Do 650b wheels help on climbing?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times
in
441 Posts
Do 650b wheels help on climbing?
I'm currently running 700c wheels, but I'm entertaining the idea of going 650b. I'm wondering besides the other benefits of better grip and perhaps lower gearing, will going with the smaller diameter wheels help on climbing, mainly loose dirt/gravel trails? Most the articles I read don't really delve into the climbing aspect of 650b, mainly just the comfort benefits. I'd be interested in hearing how 650b fares for climbing. Thanks!
#2
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
The only difference I can discern is that they seem to "spin up" faster. Climbing performance "feels" the same to me.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times
in
441 Posts
So the smaller diameter wheel, offset with the wider/taller tires probably wouldn't gain much for climbing then? Is the effects on gearing (being lower) minimal as well?
#4
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
But, you got me thinking...I just plugged in my two wheel sets, 700c shod with 38mm, and 650b shod with 2.1", 46t chainring and 10-42 cassette, in a gear calculator. The gearing is almost identical, to the point that the difference is indistinguishable. What that tells me is if you are going to go to 650b and want to use that to get lower gearing, you need to use narrow tires...which defeats the purpose of 650b, IMO.
Likes For Badger6:
#5
Senior Member
Doing fairly long climbs up steeper grades with loose surface I do prefer the extra cush of a wider 650b.
For me, there's only about one tooth jump between 700c and 650b. 700c being on the larger cassette cog.
A narrow 700c with deeper knobs can match the climbing grip of the 650b with lower knobs, but it is a harsher ride.
Makes a difference also when you're running 1200gm wheels and one of the lighter 2.1/2.2 options.
For me, there's only about one tooth jump between 700c and 650b. 700c being on the larger cassette cog.
A narrow 700c with deeper knobs can match the climbing grip of the 650b with lower knobs, but it is a harsher ride.
Makes a difference also when you're running 1200gm wheels and one of the lighter 2.1/2.2 options.
Likes For tangerineowl:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,022 Times
in
722 Posts
All things being equal the 650b should climb better. So same make model and width of tire, same hubs, same make, model of rim, same cassette and built with the same spokes the 650b should climb better. It would have a lower diameter which would be easier to turn up a hill and the parts would all be lighter by some amount. Often 10-30g per rim, 5-8 grams in the spokes combined, and 20-100g in the tires depending on quality and size, so potentially a good weight difference though can be small enough to not be noticeable as well.
If you're going smaller to go wider, then maybe. Tire tread and weight will make a difference.
If you're going smaller to go wider, then maybe. Tire tread and weight will make a difference.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#7
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
All things aren't equal, though...
For instance, my 700c wheelset is rolling on Pathfinder Pro (38mm), and the tire weight is generally around 490g. My 650b wheelset wearing 2.1" (ERTRO is 52-584) Vittoria Barzos which each weigh in around 670g! Despite the weight saving on the smaller rim and slightly shorter spokes, the wheelset is only about 70g lighter on both ends, while the tires are in total 360g heavier. Certainly, my tire choice contributes to this, but I don't have a 650b wheelset to save weight, I have it for the comfort it provides on the rougher trails I ride.
For instance, my 700c wheelset is rolling on Pathfinder Pro (38mm), and the tire weight is generally around 490g. My 650b wheelset wearing 2.1" (ERTRO is 52-584) Vittoria Barzos which each weigh in around 670g! Despite the weight saving on the smaller rim and slightly shorter spokes, the wheelset is only about 70g lighter on both ends, while the tires are in total 360g heavier. Certainly, my tire choice contributes to this, but I don't have a 650b wheelset to save weight, I have it for the comfort it provides on the rougher trails I ride.
Likes For Badger6:
#8
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Outfitted with the same chainring and cogs, a 650B wheel will give you lower gears than a 700c wheel by a couple of gear inches. Whether this is "minimal" is subjective.
Last edited by Rolla; 11-21-21 at 09:19 PM.
Likes For Rolla:
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times
in
441 Posts
Thanks for all comments so far. I'll probably stick with 700c wheels for now. I always road ride before hitting the trails and I think I'll be better served sticking to that size. It seems the tire weight of 650b will negate its advantages for climbing from what I'm gathering from the various posts here.
#10
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Thanks for all comments so far. I'll probably stick with 700c wheels for now. I always road ride before hitting the trails and I think I'll be better served sticking to that size. It seems the tire weight of 650b will negate its advantages for climbing from what I'm gathering from the various posts here.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 737
Bikes: Dahon Jetstream p8 (sold), customized Dahon Helios x10, customzed Dahon Smooth Hound x11,customized Dahon Hammerhead 8.0 d7, Planet X Free Ranger (mullet setup 1x11), Planet X Giovanissimi 20 (1x9), Frog 52 (1x9) and Frog 48 1s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Liked 238 Times
in
174 Posts
I was looking at gearinch for 700-38 vs 650-50 and it seems the gearinch difference would be the equivalent of 1.25T on the chainring so if you were to swap from a 40T chainring to a 39T, you 'd get a similar effect.
Now, Badger6 comment about "spinning up" faster. That is interesting as I noticed the same and thought it was down to better rolling resistance of the tyres i have on the 650b.
