View Poll Results: Do You Use the Large Front Chainring/Large Rear Cog Combination?
Yes
51
46.79%
No
58
53.21%
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll
Do You Use the Large Front Chainring/Large Rear Cog Combination?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The banks of the River Charles
Posts: 2,018
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease, 2020 Seven Evergreen, 2019 Honey Allroads Ti, 2018 Seven Redsky XX, 2017 Trek Boon 7, 2014 Trek 520
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Liked 900 Times
in
483 Posts
If I do inadvertently shift into that combination the chain makes unpleasant noises reminding me and then I quickly correct it.
#27
Senior Member
I have a 1x 46 front 32 rear, so yeah. Even before I converted my bike to a 1x I still used the big-big combination. Never had any issues.
#28
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,911
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3556 Post(s)
Liked 3,332 Times
in
1,899 Posts
[X] Not intentionally.
#29
Junior Member
I remember seeing an article years ago when 10 speed chains came out. It stated that the manufacturing tolerances for 10 speed chains had to be so precise that cross-chaining was no longer a problem. Something about the chains being stronger and more flexible.
Now, I have no idea if that is true, and I cannot find the article but, hell, that's good enough for me! I cross-chain all the time!
Now, I have no idea if that is true, and I cannot find the article but, hell, that's good enough for me! I cross-chain all the time!
#30
Senior Member
Only time I ever do that (large/large) intentionally is when I'm function-checking shifting. On occasion I've overshifted one bike into that combo for startup from a dead stop, though.
On one of my bikes, I habitually use large/2nd largest at a stop. It's 2x7 with 11-28 rear, and the 50/24 combo works well for me from a dead stop. Only stay there about 25-30m or so before upshifting.
On the other bike, no need to go that low even from a dead stop. It's 2x10 with an 11-32 rear. 3rd or 4th largest is good there for starting from a dead stop.
It's pretty flat where I live, so I generally don't ever use the small chainring except for function testing.
On one of my bikes, I habitually use large/2nd largest at a stop. It's 2x7 with 11-28 rear, and the 50/24 combo works well for me from a dead stop. Only stay there about 25-30m or so before upshifting.
On the other bike, no need to go that low even from a dead stop. It's 2x10 with an 11-32 rear. 3rd or 4th largest is good there for starting from a dead stop.
It's pretty flat where I live, so I generally don't ever use the small chainring except for function testing.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,750
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1927 Post(s)
Liked 2,143 Times
in
1,309 Posts
I’ve posted this before and have yet to get a definitive answer.
What is the maximum angle the chain should not exceed, because that is really the argument?
About 6 months ago I did some quick and dirty calculations on cross chaining. It was pretty simple based on chainline (adjusting for chainring offset), cassette width, and chainstay length (ctc). The results were low 2 degrees to upper 2 degrees. I think, but can’t remember exactly, that running a 1x11, big or small, was at a greater angle than a 2x7 big-big.
I do think modern chain flexibility plays a part, but not sure if the modern flexibility changes as chain width changes.
John
What is the maximum angle the chain should not exceed, because that is really the argument?
About 6 months ago I did some quick and dirty calculations on cross chaining. It was pretty simple based on chainline (adjusting for chainring offset), cassette width, and chainstay length (ctc). The results were low 2 degrees to upper 2 degrees. I think, but can’t remember exactly, that running a 1x11, big or small, was at a greater angle than a 2x7 big-big.
I do think modern chain flexibility plays a part, but not sure if the modern flexibility changes as chain width changes.
John
Last edited by 70sSanO; 09-11-21 at 07:50 AM.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,433
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7620 Post(s)
Liked 3,432 Times
in
1,813 Posts
As @ThermionicScott mentioned, with flexible 10- and 11-speed chains, it is not really a problem, and the derailleur can be set to cover the full range of cogs without making any noise. Why not? Back in the day when chains were a lot laterally stiffer it abused the cogs and the chain, but a lot of things were different back in the day. The point of buying and owning new tech is to use it, I figure.
If I am planning on being down low for a while, I shift up front. For short, punchy climbs, or stopping at traffic lights, or for sudden braking maneuvers when I want to drop a lot of gears so I can re-accelerate .... sure, and as far as I can tell it doesn't hurt a thing. I have 20 or 22 gears (or more ) on my bikes, not for show, but for go.
If I am planning on being down low for a while, I shift up front. For short, punchy climbs, or stopping at traffic lights, or for sudden braking maneuvers when I want to drop a lot of gears so I can re-accelerate .... sure, and as far as I can tell it doesn't hurt a thing. I have 20 or 22 gears (or more ) on my bikes, not for show, but for go.
#33
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,585
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4696 Post(s)
Liked 1,512 Times
in
987 Posts
As @ThermionicScott mentioned, with flexible 10- and 11-speed chains, it is not really a problem, and the derailleur can be set to cover the full range of cogs without making any noise. Why not? Back in the day when chains were a lot laterally stiffer it abused the cogs and the chain, but a lot of things were different back in the day. The point of buying and owning new tech is to use it, I figure.
