Cyclone M-11 RD pulley replacement
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
Cyclone M-11 RD pulley replacement
Replacing the cracked pulleys on a Suntour Cyclone MK-II. Discovered that, of course, the minuscule tab that goes into the split bolt for the top pulley is missing...
Comparing to the rebuild photos from another thread, it seems a bushing/washer may also be missing from mine- where does the circled piece below go (this is the bit I don't seem to have...)?
And then there's this part- on my Cyclone this bushing doesn't have the little 'hook' in it- is this another bit that's missing? *There is a big plastic bushing here, just it's completely round and doesn't have this extra hook bit.
I only very briefly test rode the bike this RD was on when I bought it months ago, and it shifted OK. But in dismantling the mech right now the top pivot/pulley bolt was quite loose. Test fitting it back together (without the missing little tab- I'll have to grind something to put in there....), if that pivot/pulley nut is tightened, the cage binds and won't pivot. Does having the tab in there remedy this, or is there a bushing part that's missing and that's the problem?
(I did search for an exploded diagram of a Cyclone MK-II RD, but haven't found one.....)
Comparing to the rebuild photos from another thread, it seems a bushing/washer may also be missing from mine- where does the circled piece below go (this is the bit I don't seem to have...)?
And then there's this part- on my Cyclone this bushing doesn't have the little 'hook' in it- is this another bit that's missing? *There is a big plastic bushing here, just it's completely round and doesn't have this extra hook bit.
I only very briefly test rode the bike this RD was on when I bought it months ago, and it shifted OK. But in dismantling the mech right now the top pivot/pulley bolt was quite loose. Test fitting it back together (without the missing little tab- I'll have to grind something to put in there....), if that pivot/pulley nut is tightened, the cage binds and won't pivot. Does having the tab in there remedy this, or is there a bushing part that's missing and that's the problem?
(I did search for an exploded diagram of a Cyclone MK-II RD, but haven't found one.....)
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
Replacing the cracked pulleys on a Suntour Cyclone MK-II. Discovered that, of course, the minuscule tab that goes into the split bolt for the top pulley is missing...
Comparing to the rebuild photos from another thread, it seems a bushing/washer may also be missing from mine- where does the circled piece below go (this is the bit I don't seem to have...)?
Comparing to the rebuild photos from another thread, it seems a bushing/washer may also be missing from mine- where does the circled piece below go (this is the bit I don't seem to have...)?
It's just positioned so that the side that you usually see is facing down in the photo.
here's a shot of the assembled derailleur, just for the benefit of those not familiar with the derailleur...
This seals up the chamber where the spring is located.
I only very briefly test rode the bike this RD was on when I bought it months ago, and it shifted OK. But in dismantling the mech right now the top pivot/pulley bolt was quite loose. Test fitting it back together (without the missing little tab- I'll have to grind something to put in there....), if that pivot/pulley nut is tightened, the cage binds and won't pivot. Does having the tab in there remedy this, or is there a bushing part that's missing and that's the problem?
(I did search for an exploded diagram of a Cyclone MK-II RD, but haven't found one.....)
(I did search for an exploded diagram of a Cyclone MK-II RD, but haven't found one.....)
Steve in Peoria
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
steelbikeguy , Doh, of course the first bit is the nut for the pivot!
I wonder if maybe there were some slight design mods over the Cyclone MKII run and they didn't all have the extra 'hook' part to seal the spring.. Looking closer at mine it doesn't seem like another bushing could fit in the assembly. I'm wondering if maybe with the little tab in the slot the pivot nut will get tight without causing the pivot to bind.... Time to fire up the dremel and make a tab out of... something....
I wonder if maybe there were some slight design mods over the Cyclone MKII run and they didn't all have the extra 'hook' part to seal the spring.. Looking closer at mine it doesn't seem like another bushing could fit in the assembly. I'm wondering if maybe with the little tab in the slot the pivot nut will get tight without causing the pivot to bind.... Time to fire up the dremel and make a tab out of... something....
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
steelbikeguy , Doh, of course the first bit is the nut for the pivot!
I wonder if maybe there were some slight design mods over the Cyclone MKII run and they didn't all have the extra 'hook' part to seal the spring.. Looking closer at mine it doesn't seem like another bushing could fit in the assembly. I'm wondering if maybe with the little tab in the slot the pivot nut will get tight without causing the pivot to bind.... Time to fire up the dremel and make a tab out of... something....
I wonder if maybe there were some slight design mods over the Cyclone MKII run and they didn't all have the extra 'hook' part to seal the spring.. Looking closer at mine it doesn't seem like another bushing could fit in the assembly. I'm wondering if maybe with the little tab in the slot the pivot nut will get tight without causing the pivot to bind.... Time to fire up the dremel and make a tab out of... something....
There's a chance that someone has grabbed a bushing from another derailleur and it might not be compatible with yours. Did it bind before you took it apart?
Steve in Peoria
#5
Wheelman
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Putney, London UK
Posts: 845
Bikes: 1982 Holdsworth Avanti (531), 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 298 Post(s)
Liked 676 Times
in
341 Posts
You've probably seen it but here's the diagram:
I replaced the pulleys on mine a while back: used BBB RollerBoys sealed bearing pulleys, they work really well
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...-bdp-01-a.html
I replaced the pulleys on mine a while back: used BBB RollerBoys sealed bearing pulleys, they work really well
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...-bdp-01-a.html
Likes For Aardwolf:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
I hadn't seen that diagram- my searches kept coming up with 1st gen diagrams. Interesting that the bushing with the extra 'hook' bit to seal the pivot spring isn't labelled as a separate part in the diagram...
The pivot didn't bind up before I took it all apart, but I rode the bike it came on very little, and the pivot nut was pretty loose...
The pivot didn't bind up before I took it all apart, but I rode the bike it came on very little, and the pivot nut was pretty loose...
#7
Wheelman
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Putney, London UK
Posts: 845
Bikes: 1982 Holdsworth Avanti (531), 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 298 Post(s)
Liked 676 Times
in
341 Posts
The diagram is from Disraeli Gears website: https://www.disraeligears.co.uk/site/home.html
In particular the 1983 SunTour small parts catalogue: https://www.disraeligears.co.uk/site...og_-_1983.html
In particular the 1983 SunTour small parts catalogue: https://www.disraeligears.co.uk/site...og_-_1983.html
Likes For Aardwolf:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Near Pottstown, PA: 30 miles NW of Philadelphia
Posts: 2,186
Bikes: 2 Trek Mtn, Cannondale R600 road, 6 vintage road bikes
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Liked 1,028 Times
in
404 Posts
I have a MKII on my Fuji TS III which works beautifully. It did not come to me with the “spring retainer” - part 18 in the above diagram. I could not figure out what it was for, as if the center tab of the spring will climb up out of the slot in the pivot shaft and sneak out through the hole in the tension nut - part 15. After I cleaned and reassembled the derailleur, I closed the hole in the tension nut with a rubber plug, to keep dirt out of the RD, then put it all to work. I still wonder how important that part 18 retainer is. Open to suggestions.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
I have a MKII on my Fuji TS III which works beautifully. It did not come to me with the “spring retainer” - part 18 in the above diagram. I could not figure out what it was for, as if the center tab of the spring will climb up out of the slot in the pivot shaft and sneak out through the hole in the tension nut - part 15. After I cleaned and reassembled the derailleur, I closed the hole in the tension nut with a rubber plug, to keep dirt out of the RD, then put it all to work. I still wonder how important that part 18 retainer is. Open to suggestions.
Likes For ehcoplex:
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
For posterity/completeness sake, here's the parts diagram of the specific Cyclone in question (the earlier parts scan was for medium or short-cage...
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
In perusing the parts catalogs on Disraeli, the only thing I can find with a spring bushing that doesn't have the little hook bit is the Superbe Pro. Interestingly, it looks like that RD has the same spring setup, just doesn't have the hook bit to 'seal' it.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
But while we're on it...... does anyone know for certain what the purpose of that little tab actually is? Yeah, it says 'spring retainer tab', but it's really hard to see how it actually retains the spring!
*unless maybe the shape of it, with the tiny, tiny little 'wings' at the bottom allows the nut to tighten down without binding the pivot action......
