Threaded headset cups install, too much interference?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Threaded headset cups install, too much interference?
Hi, here's what I hope is a new topic, but I apologize if it is old hat.
I'm rebuilding my 1952 Rudge Aero Special, a 27" Reynolds-framed drop bar bike made by Raleigh in Nottingham, England. Current stage is to install the H/S cups and bearings, installing the fork. I've been told the head tube IDs are to be 30.0 mm, and mine are (actually 29.97 mm, if I can believe my Harbor Freight digital caliper!). Also, Park Tool says the maximum allowed interference in such a press-fit installation is to be maximum 0.2 mm (not 0.20 mm for some reason).
My fixed cups have OD of 30.28 mm, so the interference works out to 0.30 mm, theoretically too great to use if Park Tool is correct. Has anyone ever installed a HS with this much interference? The frame is labelled to be full straight guage 531, but the head tube sure looks seamed, peeking inside it! The head lugs are nicely brazed and 70 years old. Should I go ahead and use these cups? They MIGHT be the ones which came out of the frame originally, actually I think they are, but I didn't mark them carefully when I pressed them out and put them in the parts cleaner.
Am I really at risk of cracking my head tube if I force these in, with a pretty decent HS press? I don't have a convenient way of cutting down the ODs of the upper and lower fixed cups. Emery cloth sounds attractive, but I don't have a machine tool where I can chuck up the cup and work it with an abrasive, keeping it concentric.
FWIW, the bike frame size is about 54 or 55 cm c-c with 27" wheels. Overall geometry is long and laid back, a precursor to the Super Course and the Raleigh International of 1971.
I'm rebuilding my 1952 Rudge Aero Special, a 27" Reynolds-framed drop bar bike made by Raleigh in Nottingham, England. Current stage is to install the H/S cups and bearings, installing the fork. I've been told the head tube IDs are to be 30.0 mm, and mine are (actually 29.97 mm, if I can believe my Harbor Freight digital caliper!). Also, Park Tool says the maximum allowed interference in such a press-fit installation is to be maximum 0.2 mm (not 0.20 mm for some reason).
My fixed cups have OD of 30.28 mm, so the interference works out to 0.30 mm, theoretically too great to use if Park Tool is correct. Has anyone ever installed a HS with this much interference? The frame is labelled to be full straight guage 531, but the head tube sure looks seamed, peeking inside it! The head lugs are nicely brazed and 70 years old. Should I go ahead and use these cups? They MIGHT be the ones which came out of the frame originally, actually I think they are, but I didn't mark them carefully when I pressed them out and put them in the parts cleaner.
Am I really at risk of cracking my head tube if I force these in, with a pretty decent HS press? I don't have a convenient way of cutting down the ODs of the upper and lower fixed cups. Emery cloth sounds attractive, but I don't have a machine tool where I can chuck up the cup and work it with an abrasive, keeping it concentric.
FWIW, the bike frame size is about 54 or 55 cm c-c with 27" wheels. Overall geometry is long and laid back, a precursor to the Super Course and the Raleigh International of 1971.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,071
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 3,851 Times
in
2,301 Posts
The easiest way to close down the amount of interference is to slightly open up the head tube, flap wheel on a die grinder would work. But I would first just try pressing these cups in and judge how they fit. With a steel HT that was undoubtedly brass brazed the chance of a future crack is quite small. What ever you do make sure all the other headset parts go with the cups Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 761 Times
in
569 Posts
Sheldon's page says that both 1" Raleigh and 1" JIS cups should be 30.0mm. You said you weren't sure if the cups you have are original or if they even came out of that frame? Is it possible they're 1" ISO cups (30.2mm)? I wonder if it'd be possible to use 1" JIS cups in the frame with the original Raleigh threaded race to use with what I presume is a 26 TPI steer tube on your fork. Interchangeability may take some trial an error (to find a cup that'd work with your threaded race, but it may be an option if you're not comfortable pressing those in.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/cribsheet-headsets.html
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/cribsheet-headsets.html
#4
Junior Member
To give you some comparison figures, I fitted my ( aluminium ) headset cups to my "531 Pro" steel framed bike ( 1 inch threaded steerer of course ) a couple of months ago. My interference figures were 0.18 mm on one cup and 0.13 mm on the other. I greased the fitted surfaces and used proper bike tools ( press, etc. ) and found the level of force to be "quite high but appropriate". ( I have fitted lots of races, bearings, etc. over the years to various things ).