If I am planning on being down low for a while, I shift up front. For short, punchy climbs, or stopping at traffic lights, or for sudden braking maneuvers when I want to drop a lot of gears so I can re-accelerate .... sure, and as far as I can tell it doesn't hurt a thing. I have 20 or 22 gears (or more ) on my bikes, not for show, but for go.
If I am planning on being down low for a while, I shift up front. For short, punchy climbs, or stopping at traffic lights, or for sudden braking maneuvers when I want to drop a lot of gears so I can re-accelerate .... sure, and as far as I can tell it doesn't hurt a thing. I have 20 or 22 gears (or more ) on my bikes, not for show, but for go.
#34
PBP Ancien (2007)
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 358
Bikes: Cannondale CAADX (for commuting), Cannondale CAAD12, Cannondale CAAD12 Team CNCPT, Giant Contend 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 156 Times
in
106 Posts
Yes, but only very occasionally and on one specific climb when on my heavy commuting bike with fenders.
To even out wear on my chainrings I ride in to work (quite slowly) on the inner ring and ride home (a fair bit faster) on the outer ring. On the toughest climb I very occasionally, perhaps once a month, go big-big if there is a headwind or if I'm tired. The climb really isn't very long at all - about 0.5km.
To even out wear on my chainrings I ride in to work (quite slowly) on the inner ring and ride home (a fair bit faster) on the outer ring. On the toughest climb I very occasionally, perhaps once a month, go big-big if there is a headwind or if I'm tired. The climb really isn't very long at all - about 0.5km.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,750
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1927 Post(s)
Liked 2,143 Times
in
1,309 Posts
I've wondered from time to time, that as the bike component makers want to have product tiers and offer eg. lower cost 8 or 9 speed options, why they don't release these with the same gauge chains and cassettes that eg. 11 speed uses. You'd by default have narrower cassettes, less cross chaining, and from a tooling perspective, you wouldn't have to make as much of lots of different chains and cogs.
I would guess it is not profitable to produce close tolerance narrow spacing drivetrains at lower cost points. Taking a Tourney level quality and mfg it to 11 speed specs might be a lower level entry bike nightmare.
John
#36
Senior Member
My gearing is 7 speed half-step + granny, so I set the bike up to allow big-big and small-small. Around here in Flatland, I'm almost always in the middle.of the freewheel, so I almost never go into either of those gears.
Watching the TdF, I thought I saw someone (Roglic or Pogachar, IIRC) in the big-big combo, but the image was pretty fleeting, so I'm not sure.
Watching the TdF, I thought I saw someone (Roglic or Pogachar, IIRC) in the big-big combo, but the image was pretty fleeting, so I'm not sure.
#37
Member
I do sometimes for short climbs, as I usually ride on the bigger ring on the front. I have the 30-46 front and the 8 speed 11-34 on the back. A little cross chain does not seem to put that much pressure on the components, though maybe I am just not seeing it.
For anything longer than a short climb, I need to be in the granny gear on the front anyway.
Its funny, though. Sometimes I read that with seven or eight speed rear, there is not as much angle to worry about. Sometimes I read that the higher number of gears use more flexible chains so they have less to worry about than the seven or eight speeds. Opinions on this seem to be all over the map, IMO.
I don't remember this ever being an issue with my old 1970s ten speed (which I still ride sometimes) but that has only five on the back.
For anything longer than a short climb, I need to be in the granny gear on the front anyway.
Its funny, though. Sometimes I read that with seven or eight speed rear, there is not as much angle to worry about. Sometimes I read that the higher number of gears use more flexible chains so they have less to worry about than the seven or eight speeds. Opinions on this seem to be all over the map, IMO.
I don't remember this ever being an issue with my old 1970s ten speed (which I still ride sometimes) but that has only five on the back.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 848
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 429 Times
in
285 Posts
I didn't vote in the poll because the poll did not have an option for my answer:
Almost never, but occasionally it'll happen so I set my bike up so that nothing breaks if it does.
And that's on a bike that's set up such that the big/big is actually a legitimate gear. (On most drivetrains, it's a duplicate.) I'm running a 45/42/30 x 14-26 6-speed half-step + granny, so the 45x26 sits halfway between the 42x26 and the 42x23. So, in theory, there might be a circumstance where the 45x26 would be the ideal gear. In practice, however, that's not really true. If I'm in the 42x23, I'm already going uphill. If things get steeper, I'll likely be needing the granny ring soon enough, so making the double shift to the 45x26 isn't worth the effort. I'm gonna grab the 42x26, and then, if I need to, make the double/double shift from there to the 30x20, and ride out the rest of the hill on the granny ring.
On crossover or wide-double drivetrains, the big/big is almost always a duplicate of another gear on the inner ring, so there's no reason to ever ride in it, even though modern drivetrains can be set up so that it doesn't totally suck. (One should still set up one's drivetrain so that, if one should accidentally shift into that gear, one will not rip the rear derailleur off, bend the dropout, bend or break the chainstay, and brutally crash one's bicycle. Which is what happens when the whole drivetrain locks solid at speed.)
