Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

How to not get dropped in the rolling hills

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

How to not get dropped in the rolling hills

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-20, 07:17 PM
  #126  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by aceSSone
Saddle height is measured from a single point on the BB to the saddle. When the saddle is moved fore or aft, from that single point it's distance from the BB changes. So if you move the saddle back the distance from the BB is greater, which means you have to lower it to the pre measured distance to match the original height. There's no math to it just simple geometry, fore thought and logic.
So according to your non-math:

If a rider's position is unknown, then 10% of the unknown seat height = slam your saddle as far back as safety allows.

Yeah. Thanks for all of the insight. You're a bastion of useful information.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 11-23-20, 08:03 PM
  #127  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Experienced bike fitters can divine the strengths and weaknesses of a rider from nothing more than their online username, and provide accurate fit parameters based on their FTP and average power. It's a gift.

LoL
woodcraft is offline  
Old 11-23-20, 08:10 PM
  #128  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
I do agree that saddle further back will tend to engage hamstrings more and so use more muscle groups,

potentially helping endurance over long rides, but I'd guess pretty much nobody slides further back on the saddle

when trying to keep up with a blistering group.
woodcraft is offline  
Old 11-24-20, 09:29 AM
  #129  
aceSSone
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
So according to your non-math:

If a rider's position is unknown, then 10% of the unknown seat height = slam your saddle as far back as safety allows.

Yeah. Thanks for all of the insight. You're a bastion of useful information.
My suggestion was to move the saddle back as far as safely possible. Which gets them in the ball park.
If your saddle height is 70cm your setback is 7cm from the BB there's the 10% math. There are some variables, saddle length, saddle rail length, seat post setback. Two things happen when mfgs tilt seat tubes forward.
1. The BB is moved back. 2. The seat tube moves forward. Both nearly move the center about 12mm on a saddle height of 67cm.
Like I said earlier, my suggestion didn't have anything to do with FIST.
It was a suggestion. I don't know why you can't get over that.
Did you like my picture of Dan in the workshop? I think that was day 2 of the road bike session. I just bought that camera, I had to take it back, there was something wrong with the auto focus. I use that same fit bike the dude in blue is sitting on. That was back in 2012. At that time, FIST was one of the suggested schools that Trek recommended on a job application. I attended on my vacation from Lockheed Martin where I worked as an Aircraft Maintenance Support Engineer. I quit that job and started a bike shop. Turns out I suck at sales. I refused to sell bikes to people that wouldn't fit them. I bet if I was able to sell one of the big 4 I'd still be open today. People slobber all over those bikes. I hate their geometry on the small bikes though, maybe I should have just faked it. Oh well, I learned a lot. There are a zillion reasons why starting a bike shop is one of the hardest businesses to succeed in. I just didn't think honesty was one of them. It didn't help that the credit card service f'd up my service credentials and sent a months worth of sales to the wrong account.
It's all good though, I still get to ride my bikes. Peace.
aceSSone is offline  
Old 11-24-20, 11:22 AM
  #130  
aceSSone
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
There are a few contributing factors, but by far the largest reason is that an aerobar TT/Tri posture is way more aero than a drop-bar road posture, so a triathlete might pass you on the flats even if they're a significantly weaker cyclist.
According to the inventor and builder of the first TRI specific road bike, Quintana Roo, California 1989. TRI bikes are designed to save the running muscle for the run. Aerodynamics is a byproduct of that design. Meaning, some available muscle isn't used on purpose. So to me, logically, moving the saddle back allows one to use more muscle, equating to more power. There are always going to be trade offs. Experimenting with position to see what works best for rider and environment is always good.

Last edited by aceSSone; 11-24-20 at 11:26 AM.
aceSSone is offline  
Old 11-24-20, 12:12 PM
  #131  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,264
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1974 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by aceSSone
According to the inventor and builder of the first TRI specific road bike, Quintana Roo, California 1989. TRI bikes are designed to save the running muscle for the run. Aerodynamics is a byproduct of that design.
I think you're making an inaccurate inference.

Dan Empfield's design was an attempt to address the needs of fitting with aerobars, which were already dominant in high-level triathlon at that time. Aerodynamics wasn't a "byproduct", it was an implicit requirement. His steep seat angle wasn't an attempt to fix a problem with drop-bar road fits, it was an attempt to fix a problem with how people were doing aggressive aerobar fits, one major issue being that the "shallow" seat positions were creating problematically scrunched hip angles*.
It's true that you can point to studies showing that Empfield's design resulted in improved performance on the run. But these same studies often show improvements on the bike as well. This 2002 article by Empfield is a fun read, for instance.

*The other major issue being that a more-forward fit demands a longer front-center, lest you feel like you're pitched forward off the front of the bike.
HTupolev is online now  
Old 11-24-20, 01:17 PM
  #132  
aceSSone
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
I think you're making an inaccurate inference.

Dan Empfield's design was an attempt to address the needs of fitting with aerobars, which were already dominant in high-level triathlon at that time. Aerodynamics wasn't a "byproduct", it was an implicit requirement. His steep seat angle wasn't an attempt to fix a problem with drop-bar road fits, it was an attempt to fix a problem with how people were doing aggressive aerobar fits, one major issue being that the "shallow" seat positions were creating problematically scrunched hip angles*.
It's true that you can point to studies showing that Empfield's design resulted in improved performance on the run. But these same studies often show improvements on the bike as well. This 2002 article by Empfield is a fun read, for instance.

*The other major issue being that a more-forward fit demands a longer front-center, lest you feel like you're pitched forward off the front of the bike.
I agree with all the above, there are all kinds of innovations. The quote I used to back my point was directly from Dan during the 2012 workshop class. Unfortunately none of those tests in the referenced article were out doors over a hilly course. It wasn't really testing aerodynamics of the position just how the saddle position effects the ability to maintain a constant pace on a flat course. If youve ever ridden a tri bike in hills there is considerable much more effort to get up the hills, hence Tri cyclists hate hills. I did notice the improvement in the running brick by the position, which backs up my Dan quote and my position of moving the saddle back for more muscle/power. Might less oxygen used be attributed to less muscle used? The original poster was needing to improve on the hills. I stand by my suggestion.
aceSSone is offline  
Old 11-24-20, 01:41 PM
  #133  
guadzilla
Pointy Helmet Tribe
 
guadzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338

Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times in 295 Posts
JHFC.

Now i remember why i stopped reading Bikeforums all these years. People can just make their points and stop, but no, it always devolves into a ******g pissing contest where everyone has to get the last word in.
guadzilla is offline  
Likes For guadzilla:
Old 11-24-20, 01:55 PM
  #134  
growlerdinky
Duke Ulysses
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 800

Bikes: An old orange one for dirt, and for the other stuff: a white one, a kinda mint green one, and a black one.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times in 86 Posts
Originally Posted by guadzilla
JHFC.

Now i remember why i stopped reading Bikeforums all these years. People can just make their points and stop, but no, it always devolves into a ******g pissing contest where everyone has to get the last word in.



Wrong.
growlerdinky is offline  
Likes For growlerdinky:
Old 11-24-20, 02:10 PM
  #135  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,937

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 7,284 Times in 2,941 Posts
Originally Posted by growlerdinky
Wrong.
What's the famous Lemond quote?

"It never gets easier, you just get more wrong."
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 11-24-20, 02:35 PM
  #136  
growlerdinky
Duke Ulysses
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 800

Bikes: An old orange one for dirt, and for the other stuff: a white one, a kinda mint green one, and a black one.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times in 86 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
What's the famous Lemond quote?

"It never gets easier, you just get more wrong."

During interviews in recent years LeMond acknowledged that much of what he was taught, believed and, in turn, taught to others was totally wrong. That includes frame design, crank length and other factors that go into the ideal fit and energy transfer, and being wrong all the time.
growlerdinky is offline  
Old 11-24-20, 09:12 PM
  #137  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by aceSSone
The original poster was needing to improve on the hills. I stand by my suggestion.
The OP isn't riding a tri bike.

Go reread the OP and apply some context.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 11-24-20, 09:28 PM
  #138  
aceSSone
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
The OP isn't riding a tri bike.

Go reread the OP and apply some context.
Nooooo kidding. I'm thinking you should go back and read a few posts. They discuss my position why I think moving the saddle back could help, using the example of why one is moved forward on a TRI bike. I wasn't the first one to write tri bike someone else used it as an example why to move the saddle forward.
aceSSone is offline  
Old 11-24-20, 09:33 PM
  #139  
aceSSone
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by guadzilla
JHFC.

Now i remember why i stopped reading Bikeforums all these years. People can just make their points and stop, but no, it always devolves into a ******g pissing contest where everyone has to get the last word in.
Do they always include this guy? rubiksoval View Post
aceSSone is offline  
Old 11-24-20, 11:58 PM
  #140  
guadzilla
Pointy Helmet Tribe
 
guadzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338

Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times in 295 Posts
Originally Posted by growlerdinky
Wrong.
You mean "Incorrect".

(And I see what you did there....)
guadzilla is offline  
Likes For guadzilla:
Old 11-25-20, 06:59 AM
  #141  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by aceSSone
Nooooo kidding. I'm thinking you should go back and read a few posts. They discuss my position why I think moving the saddle back could help, using the example of why one is moved forward on a TRI bike. I wasn't the first one to write tri bike someone else used it as an example why to move the saddle forward.
Again, you know nothing about his position. Completely irrelevant. Your tangents about tri fit only exacerbate the irrelevancy.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 11-25-20, 07:00 AM
  #142  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by aceSSone
Do they always include this guy? rubiksoval View Post
Only people who want to double and triple down on their nonsense.

You've got that down.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 11-25-20, 10:00 AM
  #143  
growlerdinky
Duke Ulysses
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 800

Bikes: An old orange one for dirt, and for the other stuff: a white one, a kinda mint green one, and a black one.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times in 86 Posts
Originally Posted by guadzilla
You mean "Incorrect".

(And I see what you did there....)

you don't get more correct, you just get less incorrect,

WAKE UP, SHEEPLE!
growlerdinky is offline  
Old 11-25-20, 11:10 AM
  #144  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by rower2cyclist
Yesterday it was even stronger with a bunch of young bucks showed up. Did everything people told me but still got dropped. Just trusting the process at this point.

I don't know your background. have been doing endurance sports in some shape or form since 1995. 25 years of almost uninterrupted racing, exercising, training. I am not gifted or anything genetically. Played basketball in HS, I was so weak I would throw up in the middle of practice workouts. It took time.

People giving really really smart advice here. Listen to them. I got stuck in a similar training routine past few years. I got used to it mentally, my body adjusted to it. You gotto shake things up.



Me going from 185 to 170-75 helped me tremendously past few years. 175 is good but 170 is dancing on the pedals like nirvana though found it harder to sustain.



MILLION TIMES THIS. Like I wrote above I've been stuck in the same training routine the past few years. It's been convenient but I couldn't push my ceiling higher. this is about to change.





I'm picturing you with a slammed aero position, straight back, saddle as far back as it will go, having not eaten for days, on a tri bike, and you still got dropped??
woodcraft is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.