My gut feeling is that 0.30 mm interference is too high. That's around double and approaching triple my figures. My guess is that you won't even get them in without heavy banging.
I would observe Park Tools recommendation of 0.20 mm maximum interference, particularly if you value that frame.
If you can't find different parts ( as suggested above ), personally I would be inclined to attempt to reduce the cup diameters rather than expand the frame diameters. ( Don't forget to grease or oil the fitted surfaces when you are ready to instal. )
My gut feeling is that 0.30 mm interference is too high. That's around double and approaching triple my figures. My guess is that you won't even get them in without heavy banging.
I would observe Park Tools recommendation of 0.20 mm maximum interference, particularly if you value that frame.
If you can't find different parts ( as suggested above ), personally I would be inclined to attempt to reduce the cup diameters rather than expand the frame diameters. ( Don't forget to grease or oil the fitted surfaces when you are ready to instal. )
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Sheldon's page says that both 1" Raleigh and 1" JIS cups should be 30.0mm. You said you weren't sure if the cups you have are original or if they even came out of that frame? Is it possible they're 1" ISO cups (30.2mm)? I wonder if it'd be possible to use 1" JIS cups in the frame with the original Raleigh threaded race to use with what I presume is a 26 TPI steer tube on your fork. Interchangeability may take some trial an error (to find a cup that'd work with your threaded race, but it may be an option if you're not comfortable pressing those in.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/cribsheet-headsets.html
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/cribsheet-headsets.html
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
The easiest way to close down the amount of interference is to slightly open up the head tube, flap wheel on a die grinder would work. But I would first just try pressing these cups in and judge how they fit. With a steel HT that was undoubtedly brass brazed the chance of a future crack is quite small. What ever you do make sure all the other headset parts go with the cups Andy
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,071
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 3,851 Times
in
2,301 Posts
The vast majority of 26tpi headsets that I've worked on have significantly different ball track contours (bearing load angle) then most all other headsets do. I also don't suggest mixing tpis between the steerer and the headset parts. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
To give you some comparison figures, I fitted my ( aluminium ) headset cups to my "531 Pro" steel framed bike ( 1 inch threaded steerer of course ) a couple of months ago. My interference figures were 0.18 mm on one cup and 0.13 mm on the other. I greased the fitted surfaces and used proper bike tools ( press, etc. ) and found the level of force to be "quite high but appropriate". ( I have fitted lots of races, bearings, etc. over the years to various things ).
My gut feeling is that 0.30 mm interference is too high. That's around double and approaching triple my figures. My guess is that you won't even get them in without heavy banging.
I would observe Park Tools recommendation of 0.20 mm maximum interference, particularly if you value that frame.
If you can't find different parts ( as suggested above ), personally I would be inclined to attempt to reduce the cup diameters rather than expand the frame diameters. ( Don't forget to grease or oil the fitted surfaces when you are ready to instal. )
My gut feeling is that 0.30 mm interference is too high. That's around double and approaching triple my figures. My guess is that you won't even get them in without heavy banging.
I would observe Park Tools recommendation of 0.20 mm maximum interference, particularly if you value that frame.
If you can't find different parts ( as suggested above ), personally I would be inclined to attempt to reduce the cup diameters rather than expand the frame diameters. ( Don't forget to grease or oil the fitted surfaces when you are ready to instal. )
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
I agree with you about the ball tracks. Some of the parts I have around seem to form an angular contact bearing, and some of them seem to be intended to create an axial bearing. I recall the Brit parts, when I dismantled the headset, were more on the axial side. With the axial types, it looks like it's possible to mismatch the bearing track radius (the racetrack the balls will run in). I assume I could test this with a binch of balls and see if I have pairs which match - Sheesh why didn't I mark my parts better???
