Measuring hill difficulty
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 229
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times
in
36 Posts
Measuring hill difficulty
Is there a good way of measuring the difficulty of hills? If the hills are similar in grade or distance, then it would seem pretty simple. But can you compare a 1/4 mile hill to a 2-mile hill? And I guess you'd have to start by defining exactly what a hill is.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,872
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6958 Post(s)
Liked 10,959 Times
in
4,686 Posts
Another difference would be elevation: I've done some big climbing events at elevations as high as >14,000 feet; the thin air takes a toll.
Likes For Koyote:
#3
Full Member
One other significant difference is terrain -- e.g., a 20% grade on smooth pavement might be easier than a 10% grade on an MTB or gravel route which may include potholes, rocks, tree roots, and mud.
Another difference would be elevation: I've done some big climbing events at elevations as high as >14,000 feet; the thin air takes a toll.
Another difference would be elevation: I've done some big climbing events at elevations as high as >14,000 feet; the thin air takes a toll.
Any grade at 14,000 feet, would all have to be downhill. The only thing that would need factored in at that point is what shape are the brakes in
...
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,872
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6958 Post(s)
Liked 10,959 Times
in
4,686 Posts
Likes For Koyote:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,945
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3948 Post(s)
Liked 7,291 Times
in
2,945 Posts
1. a naturally raised area of land, not as high or craggy as a mountain.
The rest should be easy ...
Likes For tomato coupe:
Likes For prj71:
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
If you have to get off and walk, it's a difficult hill.
#9
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,034
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2238 Post(s)
Liked 3,429 Times
in
1,793 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,872
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6958 Post(s)
Liked 10,959 Times
in
4,686 Posts
In the formula, H=distance climbed. As the site explains, FIETS is "how much will you climb, in how much distance and what is its height." (The part I italicized is H, the actual climbing.)
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18372 Post(s)
Liked 4,507 Times
in
3,350 Posts
There are many differences between riders, bikes, gearing, etc.
A 1/4 mile hill at a 30% grade may well be more intense than a 2 mile hill at a 2% grade.
But, you can also look at your effort on the two hills. Time, speed, etc.
Many ride trackers, computers, power meters, etc, will give an estimate of average power and calories consumed. A good power meter will give you a pretty decent estimate. Cheap computers can be taken with a grain of salt.
A 1/4 mile hill at a 30% grade may well be more intense than a 2 mile hill at a 2% grade.
But, you can also look at your effort on the two hills. Time, speed, etc.
Many ride trackers, computers, power meters, etc, will give an estimate of average power and calories consumed. A good power meter will give you a pretty decent estimate. Cheap computers can be taken with a grain of salt.
#12
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Especially when caveated by Koyote 's factors: road/path quality and effects of altitude.
I haven't done the crazy climbing like some of you guys, but I'd also point out that if planning a ride on really big hills, I definitely want to know the wind forecast for that day.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18372 Post(s)
Liked 4,507 Times
in
3,350 Posts
#14
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Also, D = total distance traveled in meters is part of the formula.
Likes For livedarklions:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,823
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX Single Track 2x11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 614 Post(s)
Liked 565 Times
in
429 Posts
About as universal a measure as I can think of: percentage grade. Along with the length of the grade, that measure works well for informing how a given grade compares to another.
Beyond that, how a given person will take it, and how difficult it'll seem, will vary from person to person. Of course, everybody's different.
For myself, it's easy. If it's over ~5% grade and anything longer than a few hundred yards, it's impossible and I'm walking. If it's just a couple percent grade, almost without respect to distance, then it's something I can do. But then, I've got an old injury to contend with. Slow and steady wins that race, so to speak. These days, I'm just happy I'm still able to cope, using an older MTB with sub-15g.i. gearing. These days, I take one look at photos of the Stelvio Pass (and other similar grades), and my first thought is: "Give me the car keys."
