Show Off your Track Training and Racing Bikes (2014+)
#1026
Senior Member
ahh sorry to hear about the time off the track
I think it's going to be my next ride, I really like the build and geometry. Wish they were a little less spotty with communication, but can't have everything

I think it's going to be my next ride, I really like the build and geometry. Wish they were a little less spotty with communication, but can't have everything

#1027
Senior Member
Likes For m@tty:
#1028
Senior Member
417 Reach
494 Stack
532 Eff TT
74.5 ST Angle
Either the Eff TT is really longer, or the ST Angle is really steeper (like old bike), or reach is really shorter, etc.
https://worxbikes.com/track-wx-r/
https://worxbikes.com/product/track-wx-r-frameset/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...0-Geometry.png
The geo for the old bike they have adds up correctly:
Old Bike: Trax Worx:
https://worxbikes.com/track-worx/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...K-Geometry.png
ex, M:
417 Reach
494 Stack
536 Eff TT
76.5 ST Angle
Thanks!
#1029
Senior Member
Awesome, any chance you can measure the reach and/or effective toptube length? The geometry on their site does not check out, for example M (regular reach):
417 Reach
494 Stack
532 Eff TT
74.5 ST Angle
Either the Eff TT is really longer, or the ST Angle is really steeper (like old bike), or reach is really shorter, etc.
https://worxbikes.com/track-wx-r/
https://worxbikes.com/product/track-wx-r-frameset/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...0-Geometry.png
The geo for the old bike they have adds up correctly:
Old Bike: Trax Worx:
https://worxbikes.com/track-worx/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...K-Geometry.png
ex, M:
417 Reach
494 Stack
536 Eff TT
76.5 ST Angle
Thanks!
417 Reach
494 Stack
532 Eff TT
74.5 ST Angle
Either the Eff TT is really longer, or the ST Angle is really steeper (like old bike), or reach is really shorter, etc.
https://worxbikes.com/track-wx-r/
https://worxbikes.com/product/track-wx-r-frameset/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...0-Geometry.png
The geo for the old bike they have adds up correctly:
Old Bike: Trax Worx:
https://worxbikes.com/track-worx/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...K-Geometry.png
ex, M:
417 Reach
494 Stack
536 Eff TT
76.5 ST Angle
Thanks!
#1030
Senior Member
Awesome, thanks for confirming! Yeah if stack and reach are good, then STA/Eff-TT don't really matter. Looking through all the sizes: assuming stack, reach, and STA are correct, I get an Eff-TT of +22mm for every size. Ex: M would be 554, not 532. I'm guessing they didn't include one of the tube radius's for their calculation.
Likes For Lectron:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Non-Fiction
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
927
01-22-14 06:41 PM
ianf
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
4
02-04-13 03:47 AM