Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Tubeless Back to Tubes

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Tubeless Back to Tubes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-21, 10:28 AM
  #26  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by Rdmonster69
I had two flats this spring that both appeared to be the result of using tire levers on the install and again at the side of the road. I know , I know but the buggers were super hard to get on !! I was able to man handle them after they had gone on a few times. That was my old bike using Michelin Power Roads, love the tires BTW. I usually average maybe one flat a year but am always prepared. I ride a fair amount on a canal towpath that is hard crushed limestone and some of the shads can be pretty sharp.

If I didn't want to at least try the tubeless set up that came with the bike I would have no problem switching to tubes. If I have issues (tire issues , personal issues are a different topic) I will in a heartbeat as along with sealant I will be getting everything to switch it over just in case.
Properly maintaining tubeless is much more work than changing one flat per year - I would never consider tubeless at that kind of (in)frequency.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 09-08-21, 10:33 AM
  #27  
Rdmonster69
Shawn of the Dead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
Properly maintaining tubeless is much more work than changing one flat per year - I would never consider tubeless at that kind of (in)frequency.
Hmmmmm ... I know there is some maintaining to do with tubeless. May be why the rear went flat as it is. I had no idea and it may have been sitting in the Trek store with the sealant in it for quite some time.

The rider in me wants to forget about it and stick with what I know. The wrench in me wants to master a new tech. I guess the only sensible solution is to buy the new mountain bike and learn on that !!!
Rdmonster69 is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 01:17 PM
  #28  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,399
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 4,837 Times in 2,991 Posts
It all comes down to how many flats you get when running tubes. I used to get 1 or 2 flats per month on average - our roads are not great. With tubeless road I have had zero flats in 2 years. So I’m sticking with tubeless. I was already running tubeless mtb for 15 years, so that made the choice easier.
PeteHski is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 01:29 PM
  #29  
DangerousDanR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 898

Bikes: Time Scylon, Lynskey R350, Ritchey Breakaway, Ritchey Double Switchback, Lynskey Ridgeline, ICAN Fatbike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times in 306 Posts
Originally Posted by cxwrench
... Nearly every TL tire is heavier than it's clincher model, that's why. Ride quality isn't really an issue for me as I never over-inflated my clinchers in the first place.
Originally Posted by cxwrench
...The clinchers have better ride quality...
Indeed, the GP5000 tubeless is between 45 and 65 grams heavier than the tube type GP5000, which is about the mass of the lightest Continental tube. But if I look at Schwalbe I see that the tubeless Pro One TT tire is lighter than the tube Pro One, and the Pro One regular tubeless is 265 grams which is 30 grams heavier than the tube type. Add 20 grams for 20 cc of sealant, and you have a fairly light weight tube. What I noticed that convinced me to keep trying different sealants was that the tubeless tires at the same pressure seemed to have less harsh feedback. Yes, it was that much better.

But it would add to my enjoyment of bicycling if everyone who rides in the group rides around here would go tubeless. We have been running about 50 riders for about 30 miles, and it seems like they are about 50/50 tube - tubeless. About 1/3rd of the time someone has a flat, and the flats have been 100% tube tires. We have a lot of gravel roads in this area and the intersections between paved roads and gravel roads always have gravel on them. And people get flats at those junctions. Looking at my current GP5000 rear I can see several dings that cut through to the cord, but no flats and that tire is almost worn down to the wear indicators.

Tubeless is a rapidly changing space. What didn't work last year may be better this year. My new wheels (on the way from Light Bicycle, Carbon Ti hubs, 46mm, and no through drilled spoke holes) will not require tape. Tape has been the biggest PITA for me. Since I will use a tire mounting lubricant (which also acts as a bead seal at a pressure no higher than commonly run in heavy duty truck tires) they will not be that difficult to mount. And, with 25cc of Orange Seal Sub-Zero sealant (which doesn't seem to dry out and which works in my fat bike so I only have to keep one type of sealant around) they will be lighter than a GP5000 tube tire with a 50 gram Continental tube, and I only need to top up the sealant once a season.

