How do I know if I need shorter crank arms?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
How do I know if I need shorter crank arms?
All my bikes are pretty much off-the-shelf offerings, so I think they're all standard cranks (170mm?). I don't think I'm particularly short, but I do have a shorter leg to torso ratio. My inseam is something ridiculous like 26". And all my bikes are on the small frame size anyway, 49 or 50cm for my road bikes. My two tri bikes are 51cm, which I think is about as small a frame as I've found in a tri bike that still runs a 700 wheel.
But I have to wonder how do I know if I need shorter crank arms? Like 165 or even 160mm? Short of dropping a few hundred dollars just to try it out, is there something I could measure that might inform me? And what are the advantages/disadvantages to going with shorter crank arms?
But I have to wonder how do I know if I need shorter crank arms? Like 165 or even 160mm? Short of dropping a few hundred dollars just to try it out, is there something I could measure that might inform me? And what are the advantages/disadvantages to going with shorter crank arms?
Likes For VegasJen:
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Spokane Area
Posts: 312
Bikes: 2021 Salsa Warbird, (Specially Love my) 2021 Salsa Cutthroat, 2012 Surly LHT, 2015 Surly Cross-Check, 2008 Giant OCR A1, 2005 Leader 735R, 2005 Gary Fisher Montare, 1991 Nishiki Pueblo,
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times
in
38 Posts
If your inseam is 26" pretty good chance you might benefit from 165 mm or even 160 mm crank arm lenght. This video might shed some light on the subject.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,971
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,677 Times
in
827 Posts
To test out different crank lengths on the cheap you could bring a measuring tape and test ride bikes similar to yours, but with different cranks.
Or, if you're lucky there's a bike co-op or sympathetic bike shop near you where you can get a cheap used set of cranks installed cheaply to test them out on your bike.
#4
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,782
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,398 Times
in
1,932 Posts
In general, people with shorter inseam measurement find shorter crank arms helpful. If your bike is in the 48-52cm frame size, it may already have 165mm arms. Arm length is often marked on the back side of the arm, or you can measure it directly: center of bottom bracket axis to center of pedal spindle axis.
#5
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,976
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6186 Post(s)
Liked 4,803 Times
in
3,313 Posts
I too will tend to think that if you are having knee pain that you can't solve by changing up your position or just learning to use a gear that doesn't have you mashing and putting excessive strain on your knees, then you might benefit from a shorter crank. Also might be a little more comfortable if you regularly can keep a very aerodynamic position for a long time.
I use 165mm cranks and I have a 34.5" inseam. Didn't care for the longer cranks when I tried them. IMO, the formulas that calculate the crank length you should use aren't telling you what length you must use, they are telling you the length of crank you shouldn't exceed. But shorter is okay if you like them. Depending on your bike and your wallet size, it's not usually an inexpensive experiment to see what you prefer.
I use 165mm cranks and I have a 34.5" inseam. Didn't care for the longer cranks when I tried them. IMO, the formulas that calculate the crank length you should use aren't telling you what length you must use, they are telling you the length of crank you shouldn't exceed. But shorter is okay if you like them. Depending on your bike and your wallet size, it's not usually an inexpensive experiment to see what you prefer.
#6
Senior Member
I'm a shorty at 5'4, and also into folding bikes. As an experiment, I had Mark Stonich of bikesmithdesign.com shorten a couple cranks for me maybe 15 years ago.
He took a couple 170mm cranksets (105 double and an Ultegra triple) and shortened them both to 148mm. I tried each one on different bikes and came to the following conclusion.
Spinning is obviously much easier - your feet are pedaling smaller circles - but any gain there is lost once you hit a hill or a strong headwind. Then, the lack of leverage really compromises any traction that you'd have with a longer crankarm.
I still have both cranks, but these days I'm running 165 or 170 on all my bikes.
He took a couple 170mm cranksets (105 double and an Ultegra triple) and shortened them both to 148mm. I tried each one on different bikes and came to the following conclusion.
Spinning is obviously much easier - your feet are pedaling smaller circles - but any gain there is lost once you hit a hill or a strong headwind. Then, the lack of leverage really compromises any traction that you'd have with a longer crankarm.
