Opinions about frames without fork
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 70
Bikes: Emonda, 79/80 Colnago Super, early 80s Eddy Merckx, end 70/beginning 80s Somec Super Corsa, Santa Cruz Bronson
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 63 Times
in
34 Posts
Opinions about frames without fork
Hi,
maybe a stupid question but I am wondering what your take is on purchasing frames without the matching fork?
There could be all kind of different reasons but is this in a “red flag” for you?
Thank you
maybe a stupid question but I am wondering what your take is on purchasing frames without the matching fork?
There could be all kind of different reasons but is this in a “red flag” for you?
Thank you
#2
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,844
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2297 Post(s)
Liked 2,047 Times
in
1,253 Posts
Many forks bend without distorting the frame. Check for straightness of tubes with a steel ruler, or at least lots of close-up pics simulating this.
#3
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
I avoid. Too many complete frame sets out there. That being said, I misplaced a fork on a frameset I bought. So it does happen. I am still looking......
__________________
Please don't confuse ebay "asking" prices with "selling" prices. Many sellers never get their ask price. some are far from it. Value is determined once an item actually SELLS. Its easy enough to check SOLD prices.
Please don't confuse ebay "asking" prices with "selling" prices. Many sellers never get their ask price. some are far from it. Value is determined once an item actually SELLS. Its easy enough to check SOLD prices.
Likes For wrk101:
#4
Senior Member
Red flag.
Likes For rjhammett:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,047
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3011 Post(s)
Liked 3,786 Times
in
1,405 Posts
At the very least, if you want the matching fork in the right size, it will be hard to find and wind up costing as much as the "cheap" frame. Don't ask how I know.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,777
Bikes: Numerous
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1676 Post(s)
Liked 3,084 Times
in
911 Posts
Not necessarily a red flag but reason for caution, especially if buying on the internet. Generally easy enough to tell if there’s a problem on a steel or aluminum frame if buying in person.
__________________
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
#7
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,823 Times
in
1,709 Posts
Only buy if you (1) already have a fork that will work, (2) the frame is exceedingly rare, and (3) the frame is straight. Otherwise, hard pass. Plenty of complete, straight examples to be had.
DD
DD
Likes For Drillium Dude:
#8
Senior Member
I’ve done a couple builds using carbon forks and modern 10 speed groups. Usually turns out to make really nice riders.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
Likes For sloar:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,749 Times
in
937 Posts
I am on year three searching for the correct fork for this early sixties Torpado Professional "as found" with 27" wheels and after market fork...
I did have a 700c fork, the proper size, that does work but I just cannot bring myself to build it up until I find the right fork...
Put another way, don't expect joy by buying a frame only!
I did have a 700c fork, the proper size, that does work but I just cannot bring myself to build it up until I find the right fork...
Put another way, don't expect joy by buying a frame only!
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
Likes For randyjawa:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
I'd take it on a case-by-case basis. Some forks break without the frame having a problem. Maybe not even from misuse!
My Vitus, I bought without a fork, and then purchased a Vitus fork separately. It's been my most reliable frame, honestly.
My Vitus, I bought without a fork, and then purchased a Vitus fork separately. It's been my most reliable frame, honestly.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 809 Times
in
471 Posts
Timely question as I've been looking for a 19-20 inch rigid mtb frame for a while. Slim pickins from what I've seen...at least in what I'm looking for(higher-end steel or possibly aluminum). Most seem to be frames without forks. Sort of torks me off a bit as I've found aftermarket forks the right size and decent quality can be slim pickins too. Can there be THAT many bent forks or are people just breaking up the frame and fork to make more money?
Today I located what looks to be a nice 19 inch 1995 Stumpjumper M2..no fork. From research, it appears the original rigid fork has an ATC of 410-415mm(?), 1 1/8ths threadless. I've almost considered picking up a donor Rockhopper or Hardrock bike just for the fork, though not sure if the same fork was used nor if a threadless version was used in these bikes (or at least what years/models..more research needed). By the time I did all this I'd be better off buy a frame with a fork or a complete bike and use the components I have to upgrade if or as needed. I thought this might be easier..
If I needed a 16, 17, 18 inch frame there's more to choose from, but 19-20 there's much fewer around.