FYI: Schwalbe comparison. And I am well aware that they are different tires but the Pro One tube version is not a slouch.

Tube:Size:
ETRTO 25-622 (Franz.Bez. 700x25C)
Typ:Folding
Compound:ADDIX Race
Execution:Super Race, V-Guard
Color:Black
Seal:Tube
Weight:235 g
Pressure:6.00 - 9.00 Bar (85 - 130 psi)
Maximum load:70 kg
EPI:127
Article number:11653977


Tubeless:Size:ETRTO 25-622 (Franz.Bez. 700x25C)
Typ:Folding
Compound:ADDIX Race
Execution:Super Race
Color:Classic Sidewall
Seal:TLE
Weight:220 g
Pressure:5.00 - 7.50 Bar (70 - 110 psi)
Maximum load:70 kg
EPI:127
Article number:11653972
DangerousDanR is online now  
Likes For DangerousDanR:
Old 09-08-21, 01:30 PM
  #30  
Rdmonster69
Shawn of the Dead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
It all comes down to how many flats you get when running tubes. I used to get 1 or 2 flats per month on average - our roads are not great. With tubeless road I have had zero flats in 2 years. So I’m sticking with tubeless. I was already running tubeless mtb for 15 years, so that made the choice easier.
Yeah ....I get the advantages and think its cool that they came set up that way. Long view tho ? I havent had a flat since early may and that is about 1,000 miles riding. I am using Michelin power road front/power endurance rear and they have been great. I'm not worried that the new tires running 70 psi as opposed to 100 psi will be that much more likely to get pinch flats. I do see some hazards on my in own rides but I will see how it goes with tubes. Hopefully my luck will stay the same with the new bike. If not I am sure I can manage switching back to tubeless.
Rdmonster69 is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 07:25 PM
  #31  
Rdmonster69
Shawn of the Dead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 216 Posts
Decided what the heck ...... bought 3 tubes and rim tape AND a bottle of sealant. Had the rear mounted/filled and inflated in about 20 minutes. Topped off the front ....... only a tiny bit of spilled sealant which was my fault.

Aired up to 70 PSI and went for a 2 mile ride. If they are solid tomorrow I am sold. It was pretty easy and I have tubes for flat repair on the road. If I gotta mess with them once or twice a season its no big dea. to me
Rdmonster69 is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 07:53 PM
  #32  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by DangerousDanR
But it would add to my enjoyment of bicycling if everyone who rides in the group rides around here would go tubeless. We have been running about 50 riders for about 30 miles, and it seems like they are about 50/50 tube - tubeless. About 1/3rd of the time someone has a flat, and the flats have been 100% tube tires. We have a lot of gravel roads in this area and the intersections between paved roads and gravel roads always have gravel on them. And people get flats at those junctions. Looking at my current GP5000 rear I can see several dings that cut through to the cord, but no flats and that tire is almost worn down to the wear indicators.
Just out of curiosity, are the tubed riders still on skinnier tires, too? Most of the time, my 650B bike is also carrying a 700C tube as there's always some 700x23C rider who needs one.

We don't have any tubeless bikes in the fleet (yet), but I'm a big fan of tubeless tape...
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 08:00 PM
  #33  
Rdmonster69
Shawn of the Dead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Just out of curiosity, are the tubed riders still on skinnier tires, too? Most of the time, my 650B bike is also carrying a 700C tube as there's always some 700x23C rider who needs one.

