Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Hydraulic Vs mechanical brakes

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Hydraulic Vs mechanical brakes

Old 01-28-23, 11:02 AM
  #51  
tyrion
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasJen
By that logic, rim brakes offer the ultimate in mechanical advantage.
True in a sense. Rim brakes comparatively lose leverage due to the fact that the caliper must move a greater distance, but gain leverage due to the very large diameter "disc".
tyrion is offline  
Old 01-28-23, 01:20 PM
  #52  
wolfchild
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasJen
By that logic, rim brakes offer the ultimate in mechanical advantage.
Rim brakes have better mechanical advantage than cable mechanical cable disc brakes simply because a rim has a bigger diameter than a disc rotor....The larger the disc rotor the better the stopping power...A 185 mm or 203 mm rotor will stop better than a 140mm or 160 mm rotor.
wolfchild is offline  
Old 01-28-23, 01:48 PM
  #53  
phughes
Senior Member
 
phughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,060
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1019 Post(s)
Liked 1,246 Times in 719 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasJen
By that logic, rim brakes offer the ultimate in mechanical advantage.
Not really. The bigger rotor he was talking about has more surface area for the pad compared to the smaller rotor, and consequently lager pads. The rim brake still has a small braking surface area. I like rim brakes, but that is not a plus for rim brakes, nor is the correct term, mechanical advantage, that implies force, such as is had by using a lever, the larger rotor simply gives more braking surface area, and better heat dissipation generally speaking.
phughes is online now  
Old 01-28-23, 01:49 PM
  #54  
rosefarts
With a mighty wind
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,555
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 841 Times in 475 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
Rim brakes have better mechanical advantage than cable mechanical cable disc brakes simply because a rim has a bigger diameter than a disc rotor....The larger the disc rotor the better the stopping power...A 185 mm or 203 mm rotor will stop better than a 140mm or 160 mm rotor.
A disc is a thin piece of metal that would need hundreds of thousands of pounds of compression force to deform. Disc brake manufacturers are free to build those calipers with all the compression they feel is necessary for a good feeling brake.

An aluminum rim is hollow and also serves the purpose of keeping the tire mounted and wheels rolling smoothly. In theory a system could be built that would destroy the rim. Or frame I suppose. I’ve heard anecdotal reports of Magura rim brakes denting rims but they certainly could be built crushier if we weren’t worried about keeping the bike rideable.

Carbon rims and mullet bikes are another huge advantage of discs. Keeping the brakes as brakes and rims as rims is smart.

In the early aughts, I was in a race where we caught the group ahead of us. On a descent. The peloton smelled like burning brakes. So many people, including me, wrecked out of that race due to hot rims popping tires. That’s not a concern for discs. Something to think about.
rosefarts is offline  
Old 01-28-23, 02:06 PM
  #55  
wolfchild
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Originally Posted by rosefarts
A disc is a thin piece of metal that would need hundreds of thousands of pounds of compression force to deform. Disc brake manufacturers are free to build those calipers with all the compression they feel is necessary for a good feeling brake.

An aluminum rim is hollow and also serves the purpose of keeping the tire mounted and wheels rolling smoothly. In theory a system could be built that would destroy the rim. Or frame I suppose. I’ve heard anecdotal reports of Magura rim brakes denting rims but they certainly could be built crushier if we weren’t worried about keeping the bike rideable.

Carbon rims and mullet bikes are another huge advantage of discs. Keeping the brakes as brakes and rims as rims is smart.

In the early aughts, I was in a race where we caught the group ahead of us. On a descent. The peloton smelled like burning brakes. So many people, including me, wrecked out of that race due to hot rims popping tires. That’s not a concern for discs. Something to think about.
You're talking about the durability of steel disc rotor vs an aluminum rim, that is a different topic, and of course a steel disc will be more durable than an aluminum rim....The the further the brake caliper is located from the center of a disc the greater the leverage and stopping power.
wolfchild is offline  
Old 01-28-23, 02:10 PM
  #56  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,453

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,453 Times in 1,823 Posts
I don't want to get into a pointless debate .... but anyone who has tested manual rim brakes vs manual (cable discs) vs. Hydro discs .... assuming all three systems were set up properly .... needs read no further.
Maelochs is offline  
Likes For Maelochs:
Old 01-28-23, 02:19 PM
  #57  
rosefarts
With a mighty wind
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,555
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 841 Times in 475 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
You're talking about the durability of steel disc rotor vs an aluminum rim, that is a different topic, and of course a steel disc will be more durable than an aluminum rim....The the further the brake caliper is located from the center of a disc the greater the leverage and stopping power.
Durability isn’t the word I’d use. That makes me think about how long before it wears out.