I still have both cranks, but these days I'm running 165 or 170 on all my bikes.
Likes For bargainguy:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 980
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 506 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 638 Times
in
356 Posts
All my bikes are pretty much off-the-shelf offerings, so I think they're all standard cranks (170mm?). I don't think I'm particularly short, but I do have a shorter leg to torso ratio. My inseam is something ridiculous like 26". And all my bikes are on the small frame size anyway, 49 or 50cm for my road bikes. My two tri bikes are 51cm, which I think is about as small a frame as I've found in a tri bike that still runs a 700 wheel.
But I have to wonder how do I know if I need shorter crank arms? Like 165 or even 160mm? Short of dropping a few hundred dollars just to try it out, is there something I could measure that might inform me? And what are the advantages/disadvantages to going with shorter crank arms?
But I have to wonder how do I know if I need shorter crank arms? Like 165 or even 160mm? Short of dropping a few hundred dollars just to try it out, is there something I could measure that might inform me? And what are the advantages/disadvantages to going with shorter crank arms?
#8
The Wheezing Geezer
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Española, NM
Posts: 1,052
Bikes: 1976 Fredo Speciale, Jamis Citizen 1, Ellis-Briggs FAVORI, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 414 Post(s)
Liked 910 Times
in
445 Posts
When you scrape your pedals at the velodrome!
Likes For Fredo76:
#9
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,493
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4342 Post(s)
Liked 3,978 Times
in
2,659 Posts
Do you need them? If the answer is yes then there you go! If not then don't worry about it. I think people put a lot of importance on crank length. The only time to really worry is if you are scraping. I went to shorter cranks on my main commuter purely for scraping on my other bikes I really don't care unless I scrape. If my fitter were to say something, I might consider thinking about it but would probably ask some questions on why and what benefits it would have. In the end unless I was running something ridiculously long like a 190mm or something I wouldn't ever worry about it.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I have five bikes, all with drop bars and with different length crank arms, and I no longer feel any meaningful difference. My mountain bike has the longest crank arms, and when it still had straight bars and I rode it in a more upright position, after I entered my 50s, I started to have sore hips post-ride. But since converting it to drop-bars the hip soreness disappeared, even though it still has the longest cranks.
To test out different crank lengths on the cheap you could bring a measuring tape and test ride bikes similar to yours, but with different cranks.
Or, if you're lucky there's a bike co-op or sympathetic bike shop near you where you can get a cheap used set of cranks installed cheaply to test them out on your bike.
To test out different crank lengths on the cheap you could bring a measuring tape and test ride bikes similar to yours, but with different cranks.
Or, if you're lucky there's a bike co-op or sympathetic bike shop near you where you can get a cheap used set of cranks installed cheaply to test them out on your bike.
You may want to consider shorter crank arms if your knees are giving you problems while riding, if you have trouble reaching or maintaining high pedal cadence, if you have problems with pedal/wheel overlap, or if you have problems with pedal strike when cornering at speed (mostly a fixed gear issue).
In general, people with shorter inseam measurement find shorter crank arms helpful. If your bike is in the 48-52cm frame size, it may already have 165mm arms. Arm length is often marked on the back side of the arm, or you can measure it directly: center of bottom bracket axis to center of pedal spindle axis.
In general, people with shorter inseam measurement find shorter crank arms helpful. If your bike is in the 48-52cm frame size, it may already have 165mm arms. Arm length is often marked on the back side of the arm, or you can measure it directly: center of bottom bracket axis to center of pedal spindle axis.
I'm a shorty at 5'4, and also into folding bikes. As an experiment, I had Mark Stonich of bikesmithdesign.com shorten a couple cranks for me maybe 15 years ago.
He took a couple 170mm cranksets (105 double and an Ultegra triple) and shortened them both to 148mm. I tried each one on different bikes and came to the following conclusion.
Spinning is obviously much easier - your feet are pedaling smaller circles - but any gain there is lost once you hit a hill or a strong headwind. Then, the lack of leverage really compromises any traction that you'd have with a longer crankarm.
