Bridgestone RB-1 - Modify or Original?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Bridgestone RB-1 - Modify or Original?
I have a '92 Bridgestone RB-1 that I am thinking about selling. I have made some modifications over the years. I want to get some opinions of whether I should sell it with the modifications or return it to all original components. I swapped out the Avocet Racing saddle for the one shown. I converted from 7 speed to 8 speed. I swapped out the original Dia Compe BR300 brake calipers for 600/Ultegra to match the other components. I swapped out the bars, stem and bar end shifters for different bars, stem and Shimano (105) STIs. My question is should I return it to all the original components or sell with the modifications? I will be selling locally so I don’t know whether there will be a lot of collectors interested.
V
V
Last edited by rjhammett; 06-24-20 at 02:01 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 3,330
Bikes: '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '72 Gitane tandem, '72 Raleigh Super Course, '73 Raleigh Gran Sport, '73 Colnago Super, '76 Fiorelli Coppi, '78 Raleigh SBDU Team Pro, '78 Trek 930, '81 Holdsworth Special 650B, '86 Masi GC, ’94 Bridgestone RB-T
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 786 Post(s)
Liked 516 Times
in
280 Posts
Original. If the stuff you added works for you, keep it for another build. I think buyers of RB-1's are likely to want original components.
__________________
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
Likes For jeirvine:
#3
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,641
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,693 Times
in
932 Posts
The RB-1 is one of the few bikes that would benefit from having the stock parts on. So, if you've got them- this is the time.
Realistically, I'm guessing the parts you put on it are worth more than the parts that came on it- you'd have a better chance of selling the better parts and not losing as much money than attempting to make that money on a whole bike.
Realistically, I'm guessing the parts you put on it are worth more than the parts that came on it- you'd have a better chance of selling the better parts and not losing as much money than attempting to make that money on a whole bike.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I do have all the original parts. I was't sure if as many people would be interested in a bike with barcons as opposed to STIs.
#5
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
That bike specifically is maybe an exception because it has some odd cult following.
Usually though, around me you could get a good bit more $ for a road bike being modernized with STI than with older downtube/bar end shifting.
A $250 refurbished downtube bike is $400 with STI.
Usually though, around me you could get a good bit more $ for a road bike being modernized with STI than with older downtube/bar end shifting.
A $250 refurbished downtube bike is $400 with STI.
#6
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Only because it’s an RB-1, would the original parts have ‘value’ and in that case, it would be for ‘collectors’ You might be able to get more money than this way, but might take longer to find the right buyer.
The bike would probably generate more demand from ‘riders’ with the upgrades, because that would be what I would do.
Maybe able to get the same money as original condition, but would definitely generate more demand with modernized parts on it.
The bike would probably generate more demand from ‘riders’ with the upgrades, because that would be what I would do.
Maybe able to get the same money as original condition, but would definitely generate more demand with modernized parts on it.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,409
Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 523 Post(s)
Liked 973 Times
in
508 Posts
You could advertise it as a rider with the current parts, but mention in the ad that the original parts are available. That way, it may sell faster, but if a collector sees the ad, they'll know they can get the original parts as well.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
171 Posts
Bridgestone RB-1 - Modify or Original?
I had posted to this thread:
I normally don’t read the C&V Forum, but I noticed this zombie thread as a New Post. I bought a Bridgestone RB-1 in the mid-1980’s that looked something like this one:
I bought the Bridgestone because it fit. Iwas flattered when occasional cyclists commented and admired it.
Sheldon Brown, whom I had never even knew of while alive in Boston, wrote: :
Unfortunately in 2012, I was hit from behind by a hit-and-run, who turned himself in the next day...
Police photos
Just last week, since I need new cycling shoes, I called the police to retrieve my old ones. My accident was a news sensation at that time. and the dispatcher remembered it. He was very responsive, but unfortunately could nof find the shoes, much less the bike,
It never occurred to me to retrieve the components, many which may have been original. It was the start of phase three of four of my decades-long cycling lifestyle.
