Odd duck. Nishiki Ariel.
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Portland
Posts: 357
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 267 Times
in
98 Posts
Odd duck. Nishiki Ariel.
While out and about today I stopped at a thrift store, and as I was paying for some books I turned around and noticed this odd thing I just been wheeled out. It kind a looks fun and it was priced right so I decided to take pity on it and take it home, though my intentions are only to keep the wheels and the Kranks. I think I may need to air up the tires and take it out for a spin before I strip it of the parts I want.
Likes For Lbxpdx:
Likes For RustyJames:
Likes For Lbxpdx:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
FYI, that's the 1990 Ariel. The suspension fork, threadless headset, threadless stem, handlebar and pedals are all changes by a previous owner.
Likes For T-Mar:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Upper Left, USA
Posts: 1,915
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
298 Posts
While out and about today I stopped at a thrift store, and as I was paying for some books I turned around and noticed this odd thing I just been wheeled out. It kind a looks fun and it was priced right so I decided to take pity on it and take it home, though my intentions are only to keep the wheels and the Kranks. I think I may need to air up the tires and take it out for a spin before I strip it of the parts I want.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,052
Bikes: Gunnar, Shogun, Concorde, F Moser, Pete Tansley, Rocky Mtn, Diamant, Krapf, Marin, Avanti, Winora, Emmelle, Ken Evans
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Liked 416 Times
in
217 Posts
Love the colourscheme.
Not having chain slap is a big advantage.
Those frames are heavier though so i'd probably part it out too.
Not having chain slap is a big advantage.
Those frames are heavier though so i'd probably part it out too.
#10
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 10
Bikes: 2018 Trek Domane AL 2, 2021 Giant Talon 2, 1985(ish) Club Fuji (build in progress)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Wild silhouette! Is there any advantage to having the chainstays designed like that? Nice find
#11
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,922
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Looks like someone's prank went much too far.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#12
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,422
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times
in
647 Posts
As much as we all like Mr. Cunningham none of the raised chainstay designs were attractive
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
When ATBs were introduced they intially came with very long chainstays, allowing manufacturers to use drastic S-bends in the chainstays, that allowed wide tyres to be fitted. However, chainstay length started to shrink in the quest for more nimble frame designs. In doing so, tyres got narrower. Circa 1990, ATBs made a move to wider, 73mm shells, allowing wider tyres to be fitted. But increasing BB shell width too much results in wider crankarm/pedal spacing (aka Q-factor) which raises other issues.
By elevating the chainstays over the chainrings you alleviate this restriction. Shells and Q-factor can remain narrow but the spacing between the stays can be increased, allowing very wide tyres to be fitted.
Franklly, given the C&V trend towards wide as possible tyres on road bicycles, I'm surprised that some member hasn't taken a Pinarello Montello or similar frame and converted it to elevated chainstays, so they could run a 38-42C rear tyre. Sounds like Gugie project to me.
Last edited by T-Mar; 07-26-22 at 11:57 AM.
Likes For T-Mar:
#14
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Portland
Posts: 357
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 267 Times
in
98 Posts
Well, I posted the bike up for reasonable offers last night, went for a late night ride, and by midnight I got two offers. The frame sold this morning for $175. Young-ish guy, maybe late 20’s early 30’s. He wanted the frame so he could put 26” x 2.8’s on it.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,153
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2362 Post(s)
Liked 1,747 Times
in
1,191 Posts
Same frame as the Alien?
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
It's pretty close to the 1989 Alien, having the same concept but a slightly different execution. In 1990, the year of this Ariel, the Alien used an aluminum main triangle, constructed from rectangular tubes, while the rear triangle was constructed from Tange Prestige CrMo and bolted to the main triangle.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 735 Times
in
421 Posts
#20
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,826
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 797 Post(s)
Liked 695 Times
in
372 Posts
I met him when he was still working in a shop and getting Mantis bicycles going. We were in the same Schwinn School class in 1980- I think both of us already knew how to work on bikes and were just getting the certificate for the wall of the shop. He started Mantis Bicycles the next year and went on to bigger and better things.
MOMBAT: Mantis Bicycles History (mombatbicycles.com)
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Likes For Jeff Wills:
#21
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 10
Bikes: 2018 Trek Domane AL 2, 2021 Giant Talon 2, 1985(ish) Club Fuji (build in progress)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
There were several advantages but the big advantage was the ability to fit extra wide tyres. The bottom bracket shell is the weak link in the tyre width dilemma. By attaching the chainstays to BB shell, you're placing them fairly close together, limiting the space for a tyre to fit between them. To increase the spacing, manufacturers traditionally crimped the stays and/or used oval tubing.
When ATBs were introduced they intially came with very long chainstays, allowing manufacturers to use drastic S-bends in the chainstays, that allowed wide tyres to be fitted. However, chainstay length started to shrink in the quest for more nimble frame designs. In doing so, tyres got narrower. Circa 1990, ATBs made a move to wider, 73mm shells, allowing wider tyres to be fitted. But increasing BB shell width too much results in wider crankarm/pedal spacing (aka Q-factor) which raises other issues.
By elevating the chainstays over the chainrings you alleviate this restriction. Shells and Q-factor can remain narrow but the spacing between the stays can be increased, allowing very wide tyres to be fitted.
Franklly, given the C&V trend towards wide as possible tyres on road bicycles, I'm surprised that some member hasn't taken a Pinarello Montello or similar frame and converted it to elevated chainstays, so they could run a 38-42C rear tyre. Sounds like Gugie project to me.
When ATBs were introduced they intially came with very long chainstays, allowing manufacturers to use drastic S-bends in the chainstays, that allowed wide tyres to be fitted. However, chainstay length started to shrink in the quest for more nimble frame designs. In doing so, tyres got narrower. Circa 1990, ATBs made a move to wider, 73mm shells, allowing wider tyres to be fitted. But increasing BB shell width too much results in wider crankarm/pedal spacing (aka Q-factor) which raises other issues.
By elevating the chainstays over the chainrings you alleviate this restriction. Shells and Q-factor can remain narrow but the spacing between the stays can be increased, allowing very wide tyres to be fitted.
Franklly, given the C&V trend towards wide as possible tyres on road bicycles, I'm surprised that some member hasn't taken a Pinarello Montello or similar frame and converted it to elevated chainstays, so they could run a 38-42C rear tyre. Sounds like Gugie project to me.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 700 Ft. above sea level.
Posts: 3,240
Bikes: More than there were awhile ago.
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 630 Post(s)
Liked 1,264 Times
in
603 Posts
Dang! Makes me feel a lot better about what I gave for mine..........IIRC 3 or 4 years ago I gave $125 for this Marin Eldridge Grade, the Ariel and most of a FUJI Suncrest with it's Deer Head components intact and they were all my size or close enough. Plus they threw in a stack off oddball wheels and a couple of them were pretty high end.
__________________
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
".....distasteful and easily triggered."