Think of it as material properties and structural integrity.

In order to truly use a rim as a disc, you would need compression enough that the rim would be damaged. This is a non issue on a disc. So the calipers can be specifically designed to clamp harder.

So the whole thought experiment falls apart.

The question should be “how hard does a rim brake need to compress on a (insert rim size) to equal the stopping force of a disc on a (insert rotor size)”.

The follow up question should be “how hard can a hydraulic caliper squeeze the rotor compared with a mechanical caliper? In ft/lbs or newton meters or something.”
rosefarts is offline  
Old 01-28-23, 07:23 PM
  #58  
The Chemist
Senior Member
 
The Chemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 977

Bikes: Waltly Custom Ti // Seaboard CX01 // Dahon Boardwalk

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 519 Times in 242 Posts
Personally, I think cable-actuated hydraulics are the best of both worlds. Super easy to install / set-up since they're just cable actuated with no need for bleeding of the lines, and with the self-adjustment and dual/quad piston design of hydraulics. They're basically set and forget, with no further maintenance required after set up until the pads require replacement.
The Chemist is offline  
Old 01-29-23, 11:11 AM
  #59  
VegasJen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 895
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 532 Times in 292 Posts
Now this is just my silly opinion, but unless there's prize money on the line, no way is hydraulic worth the expense. Cable brakes have been around for how many decades? Minimal maintenance, proven reliability, low cost. There's simply no comparison. If you just have money to burn (I never have, probably never will) and you want the latest and greatest tech, or you need that last 0.01 second to beat the next guy, then knock yourself out.

But that's just me.
VegasJen is offline  
Old 01-29-23, 11:53 AM
  #60  
wolfchild
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasJen
Now this is just my silly opinion, but unless there's prize money on the line, no way is hydraulic worth the expense. Cable brakes have been around for how many decades? Minimal maintenance, proven reliability, low cost. There's simply no comparison. If you just have money to burn (I never have, probably never will) and you want the latest and greatest tech, or you need that last 0.01 second to beat the next guy, then knock yourself out.

But that's just me.
In my case I've had both hydraulic and cable discs and I prefer cable discs or rim brakes strictly because of simplicity, ease of servicing. and extreme long term reliability....Speaking of prize money, hydraulic brakes are not a guarantee for winning a race, there are still many pro cyclists who use rim brakes.
wolfchild is offline  
Old 01-29-23, 11:57 AM
  #61  
elcruxio
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,487

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 859 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times in 220 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasJen
Now this is just my silly opinion, but unless there's prize money on the line, no way is hydraulic worth the expense. Cable brakes have been around for how many decades? Minimal maintenance, proven reliability, low cost. There's simply no comparison. If you just have money to burn (I never have, probably never will) and you want the latest and greatest tech, or you need that last 0.01 second to beat the next guy, then knock yourself out.

But that's just me.
Modern hydraulics (shimano) are easier to maintain than cables. At least if you follow any reasonable maintenance regimen. You need to swap brake cables and housings every two years or so. Hoses last triple that.

With every housing swap you need new bar tapes.

Every time you swap your cable you need to do the whole adjustable ferrule, brake arm tensioning song and dance. If we compare that to bleeding you put on a funnel, put a piece of hose on the caliper. Let oil flow down through the system. Close both ends and that's it for two years.

When you swap mechanic pads, pull back inner pad all the way, pull back outer pad all the way. Take out wheel (because that's mechanic brakes for you), swap pads, put back wheel, adjust both pads until you have that rub free non spongy spot. That usually takes a while. Oh and adjust cable tension and hope you have enough adjusting space in the ferrule ends.

Compare to hydraulics. Take out pads. Push pistons in. Put in new pads. Pump levers and go ride.

One thing that also doesn't happen with hydraulics is cable freeze. When you go from wet to sub freezing it sometimes happens that the cable freezes inside the housing. That essentially means you'll have no brakes until you defrost your bike. Hate it when that happens. Granted hydraulics used to have issues in the cold back in the day but it seems those have largely been solved.

the expense thing is silly to begin with. We should all be riding walmart bikes because if you're not racing what difference does it make? We all value different things. Personally I value really good brakes. You might value other things. Like your bike being more capable than a walmart one size fits no one.
elcruxio is online now  
Likes For elcruxio:
Old 01-29-23, 12:00 PM
  #62  
wolfchild
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Originally Posted by elcruxio
You need to swap brake cables and housings every two years or so.
I hope this is a joke.
wolfchild is offline  
Likes For wolfchild:
Old 01-29-23, 12:09 PM
  #63  
phughes
Senior Member
 
phughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,060
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1019 Post(s)
Liked 1,246 Times in 719 Posts
Originally Posted by elcruxio
Modern hydraulics (shimano) are easier to maintain than cables. At least if you follow any reasonable maintenance regimen. You need to swap brake cables and housings every two years or so. Hoses last triple that.

With every housing swap you need new bar tapes.

Every time you swap your cable you need to do the whole adjustable ferrule, brake arm tensioning song and dance. If we compare that to bleeding you put on a funnel, put a piece of hose on the caliper. Let oil flow down through the system. Close both ends and that's it for two years.

When you swap mechanic pads, pull back inner pad all the way, pull back outer pad all the way. Take out wheel (because that's mechanic brakes for you), swap pads, put back wheel, adjust both pads until you have that rub free non spongy spot. That usually takes a while. Oh and adjust cable tension and hope you have enough adjusting space in the ferrule ends.

Compare to hydraulics. Take out pads. Push pistons in. Put in new pads. Pump levers and go ride.

One thing that also doesn't happen with hydraulics is cable freeze. When you go from wet to sub freezing it sometimes happens that the cable freezes inside the housing. That essentially means you'll have no brakes until you defrost your bike. Hate it when that happens. Granted hydraulics used to have issues in the cold back in the day but it seems those have largely been solved.

the expense thing is silly to begin with. We should all be riding walmart bikes because if you're not racing what difference does it make? We all value different things. Personally I value really good brakes. You might value other things. Like your bike being more capable than a walmart one size fits no one.
Oh man, I guess I better go swap the housings and cables on my Surly... they are 11 years old. I might die despite the fact they are in very good shape despite multiple cross country tours and commuting. They are clean and shiny, with no fraying, and work very well and smoothly. Thanks for the warning on possible self-destruction.

Now, the reality is, hydraulic brake systems need to have the fluid changed every two years since the fluid is hygroscopic. Maybe you got the two mixed up. Either way, both systems work, it's all a matter of choice.
phughes is online now  
Old 01-29-23, 12:24 PM
  #64  
GhostRider62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2332 Post(s)
Liked 2,094 Times in 1,311 Posts
I have mechanical disc brakes on a mountain bike for many years, I like them. They stop quickly and modulate well.

I recently got a new bike with SRAM Red Axs and hydraulic brakes. I am not in love. I cannot get them to stop squealing. I did everything I read (proper bedding, cleaning, sandpaper, adjust ad nauseum. They are good out of the driveway and just into my ride.). It turns out that despite the proper 9.5 n-m torques adapter bolts, the caliper moves very quickly into a ride. I also do not care for the modulation of them.

I am sure I will eventually like them once I can figure out how to keep them from moving. I do not see any improvement over my mechanical discs in terms of stopping power although I have never tested that out.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Old 01-29-23, 12:25 PM
  #65  
terrymorse 
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,006

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3338 Post(s)
Liked 3,436 Times in 1,737 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
there are still many pro cyclists who use rim brakes.
For real? I have seen only disc brakes in the UCI races for a few years now. Those guys ride what they're told to ride.

Are you talking domestic pros?
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is offline  
Old 01-29-23, 12:27 PM
  #66  
elcruxio
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,487

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 859 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times in 220 Posts
Originally Posted by phughes
Oh man, I guess I better go swap the housings and cables on my Surly... they are 11 years old. I might die despite the fact they are in very good shape despite multiple cross country tours and commuting. They are clean and shiny, with no fraying, and work very well and smoothly. Thanks for the warning on possible self-destruction.

Now, the reality is, hydraulic brake systems need to have the fluid changed every two years since the fluid is hygroscopic. Maybe you got the two mixed up. Either way, both systems work, it's all a matter of choice.
My cables simply do not survive multiple years. Perhaps it's the road salt or whatever but after two years they start getting sticky and sucky.

Anyways I'd imagine most hydraulic brakes these days use mineral oil instead of DOT fluid. Since it's hydrophobic you don't have to change it all that often. We have a bike that hasn't been bled in a decade. No ill effects so far. But just because you can leave something for that long doesn't mean you should.
elcruxio is online now  
Old 01-29-23, 12:28 PM
  #67  
GhostRider62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2332 Post(s)
Liked 2,094 Times in 1,311 Posts
I believe Pinarello riders have had the option but no other team. Maybe 1-2 riders overall not using disc brakes.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Likes For GhostRider62:
Old 01-29-23, 12:54 PM
  #68  
VegasJen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 895
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 532 Times in 292 Posts
Originally Posted by phughes
Oh man, I guess I better go swap the housings and cables on my Surly... they are 11 years old. I might die despite the fact they are in very good shape despite multiple cross country tours and commuting. They are clean and shiny, with no fraying, and work very well and smoothly. Thanks for the warning on possible self-destruction.

Now, the reality is, hydraulic brake systems need to have the fluid changed every two years since the fluid is hygroscopic. Maybe you got the two mixed up. Either way, both systems work, it's all a matter of choice.
Same here. But I live in a very warm, dry climate. All my bikes are at least 10 years old, although I haven't had any of them since new, but I have yet to replace a brake cable. Maybe a couple shots of dry film lubricant and off I go. Brakes are literally the last thing I think of when I take a bike out for a spin.
VegasJen is offline  
Likes For VegasJen:
Old 01-29-23, 01:10 PM
  #69  
terrymorse 
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,006

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3338 Post(s)
Liked 3,436 Times in 1,737 Posts
Mostly dry California riding here.

I'm trying to remember when I replaced brake cables on my 2011 Addict, which gets ridden a few thousand miles per year.

Definitely once, but that was because the bike insisted it be driven into the garage while on the top of the car. Lots of things got replaced after that. Stupid Addict.

So call it one brake cable set replacement in 12 years and > 20,000 miles. I also replaced the pads once.

Derailleur cables and housings are another story. I replace them when I need to replace bar tape, about every 3 years. I do not want those cables breaking off inside the shifter.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is offline  
Old 01-29-23, 01:19 PM
  #70  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,828

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4743 Post(s)
Liked 3,860 Times in 2,509 Posts
Originally Posted by elcruxio
Modern hydraulics (shimano) are easier to maintain than cables. At least if you follow any reasonable maintenance regimen. You need to swap brake cables and housings every two years or so. Hoses last triple that.
How am I still alive? I only do housings when they need it or they've been there a while (like years) and I am retaping the bars.

Originally Posted by elcruxio
With every housing swap you need new bar tapes.

Every time you swap your cable you need to do the whole adjustable ferrule, brake arm tensioning song and dance. If we compare that to bleeding you put on a funnel, put a piece of hose on the caliper. Let oil flow down through the system. Close both ends and that's it for two years.
With not very expensive 3rd and 4th hands, none of this is very difficult. If the brake has one of those good cams that can be operated half open, this gets really easy. Basic bike stuff. Fully graspable by 12 year olds.

...

Originally Posted by elcruxio
One thing that also doesn't happen with hydraulics is cable freeze. When you go from wet to sub freezing it sometimes happens that the cable freezes inside the housing. That essentially means you'll have no brakes until you defrost your bike. Hate it when that happens. Granted hydraulics used to have issues in the cold back in the day but it seems those have largely been solved.
I'll grant you that. But in 3 Ann Arbor winters and every non-college year winter in Boston until I was 26, I never had cables freeze. (Or if they did, it was such a non-event I didn't notice.) I didn't own a car until my 30s. I've ridden in nearly every weather Boston and Ann Arbor have to offer.

Originally Posted by elcruxio
the expense thing is silly to begin with. We should all be riding walmart bikes because if you're not racing what difference does it make? We all value different things. Personally I value really good brakes. You might value other things. Like your bike being more capable than a walmart one size fits no one.
I do too. All my bike have good ones. Yes, I ride with considerations for rim brake limitations doing major descents and in the wet. I ride within tire considerations on wet and dirty pavement. Potholes, Leaves. So? I also love that a quick look at cable rim brakes and a hard squeeze on the levers is all I have to do to know these brakes will stop me later. Pad rubbing? Easy fix and just as easy to do a ride-worthy fix with no tools at all; often while riding. (A lot of my levers have releases that can be ridden "off" so a little more reach but all the braking power.)

