Columbus SLX
#1
Le Crocodile
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 367 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times
in
311 Posts
Columbus SLX
I have been riding my 1990 Serotta (56x55.5) and it has the SLX tubeset.
The geometry isn't really any "tighter" than my SL bikes, but I swear it has a pretty harsh (really stiff) feel. Granted it's geometry/tires/wheels/saddle etc. but it's the first lugged steel bike that has felt this way besides my steel track bikes. It's really noticeable.
I could have sworn that the word on the street of yesteryear was that SLX was for lighter riders, SL the standard, and SP for the big guys.
Anyway, the helical internal ribs on the SLX were designed for what end again?
The geometry isn't really any "tighter" than my SL bikes, but I swear it has a pretty harsh (really stiff) feel. Granted it's geometry/tires/wheels/saddle etc. but it's the first lugged steel bike that has felt this way besides my steel track bikes. It's really noticeable.
I could have sworn that the word on the street of yesteryear was that SLX was for lighter riders, SL the standard, and SP for the big guys.
Anyway, the helical internal ribs on the SLX were designed for what end again?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 2,011
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 3,397 Times
in
983 Posts
Your answer is here: https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...ise-steel.html
Check page 112 in the Butting section.
Check page 112 in the Butting section.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times
in
2,066 Posts
I like bikes that can take a 28 c or a 32c tire. In terms of whether a bike rides “harsh” or not, I think tires matter more than the tubing.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,758
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3192 Post(s)
Liked 2,461 Times
in
1,490 Posts
I have been riding my 1990 Serotta (56x55.5) and it has the SLX tubeset.
The geometry isn't really any "tighter" than my SL bikes, but I swear it has a pretty harsh (really stiff) feel. Granted it's geometry/tires/wheels/saddle etc. but it's the first lugged steel bike that has felt this way besides my steel track bikes. It's really noticeable.
I could have sworn that the word on the street of yesteryear was that SLX was for lighter riders, SL the standard, and SP for the big guys.
Anyway, the helical internal ribs on the SLX were designed for what end again?
The geometry isn't really any "tighter" than my SL bikes, but I swear it has a pretty harsh (really stiff) feel. Granted it's geometry/tires/wheels/saddle etc. but it's the first lugged steel bike that has felt this way besides my steel track bikes. It's really noticeable.
I could have sworn that the word on the street of yesteryear was that SLX was for lighter riders, SL the standard, and SP for the big guys.
Anyway, the helical internal ribs on the SLX were designed for what end again?
#6
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,625
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1008 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,030 Posts
I have been riding my 1990 Serotta (56x55.5) and it has the SLX tubeset.
The geometry isn't really any "tighter" than my SL bikes, but I swear it has a pretty harsh (really stiff) feel. Granted it's geometry/tires/wheels/saddle etc. but it's the first lugged steel bike that has felt this way besides my steel track bikes. It's really noticeable.
I could have sworn that the word on the street of yesteryear was that SLX was for lighter riders, SL the standard, and SP for the big guys.
Anyway, the helical internal ribs on the SLX were designed for what end again?
The geometry isn't really any "tighter" than my SL bikes, but I swear it has a pretty harsh (really stiff) feel. Granted it's geometry/tires/wheels/saddle etc. but it's the first lugged steel bike that has felt this way besides my steel track bikes. It's really noticeable.
I could have sworn that the word on the street of yesteryear was that SLX was for lighter riders, SL the standard, and SP for the big guys.
Anyway, the helical internal ribs on the SLX were designed for what end again?
If you have a Columbus -tubed frame from the 1960s up to some point in the 1970s, the sticker just says "Columbus," but it could have been the thinner/standard walled tubes (what came to be known as SL) or the thicker walled tubes (what came to be known as SP), depending on the builder's preferences for the particular frame.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
Likes For bikingshearer:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,323
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times
in
1,974 Posts
SL tubed bikes with the early stamped front derailleur braze on mount, flexed a bunch. As a mechanic, I did not like it.
Soon enough, SLX assisted it taming the distortion.
And then the mounts evolved into investment cast, the attachment wrapping around the tube more.
Problem addressed.
Soon enough, SLX assisted it taming the distortion.
And then the mounts evolved into investment cast, the attachment wrapping around the tube more.
Problem addressed.