I still have both cranks, but these days I'm running 165 or 170 on all my bikes.
He took a couple 170mm cranksets (105 double and an Ultegra triple) and shortened them both to 148mm. I tried each one on different bikes and came to the following conclusion.
Spinning is obviously much easier - your feet are pedaling smaller circles - but any gain there is lost once you hit a hill or a strong headwind. Then, the lack of leverage really compromises any traction that you'd have with a longer crankarm.
I still have both cranks, but these days I'm running 165 or 170 on all my bikes.
Do you need them? If the answer is yes then there you go! If not then don't worry about it. I think people put a lot of importance on crank length. The only time to really worry is if you are scraping. I went to shorter cranks on my main commuter purely for scraping on my other bikes I really don't care unless I scrape. If my fitter were to say something, I might consider thinking about it but would probably ask some questions on why and what benefits it would have. In the end unless I was running something ridiculously long like a 190mm or something I wouldn't ever worry about it.
#11
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,493
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4342 Post(s)
Liked 3,978 Times
in
2,659 Posts
That is not ideal but that could be an incorrectly sized bike or a very aggressive position. A little toe overlap especially on a road bike isn't uncommon but usually at slower speeds or while turning but it can happen under those conditions obviously. You could try something a little shorter and see if that helps a little.
Likes For veganbikes:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,860
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6950 Post(s)
Liked 10,958 Times
in
4,685 Posts
You haven't mentioned any problem with your current crank arms...So why the question?
And you don't even know the lengths of your current crankarms -- yet you're wondering if you need a different size.
Weird post.
Weird post.
Likes For Koyote:
#13
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,372
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 996 Post(s)
Liked 1,204 Times
in
690 Posts
When you get knee pain from the cranks being too long.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#14
Lopsided biped
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 737
Bikes: 2017 Day 6 Cyclone (the Buick); 2015 Simcoe Deluxe (the Xebec); Street Strider 3i (the not-a-bike); GreenSpeed Anura (the Black Swan)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 316 Post(s)
Liked 160 Times
in
97 Posts
Think about climbing stairs. The most common stair rise is between 7" and 7 1/2" ... in metric, that's ~178 to 190mm.
#15
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,493
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4342 Post(s)
Liked 3,978 Times
in
2,659 Posts
Yes but is your saddle height and angle and setback or forward correct? If you say keep the same height and everything from a 165 crank and move to a 180 for instance that will cause problems till you adjust things.
Likes For veganbikes:
#16
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,372
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 996 Post(s)
Liked 1,204 Times
in
690 Posts
Absolutely. It’s not nearly as simple as my post makes it sound.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#17
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,493
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4342 Post(s)
Liked 3,978 Times
in
2,659 Posts
Likes For veganbikes:
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Since you guys brought up the set back and height issue, it is important to note that I have been playing with that over the last few months. I used to like to ride higher in the seat, probably left over from years of riding whatever size the "adult" bike was from the local X-mart. Invariably too tall for me. I noticed I was doing a lot of rocking side to side and was incurring a lot of hip and back pain on long rides. I didn't like riding with a lower seat position at first, but I'm getting much more comfortable with it now. I have adjusted all my seats so that my hips are pretty well flat throughout the pedal stroke. Still not totally comfortable with the leg extension (or lack thereof), but it's getting more comfortable with every ride. The fact that my back and hips don't hurt as much is going a long way to making that easier to get used to.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2700 Post(s)
Liked 486 Times
in
351 Posts
i've broken 3 sets of pedals in the last year, maybe because of pedal strikes. I bet I could benefit from shorter cranks. Been thinking about it for a while now.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,678
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 580 Times
in
408 Posts
In my case it was when dealing with cycling ending knee arthritis. The change from 172.5 to 165 cranks has been a relief and that 1/3" change in saddle height in my case has gone unnoticed. That said it may arise in the future as I have been holding at 20+ mile rides for a few months now.
#21
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,936
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10413 Post(s)
Liked 11,874 Times
in
6,081 Posts
Do you NEED shorter cranks? Obviously not, since you're able to ride with 170s. Might you benefit from shorter cranks? Sure! the only thing you lose by trying them out is whatever they cost.