Last edited by 79pmooney; 01-29-23 at 01:28 PM. Reason: Struggled to gets [QUOTE}s and bolding right
79pmooney is online now  
Old 01-29-23, 01:19 PM
  #71  
rosefarts
With a mighty wind
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,555
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 841 Times in 475 Posts
I think what’s going on here is that we’re arguing over the difference between “good enough” and “better”.

Properly adjusted and maintained cable brakes will definitely stop you. Rim or disc, no matter. The bike will stop. It sure will.

Hydraulic discs are better. Full stop (pun intended).

Does it matter? Probably not.

Some people struggle to learn new things. Others don’t want new tools. Some are more concerned about the mythological roadside repair than anything else. Mechanical brakes are good enough usually.

The advantages of hydraulic brakes have been adequately outlined here. If you can’t get your head around it, honestly it’s fine. Cables will get it done.

A little FWIW, a car has 4 hydraulic brakes. The e-brake which barely works is cable. The car is slightly heavier than a bike though.
rosefarts is offline  
Likes For rosefarts:
Old 01-29-23, 01:41 PM
  #72  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,879

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3905 Post(s)
Liked 7,181 Times in 2,905 Posts
Originally Posted by rosefarts
A little FWIW, a car has 4 hydraulic brakes. The e-brake which barely works is cable. The car is slightly heavier than a bike though.
A lot of them are electro-mechanical now.

Last edited by tomato coupe; 01-29-23 at 02:29 PM.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 01-29-23, 02:08 PM
  #73  
elcruxio
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,487

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 859 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times in 220 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
How am I still alive? I only do housings when they need it or they've been there a while (like years) and I am retaping the bars.
Things here tend to get dramatically fatalistic real quick. But I suppose that's a way to emphasize things. Maybe it's a regional thing.


With not very expensive 3rd and 4th hands, none of this is very difficult. If the brake has one of those good cams that can be operated half open, this gets really easy. Basic bike stuff. Fully graspable by 12 year olds.
Do I want to know what 3rd or 4th arms are?

But compare that to bleeding. These days it's literally pouring oil into a funnel.

​​​​​​​I'll grant you that. But in 3 Ann Arbor winters and every non-college year winter in Boston until I was 26, I never had cables freeze. (Or if they did, it was such a non-event I didn't notice.) I didn't own a car until my 30s. I've ridden in nearly every weather Boston and Ann Arbor have to offer.
I had a frozen cable last week. We have a lot of freezing a thawing with slush and that's pretty hard on cables. Especially with the road salt.


​​​​​​​I do too. All my bike have good ones. Yes, I ride with considerations for rim brake limitations doing major descents and in the wet. I ride within tire considerations on wet and dirty pavement. Potholes, Leaves. So? I also love that a quick look at cable rim brakes and a hard squeeze on the levers is all I have to do to know these brakes will stop me later. Pad rubbing? Easy fix and just as easy to do a ride-worthy fix with no tools at all; often while riding. (A lot of my levers have releases that can be ridden "off" so a little more reach but all the braking power.)
​​​​​​​I don't follow your point with this paragraph.
elcruxio is online now  
Old 01-29-23, 02:15 PM
  #74  
phughes
Senior Member
 
phughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,060
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1019 Post(s)
Liked 1,246 Times in 719 Posts
Originally Posted by elcruxio
My cables simply do not survive multiple years. Perhaps it's the road salt or whatever but after two years they start getting sticky and sucky.

Anyways I'd imagine most hydraulic brakes these days use mineral oil instead of DOT fluid. Since it's hydrophobic you don't have to change it all that often. We have a bike that hasn't been bled in a decade. No ill effects so far. But just because you can leave something for that long doesn't mean you should.
It all depends for me. These have lasted a long time. Replacing every two years as a rule is simply ridiculous though, whereas replacing hygroscopic fluid is more important since the moisture in the fluid will cause issues with the brake internals. You are correct, mineral oil is nice, and is not hygroscopic.
phughes is online now  
Old 01-29-23, 03:31 PM
  #75  
SkinGriz
Live not by lies.
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,306

Bikes: BigBox bikes.

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 860 Post(s)
Liked 784 Times in 582 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
A lot of them are electro-mechanical now.
I think the Ebrake on a Volvo actually pushes a plunger pressurizing the normal brake system.
SkinGriz is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.