I pedal in my sleep...
Yeah, I can't say that I won't need this. I wouldn't give up my radar for a camera but I'd certainly spend the necessary cash to combine the two, especially after the increase in hatefulness I've seen on rural roads in the past year.
Likes For str8jakett:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 3,541
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1691 Post(s)
Liked 1,812 Times
in
1,150 Posts
Likes For PeteHski:
#7
Senior Member
Will definitely buy, once Garmin straightens out the inevitable early release software bugs. Now on the website: Varia RCT715
Last edited by jwalther; 05-18-22 at 05:10 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: WNY
Posts: 3,065
Bikes: Caad10, Caad2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 342 Post(s)
Liked 103 Times
in
67 Posts
Review at DCRainmaker: https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2022/05/...ra-review.html
Likes For mvnsnd:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,213
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2443 Post(s)
Liked 1,504 Times
in
973 Posts
Review at DCRainmaker: https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2022/05/...ra-review.html
Likes For seypat:
#10
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 11,533
Bikes: '15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, '76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, '17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, '12 Breezer Venturi, '09 Dahon Mariner, '12 Mercier Nano, '95 DeKerf Team SL, '19 Tern Rally, ‘21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, ‘19 T-Lab X3
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2091 Post(s)
Liked 1,158 Times
in
703 Posts
DCR is so nice…talking about how people had higher expectations than a hot mess of a Garmin unit. I certainly didn’t. Garmin’s user experience is the worst.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 38,691
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 352 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20056 Post(s)
Liked 8,669 Times
in
4,342 Posts
Most of the software/firmware hiccups, like the fact that the video portion of the app isn't terribly... functional... doesn't worry me too much - I'm sure they'll improve it - but the lack of image stabilization on a $400 unit is really disappointing.
Likes For WhyFi:
#12
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 11,533
Bikes: '15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, '76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, '17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, '12 Breezer Venturi, '09 Dahon Mariner, '12 Mercier Nano, '95 DeKerf Team SL, '19 Tern Rally, ‘21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, ‘19 T-Lab X3
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2091 Post(s)
Liked 1,158 Times
in
703 Posts
What I find disappointing is that Garmin couldn’t make it usuable action cam. Also disappointing that they’re charging $400 for an emergency recorder. Were it a $200 emergency recorder/light/radar without image stabilization, that’d work. Were it a $400 action cam/light/radar with image stabilization, that’d work. It’s neither of those two things, and that’s what’s most disappointing.
Personally, and speaking as an RTL515 user, I’d be happiest with just a simple, front or rear mountable, small form action cam. I don’t find the radar functionality of the Varia particularly useful, and would not buy that feature again. Taillamps are a dime a dozen, many with designs I greatly prefer over the Varia, so I can go either way on whether to integrate a light with a camera, but I think I’d prefer to have the units separate, particularly as a multi-bike user; I do more miles where I’m not interested in using an action cam than I do rides where I want to capture images, so not having to both remove a light/cam unit and replace a light unit would be simplfied by simply adding a cam as needed. I mean, I’ve never wanted for a light to integrated into my front mounted GoPro…. The Fly12 CE has it’s appeal, but it’s bulk and feature set is a trade-off on versatility.
It’s interesting that DCR mentioned the old Garmin VIRB action cam, because I thought that, if they could get the size and form factor right, that it could have been something nice for my needs. They got close with VIRB360, but bungled it by making it 360º cam. Had they offloaded the VIRB’s GPS functionality and left that to a connected head unit, they could’ve had a pretty compelling cam, I think.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 38,691
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 352 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20056 Post(s)
Liked 8,669 Times
in
4,342 Posts
I look at it from a diametrically opposed position: given what the camera actually does. As DCR concludes, the unit really only functions practically as an emergency recorder when used in conjuction with the newest Edge units. It’s functionally inoperable as an action cam. Based on the DCR cam comparison pics, it doesn’t seem like image stabilization is necessary for emergency recorder functionality, so the absence of image stabilization makes sense.
What I find disappointing is that Garmin couldn’t make it usuable action cam. Also disappointing that they’re charging $400 for an emergency recorder. Were it a $200 emergency recorder/light/radar without image stabilization, that’d work. Were it a $400 action cam/light/radar with image stabilization, that’d work. It’s neither of those two things, and that’s what’s most disappointing.
What I find disappointing is that Garmin couldn’t make it usuable action cam. Also disappointing that they’re charging $400 for an emergency recorder. Were it a $200 emergency recorder/light/radar without image stabilization, that’d work. Were it a $400 action cam/light/radar with image stabilization, that’d work. It’s neither of those two things, and that’s what’s most disappointing.
Personally, and speaking as an RTL515 user, I’d be happiest with just a simple, front or rear mountable, small form action cam. I don’t find the radar functionality of the Varia particularly useful, and would not buy that feature again. Taillamps are a dime a dozen, many with designs I greatly prefer over the Varia, so I can go either way on whether to integrate a light with a camera, but I think I’d prefer to have the units separate, particularly as a multi-bike user; I do more miles where I’m not interested in using an action cam than I do rides where I want to capture images, so not having to both remove a light/cam unit and replace a light unit would be simplfied by simply adding a cam as needed. I mean, I’ve never wanted for a light to integrated into my front mounted GoPro…. The Fly12 CE has it’s appeal, but it’s bulk and feature set is a trade-off on versatility.
It’s interesting that DCR mentioned the old Garmin VIRB action cam, because I thought that, if they could get the size and form factor right, that it could have been something nice for my needs. They got close with VIRB360, but bungled it by making it 360º cam. Had they offloaded the VIRB’s GPS functionality and left that to a connected head unit, they could’ve had a pretty compelling cam, I think.
It’s interesting that DCR mentioned the old Garmin VIRB action cam, because I thought that, if they could get the size and form factor right, that it could have been something nice for my needs. They got close with VIRB360, but bungled it by making it 360º cam. Had they offloaded the VIRB’s GPS functionality and left that to a connected head unit, they could’ve had a pretty compelling cam, I think.
I have a Cycliq Fly12 - it's a nice product with a couple of warts. In terms of being an action cam, the battery life far and away exceeds anything that I've come across that doesn't require an external battery. The light is a nice and sensible inclusion for cycling use - I don't want to keep track of the location or of the battery charge status of a separate light and I sure don't want anything else strapped to my bars.
Likes For WhyFi:
#15
Advocatus Diaboli
The lack of IS isn't terribly bothersome. I suppose there are those who want rear-facing action cams for some types of purposes, but I ain't one of them.
#16
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 11,533
Bikes: '15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, '76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, '17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, '12 Breezer Venturi, '09 Dahon Mariner, '12 Mercier Nano, '95 DeKerf Team SL, '19 Tern Rally, ‘21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, ‘19 T-Lab X3
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2091 Post(s)
Liked 1,158 Times
in
703 Posts
Well, yes - this is exactly the reason for my disappointment.
You're an exceptionally rare example of a Varia owner that don't value its functionality - I get the impression that most, including myself, would replace it immediately if it were lost or broken.
I have a Cycliq Fly12 - it's a nice product with a couple of warts. In terms of being an action cam, the battery life far and away exceeds anything that I've come across that doesn't require an external battery. The light is a nice and sensible inclusion for cycling use - I don't want to keep track of the location or of the battery charge status of a separate light and I sure don't want anything else strapped to my bars.
You're an exceptionally rare example of a Varia owner that don't value its functionality - I get the impression that most, including myself, would replace it immediately if it were lost or broken.
I have a Cycliq Fly12 - it's a nice product with a couple of warts. In terms of being an action cam, the battery life far and away exceeds anything that I've come across that doesn't require an external battery. The light is a nice and sensible inclusion for cycling use - I don't want to keep track of the location or of the battery charge status of a separate light and I sure don't want anything else strapped to my bars.
