Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
Reload this Page >

Racers and Coaches: What would you want out of a track-specific iOS app?

Search
Notices
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area Looking to enter into the realm of track racing? Want to share your experiences and tactics for riding on a velodrome? The Track Cycling forums is for you! Come in and discuss training/racing, equipment, and current track cycling events.

Racers and Coaches: What would you want out of a track-specific iOS app?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-14, 02:03 PM
  #26  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by gtrob
Its something like "Beep, Beep, BEEEEEP".

hope that helps.

Nailed it.
carleton is offline  
Old 09-26-14, 05:42 PM
  #27  
Baby Puke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kanazawa
Posts: 1,700

Bikes: Marin Stelvio, Pogliaghi SL, Panasonic NJS, Dolan DF4, Intense Pro24 BMX

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 87 Times in 58 Posts
Sounds like it's in the key of C and just one octave, Carleton.
Baby Puke is offline  
Old 09-26-14, 05:49 PM
  #28  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Baby Puke
Sounds like it's in the key of C and just one octave, Carleton.
Got it. Thanks!!
carleton is offline  
Old 09-27-14, 07:37 PM
  #29  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
Exactly what is a rider allowed to have and not allowed to have on the bike, on the body, and in the jersey?

Have you considered wifi instead of Bluetooth? Range is better.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-27-14, 10:24 PM
  #30  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Exactly what is a rider allowed to have and not allowed to have on the bike, on the body, and in the jersey?

Have you considered wifi instead of Bluetooth? Range is better.
In most (if not all) local races, computer head units (and iPhones mounted properly as head units) are allowed. Only in official big USA Cycling and UCI events are head units not allowed. They can be installed on the bike, but in a manner where the rider cannot read the screens. Some people mount under the seat or under the stem. Some put tape over the display.

I think my tool will be more for training than big USA Cycling or UCI events.

The coaches in the infield can use whatever they want.

WiFi is definitely an option for the transmitter. I just need to figure out what will be transmitted and how to parse it
carleton is offline  
Old 09-28-14, 08:14 AM
  #31  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
Right. A racer's GPS fell off her bike during a race, which is, of course, a faux pas. One of the officials said, "No Garmins," and I wasn't sure if he meant no devices on the handlebar or no devices at all. From then on, I hid mine in my jersey pocket, which seems safer than mounting it on my seat post.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-28-14, 11:29 AM
  #32  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Right. A racer's GPS fell off her bike during a race, which is, of course, a faux pas. One of the officials said, "No Garmins," and I wasn't sure if he meant no devices on the handlebar or no devices at all. From then on, I hid mine in my jersey pocket, which seems safer than mounting it on my seat post.
A better response would have been to have the riders make sure everything is secure on their bikes.

The jersey pocket isn't a good solution. I don't think people should have anything in their jersey pockets. I've seen cellphones, water bottles, and car keys hop out of jersey pockets.

The reason why the UCI bans computers is because people will use them as a pacing device (remember, they want us all to be Eddy Merckx). USA Cycling follows UCI's lead. If you want any record set at a USA Cycling event (elite, jr, collegiate, masters nationals) to be recognized by the UCI, you have to follow UCI rules.
carleton is offline  
Old 09-28-14, 11:57 AM
  #33  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
All true!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-28-14, 12:15 PM
  #34  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
UPDATE:

I'm working on having options for:
- Nominal Imperial (gear inches of development, i.e. 50t/15t = 90"
- Ratio (50t/15t = 3.3)
- Metric (gear meters of developemnt)

In the US, rider in the infield will use the following to calculate "gear inches"

50t/15t = 27*50/15 = 90.0

What value (instead of "27" above) do the Euro riders use to calculate gear meters?
carleton is offline  
Old 09-28-14, 01:49 PM
  #35  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
The English/American way of calculating gears should not be called development because it refers to effective diameter, not movement.

With that said, I think having the three options is a good idea. I don't know what factor they use for diameter to convert to development. It might be something close to 26.5 inches since racing tires are pretty small.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-28-14, 02:00 PM
  #36  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
The English/American way of calculating gears should not be called development because it refers to effective diameter, not movement.

With that said, I think having the three options is a good idea. I don't know what factor they use for diameter to convert to development. It might be something close to 26.5 inches since racing tires are pretty small.
Yeah, unfortunately (as I'm sure you know) how we calculate gears in the US is using "27 inches" which is left over when when wheels were actually 27 inches. The reason it still works is that the values are relative to each other. Which brings us to the "Actual Gear Inches vs Nominal Gear Inches" debate. I have never met a trackie that uses actual gear inches when they speak or in their personal calculations. Everyone still uses inches (using 27), ratio, or meters.