Back in the day, I used to do distance running. Quite often, into the hills. (aka "Trail running.") Over a handful of years, I got much stronger and both strong and fit enough that I could nearly perform as briskly in the hills as on the flats. For whatever reason, the gods blessed me with shorter legs but a strong physique, which for running in such places (hills) worked out well. After a half-dozen years, it didn't much matter what a "hill" presented. I could do it, and it wouldn't hurt much more than any other hill. I had a hill-climbing running "gear" and a way of attacking the hill that worked. Brief respites before the next climb were generally sufficient. Even ~15% climbs up and over ridges became relatively commonplace, for training. And many of those runs approached "race" pace. Go figure. Never could accomplish the same sort of thing on a bike. My friends thought I was nuts. None of my running friends but one could keep up with me, on the hillier parts of climbs, when we were pushing things. We never did figure out why the differences were so great.
Beyond that, how a given person will take it, and how difficult it'll seem, will vary from person to person. Of course, everybody's different.
For myself, it's easy. If it's over ~5% grade and anything longer than a few hundred yards, it's impossible and I'm walking. If it's just a couple percent grade, almost without respect to distance, then it's something I can do. But then, I've got an old injury to contend with. Slow and steady wins that race, so to speak. These days, I'm just happy I'm still able to cope, using an older MTB with sub-15g.i. gearing. These days, I take one look at photos of the Stelvio Pass (and other similar grades), and my first thought is: "Give me the car keys."
Back in the day, I used to do distance running. Quite often, into the hills. (aka "Trail running.") Over a handful of years, I got much stronger and both strong and fit enough that I could nearly perform as briskly in the hills as on the flats. For whatever reason, the gods blessed me with shorter legs but a strong physique, which for running in such places (hills) worked out well. After a half-dozen years, it didn't much matter what a "hill" presented. I could do it, and it wouldn't hurt much more than any other hill. I had a hill-climbing running "gear" and a way of attacking the hill that worked. Brief respites before the next climb were generally sufficient. Even ~15% climbs up and over ridges became relatively commonplace, for training. And many of those runs approached "race" pace. Go figure. Never could accomplish the same sort of thing on a bike. My friends thought I was nuts. None of my running friends but one could keep up with me, on the hillier parts of climbs, when we were pushing things. We never did figure out why the differences were so great.
Last edited by Clyde1820; 09-17-22 at 06:34 AM.
#16
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,211
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2579 Post(s)
Liked 5,636 Times
in
2,920 Posts
This thread is a mediocre place for a nagging question about hills. Is it better to attack the beginning incline of a hill to increase initial momentum or just find a comfortable pace you can ride the entire hill. For instance, I am thinking 5% for a mile.
I usually will take a hard run a the start of a longish hill but to me it seems like a waste of energy without any real gain. Correct?
And back to the thread… time X distance x power (or heart rate) is a nice lame way to calculate.
I usually will take a hard run a the start of a longish hill but to me it seems like a waste of energy without any real gain. Correct?
And back to the thread… time X distance x power (or heart rate) is a nice lame way to calculate.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,872
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6958 Post(s)
Liked 10,959 Times
in
4,686 Posts
If it's a mile long hill witgh 5% grade, that running start is practically useless. Attacking at the base only gives a meaningful advantage if you're on short punchy rollers, which allow you to carry momentum from the descent up onto the next little climb.
Likes For Koyote:
#18
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,984
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6192 Post(s)
Liked 4,807 Times
in
3,316 Posts
The OP only ask about a 1/4 mile of climbing compared to 2 miles or more of climbing. Not sure how we got to the mountains so fast where 14 to 30 miles of fairly constant climbing might be involved.
As more to the OP's question, I think it mainly just comes down to past experience of what you have ridden before and your best guess. Augmenting your past experience with route profiles to see the grade of the sections of what you did and what you wish to do help in making that comparison. As does knowing what the surface is like. And for most paved road google maps can give you a street view which you can "drive" to see what the pavement is like and the surroundings. However those sometimes are years old may not be exactly the conditions today.
