Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Columbus SLX

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Columbus SLX

Old 07-12-21, 08:48 AM
  #1  
Erzulis Boat 
Le Crocodile
Thread Starter
 
Erzulis Boat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 367 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times in 311 Posts
Columbus SLX

I have been riding my 1990 Serotta (56x55.5) and it has the SLX tubeset.

The geometry isn't really any "tighter" than my SL bikes, but I swear it has a pretty harsh (really stiff) feel. Granted it's geometry/tires/wheels/saddle etc. but it's the first lugged steel bike that has felt this way besides my steel track bikes. It's really noticeable.

I could have sworn that the word on the street of yesteryear was that SLX was for lighter riders, SL the standard, and SP for the big guys.

Anyway, the helical internal ribs on the SLX were designed for what end again?
Erzulis Boat is offline  
Old 07-12-21, 08:54 AM
  #2  
SpeedofLite 
Senior Member
 
SpeedofLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 2,011

Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 3,397 Times in 983 Posts
Your answer is here: https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...ise-steel.html
Check page 112 in the Butting section.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.














SpeedofLite is offline  
Old 07-12-21, 09:17 AM
  #3  
Flatforkcrown
Full Member
 
Flatforkcrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Barboursville, Va
Posts: 289

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times in 159 Posts
It’s likely not the tubing. I have a SLX De Rosa and it’s not harsh riding at all.
Flatforkcrown is offline  
Old 07-12-21, 09:22 AM
  #4  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times in 2,066 Posts
I like bikes that can take a 28 c or a 32c tire. In terms of whether a bike rides “harsh” or not, I think tires matter more than the tubing.
bikemig is offline  
Likes For bikemig:
Old 07-12-21, 09:33 AM
  #5  
seypat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,758
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3192 Post(s)
Liked 2,461 Times in 1,490 Posts
Originally Posted by Erzulis Boat
I have been riding my 1990 Serotta (56x55.5) and it has the SLX tubeset.

The geometry isn't really any "tighter" than my SL bikes, but I swear it has a pretty harsh (really stiff) feel. Granted it's geometry/tires/wheels/saddle etc. but it's the first lugged steel bike that has felt this way besides my steel track bikes. It's really noticeable.

I could have sworn that the word on the street of yesteryear was that SLX was for lighter riders, SL the standard, and SP for the big guys.

Anyway, the helical internal ribs on the SLX were designed for what end again?
I think it was for light riders because the really thin tubing might not hold up to a bigger/heavier rider. I don't know if that's the case.
seypat is offline  
Old 07-12-21, 09:37 AM
  #6  
bikingshearer 
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
 
bikingshearer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,625

Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1008 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,030 Posts
Originally Posted by Erzulis Boat
I have been riding my 1990 Serotta (56x55.5) and it has the SLX tubeset.

The geometry isn't really any "tighter" than my SL bikes, but I swear it has a pretty harsh (really stiff) feel. Granted it's geometry/tires/wheels/saddle etc. but it's the first lugged steel bike that has felt this way besides my steel track bikes. It's really noticeable.

I could have sworn that the word on the street of yesteryear was that
SLX was for lighter riders, SL the standard, and SP for the big guys.

Anyway, the helical internal ribs on the SLX were designed for what end again?
SL, SP, SLX and SPX are all the same steel, or at least they were into the 1980s, maybe later. SLX is SL with added helical ribs at tube ends for added stiffness at the joints. SP is SL with thicker tube walls. SPX is SP plus the ribs. An SLX tubeset is heavier than an SL tubeset, an SPX set is heavier than an SP set.

If you have a Columbus -tubed frame from the 1960s up to some point in the 1970s, the sticker just says "Columbus," but it could have been the thinner/standard walled tubes (what came to be known as SL) or the thicker walled tubes (what came to be known as SP), depending on the builder's preferences for the particular frame.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
bikingshearer is offline  
Likes For bikingshearer:
Old 07-12-21, 09:48 AM
  #7  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,323
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times in 1,974 Posts
SL tubed bikes with the early stamped front derailleur braze on mount, flexed a bunch. As a mechanic, I did not like it.
Soon enough, SLX assisted it taming the distortion.
And then the mounts evolved into investment cast, the attachment wrapping around the tube more.
Problem addressed.
repechage is offline  
Old 07-12-21, 10:27 AM
  #8  
Erzulis Boat 
Le Crocodile
Thread Starter
 
Erzulis Boat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 367 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times in 311 Posts


Definitely a different lugged steel ride. I didn't have any preconceived notions with this frame, so the stiff and "dead" feel is an honest opinion. It rides very fast, and I am having a good time riding it, but boy, it has some unique qualities. I should track down the specified geometry.

My SOMEC in SL (56.5x54) with the ridiculously short wheelbase is less stiff by quite a bit.

Evidently Columbus actually had something going with the SLX/SPX tubesets besides a marketing gimmick.
Erzulis Boat is offline  
Old 07-12-21, 10:32 AM
  #9  
Doug Fattic 
framebuilder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Niles, Michigan
Posts: 1,459
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 610 Post(s)
Liked 1,905 Times in 647 Posts
It is possible that your down tube (and maybe even the seat tube and top tube) were SPX instead of SLX. SL wasn't all that stiff although both the down and top tube were .9/.6/.9. It isn't uncommon to have a slightly lighter top tube with other brands. A SLX frame alone (no fork) would weigh around 1900 grams + - (I'm going on memory) while SPX would be 2100 or 2200? That is one way to tell. A tubing sticker on the frame isn't always perfectly accurate.
Doug Fattic is offline  
Old 07-12-21, 10:36 AM
  #10  
himespau 
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,553
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 2,913 Times in 1,781 Posts
It was my understanding that SLX "rifling" should help with BB flex (in theory anyway), but, since it didn't extend up the whole tube and wasn't found in all tubes, probably wouldn't make the ride feel more "harsh" by itself. I'm sure that others with more experience will explain why my understanding is completely incorrect.
himespau is offline  
Old 07-12-21, 11:02 AM
  #11  
thinktubes 
weapons-grade bolognium
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,335

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 2,353 Times in 882 Posts
What do you weigh? I'm 6' 2" 205 lbs. and SLX feels "springy" to me (in a good way!) - 57cm frame/700x23 tires/Illinois roads
thinktubes is offline  
Old 07-12-21, 12:00 PM
  #12  
Erzulis Boat 
Le Crocodile
Thread Starter
 
Erzulis Boat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 367 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times in 311 Posts
Originally Posted by thinktubes
What do you weigh? I'm 6' 2" 205 lbs. and SLX feels "springy" to me (in a good way!) - 57cm frame/700x23 tires/Illinois roads
I'm 191, and running Vittoria Corsa 700x25 @ 90 PSI like just about all my other vintage bikes. My 531 Paramount for example is night and day different with the same tires.
Erzulis Boat is offline  
Likes For Erzulis Boat:
Old 07-12-21, 12:23 PM
  #13  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,852
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2151 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times in 1,198 Posts
Pure opinion: for the most part, high end frames are made/assembled by humans, which means that each one is somewhat different. For example, have owned more than a dozen Merckx frames and only two of them really ‘spoke’ to me. Kept one and really regret selling the other. Same deal with other brands and models, just bought & sold one after the other until coming upon the right one that had a great ride for ME…which may not have the same ride qualities for YOU.

Truly mass produced frames are more consistent. For example, have owned at least a dozen 87 Schwinn Tempo’s over the years and each one has been very, very good. Good enought that someone always came along and offered to buy the one I had, and good enough that eventually I’d buy another one. Not high end, Columbus seamed tubing, but they just work really well. So, there’s that.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is offline  
Old 07-13-21, 06:26 AM
  #14  
easyupbug 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,652

Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 560 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times in 396 Posts
At my age there is little danger of seriously flexing a BB, but I must be insensitive as I have two Tommasini super prestige from the early '80s a SL and SLX and a '81 Pinarello Montello from the Levi Team SLX and had until recently a Pinarello Montello SL early 80's. While not perfectly similar builds I perceived no difference in frames, least of all the 1 oz+ difference in weight. As a keeper test I do run all bikes down a serious decline near the house at much higher speeds than I am happy with and hit some mild undulation near the bottom before a relatively sharp turn.
easyupbug is offline  
Old 07-13-21, 01:04 PM
  #15  
tendency 
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 469
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 236 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times in 104 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
SL tubed bikes with the early stamped front derailleur braze on mount, flexed a bunch. As a mechanic, I did not like it.
Soon enough, SLX assisted it taming the distortion.
And then the mounts evolved into investment cast, the attachment wrapping around the tube more.
Problem addressed.
Investment cast lugs improved the frame stiffness compared to stamped?
tendency is offline  
Old 07-13-21, 01:07 PM
  #16  
tendency 
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 469
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 236 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times in 104 Posts
Originally Posted by onyerleft
Despite the sticker on the tube, you really don't know what the tubes are, do you? Especially the rear triangle. A sticker is just a sticker. You're really relying on the frame builder's integrity to ensure that the tubes are what the sticker represents. Sadly, Serotta didn't have as much integrity as I would have wished. As a former Serotta owner, I know.
yikes! that's surprising I always held Serotta frames in fairly high regard.
tendency is offline  
Old 07-13-21, 02:02 PM
  #17  
Erzulis Boat 
Le Crocodile
Thread Starter
 
Erzulis Boat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 367 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times in 311 Posts
Originally Posted by tendency
yikes! that's surprising I always held Serotta frames in fairly high regard.
From my limited experience, the workmanship on the Serotta frame that I have was virtually flawless. The brazing and the mitering were second to none. I stripped the frame to bare metal to paint, so I really got to see everything. In comparison, the many (6+) Italian frames that I have stripped have always had cosmetic/brazing/alignment flaws.
Erzulis Boat is offline  
Old 07-13-21, 04:05 PM
  #18  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,323
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times in 1,974 Posts
Originally Posted by tendency
Investment cast lugs improved the frame stiffness compared to stamped?
Too many variables. A better Chance that investment cast lugs will result in no voids, but even investment cast lugs are tweaked from time to time.
Then what?
builder skill.
repechage is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.