But, I could be wrong (as I often am).
carleton is offline  
Old 09-29-14, 03:28 AM
  #37  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
UPDATE:

I'm working on having options for:
- Nominal Imperial (gear inches of development, i.e. 50t/15t = 90"
- Ratio (50t/15t = 3.3)
- Metric (gear meters of developemnt)

In the US, rider in the infield will use the following to calculate "gear inches"

50t/15t = 27*50/15 = 90.0

What value (instead of "27" above) do the Euro riders use to calculate gear meters?
So, from reading a bunch if websites, it seems that those who calculate "gear meters" use the constant of 2.1 in their calculations.

50t/15t = 2.1*50/15 = 7.0 gear-meters is the same as 50t/15t = 27*50/15 = 90.0 gear-inches

I know it's not perfect, but it's a relative measure that we use when communication amongst each other.

Can anyone confirm that the "rule of thumb" constant for calculating gear-meters is 2.1? If no one corrects me, 2.1 is goin' in the app
carleton is offline  
Old 09-29-14, 07:16 AM
  #38  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
I say go with it. You can always change it later or even make it user-configurable.

My point was about grammar. You should not use the word development when expressing effective diameter. Europeans use development; Brits and Americans use diameter. There is a direct (times pi) relationship, but they are different.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-29-14, 11:15 AM
  #39  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
I say go with it. You can always change it later or even make it user-configurable.

My point was about grammar. You should not use the word development when expressing effective diameter. Europeans use development; Brits and Americans use diameter. There is a direct (times pi) relationship, but they are different.
Ah. I see what you mean.
carleton is offline  
Old 10-02-14, 12:41 PM
  #40  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
I'm sooo close to finishing....
carleton is offline  
Old 10-02-14, 04:29 PM
  #41  
Baby Puke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kanazawa
Posts: 1,700

Bikes: Marin Stelvio, Pogliaghi SL, Panasonic NJS, Dolan DF4, Intense Pro24 BMX

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 87 Times in 58 Posts
Japanese riders just use the ratio to communicate gear size.
Baby Puke is offline  
Old 10-02-14, 05:49 PM
  #42  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Baby Puke
Japanese riders just use the ratio to communicate gear size.
I got that covered

I'm testing it all right now.
carleton is offline  
Old 10-08-14, 06:54 PM
  #43  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
So I made not only 1, but 2 apps

Due to forum rules, I'm putting the information about the apps in the Marketplace forum. But we can continue to discuss them here.

Thanks so much for everyone's suggestions and feedback! Keep it coming.

https://www.bikeforums.net/sale/97588...-training.html

(I feel like deserve a cookie. I'm going to get some cookies right now.)
carleton is offline  
Old 10-09-14, 09:14 AM
  #44  
Quinn8it
Senior Member
 
Quinn8it's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 956

Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi Vigorelli

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Got them both last night! Looks awesome Carleton!

Including your road drive-train in the gear inventory was a cool touch!!
Quinn8it is offline  
Old 10-09-14, 09:29 AM
  #45  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Quinn8it
Got them both last night! Looks awesome Carleton!

Including your road drive-train in the gear inventory was a cool touch!!
Thanks! The road drive-train was Dancel's idea
carleton is offline  
Old 10-11-14, 12:06 AM
  #46  
Bulldogsprinter
Senior Member
 
Bulldogsprinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I like it, but you could add some bigger chainrings. I run a 57
Bulldogsprinter is offline  
Old 10-11-14, 12:47 AM
  #47  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Bulldogsprinter
I like it, but you could add some bigger chainrings. I run a 57
Really? Road or track?

If you are serious, I will. I've never seen a 57t.
carleton is offline  
Old 10-11-14, 05:44 AM
  #48  
Bulldogsprinter
Senior Member
 
Bulldogsprinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Track, use it for flying 200s 57x15 and 57x14 are actually quite usefull, also theoretically gives you less drivetrain friction. Just last week in windy conditions and sub 10 degree weather, I was able to do sub 12 second 200s.
I do think you need to go custom to get 57s or bigger, mine are Gebhardt, but I think Yobi from Hungary might be able to do some special order CNC track rings.

Last edited by Bulldogsprinter; 10-11-14 at 05:52 AM. Reason: Added info
Bulldogsprinter is offline  
Old 10-11-14, 12:29 PM
  #49  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Bulldogsprinter
Track, use it for flying 200s 57x15 and 57x14 are actually quite usefull, also theoretically gives you less drivetrain friction. Just last week in windy conditions and sub 10 degree weather, I was able to do sub 12 second 200s.
I do think you need to go custom to get 57s or bigger, mine are Gebhardt, but I think Yobi from Hungary might be able to do some special order CNC track rings.
OK. I'll add track chainrings up to 57t for the next update
carleton is offline  
Old 10-11-14, 01:47 PM
  #50  
Hida Yanra
VeloSIRraptor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Deschutes
Posts: 4,585
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
OK. I'll add track chainrings up to 57t for the next update
woooofff, that's pretty good sized- I've seen plenty of track frames in Small and Medium sizes that absolutely wouldn't fit a 57t.
Hida Yanra is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.