RideWithGPS, Strava, GarminConnect, MapMyRide and other websites can show you route profiles and the grade percent for any segment you select out of that route profile.
As more to the OP's question, I think it mainly just comes down to past experience of what you have ridden before and your best guess. Augmenting your past experience with route profiles to see the grade of the sections of what you did and what you wish to do help in making that comparison. As does knowing what the surface is like. And for most paved road google maps can give you a street view which you can "drive" to see what the pavement is like and the surroundings. However those sometimes are years old may not be exactly the conditions today.
RideWithGPS, Strava, GarminConnect, MapMyRide and other websites can show you route profiles and the grade percent for any segment you select out of that route profile.
#19
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
In large part because any objective mathematical measure of difficulty would be the same formula for mountains or hills.
#20
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,984
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6192 Post(s)
Liked 4,807 Times
in
3,316 Posts
While I agrees math makes all things possible. It does sometimes keep you indoors too long working on the calculations, arguing with others about 2 - 5% variances and missing the opportunities to ride.
Likes For Iride01:
#21
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
And where does one get all the data to put into those formulas? Seems simpler to just do it my way and just compare to similar segment of my past experience. Barring no experience, then just ride them to get some experience.
While I agrees math makes all things possible. It does sometimes keep you indoors too long working on the calculations, arguing with others about 2 - 5% variances and missing the opportunities to ride.
While I agrees math makes all things possible. It does sometimes keep you indoors too long working on the calculations, arguing with others about 2 - 5% variances and missing the opportunities to ride.
I don't think we're disagreeing at all, I just made the same point about gearing where there are definitely "this is 10% more" type comparisons. The point is we can know how the different slopes can compare to each other, but until we try them, we don't know how much or even whether those differences matter to us. If someone can't do 1 mile at 5% grade, the percentage difference of difficulty to 1 mile at 6% may be objectively calculable, but it really doesn't matter to that rider.
TL/DR--those 2-5% differences may be objectively measurable, but how they affect you is not.
Likes For Pratt:
#23
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,984
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6192 Post(s)
Liked 4,807 Times
in
3,316 Posts
I don't think we're disagreeing at all, I just made the same point about gearing where there are definitely "this is 10% more" type comparisons. The point is we can know how the different slopes can compare to each other, but until we try them, we don't know how much or even whether those differences matter to us. If someone can't do 1 mile at 5% grade, the percentage difference of difficulty to 1 mile at 6% may be objectively calculable, but it really doesn't matter to that rider.
TL/DR--those 2-5% differences may be objectively measurable, but how they affect you is not.
TL/DR--those 2-5% differences may be objectively measurable, but how they affect you is not.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,900
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,926 Times
in
1,209 Posts
This thread is a mediocre place for a nagging question about hills. Is it better to attack the beginning incline of a hill to increase initial momentum or just find a comfortable pace you can ride the entire hill. For instance, I am thinking 5% for a mile.
I usually will take a hard run a the start of a longish hill but to me it seems like a waste of energy without any real gain. Correct?
I usually will take a hard run a the start of a longish hill but to me it seems like a waste of energy without any real gain. Correct?
If, on the other hand, I'm going to be spending a long time cranking no matter what the beginning was like, no sense burning a match on this hill. Pedal at a sustainable effort at the bottom and shift down as required to maintain that effort.
Likes For pdlamb:
#25
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I'm not disagreeing with what you or any other is saying either. I just don't see how all the comparisons to riding long mountain climbs or determining FIETS will help the OP make a determination. Even with those numbers the OP still won't know what they are able to do with out prior experience.
Here's my classification system:
A. Stuff I can do easily
B. Stuff I can do but kind of hard, still fun
C. Stuff I can do but miserable
D. Stuff I can't do.
E. Stuff I really, really can't do.
TBH, I really hate steep descent more than I hate steep climbing. The roads and my eyes are both getting worse.