Minimum Insertion Point?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Minimum Insertion Point?
I’ve got a vintage Ambrosio stem and bars. Based on the component evidence from the Fiorelli they’re on, I’m guessing mid 1960’s. The stem doesn’t have a Minimum Insertion Mark. How would I determine the minimum safe point?
#2
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
Stem Insertion Depth
3" or 75mm to 80mm - or less depending on how long the threaded section of the steerer is.
You don't want the bottom of the steerer expanding in the threads:
Note how thin the steel is in the threads.
YOU DON'T WANT TO EXPERIENCE A "HEY WATCH THIS" NANOSECOND!
verktyg
You don't want the bottom of the steerer expanding in the threads:
Note how thin the steel is in the threads.
YOU DON'T WANT TO EXPERIENCE A "HEY WATCH THIS" NANOSECOND!
verktyg
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Likes For verktyg:
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thank you for the very clear answer 👍
Likes For ejw:
#4
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
Thank you very much for this Chas-
I'd always assumed that minimum measurement had more to do with how much steerer the expander needed to hold on to.
I'd always assumed that minimum measurement had more to do with how much steerer the expander needed to hold on to.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#5
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
865 Posts
Everything counts, starting with determining how far from the top of the steerer that the threading actually extends!
Plenty of bikes were made with a LOT of threaded length on the steerer, certainly enough to where the "safe limit" line on the stem quill would not assure that the the expander was in an unthreaded section of the steerer.
I think that the quality of the stem plays huge as well, as some stems are vulnerable to having their slot-bisected lower end literally crack and collapse (with complete loss of bolt tension and steering control).
Rider weight, stem/bar leverage/length, riding conditions, and length of service, again, can all play huge into the reliability equation!
Plenty of bikes were made with a LOT of threaded length on the steerer, certainly enough to where the "safe limit" line on the stem quill would not assure that the the expander was in an unthreaded section of the steerer.
I think that the quality of the stem plays huge as well, as some stems are vulnerable to having their slot-bisected lower end literally crack and collapse (with complete loss of bolt tension and steering control).
Rider weight, stem/bar leverage/length, riding conditions, and length of service, again, can all play huge into the reliability equation!