I'm just shy of 6', and I run 170s-175s, so for you who are considerably smaller, just proportionally shorter cranks make sense - at least to try! In your place I'd scour Ebay for a set of 165s of the same model as one of your current bikes, and make the switch. Remember to adjust the saddle height up a bit, or you'll feel like you're pedaling flatfooted.
I have a bunch of bikes. All the bikes I have that were made after 1990 have 175s. The ones from earlier have either 170s or 172.5s. I notice bit of difference, mostly that shorter seem to encourage higher cadence, but it's only about 5 rpm more. They felt really weird at first, because I was setting my saddle height based on the BB spindle - Oops! When I used the pedal surface at furthest extension instead, that went away, but they still seem to spin faster. I can't tell if they allow me to get lower because the bikes are sufficiently different that I notice a whole lot of other things more prominently.
I'm just shy of 6', and I run 170s-175s, so for you who are considerably smaller, just proportionally shorter cranks make sense - at least to try! In your place I'd scour Ebay for a set of 165s of the same model as one of your current bikes, and make the switch. Remember to adjust the saddle height up a bit, or you'll feel like you're pedaling flatfooted.
I have a bunch of bikes. All the bikes I have that were made after 1990 have 175s. The ones from earlier have either 170s or 172.5s. I notice bit of difference, mostly that shorter seem to encourage higher cadence, but it's only about 5 rpm more. They felt really weird at first, because I was setting my saddle height based on the BB spindle - Oops! When I used the pedal surface at furthest extension instead, that went away, but they still seem to spin faster. I can't tell if they allow me to get lower because the bikes are sufficiently different that I notice a whole lot of other things more prominently.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#22
Banned
Check with your local bike shops and see if they have a bike with 165mm cranks you can try. Even tall riders have switched to 165mm or shorter cranks and been happy with the results.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I rode my K2 again today. This is the bike with the 175 cranks. This is also maybe my favorite bike, although not because of the crank length. But after talking about this, I was paying more attention to my knees and hips today. I'm arthritic in both hips and knees although it really hasn't been a major concern biking, but today I did notice a little more tension in the left knee at the top of the crank stroke, right when the knee is closed at the tightest angle. I think this bike is going to be my candidate for experimenting with the 165mm crank arms. It's a Ritchey crank set so I'll just have to keep my eyes open for suitable 165 arms.
#24
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,372
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 996 Post(s)
Liked 1,204 Times
in
690 Posts
In my case it was when dealing with cycling ending knee arthritis. The change from 172.5 to 165 cranks has been a relief and that 1/3" change in saddle height in my case has gone unnoticed. That said it may arise in the future as I have been holding at 20+ mile rides for a few months now.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
Likes For urbanknight:
#25
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
To determine if you need shorter crank arms, you can consider the following factors:
Leg angle at pedal strike: Are your legs hyperbent or hyperextended when your bike's pedals are perpendicular to the ground? If yes, you might be more comfortable with shorter crank arms.
Flat vs. uphill difficulty: If you're struggling with uphill or you need to use more force to complete the climb, shorter crank arms can make the climb easier.
Comfort: If you experience discomfort in your knees or other joints, it may be because your crank arms are not the right length for your body size and proportions.
If you're not happy with any of the above, you can try shorter crank arms to see if another length works better for you. It's best to consult a professional bike mechanic and ask them to help you measure the crank arm length you need as it will depend on your body measurements, seat height and pedal style etc.
Leg angle at pedal strike: Are your legs hyperbent or hyperextended when your bike's pedals are perpendicular to the ground? If yes, you might be more comfortable with shorter crank arms.
Flat vs. uphill difficulty: If you're struggling with uphill or you need to use more force to complete the climb, shorter crank arms can make the climb easier.
Comfort: If you experience discomfort in your knees or other joints, it may be because your crank arms are not the right length for your body size and proportions.
If you're not happy with any of the above, you can try shorter crank arms to see if another length works better for you. It's best to consult a professional bike mechanic and ask them to help you measure the crank arm length you need as it will depend on your body measurements, seat height and pedal style etc.