Only because it’s an RB-1, would the original parts have ‘value’ and in that case, it would be for ‘collectors’ You might be able to get more money than this way, but might take longer to find the right buyer.
The bike would probably generate more demand from ‘riders’ with the upgrades, because that would be what I would do.
Maybe able to get the same money as original condition, but would definitely generate more demand with modernized parts on it.
The bike would probably generate more demand from ‘riders’ with the upgrades, because that would be what I would do.
Maybe able to get the same money as original condition, but would definitely generate more demand with modernized parts on it.
I normally don’t read the C&V Forum, but I noticed this zombie thread as a New Post. I bought a Bridgestone RB-1 in the mid-1980’s that looked something like this one:
I bought the Bridgestone because it fit. Iwas flattered when occasional cyclists commented and admired it.
Sheldon Brown, whom I had never even knew of while alive in Boston, wrote: :
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Bridgestone "road" bikes, particularly the legendary RB-1, combine frame design taken from classic Italian road bikes of the '70's with excellent Japanese workmanship and functional, reliable parts.
The RB-1 was extremely popular with racers, and held its own against competing models costing hundreds of dollars more.
https://sheldonbrown.com/bridgestone/
The RB-1 was extremely popular with racers, and held its own against competing models costing hundreds of dollars more.
https://sheldonbrown.com/bridgestone/
Police photos
It never occurred to me to retrieve the components, many which may have been original. It was the start of phase three of four of my decades-long cycling lifestyle.
Last edited by Jim from Boston; 06-25-20 at 10:04 AM.
#9
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
The components themselves, while good quality period parts, aren’t in and of themselves that unique, as opposed to something like the black-and-gold Suntour Superbe Pro group fitted to the Cannondale Black Lightning.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I was actually thinking of doing that.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I decided to go back to all original. I liked the ride of the modified version but thought a collector would want original.
#13
Port
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,637
Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 1,838 Times
in
1,050 Posts
The original parts are not worth much, but the bike with original spec is what collectors want. But I don't think that adds any significant value. RB-1's never had top of the line parts -or even a complete groupset, IIRC. Part of Grant Petersen's genius (madness?) was mixing and matching to get the best bang for the buck. And to stick with tried and true tech instead of what he felt was just the newest fads. He was a big advocate for friction shifting when everyone was going to index, single pivot brakes (Royal Gran Compes) instead of dual pivot (Ultegra), barcons instead of STI (still have a friction option)...
The frames themselves were nice, but any not nicer than other comparable Japanese mid level bikes. I did appreciate the subtle for the time aesthetics. There was nothing loud or obnoxious about Bridgestone paintjobs. They just looked good.
And they rode great too. The road bikes put you into a long low position, as opposed to a hunched over "slam the stem" position. Flat back, but long(ish) wheelbase. Room for 700x28 tires.
I love mine (currently built with Campy 10 sp) but would never pay a premium to get one all original.
The frames themselves were nice, but any not nicer than other comparable Japanese mid level bikes. I did appreciate the subtle for the time aesthetics. There was nothing loud or obnoxious about Bridgestone paintjobs. They just looked good.
And they rode great too. The road bikes put you into a long low position, as opposed to a hunched over "slam the stem" position. Flat back, but long(ish) wheelbase. Room for 700x28 tires.
I love mine (currently built with Campy 10 sp) but would never pay a premium to get one all original.
__________________
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
#14
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 458
Bikes: 91 Ritchey Ultra, 1992 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1990 Klein Rascal, 97 Trek OCLV9700, 90 Minnelli Eclipse, 95 Marin Bear Valley SE, 1991 Breezer Lightning Flash 1991 Diamondback Axis 1992 Stumpjumper Comp 1983 Stumpjumper Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
236 Posts
I like posting the add with an as
is
price
but throw in the fact that you have the original parts available.
is
price
but throw in the fact that you have the original parts available.