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,071
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 3,851 Times
in
2,301 Posts
My point was about mixing headset parts to "fix" one issue (press fit in head tube, but retain the threaded upper race to not harm the threading and that the ball tracks (assuming the 26tpi race is like most all I have seen and are of the more axial bearing contact angle) wouldn't match (assuming that the now "new" upper cup was of the more angular contact type).
The shop where I began to learn my chops was a major (for our 1970s market) Raleigh dealer. I learned to hate those axial contact Raleigh headsets so common on Sports, Sprites and Records. We learned that the lower stack took one more bearing than the upper did and you wanted barely more than one ball gap when assembling. We also found that subbing a more common angular contact lower stack cured a lot of the headset adjusting challenges (it binds one way but is loose 180* in the other way...). I remember we came across a special of an Asian made headset with angular contact bearings in 26tpi and a stack height that worked for all those English made Raleighs, my boss bought a lot of these
The shop where I began to learn my chops was a major (for our 1970s market) Raleigh dealer. I learned to hate those axial contact Raleigh headsets so common on Sports, Sprites and Records. We learned that the lower stack took one more bearing than the upper did and you wanted barely more than one ball gap when assembling. We also found that subbing a more common angular contact lower stack cured a lot of the headset adjusting challenges (it binds one way but is loose 180* in the other way...). I remember we came across a special of an Asian made headset with angular contact bearings in 26tpi and a stack height that worked for all those English made Raleighs, my boss bought a lot of these
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#12
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
My fixed cups have OD of 30.28 mm, so the interference works out to 0.30 mm, theoretically too great to use if Park Tool is correct. Has anyone ever installed a HS with this much interference? The frame is labelled to be full straight guage 531, but the head tube sure looks seamed, peeking inside it! The head lugs are nicely brazed and 70 years old. Should I go ahead and use these cups? They MIGHT be the ones which came out of the frame originally, actually I think they are, but I didn't mark them carefully when I pressed them out and put them in the parts cleaner.[/color]
Failing that, a 30.0mm ID head tube can easily be reamed to accept a 30.2mm ISO spec headset, although you'll likely want to have a bike shop do the work. Before doing this, make sure that the threaded parts will work on the fork; Raleigh used non-standard 26tpi thread on some models, rather than 24tpi.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
My point was about mixing headset parts to "fix" one issue (press fit in head tube, but retain the threaded upper race to not harm the threading and that the ball tracks (assuming the 26tpi race is like most all I have seen and are of the more axial bearing contact angle) wouldn't match (assuming that the now "new" upper cup was of the more angular contact type).
The shop where I began to learn my chops was a major (for our 1970s market) Raleigh dealer. I learned to hate those axial contact Raleigh headsets so common on Sports, Sprites and Records. We learned that the lower stack took one more bearing than the upper did and you wanted barely more than one ball gap when assembling. We also found that subbing a more common angular contact lower stack cured a lot of the headset adjusting challenges (it binds one way but is loose 180* in the other way...). I remember we came across a special of an Asian made headset with angular contact bearings in 26tpi and a stack height that worked for all those English made Raleighs, my boss bought a lot of these
The shop where I began to learn my chops was a major (for our 1970s market) Raleigh dealer. I learned to hate those axial contact Raleigh headsets so common on Sports, Sprites and Records. We learned that the lower stack took one more bearing than the upper did and you wanted barely more than one ball gap when assembling. We also found that subbing a more common angular contact lower stack cured a lot of the headset adjusting challenges (it binds one way but is loose 180* in the other way...). I remember we came across a special of an Asian made headset with angular contact bearings in 26tpi and a stack height that worked for all those English made Raleighs, my boss bought a lot of these
I just started pressing in the parts after greasing so they were secure in the head tube and the crown race, added new Park grease, poked new 5/32" balls into heir clean resitng places with more new Park grease, and gently tightened the top nut and the top race. It still needs final adjustment, but I like to wait for a ride or two for that. Now I have to lace up wheels with Al rims, new Pasela Protek tires, give the Alloy AW hub an adjustment, and move on to the brakes and cockpit. The first ride is near, 70 years after it was born!
I also bought a NOS set of bearing parts, for good measure.