What I hate most about Varia, perhaps, is that it doesn’t stop reporting when the bike is not moving, so if I pull over at a junction to regroup, it beeps for all the passing cars as if I don’t expect cars to be passing by on the road! I also find it unreliable, sometimes only reporting one or two cars when there are more, perhaps especially at the first part of climbs, when my speed drops quickly but riders behind are approaching quickly as they hit the incline. I think the Varia gets confused about whether it was reporting the rider, who eventually slows to below radar threshold approach speed, and any cars which may have been coming up at the same time. I dunno, but the net effect is that I cannot trust Varia to get it right on group rides, which are most of what I do.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 22,955
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17642 Post(s)
Liked 9,550 Times
in
5,390 Posts
There's speculation on ****** that this was deliberate because stabilization is processing and can interfere with the use of the video as evidence. That sounds untrue to me, but it's what I've heard.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 22,955
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17642 Post(s)
Liked 9,550 Times
in
5,390 Posts
Let's both hope I never get hit and regret not upgrading to the camera model.

#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 38,691
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 352 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20056 Post(s)
Liked 8,669 Times
in
4,342 Posts
They're saying that a recording might be disqualified as evidence because of stabilization? Yeah, that sounds pretty... suspect. FWIW, all of the current Cycliq cameras feature stabilization, and they're ostensibly built for the same purpose.
#20
Dirt Roadie
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,244
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 825 Times
in
500 Posts
I bought the gen 1 radar soon after it came out, and it is still going strong. This would be something worth upgrading to, but after reading the DCRainmaker review, I think I might wait for gen N+1, or at least some substantial firmware upgrades.
(The other thing is the size. The square box of the gen. 1 radar fits nicely on my seatpost, but I think this thing might simply be too big. A chainstay mount could help, or a horizontal mount.)
(The other thing is the size. The square box of the gen. 1 radar fits nicely on my seatpost, but I think this thing might simply be too big. A chainstay mount could help, or a horizontal mount.)
#21
MotuekaCascadeChinook
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,142
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4510 Post(s)
Liked 3,014 Times
in
2,104 Posts
Well if you want video for just incident protection and radar and a rear light on your bike, you could get the Cycliq gen 3 plus the Varia RVR315 and slide in about $20 - $30 less than the current $399 for the Varia RCT715. But then the realestate on the back of your seatpost will be competing with your seat bag.
If you only want an action cam, this is not the product for you. If you only want a rear light and rear camera this is also still not the product for you.
If you only want an action cam, this is not the product for you. If you only want a rear light and rear camera this is also still not the product for you.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 38,691
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 352 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20056 Post(s)
Liked 8,669 Times
in
4,342 Posts
Well if you want video for just incident protection and radar and a rear light on your bike, you could get the Cycliq gen 3 plus the Varia RVR315 and slide in about $20 - $30 less than the current $399 for the Varia RCT715. But then the realestate on the back of your seatpost will be competing with your seat bag.
Likes For WhyFi:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: 757
Posts: 5,945
Bikes: Cervélo C2, Ritchey Breakaway
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5272 Post(s)
Liked 2,336 Times
in
1,021 Posts
Step in the right direction, but obviously it can be improved upon and most likely will be.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,674
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 784 Times
in
438 Posts
I look at it from a diametrically opposed position: given what the camera actually does. As DCR concludes, the unit really only functions practically as an emergency recorder when used in conjuction with the newest Edge units. It’s functionally inoperable as an action cam. Based on the DCR cam comparison pics, it doesn’t seem like image stabilization is necessary for emergency recorder functionality, so the absence of image stabilization makes sense.
What I find disappointing is that Garmin couldn’t make it usuable action cam. Also disappointing that they’re charging $400 for an emergency recorder. Were it a $200 emergency recorder/light/radar without image stabilization, that’d work. Were it a $400 action cam/light/radar with image stabilization, that’d work. It’s neither of those two things, and that’s what’s most disappointing.
Personally, and speaking as an RTL515 user, I’d be happiest with just a simple, front or rear mountable, small form action cam. I don’t find the radar functionality of the Varia particularly useful, and would not buy that feature again. Taillamps are a dime a dozen, many with designs I greatly prefer over the Varia, so I can go either way on whether to integrate a light with a camera, but I think I’d prefer to have the units separate, particularly as a multi-bike user; I do more miles where I’m not interested in using an action cam than I do rides where I want to capture images, so not having to both remove a light/cam unit and replace a light unit would be simplfied by simply adding a cam as needed. I mean, I’ve never wanted for a light to integrated into my front mounted GoPro…. The Fly12 CE has it’s appeal, but it’s bulk and feature set is a trade-off on versatility.
It’s interesting that DCR mentioned the old Garmin VIRB action cam, because I thought that, if they could get the size and form factor right, that it could have been something nice for my needs. They got close with VIRB360, but bungled it by making it 360º cam. Had they offloaded the VIRB’s GPS functionality and left that to a connected head unit, they could’ve had a pretty compelling cam, I think.
What I find disappointing is that Garmin couldn’t make it usuable action cam. Also disappointing that they’re charging $400 for an emergency recorder. Were it a $200 emergency recorder/light/radar without image stabilization, that’d work. Were it a $400 action cam/light/radar with image stabilization, that’d work. It’s neither of those two things, and that’s what’s most disappointing.
Personally, and speaking as an RTL515 user, I’d be happiest with just a simple, front or rear mountable, small form action cam. I don’t find the radar functionality of the Varia particularly useful, and would not buy that feature again. Taillamps are a dime a dozen, many with designs I greatly prefer over the Varia, so I can go either way on whether to integrate a light with a camera, but I think I’d prefer to have the units separate, particularly as a multi-bike user; I do more miles where I’m not interested in using an action cam than I do rides where I want to capture images, so not having to both remove a light/cam unit and replace a light unit would be simplfied by simply adding a cam as needed. I mean, I’ve never wanted for a light to integrated into my front mounted GoPro…. The Fly12 CE has it’s appeal, but it’s bulk and feature set is a trade-off on versatility.
It’s interesting that DCR mentioned the old Garmin VIRB action cam, because I thought that, if they could get the size and form factor right, that it could have been something nice for my needs. They got close with VIRB360, but bungled it by making it 360º cam. Had they offloaded the VIRB’s GPS functionality and left that to a connected head unit, they could’ve had a pretty compelling cam, I think.
I bought a Gen2 Fly6 a few years back - I used it mainly for the decent strobe, although one time it proved useful following up on an SUV that intentionally buzzed the pace line - the cops followed up, but only because one the the riders memorized the tag# (NC cars have no front tags, so a rear-facing camera is useless in this regard). The Fly6 died after ~2 years - I replaced it with a Gen3 - smaller, but the trade-off is that the battery life is reduced. I get 4h of camera + daylight red LED flash - not long enough for many of my rides, so I end up carrying a small spare light in my jersey.
I bough the Varia mainly for the light and the battery life of 12-14h - the radar was a bonus, but I was skeptical of its usefulness, given I have a mirror and ears. However, a few rides sold me on it - I still use the mirror, just less often, and the ability to track multiple cars graphically is nothing short of amazing for a small consumer-grade box. I think it makes a far more useful attachment to my seat post than the camera, particularly considering the limited car-identification utility of rear cameras in NC. However, if Garmin or someone else came up with a more evolved combination cam-radar-strobe that wasn't quite so chunky and had decent run-time, I'd be all over it but, but this Garmin isn't it, alas.
Not sure what I'll do with the Fly3 - possibly repurpose it as a front camera - it's a pretty compact and well-evolved bike-cam (decent imaging, OK run-time, and straightforward incident capture and playback management), and I should get better run-time if I leave the red strobe off.
A while back I suggested to Cycliq that they build a white-strobe Fly6 as a compact front cam, given that I'm not interested in having a combination headlight-cam like the Fly12 (I want to be able to choose my own headlight), but they didn't bite.
#25
:D
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 5,566
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 1,853 Times
in
1,243 Posts
if it had stabilization, it would be a lot more useful for road use in my area. Although, if it had it, it not only would be much more expensive, but that B+ life & memory would suffer a lot, unless they grow the packaging size. 64 gig & 6 hours run time using it's full potential is never going to exist for a reasonable price & at a small enough packaging.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
Likes For Troul: