Columbus SLX ~62cm frame for a larger rider? Bad idea?
#1
▒▒▒▒▒▒
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Columbus SLX ~62cm frame for a larger rider? Bad idea?
Hey fellas, I'm about to pick up a frame from one of my all-time favorite custom builders from where I grew up, who has since passed. The frame is a 63 ST and 60 TT (CtC). I am about 210lbs at the moment. Is this a bad idea? I actually want a springier ride as I have a very stiff steel frame already. This will be for long solo rides at a more relaxed pace. I have read that many people considered the limit for SL tubing ~180lbs. SLX should be a bit stronger with the rifling, but what do you guys think? I can't ride it first, and I know Columbus often recommended SP-based sets for larger frames/riders. Thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,085
Bikes: Frejus/Bertin/Cannondale
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think if I were over 200, I'd be taking those weight limits pretty seriously. Maybe for racing in a controlled environment, like a track, you might flirt with disaster a little, but not for a daily rider. But I could probably ride that frame pretty safely, I'm 6'2 or 6'3" & weigh about 175-ish. The only reason I don't have a frame like yours, is they're probably fairly rare-ish, I'd think. I ride a 63cm SP frame now, & it's definitely a bit of a chore, especially uphills, LOL.
#3
Decrepit Member
IMHO, SLX is too whippy for larger frames/larger heavier riders. In the mid-to-late eighties, many framebuilders put the SLX frame size limit for production bikes at ~58cm; for larger frames they went to a mix of SL and SP (SP down tubes).
The helical reinforcements in SLX and SPX is limited to the butts; the long center sections of the tubes doesn't have the reinforcing. I believe the only Columbus tubeset with the helical reinforcements along the whole length of the tubes is TSX.
The helical reinforcements in SLX and SPX is limited to the butts; the long center sections of the tubes doesn't have the reinforcing. I believe the only Columbus tubeset with the helical reinforcements along the whole length of the tubes is TSX.
#4
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
No idea. I just loaned a 56cm Tange 1 bike to a 6'2, 275lb man. He loved it, looked good riding it.
I've never been able to tell the difference between my SL frame and my SLX frame, and I'm every bit of 180. I've also been known to ride very hard on occasion. My friends who push 200 don't seem to care, either. My suspicion is that legal liability is one issue, and perhaps some gigantice TdF rider may want to be careful. Relaxed solo riding? I really don't think it will ever be an issue other than here. If you decide to race criteriums, do mountain descents, or go pro, maybe reconsider.
This is my opinion, and in no way assumes legal liability for any one riding any frame any time under any conditions. Also, if the NSA is reading this, they can bite me, my bike, and go sit.
I've never been able to tell the difference between my SL frame and my SLX frame, and I'm every bit of 180. I've also been known to ride very hard on occasion. My friends who push 200 don't seem to care, either. My suspicion is that legal liability is one issue, and perhaps some gigantice TdF rider may want to be careful. Relaxed solo riding? I really don't think it will ever be an issue other than here. If you decide to race criteriums, do mountain descents, or go pro, maybe reconsider.
This is my opinion, and in no way assumes legal liability for any one riding any frame any time under any conditions. Also, if the NSA is reading this, they can bite me, my bike, and go sit.
Last edited by RobbieTunes; 09-26-13 at 10:53 AM.
#5
Decrepit Member
Here's the 1988 Schwinn catalog sidebar for the Paramount. Bianchi was doing the same thing (SL/SP mix) in even smaller size frames.
#6
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
The weight limits on SL/SLX tubing aren't because the tubes are likely to fail if you exceed them, but rather because the frame may be unacceptably flexible. If you're looking for a more flexible frame, this may work well for you. Are you able to test-ride before buying it?
That said, standard practice was to use SP/SPX in those larger frame sizes, or at least for the down tube and chain stays.
That said, standard practice was to use SP/SPX in those larger frame sizes, or at least for the down tube and chain stays.
#7
▒▒▒▒▒▒
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Great info here, thanks.
This is a frame and fork from an out of state seller. No riding is possible, and I've never tried an SL/SLX frame before. I have a stable of aggressive Cannondale racers, and a Ultra Foco steel bike already. I want something soft and comfortable, but don't want it rubbing brake pads under a hard effort. This tubeset was meant for racing, so it can't possibly be THAT flimsy. I think I will take the chance, but want to hear more from those who know this material better. The frame is a utter work of art (will post pics here) so I would be happy with it just mounted on my wall if all else fails.
This is a frame and fork from an out of state seller. No riding is possible, and I've never tried an SL/SLX frame before. I have a stable of aggressive Cannondale racers, and a Ultra Foco steel bike already. I want something soft and comfortable, but don't want it rubbing brake pads under a hard effort. This tubeset was meant for racing, so it can't possibly be THAT flimsy. I think I will take the chance, but want to hear more from those who know this material better. The frame is a utter work of art (will post pics here) so I would be happy with it just mounted on my wall if all else fails.
#8
Full Member
Making me nervous. I'm 6'5" 215, about to obtain a 63cm SL/SP frame.
#9
MIKE is my name!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: finland,baltimore
Posts: 2,846
Bikes: hans lutz, , puch mistral ultima,2x Austro Daimler Smoked chrome Ultima,Austro Daimler Mixte,Austro Daimler 531 mixte, flying arrow,F Moser,
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times
in
4 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,989
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
256 Posts
I've just started riding my new-to-me 1987 63.5cm (ctt) Marinoni Sport Touring built with SLX tubing. (Pictures when I've finished the build to my satisfaction.) I weigh just over 180, and have to say that this is a fantastic riding bike, although I'm not a "strong rider" these days. Last weekend I came down the same 40-mph hill that induced a pretty scary shimmy on my former '76 64cm Masi (and is fine on the Rambouillet with OS tubes or Miyata 912 with standard size Tange tubes). I haven't noticed any rubbing or other evidence of significant flex, but there might be some "planing" going on uphill with the Marinoni (a good thing, according to Jan Heine) - it feels like I can ride a gear higher. That descent and every other condition feel fabulous on this bike.
Last edited by Dfrost; 09-26-13 at 01:30 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Marysville, WA (north of Seattle.)
Posts: 363
Bikes: 54 R.O. Harrison, 56 W. F. Holdsworth, 59 Sauvage-Lejuene campeur,63 Jack Taylor Tourist,74 & 78 Davidson, 80 Colnago Super, 82 Merckx Professional, 92 Rain City Steelhead, 08 Rivendell AHH, 2011 Rivendell Custom, 2014 Woodrup/Sayles custom 650b
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I dunno. I'm 6'3", 200 lbs, and ride a 64cm(c-t-c) 1980ish Colnago Super. 27.2mm post, and the light weight of the large frameset suggests it's an SL tubeset. I LOVE the way it rides. I do wonder if the down tube is SP, but as I said, it's very light for it's size. 2076 grams for the bare frame:
#12
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,378 Times
in
891 Posts
I would be surprised if the frame wasn't an SLX/SP mix. That seems to be the tried+true approach.
I'm 6' 2" and 200 lbs. I ride a 57cm SLX frame. It definitely moves around, but not in a bad way. Very springly and lively. Begs to be ridden fast. Plenty stable on desents as well.
Definitly think about getting the frame.
EDIT: Just read the OP comment about comfort. I've done a ton of centuries on SLX, and it's great for the long haul.
I'm 6' 2" and 200 lbs. I ride a 57cm SLX frame. It definitely moves around, but not in a bad way. Very springly and lively. Begs to be ridden fast. Plenty stable on desents as well.
Definitly think about getting the frame.
EDIT: Just read the OP comment about comfort. I've done a ton of centuries on SLX, and it's great for the long haul.
Last edited by thinktubes; 09-26-13 at 01:33 PM.
#13
Full Member
+1!
Awesome! Makes me feel better. Looks very similar to my (soon to be) '73-'74 63cm Colnago Super. What did you build yours up with?
I dunno. I'm 6'3", 200 lbs, and ride a 64cm(c-t-c) 1980ish Colnago Super. 27.2mm post, and the light weight of the large frameset suggests it's an SL tubeset. I LOVE the way it rides. I do wonder if the down tube is SP, but as I said, it's very light for it's size. 2076 grams for the bare frame:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Marysville, WA (north of Seattle.)
Posts: 363
Bikes: 54 R.O. Harrison, 56 W. F. Holdsworth, 59 Sauvage-Lejuene campeur,63 Jack Taylor Tourist,74 & 78 Davidson, 80 Colnago Super, 82 Merckx Professional, 92 Rain City Steelhead, 08 Rivendell AHH, 2011 Rivendell Custom, 2014 Woodrup/Sayles custom 650b
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
With SUPER Record, of course. The frame set came from Berlin. Most of the panto came from a complete donor bike - which became part of a big swap with Drillium Dude. He swapped some SR bits for the NR bits already on the light blue frame. There is also some custom millium by Jon Williams (Drillium Revival.) Pics of the complete saga here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/3915149...7630523654960/
#15
Senior Member
As noted more than once, there is a chance the down tube is actually SP/SPX (common practice on large frames).
In any case, I'm probably about the OP's height (I generally ride 60-63cm ctc frames), and significantly heavier.
I've been doing most of my recent riding on a Reynolds 531c bike, pretty lightweight stuff a la SL. It's not a problem.
I'm with RobbieTunes here: if you have some extremely serious riding planned, maybe take pause; for typical riding purposes, don't sweat it.
If a frame with less stiffness was your goal, I suspect you'll get your wish and no trouble. If it's too flexy, you'll know for next time.
In any case, I'm probably about the OP's height (I generally ride 60-63cm ctc frames), and significantly heavier.
I've been doing most of my recent riding on a Reynolds 531c bike, pretty lightweight stuff a la SL. It's not a problem.
I'm with RobbieTunes here: if you have some extremely serious riding planned, maybe take pause; for typical riding purposes, don't sweat it.
If a frame with less stiffness was your goal, I suspect you'll get your wish and no trouble. If it's too flexy, you'll know for next time.
#16
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,651
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,525 Times
in
1,055 Posts
I'm 6'3, and I weigh every bit of 275#. One of my rides is an '86 De Rosa, 63cm or 64cm, with an SLX sticker. (My guess is it has SPX downtube and chainstays, but I don't know.) It's great.
Get the frame. Immediately. You will regret it if you don't.
Get the frame. Immediately. You will regret it if you don't.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#17
▒▒▒▒▒▒
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks. I too wonder if the frameset is a mixed tube one, but we'll never know now.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times
in
142 Posts
I was in the 220s last year at this time and I routinely rode larger framed SLX specced bicycles and loved them.
Likely they do have some SP or SPX, but that's a good thing imho.
I am currently in the 170s and still love SLX.
Nice all around tubeset.
#21
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
#22
Procrastinateur supreme
Go ahead, make us all cry. If it's too flexy and you decide it's not for you, it's my size & I'm 162#- PM me!
#23
Full Member
With SUPER Record, of course. The frame set came from Berlin. Most of the panto came from a complete donor bike - which became part of a big swap with Drillium Dude. He swapped some SR bits for the NR bits already on the light blue frame. There is also some custom millium by Jon Williams (Drillium Revival.) Pics of the complete saga here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/3915149...7630523654960/
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,928
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 179 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times
in
124 Posts
#25
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
I'll be a bit of a contrarian and say that the larger frames beg for SP or SPX or even CROMAR.
The size of the frame, more than anything else, determines the overall stiffness. A bike model that has the "just right" amount of stiffness in a 56cm size with a 165 lbs rider can present too much flex in a 63cm size with a 210 lb rider. I'm not saying that the bike will fold in half, but too much flex while sprinting or climbing can noticed. If it matters, or not, is up to the cyclist and the style of riding he enjoys.
I have two larger frames, one is a 62cm Trek 970 in SP and the other is a 63cm Serotta Nova Special X in SPX. I'm 215 lbs.
The 62cm Trek 970 in SP is very stiff. It sometimes feels stiff and a little buzzy riding at 15 mph but always feels just right at 19 mph. I average 17 to 18 mph, so the bike is smooth enough for most of the ride. It does climb and sprint like a muscle car, rock solid and quickly.
The 63cm Serotta Nova Special X in SPX is just right. It provides just a trace of stiffness while riding at 14 mph but feels just right and a little plush at 16 mph. It does climb and sprints even better than the Trek, with a touch of dampness. I contribute the variation to the builder and not the tubeset. The Trek is a hardcore Criterium bike while the Serotta is a stage-race or club-race bike intended for longer distances.
If you can find a frame with SP or SPX, buy it.
The size of the frame, more than anything else, determines the overall stiffness. A bike model that has the "just right" amount of stiffness in a 56cm size with a 165 lbs rider can present too much flex in a 63cm size with a 210 lb rider. I'm not saying that the bike will fold in half, but too much flex while sprinting or climbing can noticed. If it matters, or not, is up to the cyclist and the style of riding he enjoys.
I have two larger frames, one is a 62cm Trek 970 in SP and the other is a 63cm Serotta Nova Special X in SPX. I'm 215 lbs.
The 62cm Trek 970 in SP is very stiff. It sometimes feels stiff and a little buzzy riding at 15 mph but always feels just right at 19 mph. I average 17 to 18 mph, so the bike is smooth enough for most of the ride. It does climb and sprint like a muscle car, rock solid and quickly.
The 63cm Serotta Nova Special X in SPX is just right. It provides just a trace of stiffness while riding at 14 mph but feels just right and a little plush at 16 mph. It does climb and sprints even better than the Trek, with a touch of dampness. I contribute the variation to the builder and not the tubeset. The Trek is a hardcore Criterium bike while the Serotta is a stage-race or club-race bike intended for longer distances.
If you can find a frame with SP or SPX, buy it.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Last edited by Barrettscv; 09-27-13 at 10:23 AM.