Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Cable housing, friction shifting

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Cable housing, friction shifting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-22, 08:29 AM
  #1  
ehcoplex 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683

Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times in 757 Posts
Cable housing, friction shifting

Maybe a dumb question.... back in the day of friction shifting, were brake and shifter cable housings the same thing, or different as they are now? (I understand why they're different now, in the age of indexing, etc)
ehcoplex is offline  
Old 01-06-22, 09:08 AM
  #2  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times in 1,580 Posts
that's my recollection.
It was all just spiral wound metal with a plastic outer layer.. except for the nifty stainless steel wound housing used for rear derailleurs sometimes.
Of course, it was common to use very little cable housing for derailleurs. With downtube shift levers, about the only derailleur housing that was needed was right at the rear derailleur.

Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Likes For steelbikeguy:
Old 01-06-22, 09:57 AM
  #3  
BFisher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 767 Post(s)
Liked 1,898 Times in 889 Posts
Some companies did use different diameter housing for brake and shift systems, notably Schwinn. Still the same basic design, though.
BFisher is offline  
Likes For BFisher:
Old 01-06-22, 10:13 AM
  #4  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times in 2,610 Posts
For some old-school builds, I still like to use the bare coiled steel housing for the RD loop. Supposedly it drains off the wet stuff, but I also put a dab of grease on the shifter cable to ensure smooth passage.
nlerner is offline  
Likes For nlerner:
Old 01-06-22, 12:36 PM
  #5  
SurferRosa
señor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,623

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 6,480 Times in 3,206 Posts
I use brake cable housing for my friction shifting, because it's more flexible, cost efficient, more easily available, and perfectly matches in color the rest of the housing on the bike.

Also, shift housing often separates uncontrollably when not using the exactly correct diameter ferrule, an ugly problem you needn't worry about with brake cable housing.
SurferRosa is offline  
Likes For SurferRosa:
Old 01-06-22, 01:11 PM
  #6  
SJX426 
Senior Member
 
SJX426's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579

Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8

Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times in 1,103 Posts
Newish:
P1050091 on Flickr

Older:
P1000498w on Flickr
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
SJX426 is offline  
Likes For SJX426:
Old 01-06-22, 01:28 PM
  #7  
ehcoplex 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683

Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times in 757 Posts
Ah, of course- I didn't think about the fact that most/many BITD bikes had down-tube shifters and no cable housing other than from the chain-stay to the RD... Mainly wondering because I have a bunch of old, unused brake housing I was wondering about using on my PX-10 refurb- but of course, it's really just the little bit at the RD that needs something, and the bare steel housing would look apropos there...
ehcoplex is offline  
Old 01-07-22, 05:30 AM
  #8  
smontanaro 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,093

Bikes: many

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times in 760 Posts
My late-50s/early-60s Frejus TdF originally had full housing for the derailleurs. When I got it the previous owner had cobbled together some combination of barrel adjusters and funny little ferrules to eliminate most of it. I returned it to stock. The shifter housing is definitely smaller diameter than the brake housing. (Fortunately, it appears Schwinn bought similar housing from Huret that matches the brake housing (a small crosshatch detail), so I was able to get pretty good matchy matchy.

I don't have any good photos of that part of the bike, but in this shot you can see that the "cable stop" on the drive side chainstay isn't a stop at all. It just guides the housing to the real stop on the derailleur.

__________________
Monti Special
smontanaro is offline  
Likes For smontanaro:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.