Now, you could argue the "heavier" outter of the 650B will require more torque to change rpm drastically but will store more energy like so should keep spinning at a given rpm range better like a flywheel.
Not sure if it is really noticeable. (I think DT swiss published something about than).
Now, Badger6 comment about "spinning up" faster. That is interesting as I noticed the same and thought it was down to better rolling resistance of the tyres i have on the 650b.
Now, you could argue the "heavier" outter of the 650B will require more torque to change rpm drastically but will store more energy like so should keep spinning at a given rpm range better like a flywheel.
Not sure if it is really noticeable. (I think DT swiss published something about than).
#12
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
Like I said, it's all based on feel, no actual measurements or compared (comparable) data...could just be placebo. In reality, the tread on my 650b set would likely measure a whole lot more rolling resistance than that on the 700c. So, there is that also...
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times
in
441 Posts
Would going with carbon wheels be another option if I want to improve my trail climbing? My 2nd bike has a carbon frame, wheels, lightweight cassette + Shimano 105 groupset and the performance difference between the two bikes is very noticeable when road climbing. My alloy gravel bike though rides in much rougher off-road conditions, so I've been hesitant going carbon with the wheelset since the trail descents are usually littered with small drops, rocks, twigs and tree roots. Though climbing feels much more heavier when trying to ride up the trail. That's why I was considering 650b, but maybe reducing wheel weight might be a better option for me.
#14
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
I’ve said it many times: climbing better is a function of the motor first. Every thing else helps, a little. Carbon hoops will all around be a nicer ride, but the few hundred grams saved won’t all of a sudden make you fly up hills. Honestly the weight loss on a bike that makes the biggest difference climbing is the rider themselves.
#15
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
A reduction in rotating weight will improve efficiency, but I think weight is often over-emphasized as a means of improving performance all by itself. For me, following Ned Overend's simple advice made the biggest difference. He said, "Just convince yourself that you love to climb."
Likes For Rolla:
#16
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Big +1 to this. It's a virtuous cycle, once you decide that you enjoy climbing, you'll put more into it and get way better at it. You can't buy your way to being a better climber.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
Virtually no difference. If tires are chosen to make the overall diameter the same (choose 650b tires approx. 19mm wider than the 700C tires your comparing), and weight is the same, there will be virtually no difference besides maybe a bit smother ride and maybe better traction on wider and softer 650bs.
And contrary to a common misconception, added weight on your wheels only effects climbing the same amount as having the same extra weight added to a static part of the bike, like in your water bottle.
And contrary to a common misconception, added weight on your wheels only effects climbing the same amount as having the same extra weight added to a static part of the bike, like in your water bottle.
#18
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
"There is no question that if a rider climbs at constant speed, it doesn’t matter where the weight is located on the bike. Extra mass could be concentrated on the pedals, at the rims, in the frame, or in the hubs, and as long as the bike’s total weight is the same and it has otherwise the same characteristics, it will create the same resistance to the rider’s efforts.
That said, there is also no question that it takes more energy to accelerate the same amount of mass if it is located out on the rim as if it is located at the center of the wheel (or on the frame)."
#19
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
#20
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
Sorry about the second post, but also…
What if you could have both? A properly laid up carbon rim will be stronger and lighter than even the best aluminum wheel. Now, that said, the ‘stronger’ part won’t come into play, likely, until the average rider has ridden way past their own abilities. So…for the average sport rider the choice between carbon or Aluminium is usually a matter of weight and cost.
What if you could have both? A properly laid up carbon rim will be stronger and lighter than even the best aluminum wheel. Now, that said, the ‘stronger’ part won’t come into play, likely, until the average rider has ridden way past their own abilities. So…for the average sport rider the choice between carbon or Aluminium is usually a matter of weight and cost.
#21
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Likes For Rolla:
#22
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
Oh, definitely without a doubt.
As I stated, for the regular sport rider (I am squarely in this group at this point), it is a matter of weight and cost. The latter factor being the one that keeps most people from ever got in down the road of carbon hoops.
As I stated, for the regular sport rider (I am squarely in this group at this point), it is a matter of weight and cost. The latter factor being the one that keeps most people from ever got in down the road of carbon hoops.
Likes For Badger6:
#23
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 13
Bikes: 1985 Shogun 2000, 1988 Cramerotti, 1994 Kona Fire Mountain (polo bike), 2009 Brodie Fury, 2011 Brodie Voltage (1x10 gravel conversion), 2017 Radwagon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
It sounds like you want to try 650b. Any real difference will be in 'feel' and not performance (ignoring placebo effects) so either take the plunge and buy them or try to find a friend with a set you can borrow.
And a few people have said already, maybe some hypnotherapy to convince yourself that you really like climbing would be the most effective route to take.
And a few people have said already, maybe some hypnotherapy to convince yourself that you really like climbing would be the most effective route to take.
Likes For Wet Coast Rider:
#24
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Yep -- I'm in that same group, as I believe 90% of riders probably are. And while there's nothing wrong with buying lightweight gear, it's not only about the expense; my performance just isn't good enough to where a few hundred grams is going to make any difference.
#25
Banned
Climbing is helped by shorter chain stays and a more upright position and wider tires. Going to tubeless tires is also an option. Check the specs for the varous bikes from Specialized and Trex and notice the difference in chain stay length and seat tube angle based on the intended use.