Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Geometry question

Search
Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Geometry question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-22, 06:20 AM
  #1  
Tandem Tom
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,595

Bikes: 1992 Serotta Colorado II,Co-Motion Speedster, Giant Escape Hybrid, 1977 Schwinn Super Le Tour

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 112 Times in 85 Posts
Geometry question

Maybe I need more coffe but sometimes I cannot see tge solution!
When you have toe overlap, where the toe interferes with the front wheel, how should a frame geometry be changed? Does this indicate a longer TT? A steeper HT angle?
While I wait I'
m goingvto have more coffee!
Tandem Tom is offline  
Old 03-24-22, 06:41 AM
  #2  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,694 Times in 2,516 Posts
Enjoy the coffee. More rake and slacker head tube angle will give more toe clearance and will not change the handling much. How much overlap is it?
unterhausen is offline  
Old 03-24-22, 07:24 AM
  #3  
Tandem Tom
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,595

Bikes: 1992 Serotta Colorado II,Co-Motion Speedster, Giant Escape Hybrid, 1977 Schwinn Super Le Tour

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 112 Times in 85 Posts
My current frame,maybe 1". But just trying to exoand my knowledge base!
Tandem Tom is offline  
Old 03-24-22, 07:38 AM
  #4  
Doug Fattic 
framebuilder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Niles, Michigan
Posts: 1,471
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 615 Post(s)
Liked 1,914 Times in 655 Posts
Tom, there are several ways to increase your front center to avoid toe overlap. Production frames almost always rely on using a steeper seat angle to push the front wheel forward. This is okay for a performance style of bicycle but not for a more relaxed sitting-more-upright-position (more necessary as we age). Eric is right that the easiest thing to do is slacken the head angle and at the same time that increases the fork rake. Another option is to lengthen the top tube while at the same time shortening the stem. Sometimes these compromises can negatively effect how the frame handles. And then you have to ask yourself "what is more important?" Maybe you have to tolerate some toe overlap (especially if you have fenders). These problems are why in some circumstances, smaller wheels should be chosen. This is particularly true on smaller frames. The desire to stick with big wheels never made sense to me when building a custom frame when smaller wheels can remove some of the problems. For example if one is going to use 38 mm wide tires, it is better to use a 650B tire than a 700C one. Or perhaps going to an MTB 559 tire.
Doug Fattic is offline  
Likes For Doug Fattic:
Old 03-24-22, 11:30 AM
  #5  
duanedr 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 507
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked 144 Times in 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Doug Fattic
, smaller wheels should be chosen. This is particularly true on smaller frames.
Especially now with the abundance of really good 26" and 650b tires.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/54319503@N05/
https://www.draper-cycles.com
duanedr is offline  
Old 03-24-22, 02:11 PM
  #6  
dsaul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,265
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 714 Post(s)
Liked 800 Times in 475 Posts
As a shorter rider, I always have to deal with toe overlap issues. I've found that pushing the entire front end further forward and using a shorter stem to be the best solution for me. This has several benefits, especially for off road bikes, with the only negative being that it is harder to ride with no hands at lower speeds.
dsaul is offline  
Old 03-24-22, 09:06 PM
  #7  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,694 Times in 2,516 Posts
I tried moving the head tube forward/shorter stem on my randonneuring bike and I like it. It's fine on high speed descents, and I have never noticed anything while cornering. The only thing it does is "steer in" a little on a really tight turn, like into a driveway. I might go with a little less rake, it has something like 65mm. Okay, the other thing is that I have trouble getting used to the way the short stem looks.
With such low trail, some front load is required though. I'm sure I'd get used to it unloaded, but if I was riding it unloaded regularly I'd want more trail. I did it to get the rando bag closer to the head tube.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 03-25-22, 06:22 AM
  #8  
Tandem Tom
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,595

Bikes: 1992 Serotta Colorado II,Co-Motion Speedster, Giant Escape Hybrid, 1977 Schwinn Super Le Tour

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 112 Times in 85 Posts
Thanks for your replies!
Tandem Tom is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.