--Shannon
Almost never, but occasionally it'll happen so I set my bike up so that nothing breaks if it does.
And that's on a bike that's set up such that the big/big is actually a legitimate gear. (On most drivetrains, it's a duplicate.) I'm running a 45/42/30 x 14-26 6-speed half-step + granny, so the 45x26 sits halfway between the 42x26 and the 42x23. So, in theory, there might be a circumstance where the 45x26 would be the ideal gear. In practice, however, that's not really true. If I'm in the 42x23, I'm already going uphill. If things get steeper, I'll likely be needing the granny ring soon enough, so making the double shift to the 45x26 isn't worth the effort. I'm gonna grab the 42x26, and then, if I need to, make the double/double shift from there to the 30x20, and ride out the rest of the hill on the granny ring.
On crossover or wide-double drivetrains, the big/big is almost always a duplicate of another gear on the inner ring, so there's no reason to ever ride in it, even though modern drivetrains can be set up so that it doesn't totally suck. (One should still set up one's drivetrain so that, if one should accidentally shift into that gear, one will not rip the rear derailleur off, bend the dropout, bend or break the chainstay, and brutally crash one's bicycle. Which is what happens when the whole drivetrain locks solid at speed.)
--Shannon
#40
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,863
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3899 Post(s)
Liked 7,162 Times
in
2,897 Posts
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I dunno what the question is.
His objection is to the capacity of the rear derailleur. I've worked out the gearing, and its capacity falls within the range of gears that I will actually use.
I'm going from the stock 12-21 to 13-28. I'm old, out of shape, and have 10% grades where I live.
His objection is to the capacity of the rear derailleur. I've worked out the gearing, and its capacity falls within the range of gears that I will actually use.
I'm going from the stock 12-21 to 13-28. I'm old, out of shape, and have 10% grades where I live.
Likes For Frank S:
#43
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,251
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 149 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6133 Post(s)
Liked 4,067 Times
in
2,310 Posts
That has very little to do with the big/big combination. It has more to do with your mechanic’s lack of imagination. There are limits to how range you can have but it’s a lot wider than most people think. I have had 48/36/20 cranks with an 11-36 cassette for a range of 119 gear inches to 14 gear inches. Recently I dropped down a 44 tooth outer ring because 119 gear inch top gear is too tall. I still have a 110” gear which is good enough. Shimano says that you can’t do that. Most mechanics would say the same. They are wrong.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,020
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4193 Post(s)
Liked 4,616 Times
in
2,852 Posts
I dunno what the question is.
His objection is to the capacity of the rear derailleur. I've worked out the gearing, and its capacity falls within the range of gears that I will actually use.
I'm going from the stock 12-21 to 13-28. I'm old, out of shape, and have 10% grades where I live.
His objection is to the capacity of the rear derailleur. I've worked out the gearing, and its capacity falls within the range of gears that I will actually use.
I'm going from the stock 12-21 to 13-28. I'm old, out of shape, and have 10% grades where I live.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,750
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1927 Post(s)
Liked 2,143 Times
in
1,309 Posts
I dunno what the question is.
His objection is to the capacity of the rear derailleur. I've worked out the gearing, and its capacity falls within the range of gears that I will actually use.
I'm going from the stock 12-21 to 13-28. I'm old, out of shape, and have 10% grades where I live.
His objection is to the capacity of the rear derailleur. I've worked out the gearing, and its capacity falls within the range of gears that I will actually use.
I'm going from the stock 12-21 to 13-28. I'm old, out of shape, and have 10% grades where I live.
John
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
Not really. The difference in drivetrain losses (for 11 speed) between running big-big and the closest matching gears on the small chainring is about 0.75 of a watt at 250W rider output. That's pretty insignificant.
It’s not something you do on purpose, but sometimes you don't want to switch to the small ring but momentarily need an easier gear. Following the wheel in front and not wanting to lose momentum by switching to the small ring, and when the apex of the climb is visible and I want to power over it are two situations where it sometimes happens.
It’s really not a big deal if your gears are setup correctly.
It’s not something you do on purpose, but sometimes you don't want to switch to the small ring but momentarily need an easier gear. Following the wheel in front and not wanting to lose momentum by switching to the small ring, and when the apex of the climb is visible and I want to power over it are two situations where it sometimes happens.
It’s really not a big deal if your gears are setup correctly.
Likes For Branko D:
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,033
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
205 Posts
If I occasionally cross-chain, it’s small-small. By the time I get to 50/23 uphill, I’m looking to dump into the 34x21 or 19 unless I know the top is very close.
Tadej Pogacar was clearly riding big-big on stage 8 of the Tour, so it can’t be too bad. Though he does get all his gear paid for.
Tadej Pogacar was clearly riding big-big on stage 8 of the Tour, so it can’t be too bad. Though he does get all his gear paid for.