*unless maybe the shape of it, with the tiny, tiny little 'wings' at the bottom allows the nut to tighten down without binding the pivot action......
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
But while we're on it...... does anyone know for certain what the purpose of that little tab actually is? Yeah, it says 'spring retainer tab', but it's really hard to see how it actually retains the spring!
*unless maybe the shape of it, with the tiny, tiny little 'wings' at the bottom allows the nut to tighten down without binding the pivot action......
*unless maybe the shape of it, with the tiny, tiny little 'wings' at the bottom allows the nut to tighten down without binding the pivot action......
It does seem like the nut should be adequate to keep the spring in place, I won't rule out that the end of the spring might creep towards the end of that shaft and cause some odd problem with the spring.
After spending a career in engineering, I've seen various cases where fixes were made to prevent a weird thing from happening. It's made me reluctant to just look at a design and say "I don't know why that part is there, so I'll just remove it". At the same time, I've seen people using a design that didn't understand it, and totally fail to adjust values of some parts to suit how they were using it.
In summary, don't bet against the designer's choice, especially when it's been validated by being in production for years.
It is good to see the exploded parts diagram, just to clearly indicate how that part should be oriented.
Steve in Peoria
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
I was rather shocked when the parts list didn't identify #17 as "weird doo-hickey".
It does seem like the nut should be adequate to keep the spring in place, I won't rule out that the end of the spring might creep towards the end of that shaft and cause some odd problem with the spring.
After spending a career in engineering, I've seen various cases where fixes were made to prevent a weird thing from happening. It's made me reluctant to just look at a design and say "I don't know why that part is there, so I'll just remove it". At the same time, I've seen people using a design that didn't understand it, and totally fail to adjust values of some parts to suit how they were using it.
In summary, don't bet against the designer's choice, especially when it's been validated by being in production for years.
It is good to see the exploded parts diagram, just to clearly indicate how that part should be oriented.
Steve in Peoria
It does seem like the nut should be adequate to keep the spring in place, I won't rule out that the end of the spring might creep towards the end of that shaft and cause some odd problem with the spring.
After spending a career in engineering, I've seen various cases where fixes were made to prevent a weird thing from happening. It's made me reluctant to just look at a design and say "I don't know why that part is there, so I'll just remove it". At the same time, I've seen people using a design that didn't understand it, and totally fail to adjust values of some parts to suit how they were using it.
In summary, don't bet against the designer's choice, especially when it's been validated by being in production for years.
It is good to see the exploded parts diagram, just to clearly indicate how that part should be oriented.
Steve in Peoria
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
I'm not sure what sets the proper spacing of the nut. My guess is that it is the shim, which seems to be SunTour's solution to a lot of these sorts of problems. The downside is that a previous owner may have lost or damaged the proper shims, and now you've got to try to improvise. Might be another reason to buy a beat-up derailleur for parts.
Steve in Peoria
(more than a few Cyclones in the parts box)
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
[QUOTE=steelbikeguy;22656525]I would suggest picking up a really beat up Cyclone Mk II on ebay and getting the part from it. [/QUOTE
Though I wonder what the odds of a beat-up RD from eBay actually still having that minuscule bit are!
Though I wonder what the odds of a beat-up RD from eBay actually still having that minuscule bit are!
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
[QUOTE=ehcoplex;22656571]
I suspect that you should be able to tell from the photos whether or not the piece is there.
In my photos below, it seems easily discernible.
Steve in Peoria
In my photos below, it seems easily discernible.
Steve in Peoria
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
[QUOTE=steelbikeguy;22656611]In theory, yeah, but a perusal of the offerings on eBay indicates it's really difficult to tell in most photos (or most of them are actually missing the tab!)..
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
I have a MKII on my Fuji TS III which works beautifully. It did not come to me with the “spring retainer” - part 18 in the above diagram. I could not figure out what it was for, as if the center tab of the spring will climb up out of the slot in the pivot shaft and sneak out through the hole in the tension nut - part 15. After I cleaned and reassembled the derailleur, I closed the hole in the tension nut with a rubber plug, to keep dirt out of the RD, then put it all to work. I still wonder how important that part 18 retainer is. Open to suggestions.