We don't have any tubeless bikes in the fleet (yet), but I'm a big fan of tubeless tape...
I carry tons of stuff.. Internal storage has tube,levers and inflator. My very small back pack has a skinny tube (I have a bike running 700x23 tubed) ,levers,patch kit, a park I-beam multi tool and a small pump. The I-beam has a chain tool and I carry a spare quick link ..... I have helped 3 fellow riders with flats this year .....and saved a turtle : )
Rdmonster69 is offline  
Likes For Rdmonster69:
Old 09-08-21, 09:22 PM
  #34  
jaxgtr
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,872

Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 763 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 1,008 Posts
Originally Posted by cxwrench
Wrong. Bontrager rims don't use tubeless tape, they use a somewhat bulky plastic rim strip. If you're not tubeless it should be removed and replaced w/ either the 'normal' Bontrager rim strip or tape.
Just to throw my hat in, I can not stand tubeless on the road. Did it for years, had one cut tire and it was such a mess I went back to tubes as soon as I got home from that ride.
I've run tubes with the tubeless rim strip on a set of wheels and it did not make putting a tube in any more difficult than if it had velox in it. I actually did not find it better or worse actually. The downside to removing, if you want to go back to tubeless you have to replace it, well, they recommend it as a 1 use item.
__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Originally Posted by AEO
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.



jaxgtr is online now  
Old 09-09-21, 01:37 AM
  #35  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times in 740 Posts
Originally Posted by Rdmonster69
Apparently my new Domane came factory with tubeless as opposed to the stated tubeless ready. This doesn't look like its for me as it looks like a PITA.
It "looks" like a PITA or did you actually have a problem?
bruce19 is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 05:09 AM
  #36  
Rdmonster69
Shawn of the Dead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
It "looks" like a PITA or did you actually have a problem?
It "looked" like more of a pain than it was. The beads set easy, putting in the sealant was pretty easy and they are just as aired up this morning as last night. Other than roadside flats I think I will stick with it.
Rdmonster69 is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 06:45 AM
  #37  
masi61
Senior Member
 
masi61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682

Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times in 315 Posts
DangerousDanR - I agree what you say in post #29 about tubeless being less harsh. On my tubed (aluminum) road bike with 25mm latex tubed tires I find it harsh to ride a lot in the crack filled pavement near the white line on the right. Makes me migrate further out into the road to seek the car tire ruts.

On my tubeless (titanium) road bike the harshness is much less even when the tubeless tires are inflated at the higher end (say..90f/100r). It allows me to relax on my solo training rides around traffic and I don’t get beat to death by choppy pavement and cars appreciate me since I’m not as squirrelly.

To make the harshness comparison of tubed to tubeless more meaningful and not just attributable to what is probably superior shock dampening from the titanium frame, I plan to convert my aluminum bike to tubeless as well. My Flyte SRS-3 aluminum bike has a nice Reynolds carbon fork and I run Velocity A23 clincher wheels with tubeless tape/latex tubes and currently w/ Schwalbe One (23mm) clinchers at like 84 psi front and 90 psi rear and the ride is just “OK”. Normally these wheels are run with 25mm Challenge Strada open tubulars and yeah those are a bit less harsh. But even those are quite a bit more harsh than the Panaracer/Hutchinson Secteur tubeless set up on my titanium bike.
masi61 is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 07:08 AM
  #38  
eduskator
Senior Member
 
eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,112

Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times in 439 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlas Shrugged
The liner is thinner than than the standard rim tape so no problem there. Ignore the hook versus hookless as your bike will be compatible with tubes. If you want put tubes in great however talk to your bike shop as tubeless is not as bad as the luddites which frequent this forum would lead you to believe. I love it and have toured and ridden thousands of km tubeless without a issue. No flats with a super supple performance tire.
True that. Once you understand how it works and how to make it work, you quickly realise how much better it is! I know by fact that some tire and rim combos are harder than other to set-up. For instance, the factory wheel setup I had on my 2 previous bikes (OEM tires and rims) were both a PITA to seat on rims. It took me half an hour just to seat one tire on its rim. On the other hand, my current setup (Schwalbe tires on OEM rims) is a charm. Tires can be mounted by using a regular pump - no compressor needed.

Anyhow, I wouldn't go back to tubes. 4000kms on my current TL setup and not a single flat .

Last edited by eduskator; 09-09-21 at 07:18 AM.
eduskator is offline  
Likes For eduskator:
Old 09-09-21, 07:09 AM
  #39  
eduskator
Senior Member
 
eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,112

Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times in 439 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
It "looks" like a PITA or did you actually have a problem?
He used ''looks like'' 2 times
eduskator is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 07:15 AM
  #40  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times in 740 Posts
Originally Posted by Rdmonster69
It "looked" like more of a pain than it was. The beads set easy, putting in the sealant was pretty easy and they are just as aired up this morning as last night. Other than roadside flats I think I will stick with it.
There are a lot of things in life that change. I'm always annoyed. I never want to be forced into new stuff when I'm used to the "old" stuff. I've had to tell myself to just learn the "new" and see what happens. It ends up not being that bad.
bruce19 is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 07:26 AM
  #41  
Rdmonster69
Shawn of the Dead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
There are a lot of things in life that change. I'm always annoyed. I never want to be forced into new stuff when I'm used to the "old" stuff. I've had to tell myself to just learn the "new" and see what happens. It ends up not being that bad.
My exact experience....limited tho it is. I wont be going tubeless on my other bike simply because it is an older machine and flats aren't a huge problem for me. The new bike came that way and was easy enough to fix so I'm sold on that set up as it came which is Bontrager Aeolus 3 with the plastic rim strips installed already. If I ever start from scratch on a build which isn't super likely but is possible we will see how it goes.
Rdmonster69 is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 08:27 AM
  #42  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by Rdmonster69
My exact experience....limited tho it is. I wont be going tubeless on my other bike simply because it is an older machine and flats aren't a huge problem for me. The new bike came that way and was easy enough to fix so I'm sold on that set up as it came which is Bontrager Aeolus 3 with the plastic rim strips installed already. If I ever start from scratch on a build which isn't super likely but is possible we will see how it goes.
If you're really intent on experimenting with this, even though it's not necessary, you should at least make it as easy on yourself as you can. Get a syringe-type sealant injector/remover (like this - https://www.amazon.com/KOM-Cycling-T...4XR/ref=sr_1_5) so that you can easily check your sealant levels periodically. If your stems won't pass the "needle" all the way through, get new stems that will, like the Muc-Off aluminum ones.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 09-09-21, 10:55 AM
  #43  
DangerousDanR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 898

Bikes: Time Scylon, Lynskey R350, Ritchey Breakaway, Ritchey Double Switchback, Lynskey Ridgeline, ICAN Fatbike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times in 306 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Just out of curiosity, are the tubed riders still on skinnier tires, too?...
I have a hard time with this one. I have nothing against using a 23 mm tire, and I don't doubt that they have lower aerodynamic resistance on most wheels. But I have ridden on large rear tires for many years and on 25 mm or larger fronts for over 10 years. I am a large lump, so I need the larger tires. I understand that people believe that a 23 mm tire has less wind resistance, but I also see most of the group on the hoods 100% of the time.

But, yes, the flats are mostly 23 mm, and they seem to mostly be Conti, either GP4000 or GP5000. But most of the tires on those rides are Conti...
DangerousDanR is online now  
Old 09-09-21, 11:08 AM
  #44  
Rdmonster69
Shawn of the Dead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
If you're really intent on experimenting with this, even though it's not necessary, you should at least make it as easy on yourself as you can. Get a syringe-type sealant injector/remover (like this - https://www.amazon.com/KOM-Cycling-T...4XR/ref=sr_1_5) so that you can easily check your sealant levels periodically. If your stems won't pass the "needle" all the way through, get new stems that will, like the Muc-Off aluminum ones.
Noted .....the sealant I had came with a threaded adapter but seems kinda weak and I had seen these syringes. I was fully prepared to ditch tubeless as I bought all the stuff to change over but honestly ....it would have been more trouble to pop out the rim strips and put rim tape in than it was to just reseat and seal up the tubeless set up. It was really that easy !!
Rdmonster69 is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 11:25 AM
  #45  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by Rdmonster69
Noted .....the sealant I had came with a threaded adapter but seems kinda weak and I had seen these syringes.
The injectors that thread on to the stem are only good for getting sealant in to the tire - they can't take sealant out, not all of it, at least. IOW, if you want to check the amount of sealant in your tire, you'll won't be able to do anything better than use a dipstick unless you want to unseat the tires. Removing sealant would also need to be done by unseating the tires. All of this is to say that tubeless life is just a lot easier with a syringe.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 11:29 AM
  #46  
DangerousDanR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 898