#8
Le Crocodile
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 367 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times
in
311 Posts
Definitely a different lugged steel ride. I didn't have any preconceived notions with this frame, so the stiff and "dead" feel is an honest opinion. It rides very fast, and I am having a good time riding it, but boy, it has some unique qualities. I should track down the specified geometry.
My SOMEC in SL (56.5x54) with the ridiculously short wheelbase is less stiff by quite a bit.
Evidently Columbus actually had something going with the SLX/SPX tubesets besides a marketing gimmick.
#9
framebuilder
It is possible that your down tube (and maybe even the seat tube and top tube) were SPX instead of SLX. SL wasn't all that stiff although both the down and top tube were .9/.6/.9. It isn't uncommon to have a slightly lighter top tube with other brands. A SLX frame alone (no fork) would weigh around 1900 grams + - (I'm going on memory) while SPX would be 2100 or 2200? That is one way to tell. A tubing sticker on the frame isn't always perfectly accurate.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,553
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 2,913 Times
in
1,781 Posts
It was my understanding that SLX "rifling" should help with BB flex (in theory anyway), but, since it didn't extend up the whole tube and wasn't found in all tubes, probably wouldn't make the ride feel more "harsh" by itself. I'm sure that others with more experience will explain why my understanding is completely incorrect.
#11
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,335
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 2,353 Times
in
882 Posts
What do you weigh? I'm 6' 2" 205 lbs. and SLX feels "springy" to me (in a good way!) - 57cm frame/700x23 tires/Illinois roads
#12
Le Crocodile
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 367 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times
in
311 Posts
I'm 191, and running Vittoria Corsa 700x25 @ 90 PSI like just about all my other vintage bikes. My 531 Paramount for example is night and day different with the same tires.
Likes For Erzulis Boat:
#13
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,852
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2151 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times
in
1,198 Posts
Pure opinion: for the most part, high end frames are made/assembled by humans, which means that each one is somewhat different. For example, have owned more than a dozen Merckx frames and only two of them really ‘spoke’ to me. Kept one and really regret selling the other. Same deal with other brands and models, just bought & sold one after the other until coming upon the right one that had a great ride for ME…which may not have the same ride qualities for YOU.
Truly mass produced frames are more consistent. For example, have owned at least a dozen 87 Schwinn Tempo’s over the years and each one has been very, very good. Good enought that someone always came along and offered to buy the one I had, and good enough that eventually I’d buy another one. Not high end, Columbus seamed tubing, but they just work really well. So, there’s that.
Truly mass produced frames are more consistent. For example, have owned at least a dozen 87 Schwinn Tempo’s over the years and each one has been very, very good. Good enought that someone always came along and offered to buy the one I had, and good enough that eventually I’d buy another one. Not high end, Columbus seamed tubing, but they just work really well. So, there’s that.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,652
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 560 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times
in
396 Posts
At my age there is little danger of seriously flexing a BB, but I must be insensitive as I have two Tommasini super prestige from the early '80s a SL and SLX and a '81 Pinarello Montello from the Levi Team SLX and had until recently a Pinarello Montello SL early 80's. While not perfectly similar builds I perceived no difference in frames, least of all the 1 oz+ difference in weight. As a keeper test I do run all bikes down a serious decline near the house at much higher speeds than I am happy with and hit some mild undulation near the bottom before a relatively sharp turn.
#15
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 469
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 236 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times
in
104 Posts
SL tubed bikes with the early stamped front derailleur braze on mount, flexed a bunch. As a mechanic, I did not like it.
Soon enough, SLX assisted it taming the distortion.
And then the mounts evolved into investment cast, the attachment wrapping around the tube more.
Problem addressed.
Soon enough, SLX assisted it taming the distortion.
And then the mounts evolved into investment cast, the attachment wrapping around the tube more.
Problem addressed.
#16
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 469
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 236 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times
in
104 Posts
Despite the sticker on the tube, you really don't know what the tubes are, do you? Especially the rear triangle. A sticker is just a sticker. You're really relying on the frame builder's integrity to ensure that the tubes are what the sticker represents. Sadly, Serotta didn't have as much integrity as I would have wished. As a former Serotta owner, I know.
#17
Le Crocodile
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 367 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times
in
311 Posts
From my limited experience, the workmanship on the Serotta frame that I have was virtually flawless. The brazing and the mitering were second to none. I stripped the frame to bare metal to paint, so I really got to see everything. In comparison, the many (6+) Italian frames that I have stripped have always had cosmetic/brazing/alignment flaws.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,323
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times
in
1,974 Posts