Today I located what looks to be a nice 19 inch 1995 Stumpjumper M2..no fork. From research, it appears the original rigid fork has an ATC of 410-415mm(?), 1 1/8ths threadless. I've almost considered picking up a donor Rockhopper or Hardrock bike just for the fork, though not sure if the same fork was used nor if a threadless version was used in these bikes (or at least what years/models..more research needed). By the time I did all this I'd be better off buy a frame with a fork or a complete bike and use the components I have to upgrade if or as needed. I thought this might be easier..
If I needed a 16, 17, 18 inch frame there's more to choose from, but 19-20 there's much fewer around.
#12
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
Timely question as I've been looking for a 19-20 inch rigid mtb frame for a while. Slim pickins from what I've seen...at least in what I'm looking for(higher-end steel or possibly aluminum). Most seem to be frames without forks. Sort of torks me off a bit as I've found aftermarket forks the right size and decent quality can be slim pickins too. Can there be THAT many bent forks or are people just breaking up the frame and fork to make more money?
Today I located what looks to be a nice 19 inch 1995 Stumpjumper M2..no fork. From research, it appears the original rigid fork has an ATC of 410-415mm(?), 1 1/8ths threadless. I've almost considered picking up a donor Rockhopper or Hardrock bike just for the fork, though not sure if the same fork was used nor if a threadless version was used in these bikes (or at least what years/models..more research needed). By the time I did all this I'd be better off buy a frame with a fork or a complete bike and use the components I have to upgrade if or as needed. I thought this might be easier..
If I needed a 16, 17, 18 inch frame there's more to choose from, but 19-20 there's much fewer around.
Today I located what looks to be a nice 19 inch 1995 Stumpjumper M2..no fork. From research, it appears the original rigid fork has an ATC of 410-415mm(?), 1 1/8ths threadless. I've almost considered picking up a donor Rockhopper or Hardrock bike just for the fork, though not sure if the same fork was used nor if a threadless version was used in these bikes (or at least what years/models..more research needed). By the time I did all this I'd be better off buy a frame with a fork or a complete bike and use the components I have to upgrade if or as needed. I thought this might be easier..
If I needed a 16, 17, 18 inch frame there's more to choose from, but 19-20 there's much fewer around.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 809 Times
in
471 Posts
Makes sense..the suspension fork craze. When they first became available they were all the rage. I suppose the rigid ones seemed worthless at the time.
#14
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,500
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2741 Post(s)
Liked 3,388 Times
in
2,051 Posts
I've never bought a frame without a fork but sold a couple. Those I bought just to get the forks. Sold them cheap.
#15
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26383 Post(s)
Liked 10,364 Times
in
7,196 Posts
#16
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,237 Times
in
653 Posts
Original forks
FIRST QUESTION???
What happened to the original fork???
There are lots of reasons listed above as to why the fork is missing... One that hasn't been mentioned: a PO replaced the steel fork with a carbon fiber fork on classic racing bike...
Back when this was commonplace, lots of 1Di0Ts threw away the original steel fork because... why would anyone want to go back to something old fashioned. Also some just misplaced the original fork or lost it in moves and so on.
Getting back to original fork issues, I bought an early 80's Motobecane Team Champion frame on eBay back in 2007 and did a local pickup. As I walked up to the seller he held it out. From 20 feet away I could tell the fork was WRONG!!! It was a Tange 27" replacement fork!
First thing I did was feel under the top and down tubes at the head tube - there were slight ripples! It was such a beautiful frame, I was sick!
After some discussion, I took it to a frame builder friend and we checked the alignment. It was OK even with the ripples but the 27" replacement fork caused the frame to sit 1/2" higher in the front which changed the front end geometry. I negotiated about a 50% refund with the seller and started assembling it but was so bummed out that it sat for about 8 years.
Years later I bought a 1980's Gitane that came with 2 forks. They had the same crown and geometry as the original Motobecane fork so I finished it with that Gitane fork.
I only rode it a few times and didn't like the handling so I sold it last year.
BTW, I've checked the alignment on all the frames and bikes that I've acquired. I can check and realign most of them at home. If it takes more, I have my frame builder friend do the work.
verktyg
What happened to the original fork???
There are lots of reasons listed above as to why the fork is missing... One that hasn't been mentioned: a PO replaced the steel fork with a carbon fiber fork on classic racing bike...
Back when this was commonplace, lots of 1Di0Ts threw away the original steel fork because... why would anyone want to go back to something old fashioned. Also some just misplaced the original fork or lost it in moves and so on.
Getting back to original fork issues, I bought an early 80's Motobecane Team Champion frame on eBay back in 2007 and did a local pickup. As I walked up to the seller he held it out. From 20 feet away I could tell the fork was WRONG!!! It was a Tange 27" replacement fork!
First thing I did was feel under the top and down tubes at the head tube - there were slight ripples! It was such a beautiful frame, I was sick!
After some discussion, I took it to a frame builder friend and we checked the alignment. It was OK even with the ripples but the 27" replacement fork caused the frame to sit 1/2" higher in the front which changed the front end geometry. I negotiated about a 50% refund with the seller and started assembling it but was so bummed out that it sat for about 8 years.
Years later I bought a 1980's Gitane that came with 2 forks. They had the same crown and geometry as the original Motobecane fork so I finished it with that Gitane fork.
I only rode it a few times and didn't like the handling so I sold it last year.
BTW, I've checked the alignment on all the frames and bikes that I've acquired. I can check and realign most of them at home. If it takes more, I have my frame builder friend do the work.
verktyg
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 01-23-22 at 09:03 PM.
#17
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 70
Bikes: Emonda, 79/80 Colnago Super, early 80s Eddy Merckx, end 70/beginning 80s Somec Super Corsa, Santa Cruz Bronson
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 63 Times
in
34 Posts
Thank you all for the input. That’s very helpful.
I always wondered but what triggered my thread was a 90s Colnago Master, that, as verktyg mentioned as an unfortunate option, has a carbon fork instead of the Precisa steel fork. How can you switch that fork?
I always wondered but what triggered my thread was a 90s Colnago Master, that, as verktyg mentioned as an unfortunate option, has a carbon fork instead of the Precisa steel fork. How can you switch that fork?
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,214 Times
in
1,103 Posts
@Vitma - Back in 2014 I found a TREK 760 that was a project. After bringing it home, I noticed the front fork was a Giant unicrown! Bummer. The fork for the 760 in '84/'85 was unique with the crown and 38mm rake. The only aftermarket one was a track fork and more than what I paid for the bike.
I looked for a while and finally found a fork on the bay. Long story short, the seller was local and upon pickup, discovered it was bent. I bent it back (steerer was straight). The fortunate thing was the fork was an '85 and off a 60cm frame. My frame is an '84 and 60cm.
Luck can happen but you have to look for it. Sometimes the stars align.
I looked for a while and finally found a fork on the bay. Long story short, the seller was local and upon pickup, discovered it was bent. I bent it back (steerer was straight). The fortunate thing was the fork was an '85 and off a 60cm frame. My frame is an '84 and 60cm.
Luck can happen but you have to look for it. Sometimes the stars align.
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Last edited by SJX426; 01-24-22 at 01:37 PM.
Likes For SJX426:
#19
Senior Member
A few frame only builds I’ve done.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
Likes For sloar:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,675
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 567 Post(s)
Liked 563 Times
in
405 Posts
For me a Red Flag without a good explanation. My bare frame purchases: Rockhopper MTB as fork rebuild was $200, Viscount death fork, and aluminum fork end (he gave me) was bent/cracked when he dropped the fork. My favorite was a Allez Pro that came from Specialized with an aluminum fork for some reason (weight?) and he showed me that he followed Mr. Internet's suggestions on how to remove the scratched up anodizing and surface of the fork looked like a raised relief map or three-dimensional representation of the local mountain ranges around Tucson.
#21
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,630
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4677 Post(s)
Liked 5,790 Times
in
2,279 Posts
Mixing and matching frames and forks is pretty advanced stuff. As many have mentioned, it begs the question - why is there no fork? Was there damage to the fork, which might impact the frame?
Assuming the frame is good, it's next to impossible to find an exact match for a replacement fork unless it's of fairly recent vintage. Some of the basic dimensions on the fork, such as axle to crown dimension and fork offset (rake) need to be known, or an experienced shop mechanic or framebuilder needs to analyze the frame geometry, the rider's intended use, take into account the head tube length and diameter, threaded vs threadless, wheel and tire size and type/size of brake, and possibly other considerations to determine a suitable replacement.
I've purchased a couple of frames that did not have an OEM fork. In those occasions I built my own fork to match the frame and how I wanted to ride it. It's really hard to find a framebuilder who will build you a custom fork, and if you do, it'll almost surely cost more than what you paid for a used frame.
I wouldn't buy a frame by itself unless you really knew what you were doing, or had someone that did advise you.
Assuming the frame is good, it's next to impossible to find an exact match for a replacement fork unless it's of fairly recent vintage. Some of the basic dimensions on the fork, such as axle to crown dimension and fork offset (rake) need to be known, or an experienced shop mechanic or framebuilder needs to analyze the frame geometry, the rider's intended use, take into account the head tube length and diameter, threaded vs threadless, wheel and tire size and type/size of brake, and possibly other considerations to determine a suitable replacement.
I've purchased a couple of frames that did not have an OEM fork. In those occasions I built my own fork to match the frame and how I wanted to ride it. It's really hard to find a framebuilder who will build you a custom fork, and if you do, it'll almost surely cost more than what you paid for a used frame.
I wouldn't buy a frame by itself unless you really knew what you were doing, or had someone that did advise you.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Likes For gugie:
#22
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
I bought a mid-90s cannondale road frame without fork. I wanted to go threadless so it didnt matter to me if there was no fork. The frame isnt damaged- no idea what happened to the fork and dont care.
If this were an older steel frameset where I wanted to keep it threaded, then sure I would want the fork and most likely pass on the frame alone.
If this were an older steel frameset where I wanted to keep it threaded, then sure I would want the fork and most likely pass on the frame alone.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,464
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 955 Post(s)
Liked 1,619 Times
in
1,039 Posts
I was building up a Motobecane that was missing a fork and found I could not find or get a fork to give me that Motobecane ride. On turfing it out to another of interest he ended up buying another Motobecane just to get the fork. If I had a choice I would not buy a frame without its fork...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#24
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,642
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 2,511 Times
in
1,049 Posts
I don't like the idea of trying to find a replacement fork because the frame and fork were designed to go together - a change on the for geometry affects everything. For that reason, I've only ever bought frame-and-fork combos - with one exception. For that one, I bought (traded for, actually,) the frame only. It was a true grail for me (mid-60s Cinelli, written about at length elsewhere in C&V) in a not-common size (64cm ctc), so i did it. I didn't even think to check the alignment other than eyeballing. Not smart.
I had a fork for it, though. Same maker, a few years older, that came from a frame that was rusted out. The fact that I had the fork was the reason I was willing to get the frame only. The steerer tube needed to be lengthened, which was easily done by Ed Litton. So I have a cobbled together kinda-sorta Frankenframe, although frame and fork are both from Cinelli.
The result? Only the nest riding bike I have ever owned, the one I reach for 80 or 90% of the time. The one someone will have to pry out of my cold, dead hands.
I doubt if I will buy a frame-only again, though. There is nothing I want so much that I would be willing to deal with finding-the-right-fork issues.
I had a fork for it, though. Same maker, a few years older, that came from a frame that was rusted out. The fact that I had the fork was the reason I was willing to get the frame only. The steerer tube needed to be lengthened, which was easily done by Ed Litton. So I have a cobbled together kinda-sorta Frankenframe, although frame and fork are both from Cinelli.
The result? Only the nest riding bike I have ever owned, the one I reach for 80 or 90% of the time. The one someone will have to pry out of my cold, dead hands.
I doubt if I will buy a frame-only again, though. There is nothing I want so much that I would be willing to deal with finding-the-right-fork issues.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
Likes For bikingshearer:
#25
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,376 Times
in
891 Posts
The Superior arrived with a non-original 27” fork. I purchased the frame from a long-time member here who said the original fork “fell apart”. Bike was being used by a PO hardcore commuter, so I don’t doubt it.
The stock fork was OEM Tange, 700C. I happened to have one stashed away and it works well.
The stock fork was OEM Tange, 700C. I happened to have one stashed away and it works well.