Bikes: Time Scylon, Lynskey R350, Ritchey Breakaway, Ritchey Double Switchback, Lynskey Ridgeline, ICAN Fatbike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times in 306 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Just out of curiosity, are the tubed riders still on skinnier tires, too?...
I have a hard time with this one. I have nothing against using a 23 mm tire, and I don't doubt that they have lower aerodynamic resistance on most wheels. But I have ridden on large rear tires for many years and on 25 mm or larger fronts for over 10 years. I am a large lump, so I need the larger tires. I understand that people believe that a 23 mm tire has less wind resistance, but I also see most of the group on the hoods 100% of the time.

But, yes, the flats are mostly 23 mm, and they seem to mostly be Conti, either GP4000 or GP5000. But most of the tires on those rides are Conti...
DangerousDanR is online now  
Old 09-09-21, 11:32 AM
  #47  
Rdmonster69
Shawn of the Dead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by DangerousDanR
I have a hard time with this one. I have nothing against using a 23 mm tire, and I don't doubt that they have lower aerodynamic resistance on most wheels. But I have ridden on large rear tires for many years and on 25 mm or larger fronts for over 10 years. I am a large lump, so I need the larger tires. I understand that people believe that a 23 mm tire has less wind resistance, but I also see most of the group on the hoods 100% of the time.

But, yes, the flats are mostly 23 mm, and they seem to mostly be Conti, either GP4000 or GP5000. But most of the tires on those rides are Conti...
I run 23s on my other bike but that's simply because its what came on it. My younger self inherently thought ... skinnier = faster.
Rdmonster69 is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 11:33 AM
  #48  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by DangerousDanR
I have a hard time with this one. I have nothing against using a 23 mm tire, and I don't doubt that they have lower aerodynamic resistance on most wheels. But I have ridden on large rear tires for many years and on 25 mm or larger fronts for over 10 years. I am a large lump, so I need the larger tires. I understand that people believe that a 23 mm tire has less wind resistance, but I also see most of the group on the hoods 100% of the time.

But, yes, the flats are mostly 23 mm, and they seem to mostly be Conti, either GP4000 or GP5000. But most of the tires on those rides are Conti...
Skinnier tires like 23mm have always seemed more prone to punctures, to me. And I'd imagine that the tubeless folks in your group are mostly, if not all, on 25mm or bigger. So anyone riding an older road bike with only enough clearance for 23s would have a couple strikes against them, in my mind.

Complete speculation on my part.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 12:39 PM
  #49  
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by Rdmonster69
I appreciate all the input.I was quite surprised to see that they were already set up tubeless. I dont think I would have any problems with ride quality or PSI related flats if I change over to tubes. Still...I have everything I need and will take a stab at resealing the current set up. If it turns out to be a pain. I will have tubes and tape ready to go. No biggie.
Once you figure it out, then it's pretty trouble free. I used to get about 6-8 flats per year with tubes. The last 3 years, riding 4000 miles per year including tours, I have yet to get a flat. You can get plugs so that if you do get a puncture the sealant doesn't seal, you can plug it in mere seconds. I've had to do this twice in that same 4 years. Never once did I have to stop, remove the tire and insert a tube. For me, not having a flat in all that time and having to spend time roadside repairing it, is worth a little extra time at home setting it up.

Make sure there's sealant in there, spin the wheel horizontally and vertically for a few minutes and then check the pressure an hour later. It should be holding.

J,
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 09-09-21, 12:44 PM
  #50  
Rdmonster69
Shawn of the Dead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnJ80

Make sure there's sealant in there, spin the wheel horizontally and vertically for a few minutes and then check the pressure an hour later. It should be holding.

J,
I spun it every which away and rode a few miles after. It was still fully inflated this morning when I got up. I also topped up the front to be sure it .
Rdmonster69 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.