Road bike carbon fork: tapered or not
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Road bike carbon fork: tapered or not
Grateful if somebody can explain me:
What are the advantages of tapered 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼ inch carbon fork over non tapered 1 ⅛ for road bike? I saw that tapered is usually more expensive.
Can I use (adapt) 1 ⅛ fork instead of 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼ tapered? How can I do this and what would be the disadvantages (if any)?
Thanks
What are the advantages of tapered 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼ inch carbon fork over non tapered 1 ⅛ for road bike? I saw that tapered is usually more expensive.
Can I use (adapt) 1 ⅛ fork instead of 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼ tapered? How can I do this and what would be the disadvantages (if any)?
Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2025 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,086 Times
in
734 Posts
The theoretical advantage is the tapered fork is a bit more rigid. The real advantage for a road bike is about zero.
What is your current fork and headset? If the fork is 1-1/8 - 1/1/4 and so is your headset, using a 1-1/8" straight steerer fork will require a new 1-1/8" lower headset cup and crown race. Cane Creek sells individual lower cups/bearings and crown races. You will have to match the frame's headtube ID and headset type.
What is your current fork and headset? If the fork is 1-1/8 - 1/1/4 and so is your headset, using a 1-1/8" straight steerer fork will require a new 1-1/8" lower headset cup and crown race. Cane Creek sells individual lower cups/bearings and crown races. You will have to match the frame's headtube ID and headset type.
Likes For HillRider:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks.
Actual fork is 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼. Is it possible just to use some sort of adaptor to increase from a new 1 ⅛ to the old 1 ¼ diameter and use the original headset, incl. bearings?
Headset cup is integrated.
Actual fork is 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼. Is it possible just to use some sort of adaptor to increase from a new 1 ⅛ to the old 1 ¼ diameter and use the original headset, incl. bearings?
Headset cup is integrated.
Last edited by Redbullet; 01-25-23 at 12:32 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2025 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,086 Times
in
734 Posts
What type of headset do you now have; press-in cups, zero stack, integrated? What is your frame's headtube ID? What you need to convert it will depend on the type.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The cups are integrated - part of the carbon frame: 1 ⅛ inch at top, 1 ¼ at bottom above the fork blades. I can't change those, as they are parts of the carbon frame. The headset if FSA, with 2 different diameter bearings, to fit the integrated cups.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,547
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3416 Post(s)
Liked 811 Times
in
539 Posts
There might be some sort of adapter race that could be put between the bearing and the fork, but probably not. And the replacement fork would probably need to not have a bevel for the bearing but be the square type that can accept a race.
I hope you're asking because you have limited cash and a free fork. If not, get something 1 1/4. There is no good reason to change this, and the 1 1/8" fork crown might look stupid with the 1 1/4" head tube.
I hope you're asking because you have limited cash and a free fork. If not, get something 1 1/4. There is no good reason to change this, and the 1 1/8" fork crown might look stupid with the 1 1/4" head tube.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Simple 1 ¼ (straight) would not work, because the upper cup is 1 ⅛, integrated as well.
#8
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 42,738
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11257 Post(s)
Liked 6,208 Times
in
3,253 Posts
Thanks. I am asking because tapered looks to me too expensive for (probably) no benefit. For example, I can find Columbus 1 1/8 for around 250 EUR. But for tapered 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼ I can only find Enve at 470 EUR. Almost double.
Simple 1 ¼ (straight) would not work, because the upper cup is 1 ⅛, integrated as well.
Simple 1 ¼ (straight) would not work, because the upper cup is 1 ⅛, integrated as well.
https://www.chainreactioncycles.com/.../rp-prod181893
Wait, you say you need 1-1/4" at the bottom? Hmmm...
Are you going to use QR or Thru axle front wheel? Rim or disc brake?
If QR rim brake, I'm not familiar with this brand, so not sure I'd go this route, but
https://www.ebay.com/itm/294189577855
Last edited by LesterOfPuppets; 01-26-23 at 03:54 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
If QR rim brake, I'm not familiar with this brand, so not sure I'd go this route, but
https://www.ebay.com/itm/294189577855
Yes, rim brake and QR. I don't know that brand and I am not very happy to buy from Ebay (you don't know what you really receive, and a fork is a very important component). But I shall look in more detail to that.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,398
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1878 Post(s)
Liked 2,129 Times
in
1,200 Posts
Grateful if somebody can explain me:
What are the advantages of tapered 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼ inch carbon fork over non tapered 1 ⅛ for road bike? I saw that tapered is usually more expensive.
Can I use (adapt) 1 ⅛ fork instead of 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼ tapered? How can I do this and what would be the disadvantages (if any)?
Thanks
What are the advantages of tapered 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼ inch carbon fork over non tapered 1 ⅛ for road bike? I saw that tapered is usually more expensive.
Can I use (adapt) 1 ⅛ fork instead of 1 ⅛ – 1 ¼ tapered? How can I do this and what would be the disadvantages (if any)?
Thanks
Why are you replacing the fork, by the way?
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The advantages of 1 1/4" at the bottom of the head tube are that (i) the strength of the fork/crown junction is increased (higher resistance to shearing forces) and (less crucially) (ii) vertical forces through the bearing surfaces are distributed over a greater area and among more bearings. The upper bearings usually undergo much lower stress and last much longer, so it makes sense to stick with the smaller-diameter 1 1/8" standard there.
Why are you replacing the fork, by the way?
Why are you replacing the fork, by the way?
I want to upgrade a secondhand bike that I used a few years on the smart trainer. I think that a minimum safety measure before using it on the road would be replacing the old fork. So, I try to keep investment at minimum. It looks that a straight 1 1/8 would be sufficient for the scope, but now I start to have doubts that it is technically possible.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,547
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3416 Post(s)
Liked 811 Times
in
539 Posts
Thanks.
I want to upgrade a secondhand bike that I used a few years on the smart trainer. I think that a minimum safety measure before using it on the road would be replacing the old fork. So, I try to keep investment at minimum. It looks that a straight 1 1/8 would be sufficient for the scope, but now I start to have doubts that it is technically possible.
I want to upgrade a secondhand bike that I used a few years on the smart trainer. I think that a minimum safety measure before using it on the road would be replacing the old fork. So, I try to keep investment at minimum. It looks that a straight 1 1/8 would be sufficient for the scope, but now I start to have doubts that it is technically possible.
Also, consider contacting the maker for a "crash replacement" price on the same fork.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Agree in principle. But being an old secondhand bike, I do not know what kind of abuse it took. Crash replacement would not work, since it is a secondhand bike with no purchase documents and unknown history... No problem for using years on trainer, but not safe on the road.
Last edited by Redbullet; 01-27-23 at 08:03 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,398
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1878 Post(s)
Liked 2,129 Times
in
1,200 Posts
Agree in principle. But being an old secondhand bike, I do not know what kind of abuse it took. Crash replacement would not work, since it is a secondhand bike with no purchase documents and unknown history... No problem for using years on trainer, but not safe on the road.
Likes For Trakhak:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,547
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3416 Post(s)
Liked 811 Times
in
539 Posts
Agree in principle. But being an old secondhand bike, I do not know what kind of abuse it took. Crash replacement would not work, since it is a secondhand bike with no purchase documents and unknown history... No problem for using years on trainer, but not safe on the road.
#16
Senior Member
Agree in principle. But being an old secondhand bike, I do not know what kind of abuse it took. Crash replacement would not work, since it is a secondhand bike with no purchase documents and unknown history... No problem for using years on trainer, but not safe on the road.
Likes For Jicafold: